Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Nanovna-Users
- Messages
Search
Re: H4 + nanovna-saver calibration
Why not have a serious read of the information in the WiKi on this site?
There are several excellent guides there. Dave - W?LEV On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 11:55?PM Dragan Milivojevic via groups.io <d.milivojevic@...> wrote: On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 at 22:25, Dean W8ZF via groups.io <dwfred=-- *Dave - W?LEV* -- Dave - W?LEV |
Re: H4 + nanovna-saver calibration
It depends on how different the results are. Remember, the FW interpolates
between measured and stored cal values. Saver can be configured with 1001Saver can do unlimited (in theory) number of points. It will just do the required points in segments. For H4 that would be X times 401 points to get to your desired number of points. Word of warning: Saver is a Python single thread software, after a certain number of points it becomes time consuming to process more that ~5K points on a single CPU core. Just avoid extrapolation: use the same frequency span when measuring as you did when you calibrated ... |
Re: H4 + nanovna-saver calibration
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 at 22:25, Dean W8ZF via groups.io <dwfred=
[email protected]> wrote: Dragan,calibration. Saver takes whatever the device gives it, there is nothing in the serial protocol commands that deal with calibration data. "When you calibrate the Nano (on device calibration) in the range as theI believe that it takes the number of points set on the device. I never use the device standalone so I don't remember which option it is. If the calibration of nanovna-saver gives different results, depending onIt's simple: NanoVNA has a simple serial protocol, you can set the basic parameters, request the scan etc. If your on device calibration is completely off you will get bad results without or with Saver calibration since it's working with bad data from the start. Forgive me, I still don't understand how this works together. I don't seeIt can, that is why I said that you should store the uncalibrated state in slot 0. Number of points, BW etc will be set via the serial commands from the Saver side. Does anyone KNOW, not guess, what the proper procedure to calibrate thisIt really isn't that complicated, it becomes pretty obvious when you examine the NanoVNA serial protocol documentation. |
Re: Smith Charts
I've posted the s-parameter Smith plotter here:
Please read splot.txt to learn the obscure tricks (like how to display a Smith plot!). I will try to free up some screen space for a dedicated Smith button. I found so many bugs today and of so many kinds that I'm sure there must be some left. Please email if you spot something amiss. My email address is at the bottom of the page referenced above. When I post a new version, the image at the top of the page will have an updated version number (it's in the upper left). You may have to Ctrl-refresh your browser to refresh your image cache. Brian |
Re: H4 calibration
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 03:23 PM, Andreas Ott K6OTT wrote:
Yes Reset first and then calibrate If I then want to show a single band, like just 40m or 20m, I would again set those respective If what you are measuring does not have sharp valleys and peaks in SWR then you can just reduce the stimulus range on some NanoVNA's (like the -H and -H4) and the device will interpolate between the calibrated points and give you a fairly good estimate of SWR and Return loss. But your best option if you are only interested in HF is to calibrate for the entire HF band from 2 to 30 MHz and store that in slot 0. Then calibrate and store your other favorite bands in the remaining slots. That way you can turn it on and be set to go. Roger |
Re: H4 calibration
You got it! Yes.
Dave - W?LEV On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 10:24?PM Andreas Ott K6OTT via groups.io <andreas= [email protected]> wrote: Hello,-- *Dave - W?LEV* -- Dave - W?LEV |
Re: H4 calibration
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 8:40?AM Roger Need via groups.io <sailtamarack= [email protected]> wrote: You will only have valid measurements within the frequency range you Am I reading this right as: I should always configure the stimulus range first, and then calibrate. For example, if I want to get an overall (not finely granular) sweep of a multiband antenna from 3...30MHz, I would first select this as stimulus range and then calibrate? If I then want to show a single band, like just 40m or 20m, I would again set those respective ranges and recalibrate? Thanks, andreas K6OTT |
Re: H4 + nanovna-saver calibration
I'm real time on my H4, so hope this maps to yours.
QUOTE (Dean, W8ZF): This just confuses me again. "Remove the calibration and save that to the default slot (0 slot) when using NanoVNA Saver." Remove *which* calibration? And save *what* to slot 0? Are you talking about the H4 device? Do you mean from the calibrate menu, choose "Reset" and then "Save" to memory 0? What values does this put into memory 0? And since nanovna-saver depends on the calibration of the H4 device, what is that calibration now (after reset and store 0)? "When you calibrate the Nano (on device calibration) in the range as the documentation suggests 0-900MHz with 401 points..." Where is there an option on the H4 device to select the number of points used for calibration? I haven't seen that as a menu option. Calibrating on the native NANOVNA, there is no choice for number of points. I believe it will default to the maximum number of points which is 401 (??). Always remember to "RESET" before a new calibration. *** If the calibration of nanovna-saver gives different results, depending on the state of the H4's calibration, I don't know what to believe. It depends on how different the results are. Remember, the FW interpolates between measured and stored cal values. Saver can be configured with 1001 points so the cal. sampling is much finer than a cal. on the native NANOVNA (without SAVER). *** Forgive me, I still don't understand how this works together. I don't see why nanovna-saver can't just read raw results from the H4, and then use those for a calibration (which would make it independent of the H4's calibration). There have been some mentions about different numbers of points, about reporting invalid values, etc. Again, using SAVER, there is the option to use considerably more points for calibratioin: Native is 401 points, SAVER allows up to 1001 points. So extrapolation between measured points using the two calibrations will be coarser with the native VNA cal than with the SAVER cal. If you simply were able to upload the native cal (H4 alone) to SAVER, you would not take advantage of a number of additional measurements and presentations. SAVER is considerably more powerful than the FW within the native NANOVNA. * Does anyone KNOW, not guess, what the proper procedure to calibrate this system using nanovna-saver is? Nanovna-saver is what it is, I'm not bashing it or trying to change it -- I'm just trying to understand the limitations and requirements to get good results out of the software. The ability to store calibrations, write s-parameter files, and plot using different formats is invaluable to me. I *really* want to use it for these features, but not if I can't be sure of the measurement. Once you have "woke up" your NANOVNA by a native calibration, connect and run SAVER. Treat SAVER as a totally independent set of FW/SW from that within the NANOVNA. SAVER has all the options to connect, reset, do a complete cal potentially with more points than the native NANOVNA can support. Again, SAVER offers much more capability the the FW embedded within the native NANOVNA. *** General Comment: Remember we are not expecting metrology lab comparisons between the native NANOVNA and the SAVER results/measurements. Differences with carefully and faithfully duplicated setups, disagreements in the first significant figure, or maybe in the second, should be of little concern. For example, if you measure a single 50-ohm resistos with three different DMMs, you will get three different results. Here you go using a stock 50-¦¸, 3%, 1-watt resistor: [image: image.png] INSTRUMENT MEASURED VALUE (¦¸) HP 3478A 49.994 Cen-Tek P37772 50.1xx Sperry DM-6400 49.8xx HP 4261A LCR Mtr 50.8xx Well, which one would you pick? Is it a 50-¦¸ resistor? None of the measurements indicate it's 50-¦¸. Is it within the 3% specification of ¡À1.5 % or ¡À 0.75 ohms? Yes, by three of the four measured values made on four different instruments. Dave - W?LEV On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 8:25?PM Dean W8ZF via groups.io <dwfred= [email protected]> wrote: Dragan,-- *Dave - W?LEV* -- Dave - W?LEV |
Re: H4 + nanovna-saver calibration
Can anyone direct me to the latest SAFE version of nanovna-app? I went to GitHub and found a branch under DiSlord. There is a Win32 release of NanoVNA-App.exe from 2 months ago. When I try to run it, it fails the MS Defender malware scan. That is common for many apps that don't pay MS for the "safe" tag, so it may be fine. I just wanted to verify before I bypassed the warning and ran it.
Thanks, Dean W8ZF |
Re: H4 + nanovna-saver calibration
Dragan,
This just confuses me again. "Remove the calibration and save that to the default slot (0 slot) when using NanoVNA Saver." Remove *which* calibration? And save *what* to slot 0? Are you talking about the H4 device? Do you mean from the calibrate menu, choose "Reset" and then "Save" to memory 0? What values does this put into memory 0? And since nanovna-saver depends on the calibration of the H4 device, what is that calibration now (after reset and store 0)? "When you calibrate the Nano (on device calibration) in the range as the documentation suggests 0-900MHz with 401 points..." Where is there an option on the H4 device to select the number of points used for calibration? I haven't seen that as a menu option. If the calibration of nanovna-saver gives different results, depending on the state of the H4's calibration, I don't know what to believe. Forgive me, I still don't understand how this works together. I don't see why nanovna-saver can't just read raw results from the H4, and then use those for a calibration (which would make it independent of the H4's calibration). There have been some mentions about different numbers of points, about reporting invalid values, etc. Does anyone KNOW, not guess, what the proper procedure to calibrate this system using nanovna-saver is? Nanovna-saver is what it is, I'm not bashing it or trying to change it -- I'm just trying to understand the limitations and requirements to get good results out of the software. The ability to store calibrations, write s-parameter files, and plot using different formats is invaluable to me. I *really* want to use it for these features, but not if I can't be sure of the measurement. 73, Dean W8ZF |
Re: Smith Charts
AppCAD. Brian, I mentioned this way back when you started this plotter project.
It is now available as.... And is the old HP semiconductor group, formed AVAGO semi off shoot and now under BROADCOM. It does more than S parameter 2 port circuit analysis and is quite worthwhile to bring into a classroom environment. Program permits up to 6 s data files to be compared and I have used it to illustrate stability analysis on amplifiers as I can add feedback and compare an unstable s data file with one that is stabilized. Many features at an attractive price,,, Alan |
S22 - Re: [nanovna-users] Smith Charts
No relay to switch the source to the second port.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
(and no bridge on the second port, either) The NanoVNA doesn't use a directional coupler - it's a straight up bridge on Ch0 and a pad on Ch1. Now that you mention it, that would have been a fairly easy thing (but hard to fit in the original 2x3" size) You can, in fact, use two NanoVNAs with SMA T connectors to do a full 4 parameter measurement without having to move cables. You can "almost" do it simultaneously, even. If NanoVNA B sees the sweep from NanoVNA A, (or vice versa) you get a momentary spike in the displayed data. I tried it using NanoVNA-Saver (running two separate instances) and it calibrates nicely, etc. -----Original Message-----
From: <[email protected]> Sent: Apr 28, 2025 7:52 AM To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Smith Charts Brian, S22 is also useful and a Smith chart presentation would be desirable. But this would have less priority because the nanovna does not have the capability to measure it. Plus, you can always measure s22 by reversing your ports and measuring S11. I dont know if the nanovna lacks the second directional coupler or the chipset has this limitation, but you can work around, for $70! 73, Dean W8ZF |
Re: Smith Charts
Brian,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Ahh yes, the old HP AppCAD program. I loved that thing back in the day. Not perfect, but a pretty decent tool, and you can't beat the price. For those looking for more information on this program, and I recomend it highly for those wanting a useful tool, try starting at the following website for older versions, as well as related help files and information: Good call, Brian, I hadn't used that in a while, because I'm currently teaching space engineering courses, but a useful program for anyone working with microwave circuits, filters, baluns etc. Randy Randy J. Jost, PhD r.jost@... 435-770-9855 (c) On 04/28/2025 11:19 AM MDT Brian Beezley <k6sti@...> wrote: |
Re: Smith Charts
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 08:22 AM, RANDY JOST wrote:
Randy, if the program proves helpful for your students, that would be just great. I didn't set out to write an s-parameter plotter. I wrote a little utility to renormalize the s-parameter reference impedance. This lets you use a VNA to measure a filter whose termination impedances differ from 50 ohms without building a matching network. When it came time to test the program, I looked around for an s-parameter plotter. The only ones I could find either did not handle all s-parameters, had bugs, or were very awkward to use. So I wrote my own. While I was at it, I built renormalization into it. If you need an s-parameter plotter oriented toward amplifiers for your students, try AppCAD: It hasn't been updated since 2012, but it has many features for amplifiers I found nowhere else. I think this is the program that took me 45 minute to see a plot! This also may be the one with points slightly off in a group delay plot. Nevertheless, I think students might find it helpful. Brian |
Re: Smith Charts
Computer Results: Remember maybe four or five decades ago (man, its been
that long!) when all the computer "Yagi Design" applications hit hams with stars in the eyes? Some were good, some were mediocre, some yielded unreasonable results, and some were just off the wall. The "math" or models behind them was fixed and allowed little, if any, real input from the user other than frequency and number of elements. The general belief was almost universal: "I designed it on my computer so it must be right and better than any other option!" Wrong....... But hams almost "worshipped" the results totally believing the computer could and did offer far better results than any other method under the sun and blue sky. At present, I would venture an hypothesis that we're in a similar situation with the tried-and-true Smith Charts vs. the computer generated reams and columns of computer generated numerals. Take your pick. I'm an old fuddy-duddy fossil, and I'll stick with what is so clear and designed for impedance space: The Smith Chart. Yes, I use SimSmith extensively, but it's still the tool that was designed specifically for impedance space, the venerable and highly useful Smith Chart. Would you say the computer, PC is better at the following? Time Domain: The oscilloscope ... not a PC Frequency Domain: The spectrum analyzer ... not a PC Impedance Domain: The Smith Chart ... That's what this thread is all about Temperature Domain: The thermometer ... not a PC Color Domain: The optical spectrometer (similar to the spectrum analyzer) ... not a PC Voltage Domain: The volt meter or DMM ... not a PC Current Domain: The ammeter ... not a PC Power Domain: The proper power meter ... not a PC .... ..... ...... ....... Fill in your favorite "space". Dave - W?LEV On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 3:07?AM William Heller via groups.io <wheller34052= [email protected]> wrote: While in colledge I took a computational physics class and was assigned a-- *Dave - W?LEV* -- Dave - W?LEV |
Re: Smith Charts
Hi, Brian,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
This looks really good to me. Very crisp and sharp lines. Using Gwenview under Kubuntu here in case it matters. 73, Maynard W6PAP On 4/28/25 07:19, Brian Beezley wrote:
This is just a test plot. I noticed that the 1024 x 768 plots I posted earlier were not exactly reproduced. They are slightly fuzzy and colors are a bit off. Let's see how well this this 800 x 600 plot does. |
Re: Unexpected antenna measurement difference
Hi,
home made antenna is with ONE sma connector (no balun added) while factory made has a wilkinson splitter and two cableszhave I ever mentioned that to be a difference ? yes, one has SMA, the other has solder joints. Both have had the same balun (obviously) factory antenna has a triangle "groundplane" (while homemade has not) ... so yes you may see high difference cause they are not as identical as you thinkwhat triangles and what "groundplane" would those be ? sidenote: it looks way roo small for 300mhz ... are you sure its not for 3 ghz?!? ;-)pretty sure ;-) Thanks |
Re: Smith Charts
Wow, I love spirograph art, so cool! :-) Really looking forward to your updated program to show students in my EM courses how it should be done. Using a Smith Chart program along with the equations really helps to remove the black box / black magic aspect of so many aspects of antenna, transmission line and microwave engineering. At least for we old timers, I guess.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Randy J. Jost, PhD r.jost@... 435-770-9855 (c) On 04/28/2025 9:07 AM MDT Brian Beezley <k6sti@...> wrote: |
Re: Smith Charts
Thanks, Dean. The S22 Smith plot is available. I've attached one that looks like abstract art. I was just curious whether I was gilding the lily.
The program includes a utility to merge two .s2p files containing S11 and S21 to produce a file with all four s-parameters. This is for NanoVNA users willing to take the trouble to measure both forward and reverse response. Both reference impedance renormalization and the Y21 method work best with all four parameters. The 800 x 600 test plot looks fine. I think the forum rescaled the 1024 x 768 and then scaled it back to its original size. I'm going to leave admittance for another day (probably tomorrow). I keep finding small bugs so I'm going to concentrate on digging them out before posting the program later today. Brian |
Re: Smith Charts
Brian,
S22 is also useful and a Smith chart presentation would be desirable. But this would have less priority because the nanovna does not have the capability to measure it. Plus, you can always measure s22 by reversing your ports and measuring S11. I dont know if the nanovna lacks the second directional coupler or the chipset has this limitation, but you can work around, for $70! 73, Dean W8ZF |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss