开云体育

Folks, David, one of the group owners has graciously added links to the Wiki and FILE sections in the forum signature that appears at the bottom of each emailed message. Regards,Larry What is hard?

Signature line test 21 Oct 2019 0920 MDT

Hi Paul, if you selected "yes" to automatic checking for updates, it only runs when it has an Internet connection because of a bug. Sorry! 0.1.4 will fix this issue :-) If you open the

The latest version only runs when I am connected to the internet. The previous version works without. Have I done something wrong? Or is it just how it us? Only had my nano a week. The software makes

My reasoning is that, by shorting one of the caps to ground, you are effectively halving the mixer’s output level. I am assuming no new noise is injected. But, because recalibration would

I have added a new wiki page : /g/nanovna-users/wiki/NanoVNA-Saver_Calibration-Settings It shows at an example of the *SDR-Kits Testboard* how to use the NanoVNA-Saver software

You would be surprised to the number of members that don't realize we have a Wiki on site, most go on line and ask the question not knowing we have it here!!!!!! Mel, K6KBE

What is hard? missing? badly organized? wrong? Did you use the Wiki search box?

This draft recipe is missing ingredients and wants baking. Comments are invited: https://oristopo.github.io/nVhelp/html/nVargs.htm

C26 and C27 connect to the output of the transmission mixer. Do not expect a lot of sensistivity for noise going back into the output, especially because of C32 and C33 removing all HF. Most unwanted

I believe the main function of the shielding in this design is to improve isolation between the signal source and the SA612 receivers (so, to W5DXP’s question, I doubt there’s much improvement at

To better understand the performance of the nanoVNA I did a small comparison with my home build VNA. This home build VNA uses the same SI5351, the same three SA612 mixers but instead of an embedded

this is because shield installed incorrectly, it affects circuit performance. Shield is needed. But this PCB has some design mistakes which makes proper shield installation more hard. Probably this is

Hi Bryan, there's a 0.3.1 out now - as far as I can tell, it only reverses the sign of "group delay", so not a big change. I don't think it should affect your measurements, but I thought I would

NanoVNASharp MOD v3 is released: https://www.rtl-sdr.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4881&p=12524#p12524 Whats new: - added CAPTURE button, which allows to get screenshot from the NanoVNA - completely

This bug is fixed in the NanoVNASharp MOD v3: https://www.rtl-sdr.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4881&p=12524#p12524

I did

QRP RX, There is no easy way (impossible) to make two sections under the larger shield and have any sort of continuous solder line to the board, so perhaps I'll just take it off. I'll take your other

Question: If the NanoVNA is used only for HF, are the shields necessary?

You could do what I did when I got my Nano back in June - use a very thin cellphone battery.It's perfectly safe and there are a couple of photos in the photo section of the forum: