¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: New version of NanoVNA-Saver: 0.2.1
Hi, From Kurt very good measurement with good calibrated s1p file used, I interpolate several point. Original data is 101 point. See the attachment, what's happening if I modify the points to 100,
By pgc1682@... · #8287 ·
Re: New version of NanoVNA-Saver: 0.2.1
Hi Ron, Thanks the reply, that could be the problem. Many clones exist, maybe my Hugen like (not know) device calibrators not same than others. I try use nanovna default 50fF C0 or data from Kurt
By pgc1682@... · #8286 ·
Re: Simple example of interfacing Octave with nanoVNA #octave
You need to load the instrumentation library I am running latest Octave on W10 -- NanoVNA Wiki: /g/nanovna-users/wiki/home NanoVNA Files: /g/nanovna-users/files Erik,
By Erik Kaashoek · #8285 ·
Re: Simple example of interfacing Octave with nanoVNA #octave
Hi Erik , I tried to use the Octave code , but i'snt works. Wich version of Octave are you using , and wich OS. May be my version of Octave 5.1.0.0 on win7 is not supporting the serial function. any
By Maurizio IZ1MDJ · #8284 ·
Re: New version of NanoVNA-Saver: 0.2.1
Lajos, I'm NO expert on NanoVNAs, but I believe the difference you are seeing is due to 2 factors: 1. the total Over All Length of the 2 parts or 2. the different dilectric constant of the 2. ron N4UE
By Ron Bussiere <n4ue@...> · #8283 ·
Re: New version of NanoVNA-Saver: 0.2.1
Hi, Great idea the higher resolution graph on nanovna saver. I mesured the very non ideal indoor 40 band antenne. The goal construct special tuner to shift 20 meter band electrically. I sweeep 6-15Mhz
By pgc1682@... · #8282 ·
Re: New version of NanoVNA-Saver: 0.2.1
Hi Kurt, Thanks for the detailed reply and your other post on wvna calibration method. Very useful for me. I use female open, not male open, not a big difference, but i not know why this error exist.
By pgc1682@... · #8281 ·
Re: errors of "error" models
@Oristo - 4 November 2019 - /g/nanovna-users/message/6439 Hello, Allow us, please, to thank you at last for your most motivating us comments, regarding the relative values of s and o,
By gin&pez@arg · #8280 ·
New file uploaded to [email protected]
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that the following files have been uploaded to the Files area of the [email protected] group. * /Hardware Mods/vna modded.pdf (
By [email protected] Notification <nanovna-users+notification@...> · #8279 ·
Re: errors of "error" models
#86': UPGRADE : On the Results of Measuring Two-Ports Using Only [NanoVNA] Channel [CH0] or a [LeastVNA]. - #86: On the Results of Measuring Two-Ports Using Only [NanoVNA] Channel [CH0]: 16 December
By gin&pez@arg · #8278 ·
Simple example of interfacing Octave with nanoVNA #octave
Using the matlab script from QRP I created a rough Octave script. https://github.com/erikkaashoek/NanoVNA-MATLAB The script can send commands to the nanoVNA and read S11 and S21 Nothing special but it
By Erik Kaashoek · #8277 ·
Re: rf toolbox for Octave?
Not really; Octave Forge has some signal processing https://octave.sourceforge.io/packages.php creatingrf [@] gmail.com has some RF support for Octave: https://rf.helpingcreate.com/cgi-bin/octave.pl
By Oristo · #8276 ·
Re: errors of "error" models
#86: On the Results of Measuring Two-Ports Using Only [NanoVNA] Channel [CH0] Hello, Allow us, please, to announce that, in the process of preparing the presentation of our results on Measuring
By gin&pez@arg · #8275 ·
rf toolbox for Octave?
I have the Octave interface to nanoVNA working and wanted to work with the data All Matlab code I can find uses rf toolbox Is rf toolbox (or something equivalent) available for Octave? -- NanoVNA
By Erik Kaashoek · #8274 ·
Re: Increasing measurement range (ohms) ?
Hi Alan, I did some modelling and there are quite a few places where errors can creep in. I was a little surprised on the significance of Tx driver source impedance and balanced Rx output loading
By roncraig1@... · #8273 ·
Re: Homebrew Female SMA standards and T-Check
Hi Allison Sure they will work fien with thee NanoVNA as the difference in offset delay is very small as the NanoVNA is designed for ideal calibration kit except the open is compensated by 50fF. But
By Kurt Poulsen · #8272 ·
Re: Are any of the NanoVNA sold on Amazon any better or worse than any others? Is there a better U.S. site to order from?
Hugen, What will be the price of the new version? And when it comes out, will the older version still be available? BruceN, K4TQL -- *"To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk"* --
By BruceN · #8271 ·
Re: Homebrew Female SMA standards and T-Check
Hi Rudi, The MATLAB T-check script is part of a package of scripts written by Dick Benson, W1QG, and downloadable from the Matlab Central:
By Jeff Anderson · #8270 ·
Re: Homebrew Female SMA standards and T-Check
Allison, Dave, and Kurt, many thanks for your replies. Dave -- thank you very much for the "flush thru" description. That explains a lot, and it was a key bit of info that I lacked. Kurt -- I'll
By Jeff Anderson · #8269 ·
Re: My nanoVNA does't go into DFU mode #improvement
I would like to thank all the replies to my initial message. Unfortunatelly, the firmware was an old one that didn't allow me to go into a config menu. I also made sure to jumper the boot0 and Vcc. In
By Luciano Gasparini PT9KK · #8268 ·