¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: MY CMC MEASUREMENT #measurement

 

On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 09:21 AM, Peter Ivanooff wrote:


.I started tests with several noname ferrite toroids
Chances are that I'm not interpreting your setup correctly, but based on the picture with choke and nanoVNS, you were only testing the DM mode - impact of your choke on power sent from one side to the other side of your choke.
You need to test the CM (common mode) suppression, and that get's done differently - for example, you short both sides

Would be great if you can clarify your test setup and then mention what attached screens shots are for :)


Re: MY CMC MEASUREMENT #measurement

 

On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 09:21 AM, Peter Ivanooff wrote:


the toroides turned out to be MgZn
I suppose you meant MnZn (Manganese-Zinc)


Re: MY CMC MEASUREMENT #measurement

 

On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 09:21 AM, Peter Ivanooff wrote:


Full House with Data ...I've made a try to burn the choke with my PA and 250W
noninductive dummy load (with some pauses).KEY Down on CW and 175 volts p/p on
Tektronix osci.
That is 612 watts on the peaks....The core and windings were cold as before
the test ...I know the real test is up on the feedpoint of the antenna....
You did not get power correctly :) P=Vrms^2/R, so if you have Vpp=175V (peak to peak), Vmax=Vpp/2=87.5V and Vrms=Vmax/sqrt2=87.5/1.41=62V and P=77W on 50ohm load


Re: CMC MEASUREMENTS - PDF'ed & SIZE REDUCED

 

Hi,
Thanks for the clarification, do you think this is due to the PVC itself absorbing water, or just moisture in the air?

73, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)

ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI
ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources

On 2/8/21 10:34 AM, Jim Lux wrote:
The leakage resistance changes noticeably with humidity.


Re: CMC MEASUREMENTS - PDF'ed & SIZE REDUCED

 

On 2/8/21 9:07 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
I am referring to the line:

"It's also fairly hygroscopic..."
Is this referring to PVC?
Yes - I think probably more due to porosity and filler than the actual PVC itself.

If you go look up a plastics table, PVC is in the "generally non-hygroscopic" bucket (like PE, PP and PS)

However, in practice, particularly with pipe in HV gear, I've not found that the case. The leakage resistance changes noticeably with humidity.

The hygroscopic plastics (Nylon, polycarbonate, PET, Acrylic) are just a lot worse <grin>




73, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)

ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI
ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources

On 2/8/21 8:55 AM, Jim Lux wrote:
On 2/8/21 8:45 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
Are you referring to PVC here?
yes, it's kind of like nylon in that way, and unlike, say polyethylene, PTFE, or polypropylene, which "as delivered" tend to be fairly hydrophobic.

?From what I understand, depending on what kind of PVC you get, it might have contaminants in it (from remelting other batches), fillers, and the porosity can vary.

For example you can take 4 or 5 pieces of PVC pipe and put them in a microwave oven and they will not necessarily heat the same (a rough and ready RF absorption test, granted at a higher frequency than HF, but easier to do)

I've had the interesting experience of putting a piece of white PVC pipe on a lathe to cut grooves in it, and found that only the surface was white, and that there were black streaks in other parts.

I guess the story here is that if you go look up plastic dielectric properties, that's typically for a lab sample, not necessarily what's extruded on your hookup wire or plastic tubing.

That might also explain the varying results people get with stuff not designed for RF (or at least with properties controlled), like zipcord. For hookup wire insulation, all they care about is that it passes the breakdown voltage test, not that it has low dissipation.









Re: PROCEDURES for MEASURING DM LOSS and CM ATTENUATION of CMCs

 

On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 04:55 PM, AG6CX wrote:


Do you have in your stash a piece on conversion of dB attenuation to Zs= Rs +
Xs ?
Ed, if you have S21 in terms of magnitude and phase, calculation of the series impedance of the device being measured is straight forward:

Zdut = Zo*((2/S21) - 2), where Zo = 50 ohms for a 50-ohm VNC.

- Jeff, k6jca


Re: CMC MEASUREMENTS - PDF'ed & SIZE REDUCED

 

I am referring to the line:

"It's also fairly hygroscopic..."

Is this referring to PVC?

73, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)

ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI
ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources

On 2/8/21 8:55 AM, Jim Lux wrote:
On 2/8/21 8:45 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
Are you referring to PVC here?
yes, it's kind of like nylon in that way, and unlike, say polyethylene, PTFE, or polypropylene, which "as delivered" tend to be fairly hydrophobic.
From what I understand, depending on what kind of PVC you get, it might have contaminants in it (from remelting other batches), fillers, and the porosity can vary.
For example you can take 4 or 5 pieces of PVC pipe and put them in a microwave oven and they will not necessarily heat the same (a rough and ready RF absorption test, granted at a higher frequency than HF, but easier to do)
I've had the interesting experience of putting a piece of white PVC pipe on a lathe to cut grooves in it, and found that only the surface was white, and that there were black streaks in other parts.
I guess the story here is that if you go look up plastic dielectric properties, that's typically for a lab sample, not necessarily what's extruded on your hookup wire or plastic tubing.
That might also explain the varying results people get with stuff not designed for RF (or at least with properties controlled), like zipcord. For hookup wire insulation, all they care about is that it passes the breakdown voltage test, not that it has low dissipation.


Re: CMC MEASUREMENTS - PDF'ed & SIZE REDUCED

 

Jim, it was quite interesting to watch the PVC-wound CMC 'do its thing'. I
certainly didn't need 2.4 GHz, just 40-meters at 400-watts. It was really
rather fascinating to watch the SWR climb with applied RF energy. I
chickened out and terminated that at 3:1 SWR to save my amp..... The
microwave oven test is quite effective in revealing bad RF materials.

Thanks for the post!

Dave - W?LEV

On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 4:55 PM Jim Lux <jim@...> wrote:

On 2/8/21 8:45 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
Are you referring to PVC here?
yes, it's kind of like nylon in that way, and unlike, say polyethylene,
PTFE, or polypropylene, which "as delivered" tend to be fairly hydrophobic.

From what I understand, depending on what kind of PVC you get, it might
have contaminants in it (from remelting other batches), fillers, and the
porosity can vary.

For example you can take 4 or 5 pieces of PVC pipe and put them in a
microwave oven and they will not necessarily heat the same (a rough and
ready RF absorption test, granted at a higher frequency than HF, but
easier to do)

I've had the interesting experience of putting a piece of white PVC pipe
on a lathe to cut grooves in it, and found that only the surface was
white, and that there were black streaks in other parts.

I guess the story here is that if you go look up plastic dielectric
properties, that's typically for a lab sample, not necessarily what's
extruded on your hookup wire or plastic tubing.

That might also explain the varying results people get with stuff not
designed for RF (or at least with properties controlled), like zipcord.
For hookup wire insulation, all they care about is that it passes the
breakdown voltage test, not that it has low dissipation.







--
*Dave - W?LEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*


Re: CMC MEASUREMENTS - PDF'ed & SIZE REDUCED

 

On 2/8/21 8:45 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
Are you referring to PVC here?
yes, it's kind of like nylon in that way, and unlike, say polyethylene, PTFE, or polypropylene, which "as delivered" tend to be fairly hydrophobic.

From what I understand, depending on what kind of PVC you get, it might have contaminants in it (from remelting other batches), fillers, and the porosity can vary.

For example you can take 4 or 5 pieces of PVC pipe and put them in a microwave oven and they will not necessarily heat the same (a rough and ready RF absorption test, granted at a higher frequency than HF, but easier to do)

I've had the interesting experience of putting a piece of white PVC pipe on a lathe to cut grooves in it, and found that only the surface was white, and that there were black streaks in other parts.

I guess the story here is that if you go look up plastic dielectric properties, that's typically for a lab sample, not necessarily what's extruded on your hookup wire or plastic tubing.

That might also explain the varying results people get with stuff not designed for RF (or at least with properties controlled), like zipcord.? For hookup wire insulation, all they care about is that it passes the breakdown voltage test, not that it has low dissipation.


Re: CMC MEASUREMENTS - PDF'ed & SIZE REDUCED

 

Are you referring to PVC here?

73, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)

ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI
ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources

On 2/8/21 8:39 AM, Jim Lux wrote:
It's also fairly hygroscopic, but I doubt moisture content drives the dissipation.


Re: CMC MEASUREMENTS - PDF'ed & SIZE REDUCED

 

On 2/8/21 8:04 AM, Gary Rondeau wrote:
Very nice compilation!

So what is up with the PVC insulation? I know that PVC is particularly bad in terms of dissipation factor - but is it insulation self heating or just getting melted by a hot ferrite core?
I ask because I made a few measurements with a thermal probe on the side of a single core FT-240-31 with 8T RG-11 that is a choke I have for my 10m antenna. What I discovered is the the temperature rises very quickly on the core surface when you turn on the power and then more slowly diffuses into the center of the core. Similarly, when the power is shut off, the temperature falls relatively quickly on the surface, as the surface heat conducts inward or is lost to convection with the air. I can imagine that extreme non-uniform heating could lead to fracturing of the brittle core material.
PVC has a low melting/softening point, so it's sensitive to these kinds of effects.

It's also fairly hygroscopic, but I doubt moisture content drives the dissipation.

Skin depth is a thing, too. And since it's proportional to 1/sqrt(mu), higher mu makes the skin depth smaller. Fortunately it's proportional to sqrt(resistivity), and the resisitivity of ferrites is very high





Any comments?
Gary AF7NX





Re: upgrading firmware?

 

Great!
...Larry

On Monday, February 8, 2021, 11:23:17 a.m. EST, Jamie WW3S <ww3s@...> wrote:

Sucess !!!

Thanks Larry, I downloaded 1.0.45, and followed the same steps I did
before and it loaded fine with the original DFU app....somehow the
1.0.39 must have been kludged somewhere....

------ Original Message ------
From: "Larry Rothman" <nlroth@...>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: 2/8/2021 8:17:23 AM
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] upgrading firmware?

? Jamie,
I think you've overwritten the existing copy with a dump from your device.
Delete the firmware you're trying to update with and get a new copy from the files section of the forum - use 1.0.45
...Larry

? ? On Monday, February 8, 2021, 7:53:04 a.m. EST, Jamie WW3S <ww3s@...> wrote:

? Yea, tried that, no joy....followed the W2AEW YouTube video ( mine is exactly like his), works great, until I restart, still says 0.5.0.....I¡¯m going to try Larry¡¯s modified GUI next....thanks...l
? On Feb 8, 2021, at 3:01 AM, Martin J.K. <martin.svaco@...> wrote:

? ?See Absolute_Beginner_Guide_NanoVNA_v1_6.pdf, page 49.
? The PDF file is in the file section .

? 73
? Martin 9A2JK














Re: upgrading firmware?

 

Sucess !!!

Thanks Larry, I downloaded 1.0.45, and followed the same steps I did before and it loaded fine with the original DFU app....somehow the 1.0.39 must have been kludged somewhere....

------ Original Message ------
From: "Larry Rothman" <nlroth@...>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: 2/8/2021 8:17:23 AM
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] upgrading firmware?

Jamie,
I think you've overwritten the existing copy with a dump from your device.
Delete the firmware you're trying to update with and get a new copy from the files section of the forum - use 1.0.45
...Larry

On Monday, February 8, 2021, 7:53:04 a.m. EST, Jamie WW3S <ww3s@...> wrote:

Yea, tried that, no joy....followed the W2AEW YouTube video ( mine is exactly like his), works great, until I restart, still says 0.5.0.....I¡¯m going to try Larry¡¯s modified GUI next....thanks...l
On Feb 8, 2021, at 3:01 AM, Martin J.K. <martin.svaco@...> wrote:

?See Absolute_Beginner_Guide_NanoVNA_v1_6.pdf, page 49.
The PDF file is in the file section .

73
Martin 9A2JK














Re: CMC MEASUREMENTS - PDF'ed & SIZE REDUCED

Gary Rondeau
 

Very nice compilation!

So what is up with the PVC insulation? I know that PVC is particularly bad in terms of dissipation factor - but is it insulation self heating or just getting melted by a hot ferrite core?
I ask because I made a few measurements with a thermal probe on the side of a single core FT-240-31 with 8T RG-11 that is a choke I have for my 10m antenna. What I discovered is the the temperature rises very quickly on the core surface when you turn on the power and then more slowly diffuses into the center of the core. Similarly, when the power is shut off, the temperature falls relatively quickly on the surface, as the surface heat conducts inward or is lost to convection with the air. I can imagine that extreme non-uniform heating could lead to fracturing of the brittle core material.

Any comments?
Gary AF7NX


Re: upgrading firmware?

 

Many thanks for the link to that document... I just ordered a NanoVNA, and am getting ready for it.

73, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)

ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI
ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources

On 2/8/21 12:01 AM, Martin J.K. wrote:
See Absolute_Beginner_Guide_NanoVNA_v1_6.pdf, page 49.
The PDF file is in the file section .
73
Martin 9A2JK


Re: PROCEDURES for MEASURING DM LOSS and CM ATTENUATION of CMCs

 

On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 05:04 PM, David Eckhardt wrote:


However, the inductance of the CMC is responsible for the CM
attenuation.
For a different perspective, G3TXQ's Common-mode Choke webpage discusses why reactive (e.g. inductive) common-mode chokes are undesirable, and he gives an example of an inductive common-mode choke actually worsening a feedline's common-mode current.



- Jeff, k6jca


Re: upgrading firmware?

 

Jamie,
I think you've overwritten the existing copy with a dump from your device.
Delete the firmware you're trying to update with and get a new copy from the files section of the forum - use 1.0.45
...Larry

On Monday, February 8, 2021, 7:53:04 a.m. EST, Jamie WW3S <ww3s@...> wrote:

Yea, tried that, no joy....followed the W2AEW YouTube video ( mine is exactly like his), works great, until I restart, still says 0.5.0.....I¡¯m going to try Larry¡¯s modified GUI next....thanks...l
On Feb 8, 2021, at 3:01 AM, Martin J.K. <martin.svaco@...> wrote:

?See Absolute_Beginner_Guide_NanoVNA_v1_6.pdf, page 49.
The PDF file is in the file section .

73
Martin 9A2JK





Re: upgrading firmware?

 

Yea, tried that, no joy....followed the W2AEW YouTube video ( mine is exactly like his), works great, until I restart, still says 0.5.0.....I¡¯m going to try Larry¡¯s modified GUI next....thanks...l

On Feb 8, 2021, at 3:01 AM, Martin J.K. <martin.svaco@...> wrote:

?See Absolute_Beginner_Guide_NanoVNA_v1_6.pdf, page 49.
The PDF file is in the file section .

73
Martin 9A2JK





Re: upgrading firmware?

 

Jamie,
It's in the Misc folder: /g/nanovna-users/files/Miscellaneous

Rename the original defuse.exe to defuse.orig.exe and then drop in the modified one - there are two: One with original font and one with bold font - use one and rename it to defuse.exe

...Larry

On Sunday, February 7, 2021, 6:21:30 p.m. EST, Jamie WW3S <ww3s@...> wrote:

Larry, what folder should I look in? I see a couple files from you but am missing a modified EXE file....
On Feb 7, 2021, at 4:17 PM, Larry Rothman <nlroth@...> wrote:

?You saved the device few to the same name as the new fw... you've overwritten it.
Read the wiki about defuse and grab my modified exe.in the files section with better naming of commands.
Also, grab a new copy of fw out.of the archives and delete you prev one

Sent from Rogers Yahoo Mail on Android

? On Sun., 7 Feb. 2021 at 3:43 p.m., Jamie WW3S<ww3s@...> wrote:? I did do the verify, it says its loaded.....but whn I go to config, to
the splash screen, it says 0.5.0.....is that display a hardware or
firmware version?


------ Original Message ------
From: "DiSlord" <dislordlive@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: 2/7/2021 3:36:39 PM
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] upgrading firmware?

I think you use Upload Action button (this mean read firmware from device and store to selected file), check file size - should be 128k

Need use Upgrade oe Verify Action buttons, select choose... and select firmware (unpack again it from archive, i think you rewrite it by downloading from device). After use Upgrade button.















Re: upgrading firmware?

 

See Absolute_Beginner_Guide_NanoVNA_v1_6.pdf, page 49.
The PDF file is in the file section .

73
Martin 9A2JK