Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Nanovna-Users
- Messages
Search
Re: Inductor Q Measurement
Andrew Kurtz
How did you get it loaded and working?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Oct 12, 2021, at 3:09 PM, John Baines via groups.io <jbaines@...> wrote: |
Re: Inductor Q Measurement
Andrew,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
NanoVNA-saver works fine on my Mac. 73 John M0JBA On 12 Oct 2021, at 19:56, Andrew Kurtz via groups.io <adkurtz@...> wrote: |
Re: Inductor Q Measurement
Correct.
Dave - W?LEV On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 7:00 PM Andrew Kurtz via groups.io <adkurtz= [email protected]> wrote: Sounds intriguing! I routinely find self-resonance and calculate-- *Dave - W?LEV* *Just Let Darwin Work* |
Re: Inductor Q Measurement
Andrew Kurtz
Sounds intriguing! I routinely find self-resonance and calculate parasitic C from that. I see that I could take that R and calculate Q, but the Q would be for a frequency far from a practical one, and thus that Q would not relate to my coil when in use¡ Agree?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Andy On Oct 12, 2021, at 11:15 AM, Gary Rondeau <grondeau@...> wrote: |
Re: Inductor Q Measurement
You're fine with alligator clips at HF frequencies - especially the BC band
for the crystal radio. Don't sweat it !! If your crystal radio operated much above 100 MHz, yes, the alligator or crocodile clips would be an issue. And if the Rs is not measured at the operating frequency it does not reflect skin effect. In your case, the top of the BC band is 1.7 MHz. Rs consists of both the purely resistive component of the conductors and, in addition, the increase in effective Rs due to skin effect which is a function of frequency. Bottom line: you're fine at BC band frequencies. Dave - W?LEV On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 6:20 PM Andrew Kurtz via groups.io <adkurtz= [email protected]> wrote: Yes, R cannot be < 0, but my interpretation is simply that the -2 is error-- *Dave - W?LEV* *Just Let Darwin Work* |
Re: Inductor Q Measurement
Andrew Kurtz
That program sounds wonderful! The only problem is that my computer is a Mac, and I bet it won¡¯t handle it. I know someone might say ¡°O just get Python and change XYZ while uploading ABC from Github¡.¡± and I might as well be listening to Greek. I have not yet succeeded in getting my nanoVNA data other than by hand-typing it into Excel because I can¡¯t get nanoVNAsaver to run. Any way to get your Coil program working on a Mac?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Andy On Oct 11, 2021, at 7:00 PM, Brian Beezley <k6sti@...> wrote: |
Re: suitable software to control full funcion NanoVNA
There are several programs - please browse the forum Wiki for information.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tuesday, October 12, 2021, 02:17:10 p.m. EDT, Francesco <realfran@...> wrote:
Hello, there is one suitable PC software to control the full function of NanoVNA for windows? 73/Francesco |
Re: Inductor Q Measurement
Andrew Kurtz
Yes, that article and Alan¡¯s explanation were very helpful. I realize that I had a misunderstanding of where a ¡°parallel¡± resistor would be, and how a resonant circuit can be tested via shunt reflection versus transmission shunt through versus transmission series through. I had even gotten the impression that nanoVNAs really work best in reflection on CH0 only, not so much transmission from CH0 to CH1 even though that is available. For the record, I have been able to calculate that X / Rs = Rp / X exactly!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Andy On Oct 11, 2021, at 6:51 PM, Kerry <planningpower@...> wrote: |
Re: Inductor Q Measurement
On 10/12/21 11:20 AM, Andrew Kurtz via groups.io wrote:
Yes, R cannot be < 0, but my interpretation is simply that the -2 is error in some small number like, say 1 or 2 ohms.exactly. Let's say the gamma measurement is +/- 5%.? If you convert gamma = 1.05 (angle = 0) you get -2050 ohms and Mag S11 = 0.4238 dB If you convert gamma=0.95, you get 1950 ohms and mag S11 = -.4455 dB Here's some examples (excel attached if you want to fool with it yourself).? For any coil with a reasonably high Q (>100), your DC resistance might be pretty low, especially if the reactance is something like 100 ohms.? In such a case, gamma is VERY close to 1, so small uncertainty in the measurement will result in negative resistance Z = Z0*(1+gamma)/(1-gamma) Z0 50 gamma mag gamma ang complex Z Zreal Zimag 0.5 0 0.5 150 150.0 0.0 0.5 90 3.06287113727155E-17+0.5i 30+40i 30.0 40.0 0.95 0 0.95 1950 1950.0 0.0 0.99 0 0.99 9950 9950.0 0.0 1 0 1 #NUM! #NUM! #NUM! 1.01 0 1.01 -10050 -10050.0 0.0 1.05 0 1.05 -2050 -2050.0 0.0 0.95 90 5.81945516081595E-17+0.95i 2.56241787122207+49.9342969776609i 2.6 49.9 0.99 90 6.06448485179767E-17+0.99i 0.50249987374375+49.9974748750063i 0.5 50.0 1 90 6.1257422745431E-17+i 50i 0.0 50.0 1.01 90 6.18699969728853E-17+1.01i -0.49750012375625+49.9975248750062i -0.5 50.0 1.05 90 6.43202938827026E-17+1.05i -2.43757431629014+49.9405469678954i -2.4 49.9 gamma = (Z-Z0)/(Z+Z0) R X Z Q gamma gamma mag gamma angle 0 500 500i #DIV/0! 0.98019801980198+0.198019801980198i 1.000 11.42 1 500 1+500i 500 0.97981005617555+0.197940625729906i 1.000 11.42 2 500 2+500i 250 0.979422565531214+0.197859946815246i 0.999 11.42 -1 500 -1+500i -500 0.980586447755754+0.198097471880064i 1.000 11.42 -2 500 -2+500i -250 0.980975331346312+0.198173631809246i 1.001 11.42 0 100 100i #DIV/0! 0.6+0.8i 1.000 53.13 1 100 1+100i 100 0.595270216649472+0.793587810491231i 0.992 53.13 2 100 2+100i 50 0.590680100755667+0.787153652392947i 0.984 53.12 -1 100 -1+100i -100 0.604870574953633+0.80638658172728i 1.008 53.13 -2 100 -2+100i -50 0.609882964889467+0.812743823146944i 1.016 53.12 I will admit that many of you experts talk about how you attach your DUT very carefully, solder it, sometimes have to throw it away when done testing, and all this sounds bizarre to a non-EE who is simply playing with crystal radio. My nanoVNA attaches to my DUT via 2 alligator clips which are on little connectors (BNC maybe?) which screw into the VNA. I recognize that I am accepting error, even though I do my calibration at the same alligator clips, but except for R, I am convinced that the error I am accepting is negligible when my interest is 0.5 to 25 MHz, picking up AM signals. (I welcome any insights if you think I am wrong.) |
Re: Inductor Q Measurement
Andrew Kurtz
Yes, R cannot be < 0, but my interpretation is simply that the -2 is error in some small number like, say 1 or 2 ohms. I will admit that many of you experts talk about how you attach your DUT very carefully, solder it, sometimes have to throw it away when done testing, and all this sounds bizarre to a non-EE who is simply playing with crystal radio. My nanoVNA attaches to my DUT via 2 alligator clips which are on little connectors (BNC maybe?) which screw into the VNA. I recognize that I am accepting error, even though I do my calibration at the same alligator clips, but except for R, I am convinced that the error I am accepting is negligible when my interest is 0.5 to 25 MHz, picking up AM signals. (I welcome any insights if you think I am wrong.)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Andy On Oct 12, 2021, at 10:05 AM, Jim Lux <jim@...> wrote: |
Re: Inductor Q Measurement
Bill, I'm not sure this does what you want, but try it: Set frequency, coil diameter, and wire gauge. Click on Turns for turns/inch and set the value you have in mind. Then vary coil length with the mouse wheel until you get the desired inductance. It's really fast if it's what you need. The only thing I truly automated was Q optimization.
Brian |
Re: NanoVNA H4
It's not the backlight current as it runs off the 5v line, not the 5V-RF or the 3V sources.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Since the unit is new, it's most likely infant-mortality on the part or a counterfeit part was used that was mislabelled as a higher current device when in fact it wasn't. Lots of that in China, unfortunately. Yes - claim a replacement. If they tell you to keep the old one, you can source 3V LDO devices from old scrap home wifi routers and access points as they all use 3v parts. On Tuesday, October 12, 2021, 12:43:55 p.m. EDT, cube1us <cube1@...> wrote:
As a guess, a thermal issue? 73 JRJ? WIYN On 10/12/2021 7:33 AM, Jens M?ller wrote: Hello Larry, |
Re: Inductor Q Measurement
Hi Brian,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks for reminding all about COIL. It takes a little getting familiar with it since you use an interesting GUI interface, but I got the handle on it.? Is there a way to input the coil inductance, fix the physical parameters and come up with the required turns. It didn't seem like it. It's still very useful - thanks again. Regards...Bill - N6GHz On 10/12/2021 05:47:39, Brian Beezley <k6sti@...> wrote:
Thanks for the feedback, Dave. I didn't mention that COIL is a Windows console program. I gather that wineconsole is necessary. I forgot to mention that a user should first read README.TXT. COIL evolved from a DOS program I wrote 25 years ago. It does not have the usual Windows user interface. Many features are inscrutable, but they are explained in the documentation. Brian |
Re: NanoVNA H4
As a guess, a thermal issue?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
73 JRJ WIYN On 10/12/2021 7:33 AM, Jens M?ller wrote:
Hello Larry, |
Re: NanoVNA H4
Jens M?ller
Thanks,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
It looks like the LD01 is defective as only 1V is coming out instead of 3V. I didn't expect to have a defective unit as I posses it only 2 weeks. I'll claim for a replacement rather than chaning the regulator. Anyhow thanks for help. Am 12.10.2021 um 16:10 schrieb Larry Rothman: Well, it appears you have some type of hardware failure.. |
Re: Inductor Q Measurement
Gary Rondeau
Quick and dirty method... Just measure the self resonance of your coil. If you calibrate the nVNA to your fixture and then just run the S11 sweep up high enough on the coil, you will undoubtedly see a resonant peak. At low frequency you can determine the inductor, L. (the nVNA saver software will do this for you) The frequency of the peak tells you the self resonant parasitic capacitance, C. From the magnitude of the the resistance, R, measured at self resonance, and the calculated self resonant impedance, Z=sqrt(L/C), then Q will be R/Z.
This procedure also shows you explicitly when parasitic capacitance becomes important -- which it often does! |
Re: Inductor Q Measurement
Brian, thanks for the background information on COIL I have gotten many
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
features to work under Wine in Linux and it is very useful. I may have spoken a bit too soon in implying everything would work with Wine. However, I need to brush up on Wine and to try COILS on a Windows machine to see what I may be missing. Thanks again! Dave On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 8:47 AM Brian Beezley <k6sti@...> wrote:
Thanks for the feedback, Dave. I didn't mention that COIL is a Windows |
Re: NanoVNA H4
Well, it appears you have some type of hardware failure..
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
if you reconnect the battery, measure the voltage at the power SW with the USB cable disconnected - it should be 5V. Turn ON and? measure the voltage at the 3V LDO1 regulator in and out (see schematic image). In=5V, VDD out =3V (at edge of PCB beside the Boot-0 pin) Measure 5V out of IC 3 Refer to the photo of the H4 board here: /g/nanovna-users/photo/0/34671.24755.1?p=Created%2C%2C%2C20%2C2%2C20%2C0 It's really just standard troubleshooting at this point, unfortunately. BTW - when you turn the unit ON and it is disconnected from USB, is the LED flashing? On Tuesday, October 12, 2021, 09:48:42 a.m. EDT, Jens M?ller <df9hj@...> wrote:
Disconnected battery still doesn't power up at usb only. Am 12.10.2021 um 15:11 schrieb Larry Rothman: ? So, your nano is now no longer working at all even after letting it stay off for a while?If you open the housing and remove the battery, see if you can power the unit only from USB. If yes, then the charging/inverter IC may have failed. |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss