Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Nanovna-Users
- Messages
Search
Re: nanoVNA Output Voltage
The output power of the SI5351 is automatic set depending the requested sweep frequency, 2mA below 300MHz, 8mA above 300MHz
Similar for a manually set fixed output frequency using the freq command You can manually control the power through console by issuing power [0-3] The power is in small steps controlling the SI5351 current into the output attenuator 0->2mA 1->4mA 2->6mA 3->8mA Issuing power -1 sets the nanoVNA again in automatic power mode If you report output power please indicate at which power setting the output is generated. |
Re: nanoVNA Output Voltage
Hi, Andy,
we had the same idea, I measured the output and the frequency accuracy on the weekend. It is very bad if there are 5 kHz difference, e.g. on LF...the band is < 2kHz wide. I have set the measurement results under Photos, Output to frequency. Measuring equipment Advantest R3131 with Rubidium-10MHz reference. 73 Joe |
Re: A bit off topic, but Nano VNA related.
Why not try the following console commands through a script:
pause (the scanning - still generates output) now loop the following via a data driven stream... freq 1000000 (wait) freq 1000005 I don't know how fast these commands can be sent - talk to Rune (nanovna-saver author) 73 Larry |
A bit off topic, but Nano VNA related.
Andy G0FTD
I just checked my NanaoVNA output and frequency accuracy, utterly superb.
Good enough to generate WSPR signals, or simple FSK/CW QRSS signals. The latter are normally send with a 5Hz shift, with a dot length of 6 seconds. Is there a simple way to use the VNA to generate such signals via USB ? 73 de Andy |
Re: nanoVNA Output Voltage
I think the -10 dBm number is based on conversion of the unterminated voltage. My unit puts out -17 dBm at 100 MHz and -19 dBm at 900 MHz when properly terminated in a 50 ohm load. This level is consistent with other Si5351 devices I own.
One of those devices is the RFzero board which is a GPS referenced, Arduino based synthesizer. It comes with some very nice beacon software that allows it to run WSPR up to 1.5 GHz using harmonics of the Si5351. I have mine operating on 23 cm and get good WSPR decodes using the fifth harmonic. Warren Allgyer WA8TOD |
Re: NanoVNA Saver 0.0.9 screen size and saving screen questions
Hi Rune:
Keep up the great work - you're an indispensable asset! You might try thinking a little bit laterally. Other similar python programs I use (like the qspectrum sdr data analyzer) split the window into two sections; one contains the graphs - it scales within limits to track screen size but doesn't scroll, and the second is a sidebar which contains all data and settings and scrolls as desired - with less essential things at the bottom. I think some of the QT screen designer programs generate platform adaptation code that helps with these problems. In any case, thanks for working on this problem. I know it's hard to keep a balance at this stage of development between getting the core functionality stable and making the program pretty! M |
Re: Electrical Delay_Port Extension
Hi hwalker
Ok with your commercial kit, if I am guessing right you do not have the cal kit data ? The HP male load I have a couple of these and are far from impressed. I have also a BNC special made cal kit characterized against a Rosenberger professional kit with full documentation so I have a made a couple of BNC kit like on the photo with calibration plane data. However if used as ideal kit the calibration is super but of course not at the calibration plane. The male adaptors are special made as quick insert which I do not think is in the trade so lucky me ? Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]> P? vegne af hwalker Sendt: 19. september 2019 14:02 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: [nanovna-users] Electrical Delay_Port Extension Kurt, Thanks for the comments. I am fortunate to have a commercial BNC VSWR kit that came with OSL standards plus various mismatches. I picked it up from an engineer's estate sell and was able to verify the kit's performance up to 1 GHz using a HP8753C VNA. The kit is my gold standard against which I verified my everyday use home made BNC OSL. The home made BNC OSL (see attached photo) pretty much follow your construction suggestions, except the 50 ohm load is an HP11593A (picked up two at the same estate sell). I was told the commercial VSWR kit was manufactured by Berkeley labs but have not been able to verify that info. |
Re: NanoVNA Saver 0.0.9 screen size and saving screen questions
That looks the business allright :)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 02:25 PM, Rune Broberg wrote:
|
Re: NanoVNA Saver 0.0.9 screen size and saving screen questions
Jeffrey,
I've worked slightly more on the ideas you presented, and just pushed an update that makes it *nearly* fit on a 768 pixel screen. It does actually fit, I believe, if you hide the task bar. I think that's as good as it's going to get for today :-) It should probably fit with font size 7, I think anyway. :-) -- Rune / 5Q5R On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 07:07, Jeffrey Vandenbroucke <jeffrey@...> wrote: CollapsibleBox(QtWidgets.QWidget) would be handy - you can "hide" controls |
Re: NanoVNA LNA S21 & S11
Said,
I posted this procedure earlier that I used to check the gain of a RF preamp. The device under test was a Mini-Circuits preamp with a handwritten note saying, "27 dB gain, 1-1000 MHz". Test procedure used: 1. Turn the amplifier on to allow it to warm up and also to guard against turn on transients damaging the nanoVNA during testing. 2. Turn on the nanoVNA, set the display to CH1/LOGMAG only, 10 dB per DIV, reference position at 4 divisions to be able to see 27 dB gain. 3. Connect a 20 dB attenuator to CH1 and a 6 dB attenuator to CH0 to closely match the expected 27 dB gain of the preamp. 4. Connect attenuators together using a cable. The nanoVNA should be displaying a 26 dB loss over the frequency range. If not your attenuators are not flat 5. Change to the calibrate menu and select "reset" and then perform a "through" calibration. The new reference should be 0 dB at 4 divisions. 6. Connect the output of the 6 dB attenuator to the input of the amplifier and output of the amplifier to the 20 dB attenuator. 7. Read the amplifier gain in dB directly off the nanoVNA using the marker display. The above only checks the S21 performance of the preamp. That was all I was interested in at the time. |
Re: Electrical Delay_Port Extension
Kurt,
Thanks for the comments. I am fortunate to have a commercial BNC VSWR kit that came with OSL standards plus various mismatches. I picked it up from an engineer's estate sell and was able to verify the kit's performance up to 1 GHz using a HP8753C VNA. The kit is my gold standard against which I verified my everyday use home made BNC OSL. The home made BNC OSL (see attached photo) pretty much follow your construction suggestions, except the 50 ohm load is an HP11593A (picked up two at the same estate sell). I was told the commercial VSWR kit was manufactured by Berkeley labs but have not been able to verify that info. |
Re: NanoVNA LNA S21 & S11
Very thanks for quick answer qrp.ddc. I made the 2nd manipulation with 20db connected to ch0 & ch1 and turned the Orange & blue traces & have had the S21 & S11.I think i was wrong.
The amplifiers are 20-24db 2m band. I made a calibration with the 2 Attenuatos connected to have a zero instead of 40db. Very thanks for infos & 73s dr qrp.ddc |
Re: NanoVNA LNA S21 & S11
in order to measure S11, you're needs to put 50 ohm load on LNA output and connect CH0 to LNA input. But first, make sure that your LNA can handle 0 dBm level! If it cannot, then there is no simple way to measure S11. If your LNA cannot handle 0 dBm on the input, do not connect it directly to NanoVNA, because you can damage LNA input.
in order to measure S21, you're needs to connect LNA input to CH0 through 20 dB attenuator. And LNA output to CH1 through 20 dB attenuator. It's better to use 30-40 dB attenuator between LNA output and CH1. But 20 dB also may work if your LNA has not so high gain (smaller than 30 dB). For high gain LNA (more than 30 dB) you will need 40 dB attenuator between LNA output and CH1, otherwise your CH1 input on NanoVNA may burn out. Do not connect high gain LNA output directly to NanoVNA, you can damage NanoVNA! You're needs to add attenuators sum to the measured S21 values. In your case you will need to add 40 dB to measured S21. For example, if it shows S21=-30 dB, it means that LNA gain is -30+40=+10 dB. |
Re: NanoVNASaver 0.0.8
Thanks Rune,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
That makes life much easier. David On 2019-09-14 6:07 pm, Rune Broberg wrote:
Hi David, --
David G Hopkins (VK4ZF) --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. |
Re: NanoVNA Saver 0.0.9 screen size and saving screen questions
My $300 laptop has 1920 x 1080.
Great for video etc but awful for running normal software on, what a crazy situation. The result is everything looks so tiny on the menus on 90% of the programs in use. I often have to go into the desktop settings and tell my machine to use a lower resolution :-( I think the manufacturers are forgetting that PC's are work tools, and are NOT ll about games and movies ! 73 de Andy ====================================== I think that a great majority of the devices sold today (at least the lower-cost ones) have 1920 x 1080 displays, so it's a sensible standard for which to design. I still have some 1280 x 1024, one 1280 x 768, and two 1600 x 1200 (I prefer the greater number of lines for programming and spreadsheets). My Linx tablet with its 1920 x 1080 x 250 mm display is "challenging" to read, but does run some SDR software well. (Next challenge is 4/5K displays...) 73, David GM8ARV -- SatSignal Software - Quality software for you Web: Email: david-taylor@... Twitter: @gm8arv |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss