Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Nanovna-Users
- Messages
Search
Re: My NanoVNA
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 09:33 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
I have checked with Maggie. This item is not purchased in my Alibaba store. It must from other seller. Pls check the tracking number again. Your order here is 10pcs and we ship by HK-DHL. Sorry for the damage caused by their poor packing. The order you purchased through Alibaba store is still on the way. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Thank you. |
Re: My NanoVNA
Here¡¯s mine (from Hugen¡¯s Alibaba store).
Reminds you that not every remailer is worth their money. (This attempt was via the Alibaba remailer Pandaboo. They also messed up the customs processing, so I paid about the cost of the unit again in processing fees and customs.) The PCBs are bent toward each other between the screws (you can make this out even in this front photo). This package must have been subject to some force, which the insufficient packaging pretty much directly let through to the unit. (The screws left a deep dent mark in the LDPE plastic box it came in!) The rocker switch also is half broken off. The unit does not take any charging, it does not turn on. Have not tried any measurements because this is truly BER (beyond economic repair). Oh, and the photo below that is the amazing packaging this came in. With another layer of bubble wrap around it, in a plastic mailer bag. What were they thinking¡ (Even the cardboard box makes a sad, dumbfounded face, if you look closely :-) Gr¨¹?e, Carsten |
Re: Quick compare with HP 8753C...
Thanks Roger!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Aug 27, 2019, at 4:11 PM, Roger Henderson <hendorog@...> wrote: |
Re: My NanoVNA
Ross Wilson
Resent *with* photos.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Wed, 28 Aug 2562 at 19:40 Ross Wilson <rzzzwilson@...> wrote:
Hi all, |
My NanoVNA
Ross Wilson
Hi all,
I've been lurking for a long time, but have now received *my* NanoVNA and it looks a little different to most I have seen, so I thought I would show it here. It's black and has the more traditional formed tinplate shielding rather than no shielding or brass sheet shielding that I've seen. Purchased from Guangyi0016 on Aliexpress.com on 5 August. I put the little "feet" on the back to protect the surface. Now I just have to learn how to use it! Ross AC3DN |
Re: dfu-util
yes, the entire flash area. which it will do when there is no other instruction to limit how many bytes to transfer.
did you miss the apparent file size problem i reported? $ ls -l *dfu 131381 Aug 20 11:39 'Antenna Analyzer - 2 track 900 MHz default - nanoVNA_900_aa_20190802.dfu' 131072 Aug 27 17:12 nanovna_salamander_as_shipped_2Trace900MHz.dfu 16 Aug 27 17:11 nanovna_salamander_as_shipped_2Trace900MHz-option_bytes.dfu 131381 > 131072 .. of the firmware files available from the network drive, only that one is larger than 100000 bytes. |
Re: Quick compare with HP 8753C..., Matlab
Julia from a group at MIT seems to be the currently superior free alternative to Matlab.
Octave is losing in popularity, which for community supported software is a killer. And it is slow. The home version of Matlab is way too expensive for a language and IDE, if you need one of two toolboxes on top of the base package. |
Re: The benefits of screening
Photos of a white salamander nano.
![]()
FEB9121D-22C7-43B3-898D-17D548E736A9.jpeg
![]()
0469DCFA-511B-4FE6-8DAC-C476FA760B7E.jpeg
![]()
22E2A4DA-99D6-436C-A886-A99ABCF47C74.jpeg
|
Re: TDR Python Script
Nice :)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Command for TDR is missing from that screen cap, so here it is from the code if someone wants to test it: (I haven't yet) $ ./nanovna.py -T Here is the link which shows his TDR code, search for tdr: On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 12:43, Larry Rothman <ac293@...> wrote:
It appears that edy555 has added a TDR function to a Python script in the |
Re: Quick compare with HP 8753C...
Just a quick word regarding Matlab costs -- I have their "Home Use License" which, compared to their commercial pricing, is a pretty good deal (in my opinion). Last I looked, the Home Use license for Matlab was $149, and various add-ons (e.g. Simulink, RF Tool Box, Instrument Control Toolbox, etc.) were around $45 each.
The tools allow you to do a lot. Earlier in this thread I pointed to files on Matlab Central that allow one to capture and analyze data from various HP instruments via GPIB. And here's an example of an FPGA-base HF Transceiver designed using Simulink: And, for those unfamiliar with the Matlab language, there are on-line courses (should be able to find free ones). Check out Vince's message, or google Coursera or EdX. - Jeff, k6jca P.S. I've been considering creating a Matlab GUI front-end for driving the NanoVNA -- I've verified that I can capture the NanoVNA's serial data with a Matlab script. I just need to first finish the project that is currently on my workbench (a solid-state HF PA). |
dfu-util
i have gotten dfu-util going in DfuSe mode and made copies of the contents of my nanovna.
$ dfu-util --list dfu-util 0.9 Copyright 2005-2009 Weston Schmidt, Harald Welte and OpenMoko Inc. Copyright 2010-2016 Tormod Volden and Stefan Schmidt This program is Free Software and has ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY Please report bugs to Found DFU: [0483:df11] ver=2200, devnum=7, cfg=1, intf=0, path="6-2", alt=1, name="@Option Bytes /0x1FFFF800/01*016 e", serial="FFFFFFFEFFFF" Found DFU: [0483:df11] ver=2200, devnum=7, cfg=1, intf=0, path="6-2", alt=0, name="@Internal Flash /0x08000000/064*0002Kg", serial="FFFFFFFEFFFF" $ dfu-util -v -d 0483:df11 -p 6-2 -S "FFFFFFFEFFFF" -a 0 -s 0x08000000:131072 -U nanovna_salamander_as_shipped_2Trace900MHz.dfu dfu-util 0.9 Copyright 2005-2009 Weston Schmidt, Harald Welte and OpenMoko Inc. Copyright 2010-2016 Tormod Volden and Stefan Schmidt This program is Free Software and has ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY Please report bugs to Opening DFU capable USB device... ID 0483:df11 Run-time device DFU version 011a Claiming USB DFU Interface... Setting Alternate Setting #0 ... Determining device status: state = dfuIDLE, status = 0 dfuIDLE, continuing DFU mode device DFU version 011a Device returned transfer size 2048 DfuSe interface name: "Internal Flash " Memory segment at 0x08000000 64 x 2048 = 131072 (rew) Poll timeout 10 ms Poll timeout 10 ms Upload [=========================] 100% 131072 bytes Upload done. ** "Upload" means move data from nanovna to computer ** $ dfu-util -v -d 0483:df11 -p 6-2 -S "FFFFFFFEFFFF" -a 1 -s 0x1FFFF800:16 -U nanovna_salamander_as_shipped_2Trace900MHz-option_bytes.dfu dfu-util 0.9 Copyright 2005-2009 Weston Schmidt, Harald Welte and OpenMoko Inc. Copyright 2010-2016 Tormod Volden and Stefan Schmidt This program is Free Software and has ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY Please report bugs to Opening DFU capable USB device... ID 0483:df11 Run-time device DFU version 011a Claiming USB DFU Interface... Setting Alternate Setting #1 ... Determining device status: state = dfuIDLE, status = 0 dfuIDLE, continuing DFU mode device DFU version 011a Device returned transfer size 2048 DfuSe interface name: "Option Bytes " dfu-util: Non-valid multiplier ' ', assuming bytes Memory segment at 0x1ffff800 1 x 16 = 16 (rw) Poll timeout 10 ms Poll timeout 10 ms Upload [=========================] 100% 16 bytes Upload done. however, there is a file size difference between what i have copied from the nanovna and the ready-to-download firmware file from the "network drive" ( ). $ ls -l *dfu 131381 Aug 20 11:39 'Antenna Analyzer - 2 track 900 MHz default - nanoVNA_900_aa_20190802.dfu' 131072 Aug 27 17:12 nanovna_salamander_as_shipped_2Trace900MHz.dfu 16 Aug 27 17:11 nanovna_salamander_as_shipped_2Trace900MHz-option_bytes.dfu i am not certain why the firmware file from the network drive is 309 bytes larger than the flash memory segment available. all the rest of the firmware files on the network drive are less than 100000 bytes. - 0x49 - |
Re: Quick compare with HP 8753C...
Thanks Jeff :)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Great idea, resetting when the Calibrate button is clicked would be best. I also had to try a few times. My thinking was that the time taken to get the sweep is quite long when using the software. When I waited for a few seconds before removing the previous standard it seemed more reliable. Not sure on that though. Roger On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 01:59, Jeff Anderson <jca1955@...> wrote:
Roger, excellent detective work! |
Re: Quick compare with HP 8753C...
Great tip Vince, thanks!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I probably need to do one of those courses, as I don't know python either, I just figure it out as I go. The libraries are so comprehensive now that it is very easy to get a result with a couple of lines of code. Here is an example of a gated time domain transform on a measurement, I copied it from an scikit-rf example and just substituted one of my data files to see if it would work: So the point is, its not hard to dive in and get something working quickly - and then tinker with it to understand it properly. Also Jeff uses Matlab, but some might not be aware of GNU Octave. That is a free, compatible Matlab alternative - as Matlab is very expensive unless you are in an education environment. Roger On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 03:36, Vince Rooney <vince@...> wrote:
For anyone interested in brushing up on their Python skills, there are |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss