¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Return Loss

Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd
 

Yes, I am G8WRB.

The problem is return loss is *often* used as a negative number in
professional academic publications. This one from an IEEE, has a
particularly amusing title;

Low-Return-Loss Printed Log-Periodic Dipole Antenna

Published in
IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
<>
( Volume: 13 )
Page(s)
503 - 506
ISSN Information
INSPEC Accession Number
14195004
DOI
10.1109/LAWP.2014.2310057 <>
Publisher:
IEEE
Sponsored by
IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society <>




and another, not published by the IEEE,


and another



As such, whilst I will continue to use a positive for all passive and most
active components, I really have no appetite for changing the mind of
others.



On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 20:26, Reinier Gerritsen <r.gerritsen@...>
wrote:

return loss is (almost always) a positive number. If one insists on
negative numbers, just call it s11 (or s22). In essence the same
property, but negative.

Op 4-10-2019 om 17:20 schreef Ron Spencer via Groups.Io:
I read a recent post that said that, among hams, its become the
consensus that return loss is a negative number. I respectfully disagree.



Regarding return loss, I understand some think its a negative number,
some a positive. I am in the later camp. Why? When I was a young engineer I
had the great fortune, in the early 1980s, to work for HP. Arguably the
premier test and measurement company of its time. And equally arguably a
leading if not THE leading microwave and rf company.



As new sales people, we were sent to 3, 3 week training sessions to
learn the technology and the products so we might interact with our
engineering customers in a technically sound way.



One thing HP taught, as I've said in a much earlier post, was that
return loss was always a positive number. As someone on this list pointed
out, negative loss is gain. And we KNOW that no return loss measurement, of
a passive device, can exhibit gain.



With respect, there is no gray area here. Return loss, is always a
positive (or, perhaps better said, a non- signed) number.


Even if you are at a hobby level of involvement, why not use the proper,
and correct, terminology? If you're a private pilot, you are expected/
required to use the proper terminology. Same if you are an amateur road
racer. Or "fill in your favorite" hobby.













Sent using





--
Dr. David Kirkby,
Kirkby Microwave Ltd,
drkirkby@...

Telephone 01621-680100./ +44 1621 680100

Registered in England & Wales, company number 08914892.
Registered office:
Stokes Hall Lodge, Burnham Rd, Althorne, Chelmsford, Essex, CM3 6DT, United
Kingdom


Re: Preamp noise figure (NF) measurement?

 

From my limited understanding of the Y factor noise measurement you only need to measure power ratio in a not so critical frequency band. Correct?
If yes. The CH1 input can function as a power meter with a not so we'll defined bandpass filter
Sensitivity is limited by the noise factor of the SA or about 5 and leakage from the SI5351
In console mode you can switch to measuring the CH1 power without the DSP filter so you use the adc anti alias filter as band filter. It's basically working as a direct conversion to DC receiver.


Re: Return Loss

 

return loss is (almost always) a positive number. If one insists on negative numbers, just call it s11 (or s22). In essence the same property, but negative.

Op 4-10-2019 om 17:20 schreef Ron Spencer via Groups.Io:

I read a recent post that said that, among hams, its become the consensus that return loss is a negative number. I respectfully disagree.



Regarding return loss, I understand some think its a negative number, some a positive. I am in the later camp. Why? When I was a young engineer I had the great fortune, in the early 1980s, to work for HP. Arguably the premier test and measurement company of its time. And equally arguably a leading if not THE leading microwave and rf company.



As new sales people, we were sent to 3, 3 week training sessions to learn the technology and the products so we might interact with our engineering customers in a technically sound way.



One thing HP taught, as I've said in a much earlier post, was that return loss was always a positive number. As someone on this list pointed out, negative loss is gain. And we KNOW that no return loss measurement, of a passive device, can exhibit gain.



With respect, there is no gray area here. Return loss, is always a positive (or, perhaps better said, a non- signed) number.


Even if you are at a hobby level of involvement, why not use the proper, and correct, terminology? If you're a private pilot, you are expected/ required to use the proper terminology. Same if you are an amateur road racer. Or "fill in your favorite" hobby.













Sent using


Re: Supply voltage requirement?

 

I think folks here are reporting 2-4 hours depending on the size and age of battery.I hear units come with 300mAH up to 450mAH batteries.? YMMV

On Friday, October 4, 2019, 3:09:04 p.m. GMT-4, Bob Albert via Groups.Io <bob91343@...> wrote:

How much run time should I expect from the standard battery?
? ? On Friday, October 4, 2019, 11:46:33 AM PDT, Larry Rothman <nlroth@...> wrote:

? Mike - Don't use anything else!

The NanoVNA was designed to use only a 5V supply, via the USB port.
The internal charge IC is both a 3.7V LiIon charger and 5V inverter combo - there are lots of comments about that chip on the forum.
The 5V output from that inverter MUST be well regulated as it supplies the mixer (612) chips.
If you want? longer run time - get a bigger Lithium battery. Do NOT use anything else or you'll damage stuff.
I used one from a cellphone that was 1100mAH - it WILL charge - but will take longer.


? ? On Friday, October 4, 2019, 2:30:19 p.m. GMT-4, mike miniver <wa7ark@...> wrote:

Is there an on-board voltage regulator that converts 5.0V from the USB to whatever is used internally?

If so, what external voltage range could be used in lieu of 5.0V from USB (but through the USB connector) to power the nanoVna?

I'm thinking of 4 rechargeable NiMH cells which would be about 5.2V fully charged, and about 4.4V when they need to be recharged?

WA7ARK


Re: info update

 

Does DfuSe_Demo_V3.0.6_Setup.exe have 30-day work limitations? Yes or no?
No, "Demo" may be an historic artifact from the original author.
STM makes the software freely available to encourage use of its STM32 technology.

DMR-CLEAR_MEMORY_DFU.dfu is the only file I need to clear the memory?
Yes, but you need that only if some other firmware does not work after installation.

Shouldn't these other files be used ?:
Most folks do not install firmware for no reason.

DMR-color-tweak-sept.29.2019_DFU.dfu
Do you need to change trace colors?

DMR_FILL Flash with FF DFU.dfu
May be the same as DMR-CLEAR_MEMORY_DFU.dfu
It is for the same purpose, so not both.

DMR_M_10KHz_sept-13-19.dfu
Such as these were for enhancements, in this case 10KHz instead of 50KHz minimum.
I >>guess<< many enhancements are in Gen Hu Oct 2 firmware

DMR_nano-white-trace-test.dfu
Do you want white traces?


Re: Preamp noise figure (NF) measurement?

 

HOWEVER:
The frequency steps on the NanoVNA are quite large depending on the settings.
Now, with that said, maybe Rune can create an SA NanoVNA-Saver offshoot application that would perform multi-segmented scans with very small frequency steps?
Erik had replied to my suggestions in an earlier post regarding using this device as an SA.Any comments on Alan's idea?
Regards,Larry

On Friday, October 4, 2019, 3:00:11 p.m. GMT-4, alan victor <avictor73@...> wrote:

Hi Bruce.

I see no one replied so I will make some noise! Pun intended. What FUN.

Apparently some folks have considered placing the VNA into a spectrum analyzer (SA) mode. Hence, with some care you should be able to read noise power. If you precede the VNA with sufficient gain and a very low noise preamp, say below 1 dB, then the converted VNA as a SA could be used to measure the cold and hot state of a noise source. You can build a pretty decent noise source or find a used hp with an ENR of 15 dB. Then you can use the Y factor to find the NF of the DUT. This is a fun project.

GL, Regards, Alan


Re: Supply voltage requirement?

Bob Albert
 

How much run time should I expect from the standard battery?

On Friday, October 4, 2019, 11:46:33 AM PDT, Larry Rothman <nlroth@...> wrote:

Mike - Don't use anything else!

The NanoVNA was designed to use only a 5V supply, via the USB port.
The internal charge IC is both a 3.7V LiIon charger and 5V inverter combo - there are lots of comments about that chip on the forum.
The 5V output from that inverter MUST be well regulated as it supplies the mixer (612) chips.
If you want? longer run time - get a bigger Lithium battery. Do NOT use anything else or you'll damage stuff.
I used one from a cellphone that was 1100mAH - it WILL charge - but will take longer.


? ? On Friday, October 4, 2019, 2:30:19 p.m. GMT-4, mike miniver <wa7ark@...> wrote:

Is there an on-board voltage regulator that converts 5.0V from the USB to whatever is used internally?

If so, what external voltage range could be used in lieu of 5.0V from USB (but through the USB connector) to power the nanoVna?

I'm thinking of 4 rechargeable NiMH cells which would be about 5.2V fully charged, and about 4.4V when they need to be recharged?

WA7ARK


Re: Preamp noise figure (NF) measurement?

 

Hi Bruce.

I see no one replied so I will make some noise! Pun intended. What FUN.

Apparently some folks have considered placing the VNA into a spectrum analyzer (SA) mode. Hence, with some care you should be able to read noise power. If you precede the VNA with sufficient gain and a very low noise preamp, say below 1 dB, then the converted VNA as a SA could be used to measure the cold and hot state of a noise source. You can build a pretty decent noise source or find a used hp with an ENR of 15 dB. Then you can use the Y factor to find the NF of the DUT. This is a fun project.

GL, Regards, Alan


Re: info update

 

Thanks!


Re: Accuracy of calculated values - Nano VNA and Saver

 

Rudi,
thank you very much for your kind comments :-)

--
Rune / 5Q5R

On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 18:34, <reuterr@...> wrote:

Hello Run,

I like to use your program and I am very happy with it.
You try to realize feasible expansion requests during the program
development.
And all for free and for the three main operating systems. That's a great
achievement.
Thanks a lot for this.
The criticism of someone sitting on a high horse should not impress you.

73, Rudi DL5FA




Re: Accuracy of calculated values - Nano VNA and Saver

 

Hi David,
your suggestion of interfacing with the HP 8753 is certainly interesting! I
am going to have the code reworked at some point to accept more VNA types,
so an 8753 option isn't completely impossible. As of now, though, I have no
way I would be able to test it, and that's likely to block any progress
towards it for the foreseeable future. I wouldn't want to be releasing
software that I no way to verify was actually running.

There might be someone local who has one, but barring that, I don't think
I'll work on it for now :-)
--
Rune / 5Q5R

On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 15:10, Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd <
drkirkby@...> wrote:

On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 13:55, Rune Broberg <mihtjel@...> wrote:


If there are any miscalculations in my software, I do what I can to
correct
them. I have not recently been made aware of any problems, and at no
point
by Owen. I hope that any of you would immediately contact me, should you
find errors in NanoVNA-Saver! :-)
I have not read the article by Owen, but I would agree on this single point
about return loss. But I never commented to you, as it is a subject of much
debate. If there was a very clear majorty for one convention or the other,
I would stay you should go with it, but there's not a clear majority, so
use whatever you want.

If I was to use your software, which I might well do, but m interest is in
portable use, without external software, I would probably recompile and
change the sign. My HP LCR meter allows one to display this R+jX think in
multiple formats. I could give them to you if you wanted, but again, you
know what space you have.

While I am sending you a message, there's something else I thought of that
could be of use to many people, but you might not want to get involved in,
so I did not bother. Your software could be useful to those of us with the
very popular HP 8753 series VNA. It would be good if you could support
reading from them too. The Python code to open a GPIB code and read from it
is about 5 lines long. Much of the other commands you use to set up a
NonVNA would have an equivalent in 8753.

--
Rune / 5Q5R

--
Dr David Kirkby Ph.D C.Eng MIET
Kirkby Microwave Ltd
Registered office: Stokes Hall Lodge, Burnham Rd, Althorne, CHELMSFORD,
Essex, CM3 6DT, United Kingdom.
Registered in England and Wales as company number 08914892

Tel 01621-680100 / +44 1621-680100




Re: info update

 

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 02:51 PM, @in3elx wrote:


Thanks. It's all very perfect. I already had these files.
But I asked other questions.

I repeat:
Does DfuSe_Demo_V3.0.6_Setup.exe have 30-day work limitations? Yes or no?
NO


DMR-CLEAR_MEMORY_DFU.dfu is the only file I need to clear the memory?
YES

Shouldn't these other files be used ?:
DMR-color-tweak-sept.29.2019_DFU.dfu
NO
DMR_FILL Flash with FF DFU.dfu
Same as DMR-CLEAR_MEMORY_DFU.dfu
DMR_M_10KHz_sept-13-19.dfu
NO
DMR_nano-white-trace-test.dfu
NO

Thank you again.


Re: info update

 

Really good! Congratulations for your job.
I read it well tomorrow morning.
Thanks


Re: Method of equivalent circuit used on HP 4284A LCR meter

 

Hi David,
thanks for the list! That's a lot of ways to display the same couple of
numbers ;-) But I'm sure all very useful. I'll keep it around for
future reference :-)

--
Rune

On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 17:14, Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd <
drkirkby@...> wrote:

There has been some discussion about the best way to represent data
measured as impedance, into an equivalent circuit. The most comprehensive
of these I have seen, which my company owns, is my obsolte HP 4284A
precision LCR meter.




which is *not* a VNA, but measures the impedance of a device using a 4-wire
Kelvin measurement. This means everything shown here could conceivably be
displayed.

Someone *might* want to implement all or a subset of these. *I'm not
suggesting they are all implemented - I am just listing them for possible
discussion. *I suspect my HP 4285A LCR meter (75 kHz to 30 MHz) does the
same, but I have not checked.

*HP 4284A 1 MHz LCR meter. *
Cp-D - a parallel capacitance Cp, with a dissipation fact D
Cp-Q - a parallel capacitance Cp, with a Q of Q
Cp-G - a parallel capacitance Cp, with a conductance G
Cp-B - a parallel capacitance Cp, with a susceptance B
Cp-Rp - a parallel combination of a capacitance Cp, and resistance Rp
Cs-D - a series capacitance Cs, with dissipation factor Q
Cs-Q - a series capacitance Cs, with a Q of Q
Cs-Rs - a series combination of capacitance Cs and resistance Rs
Lp-D - a parallel inductor, with a dissipation factor D
Lp-Q - a parallel inductor, with a Q of Q
Lp-G - a parallel inductor, with a conductance of G measured in siemens
Lp-Rp - a parallel combination of an inductance Lp and resistance Rp.
Ls-Q - a series inductor Ls, with a Q of Q
Ls-Rs - a series inductor Ls with resistance Rs

*R - X - I don't need to explain what that is. *
Z-theta (degrees) - The magnitude and phase of an impedance expressed in
degrees.
Z-theta (rad) - The magnitude and phase of an impedance expressed in
radians.
G-B - G is the conductance measured in siemens (admittance Y = G + j B)
Y-theta (degrees) the magnitude of the admittance Y, and phase angle
expressed in degrees
Y-theta (rad) the magnitude of the admittance Y, and phase angle expressed
in radians

--
Dr David Kirkby Ph.D C.Eng MIET
Kirkby Microwave Ltd
Registered office: Stokes Hall Lodge, Burnham Rd, Althorne, CHELMSFORD,
Essex, CM3 6DT, United Kingdom.
Registered in England and Wales as company number 08914892

Tel 01621-680100 / +44 1621-680100




Re: info update

 

I collected some of this information near the top of Firmware Versions


.. which is at the bottom of Wiki Main Menu page
/g/nanovna-users/wiki


Re: info update

 

Thanks. It's all very perfect. I already had these files.
But I asked other questions.

I repeat:
Does DfuSe_Demo_V3.0.6_Setup.exe have 30-day work limitations? Yes or no?


DMR-CLEAR_MEMORY_DFU.dfu is the only file I need to clear the memory?
Shouldn't these other files be used ?:
DMR-color-tweak-sept.29.2019_DFU.dfu
DMR_FILL Flash with FF DFU.dfu
DMR_M_10KHz_sept-13-19.dfu
DMR_nano-white-trace-test.dfu

Thank you again.


Re: Supply voltage requirement?

 

Mike - Don't use anything else!

The NanoVNA was designed to use only a 5V supply, via the USB port.
The internal charge IC is both a 3.7V LiIon charger and 5V inverter combo - there are lots of comments about that chip on the forum.
The 5V output from that inverter MUST be well regulated as it supplies the mixer (612) chips.
If you want? longer run time - get a bigger Lithium battery. Do NOT use anything else or you'll damage stuff.
I used one from a cellphone that was 1100mAH - it WILL charge - but will take longer.

On Friday, October 4, 2019, 2:30:19 p.m. GMT-4, mike miniver <wa7ark@...> wrote:

Is there an on-board voltage regulator that converts 5.0V from the USB to whatever is used internally?

If so, what external voltage range could be used in lieu of 5.0V from USB (but through the USB connector) to power the nanoVna?

I'm thinking of 4 rechargeable NiMH cells which would be about 5.2V fully charged, and about 4.4V when they need to be recharged?

WA7ARK


Supply voltage requirement?

 

Is there an on-board voltage regulator that converts 5.0V from the USB to whatever is used internally?

If so, what external voltage range could be used in lieu of 5.0V from USB (but through the USB connector) to power the nanoVna?

I'm thinking of 4 rechargeable NiMH cells which would be about 5.2V fully charged, and about 4.4V when they need to be recharged?

WA7ARK


Re: info update

 

Use Chrome Browser with its built-in language translation capability.
Then -? Go to the NanoVNA group webpage at:??? /g/nanovna-users/topics
Look at WIKI and FILES sections at left side of screen.

Italian translation of user manual is available at:?

On Friday, October 4, 2019, 2:04:32 p.m. GMT-4, in3elx@... <in3elx@...> wrote:

On Fri, Oct? 4, 2019 at 06:44 PM, Larry Rothman wrote:


Si prega di utilizzare la sezione WIKI e FILES su questo forum.
( #quoted-73772044 )
Could you be kinder?
I just joined this system (which I don't know).
I don't speak English very well and this is already difficult for me.
If someone can put some links with useful information ... thanks


Re: info update

 

@in3elx wrote:
Is there a document that explains the update procedure for those who have never done this?

The answer is on page 19 of 29 of the document named 'NanoVNA User Guide-English-reformat-Oct-2-19.pdf' that you can find here:

/g/nanovna-users/files/NanoVNA%20User%20Guide-English-reformat-Oct-2-19.pdf

/g/nanovna-users/message/3735


And of course see the wiki:

/g/nanovna-users/wiki/home


@in3elx wrote:
I found the progam DfuSe_Demo_V3.0.6_Setup.exe, but it's a demo. Are there any limitations?

Rob, DfuSe_Demo_V3.0.6_Setup.exe is simply the tool provided by ST in order to program their STM chip used inside the NanoVNA.
You find it here:



Please take a look at this document named 'NanoVNA DFU Firmware Upgrade Guide.pdf' that you can find here:

/g/nanovna-users/message/381

Have a fun!

N.V.