Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Nanovna-Users
- Messages
Search
US Manufacturers?
Howdy,
Are there any US Manufacturers building/selling NanoVNAs? I am on a project that is regulated by The Build America Buy America Act and NDAA889 Laws which unfortunately make the linked purchase options not possible. Related question: I would like to give someone who is BABAA/NDAA889 compliant a project to build a custom software-only version without the display, LY-K3-01B switch, battery, USBC, Charge circuit, ... basically just a software NanoVNA-H for a project I am working on. I am checking with SparkFun, but is there anyone in the friends and family of this amazing project that might be interested, and if so, about how much would it cost for US-made boards? |
Re: USB vs no USB readings Plots change...
An essential principle of troubleshooting is to be able to reproduce the phenomenon. As long as another operator has not been able to contater the same thing as KQ4EKK, all the various and varied explanations are doomed to failure.
I tried the tests on my nanoVNA-F and my PC in my environment, nothing happens. Unfortunately, that doesn't prove anything. It's a negative test. It can come: Of the environment - NanoVNA itself, and this one only (failure) - cord - of a procedure - Basically anything. I had to troubleshoot magical phenomena. We must already convince ourselves that there is an explanation for that. What is positive in what Marc relates is that at home, on his table, the phenomenon is stable. Perhaps you should describe your environment more precisely. Can you do a much lower frequency test, between 10 and 50 MHz for example. A simple piece of coax in a closed circuit at the end, for example. I see on your images that you sweep from 1.5 GHz to 30 Ghz and it is in the very high frequencies that the difference appears. My tests were not at all in this frequency band You state: Errors are displayed across the spectrum but are very small at low frequencies and increase exponentially with higher frequencies. I'm doing an S21 logmag plot from 1 MHz to 30 MHz. There also seems to be a significant offset (jump down) around 15 MHz. We should focus on this type of experience -- F1AMM Fran?ois |
Re: USB vs no USB readings Plots change...
How many times do we, collectively, need to point out that EXTENDING THE
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
COUNTERPOISE WILL CHANGE READINGS? Attaching the USB cable is lengthening the extent of the counterpise from just the NANOVNA to NANOVNA PLUS USB cable. Of course the reading will not agree! Dave - W?LEV On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 5:07?PM Mark KQ4EKK <kq4ekk+groups@...> wrote:
Thanks to all for their help with this.-- *Dave - W?LEV* --
Dave - W?LEV |
Re: High Frequency Circuit Design TEXTS for SALE
Pkease remember that *all* communications related to the sale of items (for instance, the one below) must be private other than the one initial post offering the item for sale. In this case, the author should have refrained from posting the message below but instead responded privately to further responses about the book.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Also, this is not a list for continually selling items. If you wish to sell lots of items, please use a different group, start a new group or otherwise think of a way to list all items for sale in one post without reducing the S/N ratio of this group. Thank you. DaveD, co-owner On Aug 28, 2023, at 13:01, alan victor <avictor73@...> wrote: |
Re: USB vs no USB readings Plots change...
Mark KQ4EKK
Thanks to all for their help with this.
Greg, it is not a bad connector, I changed and tested all connection points, cables, etc. with identical and test units in order to remove those variables. I always recalibrate for each set of tests. I have removed all outside interference possibilities that I can. I do not move anything near the unit, dont touch anything and just take notes on readings. I attached two pics. One with USB and one without, you can see the changes clearly. The test rig is 2 identical built unun (haha, well as much as possible) in a back to back configuration. The secondaries are connected and the the ground legs are connected. The test is S21 thru displaying Smith and logmag. I am able to wave hands over everything with no change, only when I touch something with a fingertip do I see changes (of course). But it is overall stable. When USB is connected it changes as indicated on pics. It is not variable unless I change the usb source (laptop vs pc vs charger etc). As you said, not a laboratory-grade instrument. Understood. I have not tested anything other circuits yet, only my current unun config since I noticed this, but I will shortly to see if it happens during other test and scales. I just wanted to understand if anyone is seeing this. Not concerned to much yet, but I usually do testing with the PC apps when working on bench and worried that I may have gotten errors in my old stuff worked on. Francious, good to know. I may just be running a sensitive test and I am hunting efficiency, so I am looking closely and these number changes and they reflect a lot of change in overall result. Donald, the test system hopping in could be quite possible. I am testing the wire wrapped toroids with wires only into screw terminals to bnc and nanovna.. I am sure the connections are all good and solid while not optimum. I was testing many configs to search for best results in turns and caps and toroid materials. Then I noticed the changes in traces and stopped testing in search of the problem (error introductions). I just want to make sure that this is small issue and not a power circuit problem with my unit or a possible issue in the design of the power/charging system introducing these errors. And how I can isolate my usb connection further. thanks all!! |
Re: USB vs no USB readings Plots change...
On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 09:56 PM, Mark KQ4EKK wrote:
It sounds as if your measurement system is not sufficiently decoupling the test articles, so the test system is becoming part of the measurement; this happens often when measuring antennas. Perhaps if you shared a diagram of your test system it would help us to understand what is going on. Since you are testing ununs, it is possible that one of your measurement ports has a floating shield connection or similar, which picks up a ground (sorta) when the USB cable is plugged in. 73, Don N2VGU |
Re: USB vs no USB readings Plots change...
Hello
I just did a test on mine which is a NanoVNA-F [v1.0.5] Is it real? a clone ? I bought it in February 2021 : Moligh doll Vector Network Analyzer NanoVNA-F HF VHF UHF UV VNA Antenna Analyzer 10KHz-1.5GHz 4.3 Inch Press Screen Sold by : Amazon hui zhou shi hong qing dian zi you xian gong si hui yang qu dan shui kai cheng da dao bei 17 hao er lou si shi qi ka wei hui zhou shi, GUANG DONG SHENG, 516211 CN ----------------------- It was connected to a 5 m coaxial cable with a line cap "in the air" at the end (I calibrated before at the end of the cable). When I plugged the USB plug into my PC, without launching nanaovna-saver, the figure displayed did not change; the NanoVNA is in permanent scanning (relaxed). I tried with a real antenna, at the end of an additional 10 m cable but earthed at the bottom; same, nothing changed. On the other hand, if when I plug in the USB plug nothing happens, when I unplug the plug, it's like when I turn on the NanoVNA, with the home page displayed briefly. The same figure reappears on the screen as before unplugging. 73 -- F1AMM Fran?ois |
Re: USB vs no USB readings Plots change...
I¡¯ve seen similar as well. Oftentimes I don¡¯t take the time to test with multiple configurations but occasionally I¡¯ve noticed where either the Smith chart trace ¡°doesn¡¯t look right¡± or the SWR plot, and that leads me to a bad connector, etcetera. Even holding the NanoVNA or having a laptop too close changed things, so not too surprised that adding a USB cable had that effect. It¡¯s certainly not a laboratory-grade instrument but it does very well for what it costs¡. Does recalibrating help at all? That would be my first instinct but I¡¯m curious to try it myself now.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
73, Greg KN7GIG "Silence is golden. Duct tape is silver." On Aug 27, 2023, at 21:56, Mark KQ4EKK <kq4ekk+groups@...> wrote: |
USB vs no USB readings Plots change...
Mark KQ4EKK
I am building different Un:Uns using different wiring schemes and caps. While testing a config, I noticed that my battery was down to one bar and I did not have the USB cable plugged in at the time. I was not keeping records at the time, just quick tests. So I did not have my nanovna H4 4.3 plugged in, not using Nanovna-App at the time. I just plugged it in and saw the plot change on the nano display. I went HMMMM. was i touching something? did I move something? No.
I started testing by unplugging the usb, and my original plot came back. Then I plugged it back in and back to same "changed" plot. Repeatable and always the same places the changed occurred. Thought, maybe my cable is bad. Nope tried 3 different higher quality cables and exact same results. Did the same test on PC directly and not on the usb expansion bar (maybe it introduces the problem). Nope, same plot changes on pc directly to nanovna with all 3 cables. OK, maybe some ferrites will help. Put on 2 Fair-rite type 31 beads (purchased from Mouser, not amazon or ebay!), same changes. ok remove pc from the equation... I tested on a laptop with battery only, no outside electricity. Desktop on laptop has no apps open (nanovna-app) or anything. Simply plugging in the usb cable changes the plot on the nanovna, not the same but very similar change to the pc plugged in change. I also let the nanovna FULLY charge while turned off and then tested again. Simply plugging into an external power source via the usb is causing the issue. Has anyone seen this before? Do you think that the battery charging circuit in the vna is causing the issue (before I examine this further)? Some details about the nanovna. Nanovna H4. HW version 4.3_MS It was purchased via Amazon from the AURSINC store, which was listed on the nanovna.com site as a authentic seller. I have looked inside the unit and it is clean and well manufactured. Clean solder points and the unit arrived in the official box with all parts. I believe this to be an authentic unit and not clone. The errors are shown across the whole spectrum but are very low at low frequencies and grow exponentially higher with higher frequencies. I am doing a S21 logmag plot from 1MHz to 30MHz. There also seems to be large shift (jump down) around 15MHz. Any thoughts would be welcomed. Thanks in advance, Mark |
Re: How do you measure a car antenna?
QUOTE: Cars are mobile noise generators
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Especially Fords. Dave - W?LEV On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 9:53?PM Rick Murphy <k1mu.nospam@...> wrote:
The AM radio in my car works just fine. Chevy BoltEV.-- *Dave - W?LEV* --
Dave - W?LEV |
Re: How do you measure a car antenna?
The AM radio in my car works just fine. Chevy BoltEV.
How short our memories are - does nobody else remember "alternator noise"? Cars are mobile noise generators. 73, -Rick On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 9:47?PM N7RWB Craig Cherry via groups.io <craig.cherry@...> wrote: Ken, looking through FCC part 15 rules on emissions, I don¡¯t see any-- Rick Murphy, D. Sc., CISSP-ISSAP, K1MU/4, Annandale VA USA |
Re: How do you measure a car antenna?
Don't waste your time writing to the FCC.? About 20 years ago, Chairman Reed Hundt declared that interference didn't exist.? He said he went outside at lunch time and while using his cell phone, he didn't hear any.? Then he started shutting down field offices. The FCC also is convinced that the marketplace will resolve such questions.? It's a lot more accurate to say that there is a "marketplace effect" rather than a marketplace solution.? If you don't have enough complainants to cause the vendor to lose revenue, there is no effect.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
How do I know about this?? I worked at the FCC Saint Paul Field Office for over 30 years.? And I resolved many interference problems over 30 years.? I never ceased to be amazed that so many items can generate an RF signal. Frank Evans K0AM Ellsworth WI On 8/27/2023 2:41 PM, Glenn Little wrote:
Document the issues. |
High Frequency Circuit Design TEXTS for SALE
High Frequency Circuit Design, Hardy, 360 pages
New Condition Excellent and Easy Read and Comprehend! A duplicate from my library¡ $15.00 plus media shipped ATC/ AVX Capacitor Handbook,,, Everything on RF Ceramic Caps Loads of Application Guides FREE¡ Will bundle with the Text¡ Total $20.00 FOR ALL. PM ME OFF LIST IF INTERESTED, THANKS, |
Re: How do you measure a car antenna?
Document the issues.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Send a copy to the FCC. If no action is taken, take the vehicle to the Green bank observatory and park it for a while. That should get some attention. Glenn On 8/27/2023 2:21 PM, Dragan Milivojevic wrote:
Document your findings in a blog post and spread the word? --
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Glenn Little ARRL Technical Specialist QCWA LM 28417 Amateur Callsign: WB4UIVwb4uiv@... AMSAT LM 2178 QTH: Goose Creek, SC USA (EM92xx) USSVI, FRA, NRA-LM ARRL TAPR "It is not the class of license that the Amateur holds but the class of the Amateur that holds the license" |
Re: How do you measure a car antenna?
Document your findings in a blog post and spread the word?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
They will do nothing without media exposure. On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 at 19:22, W0LEV <davearea51a@...> wrote:
|
Re: How do you measure a car antenna?
I don't like to be the bearer of bad news, but the dealership has no idea
what RFI is. They know the words and there is a problem with some Jeep models, but that's as far as they go. Experience follows: While somewhat of an esoteric problem with RFI: the "Water Hole" surrounding 1420.405751 MHz. This is the emission line of celestial and deep space hydrogen designated by HI. The Water Hole is protected spectrum by international agreement, including the US. Well,......., read on. We have a 2018 Jeep JL Rubicon. It, of course, includes the capability of serving as a hotspot for the internet and making cell phone calls. As such, it contains a cell modem as part of the electronics behind the video display in the dash. That modem operates at nominally 700 MHz (I've easily detected its fundamental frequency output on the spectrum analyzer) . The second harmonic screams out of the assembly and blankets the hydrogen line such that I can not do radio astronomy on that frequency. It ceases "looking for mommie" - finding a cell tower as we have no cell coverage at home - after sitting untraveled for 3 or 4 days. Does it track my travels? Absolutely yes, but that's a different problem. I have four times contacted the local dealership where we bought the vehicle. They have absolutely no inkling of what I'm talking about other than recognizing the term "Radio Frequency Interference". I've sent Jeep in Toledo - their engineering department - three letters documenting, screen grabs, the interference both as captured on the spectrum analyzer of the second harmonic of the cell modem and in the time domain from my receiver as captured on the laptop at 1420 MHz (after some downconversion and detection). There has been absolutely no response from them, either, other than a form email "thanking me for my interest in Jeep".........which we already own. Thanks, but no thanks! Frustrated......? Yes.......! There are instructions online on disabling the cell modem, but since we camp off-grid in many...many locations which do not have any cell coverage or amateur repeaters, I'm reluctant to do so. In addition, it involves literally taking the whole dash apart which I'm not into attempting. All I can communicate is, "good luck"........and, there really is no such thing as "luck". YMMV......? Dave - W?LEV On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 5:22?PM W0LEV via groups.io <davearea51a= [email protected]> wrote: I don't like to be the bearer of bad news, but the dealership has no idea-- *Dave - W?LEV* -- Dave - W?LEV |
Re: How do you measure a car antenna?
I don't like to be the bearer of bad news, but the dealership has no idea
what RFI is. They know the words and there is a problem with some Jeep models, but that's as far as they go. Experience follows: While somewhat of an esoteric problem with RFI: the "Water Hole" surrounding 1420.405751 MHz. This is the emission line of celestial and deep space hydrogen designated by HI. The Water Hole is protected spectrum by international agreement, including the US. Well,......., read on. We have a 2018 Jeep JL Rubicon. It, of course, includes the capability of serving as a hotspot for the internet and making cell phone calls. As such, it contains a cell modem as part of the electronics behind the video display in the dash. That modem operates at nominally 700 MHz (I've easily detected its fundamental frequency output on the spectrum analyzer) . The second harmonic screams out of the assembly and blankets the hydrogen line such that I can not do radio astronomy on that frequency. It ceases "looking for mommie" - finding a cell tower as we have no cell coverage at home - after sitting untraveled for 3 or 4 days. Does it track my travels? Absolutely yes, but that's a different problem. I have four times contacted the local dealership where we bought the vehicle. They have absolutely no inkling of what I'm talking about other than recognizing the term "Radio Frequency Interference". I've sent Jeep in Toledo - their engineering department - three letters documenting, screen grabs, the interference both as captured on the spectrum analyzer of the second harmonic of the cell modem and in the time domain from my receiver as captured on the laptop at 1420 MHz (after some downconversion and detection). There has been absolutely no response from them, either, other than a form email "thanking me for my interest in Jeep".........which we already own. Thanks, but no thanks! Frustrated......? Yes.......! There are instructions online on disabling the cell modem, but since we camp off-grid in many...many locations which do not have any cell coverage or amateur repeaters, I'm reluctant to do so. In addition, it involves literally taking the whole dash apart which I'm not into attempting. All I can communicate is, "good luck"........and, there really is no such thing as "luck". YMMV......? Dave - W?LEV On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 11:49?PM Glenn Little <glennmaillist@...> wrote: Take it back to the dealer and insist that they fix the problem.-- *Dave - W?LEV* -- Dave - W?LEV |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss