开云体育

Herb, thanks very much. I assume the two devices are different enough that the manual for the smaller one will not be of help. I almost purchased the smaller one but thought why not get the larger

Attached spreadsheet contains the formula and you can paste your s2p file on the input tab -- Erik, PD0EK

This is sort of "bump" / dupe. Or more direct approach. Take your pick. This is NOT post for / to users of NanoVNA, This post is about NanoVNA operating / embedded software hacking. I am planning to

A quick note, for those running from the Python source: "scipy" is required for the TDR impedance measurement display, and you therefore need to install this, for example by re-running the "pip

Hello Bryan, I am trying to calculate the T-Check value from the NanoVNA-Saver .S2P file with LibreOffice Calc, but I did not got the T-Check formular adopted. This is already done in the attached

Its in Octave (Matlab equivalent) for now till I know what algorithms to use I have a S11 model for the cable (includes estimating the frequency dependent loss and the Complex static impedance (did

Hi Erik - Do you plan a GitHub repository? What approach for solving model parameters?

Hi Oristo Here is the Screen control for the FA-VA5 I have received from AE5CZ Larry Goga and have permission to distribute as I like Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra:

Hi Oristo The Yahoo VNWA group is in the process to move to a io group which is a better platform for a Wiki which I am sure will come. I have large number of document I will "flood" the Wiki with in

And here is the nanoVNA data with the impedance correction for the long cable ( -0.075 -0.56i ohm) Substantial oscillations are still there and these do NOT come from the calibration kit or the cable

Sadly, I lack the playful approach. Yes, I researched FA-VA5 before nanoVNA, but avoided the software until your prompting because of allergy to controls hidden in graphic user interfaces. That is why

On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 05:48 AM, gin&pez@arg wrote: Dear gin&pez@arg How are you sure the errors to be corrected are larger than the uncertainty in your measurement. e.g. you are not trying to correct

And here is a hint a first order cable correction (assuming the cable impedance is not exactly Z0) can improve the results The model corrects for the long cable impedance mismatch for the 3GHz VNA

#72 : facupov : confirmation and suggestion @QRP RX - 5 November 2019 : /g/nanovna-users/message/6471 @Bob Albert - 5 November 2019 : /g/nanovna-users/message/6472 @

Hi Oristo Good to hear about success. It may be a crazy user interface for you being a custom to something else, but not really for me as been the only VNA for me since it's birth. It is for more than

Hi Rune, The new TDR impedance measurement is good too. However it really could use the ability to manually scale the impedance in addition to the length, as the low impedance end of the scale is too

Hi Martin, thanks for the bug report. I'll have a look at it (and probably a fix!) for the next version :-) -- Rune / 5Q5R [email protected]> wrote:

From: Rune Broberg I just released NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.5: https://github.com/mihtjel/nanovna-saver/releases/tag/v0.1.5 [] As ever, dear mailing list users, I very much look forward to your comments,

Hi Rune, Thanks for the latest update, especially the ability to change the marker size and the relabeling of the Series L & C values One small bug I've noticed is that the Marker number on the S11

Hi Kurt - Thanks for the additional hints, so essential success! ... which for the attached VNWA main window are 'Log Mag' or 'Smith' .. which is titled 'Display Settings', also attached ... shown