开云体育

Flash old firmware and see if you get the same problem.

I'm hoping someone can help me with my inability to calibrate my NanoVna classic after upgrading sucessfully to 1.2.20h.dfu. While attempting to debug this problem, I did the following: 1) Ran a

QUOTE: Consider this a benefit of the tiny battery powered Nano VNA. A measurement can be made with minimal impact on the device under test. Indeed. You hit the nail on squarely on the head. Consider

Dave, I understand your point about the counterpoise extension. However, I would think that the SWR readings would shift the same for both displays. What am I missing. Bob, KN4HH

Performance/measurements of the NanoVNA might change slightly with battery level. Try making the same standalone measurement with a full battery. Roger

Last night I was measuring a high Q resonant circuit on the bench with Nano VNA on battery. The battery was getting low and without physically moving anything I connected a USB cable from Nano VNA to

If you calibrate with the measurement plane at the antenna end of the choke balun, you can measure the antenna impedance correctly. You need to calibrate out the choke balun. Dave - W?LEV

I have traps doublets (3 or 4 bands) connected by about 10 m of coax to the station. I have always measured the impedance of my antennas at the level of the center by calibrating (open short load) at

When connected to the PC or laptop, the effective counterpoise is much longer than when not connected. The counterpoise consists of anything connected to the measuring unit, including the laptop/PC

I am using a NanoVNA H4 and NanoVNA-App for SWR display. I connected my end fed half wave antenna to the CNA and compared the two graphical displays. Both the NanoVNA and H4 displays were set for

Based on my limited knowledge I think with regard to L networks there are choices in topology, depending on antenna impedance and desired phase shift in the L network. Also practical concerns such as

B. Whitfield Griffith, Jr., "Radio-Electronic Transmission Fundamentals," McGraw-Hill, 1962 discusses the design of L-networks and provides graphical methods for such designs. ARRL used to sell this

Thank you everyone for responding. Last time I measured an AM broadcast antenna I used a Delta Electronics OIB-3 operating impedance bridge. Using the Delta OIB the measurement would have been

There is an 80dB round-trip loss through that attenuator; the analyzer does not have enough dynamic range to make sensible measurements through such a high loss. Best regards, Don

The other advantage is that some VNA's like the Anritsu Sitemaster and Cellmaster can overcome some interference. My Anritsu can send a coded signal that it can use to ignore the interference. If the

Thank you for all the superb replies. I'm looking for a source that either has the relevant formulas or, where I can figure out the formulas. Ultimately to implement them in some form of auto tuner.

Yes I think that's the problem because I did exactly that with my H4 and got the same result. I flashed it again with the correct variant and it recovered. It's easy to miss the "4" when selecting the

These nanoVNAs have a smaller dynamic range than the (much more expensive) professional VNAs. With a 40 dB attenuator, the signal from the VNA is attenuated by 40 dB on its way from the analyzer to

Thank you David. I made a 40 dB Tee attenuator and did the open-short-load-save calibration at the end of the attenuator not connected to CH0. Maybe I did it incorrectly, because Nano VNA appeared to

Port CH0 ideally presents a 50 ohm resistive impedance to anything connected to it. If an attenuator is needed, it should have a Pi or Tee form, so that a 50 ohm resistive impedance is still presented