Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Nanovna-Users
- Messages
Search
Re: test fixture - how bad can it be? A non-rhetorical question
On 1/7/20 6:27 PM, hwalker wrote:
" ..A 100pF silver mica then gives the attached which indicates 105pF at 7MHz, 109pF at 14MHz and 126pF at 28MHz .." ???? Also, they choose lower frequencies not only because it's easier to measure at low frequencies, but also because many components suck at higher frequencies, and by specifying low test frequencies, component manufacturers were able to hide the uselessness of their parts.? Several decades ago I had access to an HP network analyzer, and used it to evaluate components for use in the VHF/UHF radio equipment I was designing.? Among standard ceramic chip capacitors, I found that only Murata and Panasonic were suitable for RF designs.? Pretty much everybody else's "capacitors" were much closer to resistors at those frequencies. But at the specified test frequencies of a few kilohertz to **maybe** a few megahertz, they looked fine, and I assume they would work fine, IF you were only designing audio equipment. |
Re: Measuring resonance from coax far end.
Hi wb2uaq,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Yes - i define resonance as R+j0. I had read that if there are no common-mode currents on the feedline then length of coax shouldn't matter as far as swr/resonance is concerned. If it does change, then chances are there are common-mode currents on the line affecting the reading. I understand the basics of smith-charts, i'm a new owner of a nanoVNA but have an (older) RigExpert as well. Also understand the 1/4wl or 1/2wl multiples along the length of transmission-line. I guess i'm a little confused if these will be seen at the shack-end of the coax, if there was not any common-mode current. I've read that if there is no common-mode then no change will be seen for swr or resonance at points along the transmission-line, if there was, there will be changes at every 1/4wl or 1/2wl point along the transmission-line. Trying to wrap my head around how coax changes what you see at the feedpoint. The RigExpert (AntScope2) has a menu to add/subtract/do-nothing with the transmission-line when taking readings with it and it's always confused me when taking readings with it. Anyway, i appreciate your taking the time to reply & best 73s! Thanks, Chris. On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 1:22 PM WB2UAQ <pschuch@...> wrote:
What is your definition of resonance in this situation? If you measure |
Re: test fixture - how bad can it be? A non-rhetorical question
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 03:43 PM, Brian wrote:
" ..A 100pF silver mica then gives the attached which indicates 105pF at 7MHz, 109pF at 14MHz and 126pF at 28MHz .." ======================================================= The above frequency dependent impedance effects are why manufacturers specify their component values at specific test frequencies. A dedicated LCR instrument, i.e. the well regarded DE-5000, has five test frequencies 100Hz/120Hz/1kHz/10kHz /100kHz one of which will generally match the manufacturers specified test frequency. You can judge the accuracy of the NanoVNA at 100 kHz by comparing its results with those of a dedicated instrument like the DE-5000. At HF, you're a bit out of luck unless you have access to something like a high dollar HP 4294A Precision Impedance Analyzer, 40 Hz to 110 MHz. You might start a collection of "golden" components whose impedance values at HF you have determined using other instruments and use those as transfer standards to check the accuracy of the NanoVNA. For your 100 pf capacitor example, I would expect at 100 kHz for the NanoVNA to measure 100 pf +/- the specified manufacturer's tolerance. At higher frequencies, especially for leaded components, I would expect values similar to what you measured. - Herb |
Re: Measuring resonance from coax far end.
What is your definition of resonance in this situation? If you measure say R + j0 at the antenna, the Z you measure at the input end will be dependent on the electrical length of the transmission line. Only when it is multiples of quarter waves long or a multiple of half wave long will it look like a resistance again. Any other electrical lengths will result in a resistance plus a reactance. If you are familiar with the Smith Chart, you can see this readily. If not familiar with the Smith Chart. The presence of common mode currents could add more complications but may or may result in a definitive explanation. 73
|
Re: Battery standby life
I have often thought that there should be a law that all portable devices have a hard off switch or battery disconnect.
Both issues can be fixed by the clever tinkerer. For the NVNA, add a battery disconnect jumper. For the Wouxon, move the voltage divider tap. 73 -Jim NU0C On Mon, 06 Jan 2020 20:41:55 -0800 Ismo V??n?nen OH2FTG <ismo.vaananen@...> wrote: On my nanovna clone the battery was slightly bulged from the factory. |
Re: Part Number for the Demokit Cable
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 02:44 PM, Ron Bussiere wrote:
" I made a simple tool to install the board side connectors, but also doubt they will survive very long. .." ========================================================= Ron, Thanks for the suggestions. Both boards have been donated to students for their own use. I relegate this to the same pile as the other cheap Asian electronics I've purchased that didn't live up to their promise. The success of the NanoVNA and its derivatives caused me to let my usual guard down. I generally wait for user reviews from the first wave of buyers before recommending a purchase. - Herb |
Re: test fixture - how bad can it be? A non-rhetorical question
Hi Brian,
Unfortunate but a 100 pF will NOT remain a 100 pF C independent of frequency. And in fact the C value will increase with an increase in frequency. In your case with the values you provided, the result you present is due to the presence of series inductance of ~ 67 nH. Part of this are leads on the mica C as well as L from the fixture. In any case ALL passive RLC components have a parasitic component and at the vary least, a C as well as L will show an increase in value with increased frequency as you have shown in your chart. Eventually the C will obtain series resonance and an L will obtain anti resonance or parallel resonate frequency. Alan |
Re: test fixture - how bad can it be? A non-rhetorical question
Brian,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
How much different are your results if you clip to the capacitor 0.25" away from the cap body vs 0.5" away from the cap body? The inductance of the leads in series with the capacitor will form a resonator. The measured capacitance will increase as the resonance is approached from below. --John Gord On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 03:43 PM, Brian wrote:
|
Re: Battery standby life
On the nanoVNA(H) the spec on the IP5303 says its standby is less than 100 uA, assuming it's 'Smart load detector' detects the unit has been turned off and puts the chip in standby. For a 450 mAH battery that should be upwards of six months.
LiIon's have very low self discharge and should not be the issue. If the cell is physically puffing up like a party balloon it is being over discharged and the battery will go bad within several months unless you keep up on recharging it every.four or five days. The nanoVNA(H) has a diode from battery in series feeding the Vbat input to the STM processor. Firmware could be causing too much draw on the Vbatt line. I do suspect the IP5305 is charging the battery at too high a rate for the small 450 mAH battery. The nanoVNA-F is a different animal. It has two 10k resistor divider across the battery providing half supply to one of STM's ADC input for battery voltage monitor. Having 20K across the battery all the time is not good. -F covers some of its problems by its brute force 5 AH battery. . One thing I can add about STM ADC input Z. The STM spec claims a 100K ADC input Z with wide variation. This is not truly correct and gives designers the impression they need to have low enough divider resistor to prevent the 100k input Z from effecting reading. What the ADC input is really loading the input with is a switched capacitor of 10's of pF. You can fix the loading due to the switching SAR ADC load by placing about a 500 pF cap from ADC input to ground so you can then use higher value resistors in the battery monitor divider network and reduce the off drain loss through the resistors. |
Re: test fixture - how bad can it be? A non-rhetorical question
For flying wires and alligator clips to work, everything must be in the *exact
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
same position* as when the calibration was done. I use a couple of BNC female connectors mounted on a piece of double sided FT-4 board. I've then soldered alligator clips to the BNC teat which I use to mount the component under test. This keeps everything in the same position as the cal. Dave - W?LEV On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:43 PM Brian <vk4bap@...> wrote:
I have also been looking to answer how accurate should the NanoVNA be at --
*Dave - W?LEV* *Just Let Darwin Work* *Just Think* |
Re: test fixture - how bad can it be? A non-rhetorical question
I have also been looking to answer how accurate should the NanoVNA be at HF. Most components I want to measure are wire ended so my test jig is a 60cm RG316 with SMA on each end cut in half. Each cut end has 1cm of inner exposed and an alligator clip put on. This is calibrated with open, short and a 50 ohm made from 2 100ohm resistors with short wires soldered on. A 100pF silver mica then gives the attached which indicates 105pF at 7MHz, 109pF at 14MHz and 126pF at 28MHz. I remove the alligator clips and repeat soldering the connections (inconvenient but worth trying). This gives the same results. Should the NanoVNA do better than this? Are there firmware versions which will produce more accurate results? Is it my VNA hardware(made in China somewhere) or test jig or test method?
I have found the VNA gives good results using S21 on filters but using a single cable and S11, capacitors and inductors are difficult to measure. I expect ferrite cored inductors to show a frequency variation but a 100pF capacitor should still be 100pF at 30MHz. I've repeated calibration, tried different leads but I don't have any confidence in the accuracy of reactance measurement. From what I have read, I could manually add "fudge factors" to the calibration and remove what looks like a systematic error but that is not so easy for the mathematically challenged (like me). My conclusion is that the accuracy depends on the accuracy of the standards you have and the amount of effort you put into "improving" the calibration. Some test jigs might be easier to get a good calibration but up to 30MHz the test jig is not the most important factor. I have done what Erik suggests and measured a 100 ohm resistor. It shows no significant reactance at 30MHz. I don't have a record of it but certainly not 26pF. 73 Brian. |
Re: Part Number for the Demokit Cable
Ron Bussiere
Hi Herb. I made a simple tool to install the board side connectors, but also doubt they will survive very long. My first thought was to solder them onto the board, but that would probably cause the small connector to lift off.
Perhaps some epoxy or super glue? I could make a 'dam' around the outside of the board and fill it 1/8" or so with clear fiberglass resin..... ron N4UE |
Re: Part Number for the Demokit Cable
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 01:47 PM, Phil Royce wrote:
" looks like 23 more cables to order and fix them permanently on to sma patch panel, I don't want to take on and off these, knowing in the past these connectors are not continuous use parts." ==================================================================== I bought a couple of demo boards for classroom teaching and they didn't even last out the day with my students. A lifted trace on one board and intermittent cable connections on both boards after use by my better students. For a teaching environment, I would suggest something sturdier like the SDR-Kits Testboard Kit, or as you suggested permanently attached and fixed in place demo board cables. - Herb |
Re: errors of "error" models
John Ackermann N8UR
Gary, just a guess (I'm not a VNA designer) but it might be because it's
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
easier to design and characterize an "absolute" (open or short) with nominally infinite impedance than something that needs to match some arbitrary value. And how would you choose the arbitrary values? Different users have different requirements. I think, but am not sure, that using arbitrary values also would prevent any pretense at corrected measurements beyond those arbitrary values. When your limits are infinity, nothing stands in your way. :-) 73, John ---- On 1/7/20 2:48 PM, Gary O'Neil wrote:
Hi again Jeff; |
Re: errors of "error" models
Could it be because these are most easy to manufacture? A short and an open?
-- NanoVNA Wiki: /g/nanovna-users/wiki/home NanoVNA Files: /g/nanovna-users/files Erik, PD0EK |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss