¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: nanovna-saver question #nanovna-saver

 

Upgrading to version 0.4.0 fixed this. On connect nvna-s now sets scan range to that set in the device.


Re: Antennas

 



Photos of my Curta calculator in my left hand¡­


Re: Antennas

 

My favorite slide rule precision story:

Student doing slide rule on a timed quiz and needs to multiply 2X3. He mumbles, ¡°Two times three is 5.999. Oh Hell, call it six!¡±

Larry
AC9OX


Re: Antennas

 

Hi Joe
Well, typically a dipole at resonance is near 70 Ohms (Resistive), and needs help in some form to get to 50 Ohms.
Making the dipole longer, or shorter, Is moving around those complex impedances.?
So the idea is to experimentally find a length where the Resistive and Complex combine to 50 Ohms or so.? Anything to make that SWR Meter happy!?

The classic figure '8' pattern stays the same from near zero length to about 3/4th wavelength where it starts to become a 4 leaf clover pattern.?? Between near zero and about 3/4ths wave the field strength will vary, but not the '8' pattern.

?Kent

On Wednesday, July 27, 2022 at 05:31:43 AM CDT, Joe <k1ike_mail@...> wrote:

On 7/26/2022 9:05 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
But yeah, if you're throwing a dipole for 40m up in a tree,
measurement to the nearest inch/cm is probably good enough.
This brings me to a thought that I have had for many years.? Just to nit
pick a bit more for science, I hear people say that they "cut the dipole
to 50 ohm resonance" when in actuality I believe that they are cutting
the dipole to an impedance match.? I've never taken the time to model
the antenna in software (on my bucket list to learn this skill) but I
really wonder what that does to the radiation pattern.? Probably
insignificant on HF frequencies but it would be interesting to put a
measurement on the difference.

73, Joe, K1ike


Re: Antennas

 

OK, how many of you had a Curta calculator? It looked like a black soup can
with a crank on the top. You would set numbers on dials and crank the crank
until the display stopped changing. That was your result. You could do
addition, subtraction, multiplication and division with it.

A friend of mine worked in an engineering supply store. He said engineers
were always getting curious how the things worked and tried taking them
apart. There were spring-loaded parts inside that required a special
compression tool. They could never put them back together themselves. His
company charged ALMOST as much as a new one to put them back together.
Those who took them apart learned never to do it again.

Ah, the good ole days!

Zack W9SZ

<>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 7:03 AM Donald S Brant Jr <dsbrantjr@...>
wrote:

I have a Dietzgen rule with "folded" C and D scales which enable reading
to 4 decimal places and specialized scales for solving triangles. I also
have several circular rules, including some specialized ones for aviation
complete with WWII QA stamps, and my favorite, a "Nuclear Bomb Effects
Computer, Revised Edition";

In the movie, this was used by Dr. Strangelove to calculate the half-life
of "Cobalt-Thorium G" after it was apparent that the "Doomsday Device" was
going to be triggered.
73, Don N2VGU







Re: Antennas

 

I have a Dietzgen rule with "folded" C and D scales which enable reading to 4 decimal places and specialized scales for solving triangles. I also have several circular rules, including some specialized ones for aviation complete with WWII QA stamps, and my favorite, a "Nuclear Bomb Effects Computer, Revised Edition"; In the movie, this was used by Dr. Strangelove to calculate the half-life of "Cobalt-Thorium G" after it was apparent that the "Doomsday Device" was going to be triggered.
73, Don N2VGU


Re: Antennas

 

Guilty as charged! As for finding it again¡­

On 27/07/2022 00:03, KENT BRITAIN wrote:
One must wonder if you ever owned a slide rule? hihi

(Still own my eye saving yellow one by Picket)


Re: cut/lengthen vertical antenna wire

 

Hi Doug,

Lots of good advice has already been given about the antenna feedpoint impedance.

Here are some important questions about your measurement:
1. Did you measure at the feedpoint?
2. If not, and you measured through some length of coax, did you calibrate your NanoVNA at the end of that coax?
3. If you are measuring through some length of coax, do you have a choke balun on the coax near the antenna feedpoint?

Dave NU8A


Re: Antennas

 

On 7/26/2022 9:05 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
But yeah, if you're throwing a dipole for 40m up in a tree, measurement to the nearest inch/cm is probably good enough.
This brings me to a thought that I have had for many years.? Just to nit pick a bit more for science, I hear people say that they "cut the dipole to 50 ohm resonance" when in actuality I believe that they are cutting the dipole to an impedance match.? I've never taken the time to model the antenna in software (on my bucket list to learn this skill) but I really wonder what that does to the radiation pattern.? Probably insignificant on HF frequencies but it would be interesting to put a measurement on the difference.

73, Joe, K1ike


Re: Antennas

 

I too was once a slide rule user, the Pickett / Collins C-19T.
Microwave Path calculation rule. Used it up until the advent of
computer calculation programs. Anything's an improvement on doing it
manually!!
By the way vh2, the link you provided has really good info. But if you
really want to get a super slide rule fix, try the following link to
an all electronic virtual slide rule program (with multiple variations
of slide rules) using full graphics and movable slide. Really neat.



Also, Roger, I was most interested in your detailed description of
the phase and timing of space communications. Not many of us have been
privileged to work in that world.

Ted......(KD7AQO)

-----------------------------------------From: "vh2"
To: "[email protected]"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday July 26 2022 7:12:48PM
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Antennas

I have one: a Hemmi 153:

/>

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of D. Scott MacKenzie via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 9:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Antennas

I also have some 8' Pickett and K&E instructional sliderules and a
dietzen transparent one that goes on an overhead projector - old
school all the way
,:)

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, 21:23 Zack Widup wrote:

> I have a large K&E slide rule that must have 26 or so scales on it.
I
> also have a 6 inch Pickett that we used to call the "Pocket
Pickett"
> :-)
>
> Zack W9SZ
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 6:22 PM Stephen W9SK wrote:
>
> > I have two different Post slide rules from back in the day, but
my
> > most valued one is specifically designed for electronics formula
use
> > by Picket (reactance, resonance, resistance, etc).
> >
> > Stephen W9SK
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] On Behalf Of
> KENT
> > BRITAIN
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 4:04 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Antennas
> >
> > One must wonder if you ever owned a slide rule? hihi
> >
> > (Still own my eye saving yellow one by Picket)
> >
> > I recently saw an article for a 20 Meter beam with dimensions in
> > 1/10,000ths of an inch.
> > Someone needs to slap that lad up side of the head with a K&E
slide
> > rule!Guess he also needed to establish the exact temp the
Aluminum
> > should be at for that measurement.
> > "Why be approximately correct when you can be precisely wrong!"
Tom
> Clark
> > W3IWI
> >
> >
> > For what it's worth, at last count I own 8 Network Analyzers. 3
> > Nano's
> on
> > various work benches and the big one is a 40 GHz HP 8510. That's
> > about
> 100
> > kg of analyzer.
> > On the 3 Nano's I have, one big source of uncertainty are those
50 Ohm
> > loads. I had those loads on the 8510 and they were pretty bad
above a
> few
> > Hundred MHz. If you can, I suggest getting a higher quality 50
Ohm load
> > for your calibrations. The short and open seemed fine. Kent
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 at 05:00:08 PM CDT, G8DQX list <
> > list@...> wrote:
> >
> > And forgets to say whether these are Imperial Gallons (defined as
> > 4.54609l) or Queen Anne (as used in the USA) gallons (defined as
231
> cubic
> > inches-whatever an inch might have been at the time, though today
> > the US and UK agree that an inch is 25.4 mm by definition-which
is
> > 3.785411784l.) [Thus the US gallon is about 83.27% of a UK
gallon.]
> >
> > Yours terribly pedantically,
> >
> > Robin, G8DQX
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>





Links:
------
[1] /g/nanovna-users/files
[2]
/g/nanovna-users/leave/11119600/4866111/1865567994/xyzzy


Re: Antennas

 

I had a college Slide Rule class after the USAF (1970). The instructor took a full-sized K&E DeciLon and pulled the slide 2/3 out.
Then he flexed the two ends down so that it looked like a bow. He released it and it worked perfectly.

Then he said, ¡°OK, try that with a Pickett!¡±

Larry
AC9OX


Re: Antennas

 

I have one: a Hemmi 153:

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of D. Scott MacKenzie via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 9:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Antennas

I also have some 8' Pickett and K&E instructional sliderules and a dietzen transparent one that goes on an overhead projector - old school all the way
,:)

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, 21:23 Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@...> wrote:

I have a large K&E slide rule that must have 26 or so scales on it. I
also have a 6 inch Pickett that we used to call the "Pocket Pickett"
:-)

Zack W9SZ

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 6:22 PM Stephen W9SK <stephen@...> wrote:

I have two different Post slide rules from back in the day, but my
most valued one is specifically designed for electronics formula use
by Picket (reactance, resonance, resistance, etc).

Stephen W9SK


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
KENT
BRITAIN
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 4:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Antennas

One must wonder if you ever owned a slide rule? hihi

(Still own my eye saving yellow one by Picket)

I recently saw an article for a 20 Meter beam with dimensions in
1/10,000ths of an inch.
Someone needs to slap that lad up side of the head with a K&E slide
rule!Guess he also needed to establish the exact temp the Aluminum
should be at for that measurement.
"Why be approximately correct when you can be precisely wrong!" Tom
Clark
W3IWI


For what it's worth, at last count I own 8 Network Analyzers. 3
Nano's
on
various work benches and the big one is a 40 GHz HP 8510. That's
about
100
kg of analyzer.
On the 3 Nano's I have, one big source of uncertainty are those 50 Ohm
loads. I had those loads on the 8510 and they were pretty bad above a
few
Hundred MHz. If you can, I suggest getting a higher quality 50 Ohm load
for your calibrations. The short and open seemed fine. Kent






On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 at 05:00:08 PM CDT, G8DQX list <
list@...> wrote:

And forgets to say whether these are Imperial Gallons (defined as
4.54609l) or Queen Anne (as used in the USA) gallons (defined as 231
cubic
inches-whatever an inch might have been at the time, though today
the US and UK agree that an inch is 25.4 mm by definition-which is
3.785411784l.) [Thus the US gallon is about 83.27% of a UK gallon.]

Yours terribly pedantically,

Robin, G8DQX
















Re: Antennas

 

My sister teaches math at the University of Wisconsin. She has one of those
8 foot slide rules in her office and was taking it to a classroom to
demonstrate. A student passed her and said "You know, they make calculators
now that are a lot smaller."
:-)

Zack W9SZ

<>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:47 PM D. Scott MacKenzie <kb0fhp@...> wrote:

I also have some 8' Pickett and K&E instructional sliderules and a dietzen
transparent one that goes on an overhead projector - old school all the way
,:)

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, 21:23 Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@...> wrote:

I have a large K&E slide rule that must have 26 or so scales on it. I
also
have a 6 inch Pickett that we used to call the "Pocket Pickett"
:-)

Zack W9SZ

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 6:22 PM Stephen W9SK <stephen@...> wrote:

I have two different Post slide rules from back in the day, but my most
valued one is specifically designed for electronics formula use by
Picket
(reactance, resonance, resistance, etc).

Stephen W9SK


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
KENT
BRITAIN
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 4:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Antennas

One must wonder if you ever owned a slide rule? hihi

(Still own my eye saving yellow one by Picket)

I recently saw an article for a 20 Meter beam with dimensions in
1/10,000ths of an inch.
Someone needs to slap that lad up side of the head with a K&E slide
rule!Guess he also needed to establish the exact temp the Aluminum
should
be at for that measurement.
"Why be approximately correct when you can be precisely wrong!" Tom
Clark
W3IWI


For what it's worth, at last count I own 8 Network Analyzers. 3 Nano's
on
various work benches and the big one is a 40 GHz HP 8510. That's about
100
kg of analyzer.
On the 3 Nano's I have, one big source of uncertainty are those 50 Ohm
loads. I had those loads on the 8510 and they were pretty bad above a
few
Hundred MHz. If you can, I suggest getting a higher quality 50 Ohm
load
for your calibrations. The short and open seemed fine. Kent






On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 at 05:00:08 PM CDT, G8DQX list <
list@...> wrote:

And forgets to say whether these are Imperial Gallons (defined as
4.54609l) or Queen Anne (as used in the USA) gallons (defined as 231
cubic
inches¡ªwhatever an inch might have been at the time, though today the
US
and UK agree that an inch is 25.4 mm by definition¡ªwhich is
3.785411784l.) [Thus the US gallon is about 83.27% of a UK gallon.]

Yours terribly pedantically,

Robin, G8DQX




















Re: Antennas

 

I also have some 8' Pickett and K&E instructional sliderules and a dietzen
transparent one that goes on an overhead projector - old school all the way
,:)

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, 21:23 Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@...> wrote:

I have a large K&E slide rule that must have 26 or so scales on it. I also
have a 6 inch Pickett that we used to call the "Pocket Pickett"
:-)

Zack W9SZ

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 6:22 PM Stephen W9SK <stephen@...> wrote:

I have two different Post slide rules from back in the day, but my most
valued one is specifically designed for electronics formula use by Picket
(reactance, resonance, resistance, etc).

Stephen W9SK


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
KENT
BRITAIN
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 4:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Antennas

One must wonder if you ever owned a slide rule? hihi

(Still own my eye saving yellow one by Picket)

I recently saw an article for a 20 Meter beam with dimensions in
1/10,000ths of an inch.
Someone needs to slap that lad up side of the head with a K&E slide
rule!Guess he also needed to establish the exact temp the Aluminum should
be at for that measurement.
"Why be approximately correct when you can be precisely wrong!" Tom
Clark
W3IWI


For what it's worth, at last count I own 8 Network Analyzers. 3 Nano's
on
various work benches and the big one is a 40 GHz HP 8510. That's about
100
kg of analyzer.
On the 3 Nano's I have, one big source of uncertainty are those 50 Ohm
loads. I had those loads on the 8510 and they were pretty bad above a
few
Hundred MHz. If you can, I suggest getting a higher quality 50 Ohm load
for your calibrations. The short and open seemed fine. Kent






On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 at 05:00:08 PM CDT, G8DQX list <
list@...> wrote:

And forgets to say whether these are Imperial Gallons (defined as
4.54609l) or Queen Anne (as used in the USA) gallons (defined as 231
cubic
inches¡ªwhatever an inch might have been at the time, though today the US
and UK agree that an inch is 25.4 mm by definition¡ªwhich is
3.785411784l.) [Thus the US gallon is about 83.27% of a UK gallon.]

Yours terribly pedantically,

Robin, G8DQX
















Re: Antennas

Roger Stierman
 

One more slide rule off-topic, please.
I have in my possession a slide rule picked up on the trashbin at Ames Lab IA State.? It is bamboo, and has the note 'This slide rule has been furnished as a replacement due to the War effort.? A fee of $1 can be sent with this slide rule for a new slide rule before July 31, 1942'.Needless to say I still have it on my 'In Case of Emergency ' shelf.
WA0VYU?

Sent from the all new AOL app for Android

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:06 PM, Jim Lux<jimlux@...> wrote: On 7/26/22 4:03 PM, KENT BRITAIN wrote:
? One must wonder if you ever owned a slide rule? hihi

(Still own my eye saving yellow one by Picket)

I recently saw an article for a 20 Meter beam with dimensions in 1/10,000ths of an inch.
Someone needs to slap that lad up side of the head with a K&E slide rule!Guess he also needed to establish the exact temp the Aluminum should be at for that measurement.
You may laugh, but sometimes, small changes in dimensions are important,
and therefore so is temperature.

For Aluminum, one might see a length change of 0.2% (and corresponding
resonant frequency change) for a temperature change of 100C.? 100C
sounds like a lot, but between a cold night in Winter, and a hot day in
Summer (particularly if the aluminum is shiny), that's not an
unreasonable temperature delta.

If your antenna is in space, a 100 degree change from full sun to full
shade is pretty common.

But on the ground, maybe a 50C swing is more likely - that is a 0.1%
length change, the gain doesn't change much (0.2%) but more important is
the phase change of 0.2 degrees (due to the rapid change in reactance).

0.2 degrees isn't a lot, but if you're trying to form nulls, 0.2 degrees
turns a perfect null into a -40dB null.? Large arrays forming a radio
telescope care about this kind of thing. You don't want the apparent
source to be in a different place in the sky.


In a more extreme case - When measuring the range to a spacecraft, we
send a signal to the spacecraft, which transmits it back, and we compare
the phase of the outgoing and the incoming signal.

A properly designed system can make this measurement to about 1 part in
10^15.? Let's put that into context - it's about 10^9 km to Jupiter (at
opposition). So that's 10^12 meters.? We're making that measurement to 1
mm.? (it's about 36 degrees phase difference at Ka-band - 32 GHz).

So we need to know not only the temperature of the antennas at both
ends, but the temperatures of the waveguide and feedlines.? (and the
gravitational and thermal distortion of the DSN antenna, etc.).

As for *why* - by making precise measurements of range (to cm) and
velocity (to mm/2) we can very accurately measure the orbit/trajectory
of a spacecraft, and from that, we can measure the gravitational field
of Jupiter, and from that we can infer what Jupiter's internal structure
might be.

But yeah, if you're throwing a dipole for 40m up in a tree, measurement
to the nearest inch/cm is probably good enough.


Re: Antennas

 

I have a large K&E slide rule that must have 26 or so scales on it. I also
have a 6 inch Pickett that we used to call the "Pocket Pickett"
:-)

Zack W9SZ

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 6:22 PM Stephen W9SK <stephen@...> wrote:

I have two different Post slide rules from back in the day, but my most
valued one is specifically designed for electronics formula use by Picket
(reactance, resonance, resistance, etc).

Stephen W9SK


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of KENT
BRITAIN
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 4:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Antennas

One must wonder if you ever owned a slide rule? hihi

(Still own my eye saving yellow one by Picket)

I recently saw an article for a 20 Meter beam with dimensions in
1/10,000ths of an inch.
Someone needs to slap that lad up side of the head with a K&E slide
rule!Guess he also needed to establish the exact temp the Aluminum should
be at for that measurement.
"Why be approximately correct when you can be precisely wrong!" Tom Clark
W3IWI


For what it's worth, at last count I own 8 Network Analyzers. 3 Nano's on
various work benches and the big one is a 40 GHz HP 8510. That's about 100
kg of analyzer.
On the 3 Nano's I have, one big source of uncertainty are those 50 Ohm
loads. I had those loads on the 8510 and they were pretty bad above a few
Hundred MHz. If you can, I suggest getting a higher quality 50 Ohm load
for your calibrations. The short and open seemed fine. Kent






On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 at 05:00:08 PM CDT, G8DQX list <
list@...> wrote:

And forgets to say whether these are Imperial Gallons (defined as
4.54609l) or Queen Anne (as used in the USA) gallons (defined as 231 cubic
inches¡ªwhatever an inch might have been at the time, though today the US
and UK agree that an inch is 25.4 mm by definition¡ªwhich is
3.785411784l.) [Thus the US gallon is about 83.27% of a UK gallon.]

Yours terribly pedantically,

Robin, G8DQX












Re: Antennas

 

On 7/26/22 4:03 PM, KENT BRITAIN wrote:
One must wonder if you ever owned a slide rule? hihi
(Still own my eye saving yellow one by Picket)
I recently saw an article for a 20 Meter beam with dimensions in 1/10,000ths of an inch.
Someone needs to slap that lad up side of the head with a K&E slide rule!Guess he also needed to establish the exact temp the Aluminum should be at for that measurement.
You may laugh, but sometimes, small changes in dimensions are important, and therefore so is temperature.

For Aluminum, one might see a length change of 0.2% (and corresponding resonant frequency change) for a temperature change of 100C. 100C sounds like a lot, but between a cold night in Winter, and a hot day in Summer (particularly if the aluminum is shiny), that's not an unreasonable temperature delta.

If your antenna is in space, a 100 degree change from full sun to full shade is pretty common.

But on the ground, maybe a 50C swing is more likely - that is a 0.1% length change, the gain doesn't change much (0.2%) but more important is the phase change of 0.2 degrees (due to the rapid change in reactance).

0.2 degrees isn't a lot, but if you're trying to form nulls, 0.2 degrees turns a perfect null into a -40dB null. Large arrays forming a radio telescope care about this kind of thing. You don't want the apparent source to be in a different place in the sky.


In a more extreme case - When measuring the range to a spacecraft, we send a signal to the spacecraft, which transmits it back, and we compare the phase of the outgoing and the incoming signal.

A properly designed system can make this measurement to about 1 part in 10^15. Let's put that into context - it's about 10^9 km to Jupiter (at opposition). So that's 10^12 meters. We're making that measurement to 1 mm. (it's about 36 degrees phase difference at Ka-band - 32 GHz).

So we need to know not only the temperature of the antennas at both ends, but the temperatures of the waveguide and feedlines. (and the gravitational and thermal distortion of the DSN antenna, etc.).

As for *why* - by making precise measurements of range (to cm) and velocity (to mm/2) we can very accurately measure the orbit/trajectory of a spacecraft, and from that, we can measure the gravitational field of Jupiter, and from that we can infer what Jupiter's internal structure might be.

But yeah, if you're throwing a dipole for 40m up in a tree, measurement to the nearest inch/cm is probably good enough.


Re: Antennas

 

Hi Scott,

As an aside, I have used talc as a lube for bamboo slide rules over the decades. My old Post Versalog II, (with leather case, and both in MINT condition), had small amounts of talc placed in the groves, (by myself), of the bamboo, over the years I used it, and it works very well to this day, still slides like butter...

Just thought I would pass that on to you, as you collect them... My father taught me that trick.

I have no idea if it harms the sliderule, but mine seems to have survived use of talc as a lube...

73, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)

ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI
ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources

On 7/26/22 17:30, D. Scott MacKenzie wrote:
I collect sliderules. I have approximately 300. Pickets. Post, K&E,
Dietzen, Chavez Roos, as well as some unique Russian and Chinese
sliderules. My favorite is a K&E 6" Deci-Lon.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, 19:22 Stephen W9SK <stephen@...> wrote:

I have two different Post slide rules from back in the day, but my most
valued one is specifically designed for electronics formula use by Picket
(reactance, resonance, resistance, etc).

Stephen W9SK


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of KENT
BRITAIN
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 4:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Antennas

One must wonder if you ever owned a slide rule? hihi

(Still own my eye saving yellow one by Picket)

I recently saw an article for a 20 Meter beam with dimensions in
1/10,000ths of an inch.
Someone needs to slap that lad up side of the head with a K&E slide
rule!Guess he also needed to establish the exact temp the Aluminum should
be at for that measurement.
"Why be approximately correct when you can be precisely wrong!" Tom Clark
W3IWI


For what it's worth, at last count I own 8 Network Analyzers. 3 Nano's on
various work benches and the big one is a 40 GHz HP 8510. That's about 100
kg of analyzer.
On the 3 Nano's I have, one big source of uncertainty are those 50 Ohm
loads. I had those loads on the 8510 and they were pretty bad above a few
Hundred MHz. If you can, I suggest getting a higher quality 50 Ohm load
for your calibrations. The short and open seemed fine. Kent






On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 at 05:00:08 PM CDT, G8DQX list <
list@...> wrote:

And forgets to say whether these are Imperial Gallons (defined as
4.54609l) or Queen Anne (as used in the USA) gallons (defined as 231 cubic
inches¡ªwhatever an inch might have been at the time, though today the US
and UK agree that an inch is 25.4 mm by definition¡ªwhich is
3.785411784l.) [Thus the US gallon is about 83.27% of a UK gallon.]

Yours terribly pedantically,

Robin, G8DQX












Re: Antennas

 

I collect sliderules. I have approximately 300. Pickets. Post, K&E,
Dietzen, Chavez Roos, as well as some unique Russian and Chinese
sliderules. My favorite is a K&E 6" Deci-Lon.

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, 19:22 Stephen W9SK <stephen@...> wrote:

I have two different Post slide rules from back in the day, but my most
valued one is specifically designed for electronics formula use by Picket
(reactance, resonance, resistance, etc).

Stephen W9SK


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of KENT
BRITAIN
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 4:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Antennas

One must wonder if you ever owned a slide rule? hihi

(Still own my eye saving yellow one by Picket)

I recently saw an article for a 20 Meter beam with dimensions in
1/10,000ths of an inch.
Someone needs to slap that lad up side of the head with a K&E slide
rule!Guess he also needed to establish the exact temp the Aluminum should
be at for that measurement.
"Why be approximately correct when you can be precisely wrong!" Tom Clark
W3IWI


For what it's worth, at last count I own 8 Network Analyzers. 3 Nano's on
various work benches and the big one is a 40 GHz HP 8510. That's about 100
kg of analyzer.
On the 3 Nano's I have, one big source of uncertainty are those 50 Ohm
loads. I had those loads on the 8510 and they were pretty bad above a few
Hundred MHz. If you can, I suggest getting a higher quality 50 Ohm load
for your calibrations. The short and open seemed fine. Kent






On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 at 05:00:08 PM CDT, G8DQX list <
list@...> wrote:

And forgets to say whether these are Imperial Gallons (defined as
4.54609l) or Queen Anne (as used in the USA) gallons (defined as 231 cubic
inches¡ªwhatever an inch might have been at the time, though today the US
and UK agree that an inch is 25.4 mm by definition¡ªwhich is
3.785411784l.) [Thus the US gallon is about 83.27% of a UK gallon.]

Yours terribly pedantically,

Robin, G8DQX












Re: Antennas

 

Slide rules:



Larry
AC9OX