¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Cases

 

I found the same case that Terry VK5TM did on eBay, item 174039026524. Looks like an interesting case for the -H. The listing also led to this:



73

-Jim
NU0C



On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 04:46:40 -0800
"Les Brown" <lesdbrown@...> wrote:

OK, I see there is a problem that can be solved quite easily.

I have 3D printers and Laser cutters, so if you can give me till the New Year, I will work with you all to design and prototype a case between us.

Next you are going to ask the cost, I will just ask for the cost of materials and posting.

So if anyone is interested, let me know.

I can probably find the basic 3D design but I do not have an uncased unit, so I would need local people to me in Manchester, UK. to try and test.

If you think about it, it does not need to be the standard case out already, once we have the fitting for the VNA correct, then we can mod. as we wish, for us.

The offer is there, I just need time to set my 3D units up at home, but after the holidays please.

73 - Les - M0LPB



Re: SWR readings off scale

 

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 04:42 PM, <bing-wang@...> wrote:

Anybody know how to set negative value for reference position. For example, -20dB. seems the num. keypad does not have "-" symbol.
==============================================================================================
What measurement are you referring to? SWR cannot be a negative value unless there is something wrong in your set-up.

- Herb


Re: First PCB pictures of the V2

 

Thanks for the update.

Could you use a more robust switch like that on the NanoVNA-F?

Looking forward to getting a unit.

Mike N2MS


Re: SWR readings off scale

 

Hi Bing Wang
Reference position is the grid lines from lower Line = 0 to top line 0=8
Kind regards
Kurt

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]> P? vegne af bing-wang@...
Sendt: 18. december 2019 01:43
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: [nanovna-users] SWR readings off scale

Anybody know how to set negative value for reference position. For example, -20dB. seems the num. keypad does not have "-" symbol.


Re: NanoVNA Saver software version 0.2.1 TDR operation

 

On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 09:06 PM, Clyde Spencer wrote:

In the TDR display there are two traces, One Red and one blue. I understand the red but not the blue. Would some please give me an explanation of the blue trace?
===========================================================================

You can think of the red trace as equivalent to selecting <DISPLAY-TRANSFORM-LOW PASS IMPULSE> on the NanoVNA. Where the peaks are indicative of time and distance.

The blue trace can be thought of as being equivalent to selecting <DISPLAY-TRANSFORM-LOW PASS STEP> on the NanoVNA. Where levels are indicative of impedance variations (see attachment).

- Herb


Re: SWR readings off scale

 

Anybody know how to set negative value for reference position. For example, -20dB. seems the num. keypad does not have "-" symbol.


Re: NanoVNA Saver software version 0.2.1 TDR operation

 

Reminds me of the rising edge of a square wave pulse, That's how i measure TDR using fast edge pulse from Schmitt trigger inverter and oscilloscope.

Alan W2AEW has good youtube video on it.

Worth a look, hope this helps.

Ray.


Re: NanoVNA Saver software version 0.2.1 TDR operation

 

Clyde,

I had the same question. Maybe the author of the software or someone else will reply.

Roger


Re: First PCB pictures of the V2

 

Any chance you can add the option of rotating the display graphics 180 deg?

I can see the cables coming out of the bottom being a nuisance in some instances.

And please get rid of that ridiculous "jog" button, it is the most annoying thing since I don't know when.

--
Terry VK5TM
( )


Re: Some test results using a NanoVNA

Bob Albert
 

You are correct Alan, I was too hasty in my enthusiasm.? And when the result is pure resistance there is resonance.? At frequencies above self resonance an inductor acts as a capacitor.
Which underscores my comment that this is not only a measuring instrument but also a learning tool.
Watching values change with frequency and termination is fascinating.? Try connecting a coil and capacitor to the nano and observe how frequency changes with capacitance.? Or as you squeeze the coil turns.? See how Q changes.
I used to be intimidated by the Smith chart but now its mysteries have unraveled themselves.? Thanks to Joseph Smith for devising it in the late 1930s.
Perceptive readers may have noted my omission of the S1 port, which can be used to see filter response.? If that never gets used, the remaining functions still offer better bang for the buck than any other piece of gear I have found, short of a freebie.? Did I mention that the nano is also a CW and sweep generator?? Output fixed in the range of -10 dBm, 0.1 mW.? Frequency accuracy rated at 2 ppm or so; mine more accurate than that.
Bob K6DDX

On Tuesday, December 17, 2019, 01:58:30 PM PST, alan victor <avictor73@...> wrote:

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:46 AM, Bob Albert wrote:

Very good Bob... in your post above...
Measuring the bigger ones gives an inductance reading that is too small, since
the distributed capacitance.....
However, the result of distributive C for an inductor which is one appropriate model, shunt C, leads to an inductor value which INCREASES as we approach SRF. The arithmetic for this is;

Xt= jwL/(1-w^2LC)

where w is radian frequency and Xt is the total reactance for this case. As w^2? approaches 1/(LC), Xt goes through the roof. A larger apparent L.

Alan


Re: First PCB pictures of the V2

 

On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 20:45, hwalker <herbwalker2476@...> wrote:

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 10:40 AM, Dale Parfitt wrote:

Thank you Herb, So much traffic, I missed the specs.
====================================================

Dale,
I'd like to add a correction regarding the display size:

Gabriel indicated in her previous message that a working proto-type is
already available using a 3.2" ILI9341 display. A 4" ST7796S display is
being evaluated as an option by menu-driven switchover. Her team will
make a decision about whether to offer two versions for sale.
I would also like to add my voice to the many that would want to purchase
this with a larger screen.

How does the larger screen you may or may note use compare with the 4.3" on
the NanoVNA-F? The 4.3" of the -F is more attractive than 4" for obvious
reasons, but how about pixel count, and other technical features about the
screen.

I don't know if I'm unusual, but for me, the screen is more important than
the pure performance, as great performance is no use if you can't see the
blinking thing. Of course, if you are going to use it in a lab, with a PC
interface, the screen is pretty irrelevant. But there seem to be enough
people wanting a decent screen. The 6.5" on my iPhone XS max would be nice.
Ouch, that phone was ?1250, so it's not a fair comparison! But seriously,
size matters. ?????


Re: Some test results using a NanoVNA

 

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:46 AM, Bob Albert wrote:

Very good Bob... in your post above...
Measuring the bigger ones gives an inductance reading that is too small, since
the distributed capacitance.....
However, the result of distributive C for an inductor which is one appropriate model, shunt C, leads to an inductor value which INCREASES as we approach SRF. The arithmetic for this is;

Xt= jwL/(1-w^2LC)

where w is radian frequency and Xt is the total reactance for this case. As w^2 approaches 1/(LC), Xt goes through the roof. A larger apparent L.

Alan


Re: Some test results using a NanoVNA

Martin
 

Thanks Bob. I'll give it a go.
Martin K0BXB

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019, 12:12 PM Bob Albert via Groups.Io <bob91343=
[email protected]> wrote:

How to measure inductance? Very simple. First, you make up an adapter
so you can connect the unknown to the nano S0.
Calibrate the nano. The next step depends on the inductance. Select a
frequency appropriate to the part, 50 kHz for low frequency parts and up
into the high frequencies for rf chokes and into the VHF and UHF for
straight pieces of wire, etc. Since you can't go below 50 kHz that limits
how large an inductor you can measure.
Select Smith chart for display. Read inductance off the screen. You can
read the resistance and compute the Q. If the inductance is very small,
short the leads and take a reading, which you subtract from the final
reading.
With the leads shorted, the Smith chart should have a dot at the left
edge. With the leads open, at the right edge. If the dot is not at the
edge it indicates a low Q.
As a reality check, open up the span to a reasonable frequency range and
move the marker over the range. The inductance should remain relatively
constant. If you open up the frequency range the chart shows a circle. At
some point the circle intersects the horizontal axis at the self resonant
frequency. With high Q you need to keep the span narrow, as the resonanct
frequency can elude measurement since it's very sharp.
The same procedure works for other components. For cables, it will show
electrical length. The way you measure that is to adjust the frequency so
that the Smith circle, for an open end coax, starts at the right and sweeps
down and around up to the left. Where it reaches the center line on the
left is the frequency where the coax is one quarter wave long. The
deviation from the outside circle indicates loss.
Then you put a small pot as a termination for the open coax and adjust it
until the Smith trace shrinks to a dot in the center. At that point,
measure the pot with an Ohmmeter and it will be the characteristic
impedance.
This inexpensive device is not a toy. It's a sophisticated, well designed
piece of first rate test equipment. No ham with tools should be without
one.
Each time I use mine I learn new ways to use it. You can measure diode
capacitance and, with care, can plot a curve of capacitance vs bias to
characterize it as a voltage variable capacitor to use in a PLL or tuning
network. Just don't apply dc to the vna port. Or any voltage. It has its
own generator, very accurate. You can measure transistor and tube
capacitances as well. Or connectors.
If you connect nothing to the nano it will show a residual reading,
sometimes into the femtofarads (one femtofarad is a thousandth of a
picofarad). I never measured a femtofarad before.
I measure crystals this way. This is tricky, as crystals have very high Q
and you need to keep the span very tiny. You need to know the frequency,
which is generally marked on the crystal. Set the nano as that number for
center and a small span, say a few kHz. The crystal frequency will show at
the left edge but not on a circle due to the lack of frequency resolution.
Keep narrowing the span until you can read frequency as close as you like,
although the resolution isn't all that small.
When measuring capacitors the ESR is indicated on the screen. To measure
ESL you measure the self resonant frequency (curve intersecting horizontal
line) and compute it from the classic formula. Or go to a somewhat higher
frequency and read the screen. Remember that the reading is based on a
simulation of the part as a resistance in series with a reactance.
You measure the distributed capacitance and ESL of a resistor the same
way. With care you can get readings that are very accurate. The standard
used for measuring all of this is the 50 Ohm load you use during
calibration so that needs to be very good for precise readings. My
resistor readings are within about 1% of what my GR bridge and HP 3456A
show.
I know the question was how to measure inductance but I got carried away.
Questions?
Bob K6DDX
On Tuesday, December 17, 2019, 04:59:21 AM PST, Oristo <
ormpoa@...> wrote:

> What's needed to connect my NanoVNA- to my Android phone to use the
NanoVNA- Webb app? Just a usbc to usbc cable?
/g/nanovna-users/message/4970






Re: First PCB pictures of the V2

 

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 10:40 AM, Dale Parfitt wrote:

Thank you Herb, So much traffic, I missed the specs.
====================================================

Dale,
I'd like to add a correction regarding the display size:

Gabriel indicated in her previous message that a working proto-type is already available using a 3.2" ILI9341 display. A 4" ST7796S display is being evaluated as an option by menu-driven switchover. Her team will make a decision about whether to offer two versions for sale.

- Herb


Re: Quality of shipped cables with NanoVNA-H #measurement #calibration

Ron Bussiere
 

Roger, it's really very easy to make your own cables.
There are SMA connectors that use the 'solder the center' and 'crimp the shield' type of construction. I use this method on all my connectors, SMA,BNC,PL-259 and N.
These ensure the center pin is EXACTLY correct. I use the following cable: You will need a crimp tool for the correct size sleeve.

RG-316
RG-316DS (double shield
RG-174DS " (Belden)

My favorite is the RG-316DS,

ron
N4UE


Re: Some test results using a NanoVNA

Bob Albert
 

One addendum regarding inductance.? I did mention that 50 kHz as a low limit prevents measurement of large inductances.
I just measured a few and got good results up to around 50 mH.? My inductance stock doesn't have specially made parts so the higher inductances have very low self resonat frequencies.? Measuring the bigger ones gives an inductance reading that is too small, since the distributed capacitance begins to shunt the inductance.
So for L up to a few dozen millihenries it's usable but not terribly accurate.? Down to the microhenries and below it's good.? Inductance of a straight wire is easily measured if the test fixture can accommodate it.? Shorting the leads gives a residual reading you can subtract but it's not that simple, as we are dealing with magnetic fields and any change in position messes it up.
The same is true for capacitances below several dozen picofarads.
Bob

On Tuesday, December 17, 2019, 10:12:15 AM PST, Bob Albert via Groups.Io <bob91343@...> wrote:

How to measure inductance?? Very simple.? First, you make up an adapter so you can connect the unknown to the nano S0.
Calibrate the nano.? The next step depends on the inductance.? Select a frequency appropriate to the part, 50 kHz for low frequency parts and up into the high frequencies for rf chokes and into the VHF and UHF for straight pieces of wire, etc.? Since you can't go below 50 kHz that limits how large an inductor you can measure.
Select Smith chart for display.? Read inductance off the screen.? You can read the resistance and compute the Q.? If the inductance is very small, short the leads and take a reading, which you subtract from the final reading.
With the leads shorted, the Smith chart should have a dot at the left edge.? With the leads open, at the right edge.? If the dot is not at the edge it indicates a low Q.
As a reality check, open up the span to a reasonable frequency range and move the marker over the range.? The inductance should remain relatively constant.? If you open up the frequency range the chart shows a circle.? At some point the circle intersects the horizontal axis at the self resonant frequency.? With high Q you need to keep the span narrow, as the resonanct frequency can elude measurement since it's very sharp.
The same procedure works for other components.? For cables, it will show electrical length.? The way you measure that is to adjust the frequency so that the Smith circle, for an open end coax, starts at the right and sweeps down and around up to the left.? Where it reaches the center line on the left is the frequency where the coax is one quarter wave long.? The deviation from the outside circle indicates loss.
Then you put a small pot as a termination for the open coax and adjust it until the Smith trace shrinks to a dot in the center.? At that point, measure the pot with an Ohmmeter and it will be the characteristic impedance.
This inexpensive device is not a toy.? It's a sophisticated, well designed piece of first rate test equipment.? No ham with tools should be without one.
Each time I use mine I learn new ways to use it.? You can measure diode capacitance and, with care, can plot a curve of capacitance vs bias to characterize it as a voltage variable capacitor to use in a PLL or tuning network.? Just don't apply dc to the vna port.? Or any voltage.? It has its own generator, very accurate.? You can measure transistor and tube capacitances as well.? Or connectors.
If you connect nothing to the nano it will show a residual reading, sometimes into the femtofarads (one femtofarad is a thousandth of a picofarad).? I never measured a femtofarad before.
I measure crystals this way.? This is tricky, as crystals have very high Q and you need to keep the span very tiny.? You need to know the frequency, which is generally marked on the crystal.? Set the nano as that number for center and a small span, say a few kHz.? The crystal frequency will show at the left edge but not on a circle due to the lack of frequency resolution.? Keep narrowing the span until you can read frequency as close as you like, although the resolution isn't all that small.
When measuring capacitors the ESR is indicated on the screen.? To measure ESL you measure the self resonant frequency (curve intersecting horizontal line) and compute it from the classic formula.? Or go to a somewhat higher frequency and read the screen.? Remember that the reading is based on a simulation of the part as a resistance in series with a reactance.
You measure the distributed capacitance and ESL of a resistor the same way.? With care you can get readings that are very accurate.? The standard used for measuring all of this is the 50 Ohm load you use during calibration so that needs to be very good for precise readings.? My resistor readings are within about 1% of what my GR bridge and HP 3456A show.
I know the question was how to measure inductance but I got carried away.
Questions?
Bob K6DDX
? ? On Tuesday, December 17, 2019, 04:59:21 AM PST, Oristo <ormpoa@...> wrote:

> What's needed to connect my NanoVNA- to my Android phone to use the
NanoVNA- Webb app? Just a usbc to usbc cable?
/g/nanovna-users/message/4970


Quality of shipped cables with NanoVNA-H #measurement #calibration

 

I have read numerous comments that state that the quality of the cables supplied with the NanoVNA is poor. However Hugen has supplied good calibration terminators in his NanoVNA-H in the gift box package. Has anyone tested the cables in the NanoVNA-H gift box to determine their quality and impedance?

Any recommended cables from suppliers in North America?


Re: errors of "error" models

 

@Gary O'Neil, N3GO - 17 December 2019
/g/nanovna-users/message/8320

- O K ! -


Re: First PCB pictures of the V2

 

Great stuff. Sorry if this has been answered elsewhere but are there plans for Bluetooth?

Thanks,
Brian WB8AM


Re: First PCB pictures of the V2

 

Thank you Herb,
So much traffic, I missed the specs.

Dale W4OP

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of hwalker
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 1:29 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] First PCB pictures of the V2

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 10:10 AM, Dale Parfitt wrote:

How does this differ from the 4.3" NanoVNA-F already available?

====================================================================
Recapping from information info previously provided in this thread and elsewhere:

1. Frequency range expected to be 50kHz to 3GHz.
2. Typical S11 floor is -50dB up to 2GHz and -40dB up to 3GHz
3. -70dB S21 floor below 2GHz and -60dB floor up to 3GHz
4. 4 inch display currently being prototyped

- Herb