Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Nanovna-Users
- Messages
Search
Re: METHOD for MEASURING COMMON MODE CHOKE IMPEDANCE
Hi Dave
This method of direct experimental measurement, without any computational artifice and without the risk of modeling errors or theoretical estimations, is simply my own used method, which I have already presented multiple times and illustrated in several recent topics in this IO group. Indeed, this experimental method is very elegant, accurate, and reliable, and involves no computational tricks. I have specifically presented it as the method for measuring the characteristic impedance of coaxial or twin-lead lines, offering greater precision than other methods already shown in YouTube videos or even the classical recommended techniques that I have come across in this highly respectable IO group. It has been suggested to me to use the recently introduced macro function by DiSlord called "Measure" + "Cable" in his latest firmware version 1.2.40. This function directly displays the cable¡¯s characteristic impedance, its length, its attenuation in dB, and its specific attenuation in dB/100m. It's already a very good and reliable function, and above all, it's easy to use¡ªthere¡¯s virtually nothing to do except connect the open-ended coax to port 1 for S11 measurements. This function is indeed useful, but it provides a single Zc value valid across the entire frequency range. It is based on quasi-static C0 measurements, which are more relevant at relatively low frequencies, and it does not fully account for skin effect and other second-order behaviors that are difficult for a typical user¡ªsuch as a radio amateur seeking ohm-level accuracy¡ªto model precisely. For example, I have already published the different characteristic impedance values of my RG213 cable depending on the frequency band, using the experimental method that involves centering the impedance circle at the center of the Smith chart with a fixed resistive load close to the nominal characteristic impedance of the coax, or by referring to the first-order value displayed by DiSlord¡¯s macro function. The method is simple, robust, and original because it is based on the very solid foundational concept of the characteristic impedance of an RF transmission line. This is, by definition, the impedance that produces a purely traveling wave and absorbs all the energy without any reflection¡ªas if the line were infinitely long. Therefore, in practice, we should observe a constant, purely real impedance across the entire measurement band as a first approximation (theoretically, a line¡¯s characteristic impedance may not be purely real, but for low-loss lines it is often very close to real and commonly approximated by the well-known square root of L/C¡ªthis remains a very good first-order approximation). Thus, for a ferrite balun, it is experimentally straightforward to connect an adjustable resistor in place of the antenna and connect the other side to port 1 for S11 measurements, in order to center the impedance plot across an entire frequency band on real axe dot. This is entirely feasible for a small balun or a coiled coaxial cable whose second end is accessible in the shack, allowing the connection of an adjustable resistor (non-inductive, of course) in order to find the value that yields the smallest possible Smith chart impedance plot ¡ª ideally, a single point located on the real axis over the entire desired frequency band. This value can then be directly read using the NanoVNA cursor. It's one of the best methods to measure the characteristic impedance (Zc), while also enjoying the clear and safe visual illustration of its fundamental definition on a simple and tangible Smith chart using a compact NanoVNA. So far, so good ¡ª but unfortunately, this method cannot always be applied so easily, especially when the cable is already deployed in space, fixed in place, and its far end is no longer accessible from the shack near the NanoVNA. Fortunately, the new firmware by DiSlord (version 1.2.40) offers a solution by allowing the renormalization of the equivalent impedance for Smith chart display purposes. It¡¯s important to understand that the actual impedances values remain exactly the same ¡ª only the graphical representation changes. So, there¡¯s no risk of error introduced by the renormalization of Zc in S11 measurement mode. The goal is no longer to focus the impedances on a single real point (since we can¡¯t adjust accurately the resistor remotely ¡ª unless two people coordinate via phone), but rather to connect a fixed resistive load that is approximately correct, and then use the Zc renormalization feature of DiSlord to center the impedance circle on the middle of the Smith chart, indeed the impedances are no longer all reals but remain on a small cicle around the renormalized Zc end value. The value of Zc that centers the impedance circle is the one to retain in the end. that why i appreciate a lot this renormalize graphical option offered By DiSlord firmware 1.2.40 and ask him many times if it"s possible to add a graphical X4 or X6 zoom option around Smith shart center , it will be very usefull , indeed here all is graphical with Smith Shart , zero external computing . 73's Nizar . |
Re: METHOD for MEASURING COMMON MODE CHOKE IMPEDANCE
Thanks a lot Dave, for the quick response. Here the sun is just rising up!
Shall look out for your post by evening (that will be 'tomorrow' for you!). 73 Jon, VU2JO On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 6:04?AM W0LEV via groups.io <davearea51a= [email protected]> wrote: Jon, please wait for tomorrow as it's supper time here in N. Colorado. |
Re: METHOD for MEASURING COMMON MODE CHOKE IMPEDANCE
Jon, please wait for tomorrow as it's supper time here in N. Colorado.
I'll do another procedure using the Smith Chart and the VNA on measuring the C and L. Dave - W?LEV On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:26?AM Jon via groups.io <vu2jo0= [email protected]> wrote: Dave,-- *Dave - W?LEV* -- Dave - W?LEV |
Re: METHOD for MEASURING COMMON MODE CHOKE IMPEDANCE
Dave,
I have been waiting for this post! Shall try out the first method as soon as possible. For the second and third methods, I have seen only potentiometers of 10K and above here. Shall check again. Can you kindly add a note on how to measure inductance and capacitance with NanoVNA? Usually I measure that with my LCR meter. Never tried measuring inductance and capacitance of the CMC which I homebrewed recently on an FT240-43 toroid using RG316 (). 73 Jon, VU2JO On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 5:01?AM W0LEV via groups.io <davearea51a= [email protected]> wrote: To start off, the common mode choke (CMC) I'm addressing is also referred |
METHOD for MEASURING COMMON MODE CHOKE IMPEDANCE
To start off, the common mode choke (CMC) I'm addressing is also referred
to as a transmission line transformer. Physically it consists of a single bifilar set of windings on an appropriate ferrite toroid. The windings form a short (for HF) transmission line on the toroid core with unknown impedance. Here are methods on measuring that impedance using a vector Network Analyzer. The NanoVNAs work well for the purpose. All the following are reflection measurements, so no need to complete the through and isolation calibration options on the VNA. I'm assuming the VNA is properly calibrated over the required frequency range including any fixtures or adaptors which might be used. It's best to attempt all of the following at a relatively low frequency unless you are specifically interested in the higher frequencies. A wide sweep of frequencies is not recommended. I usually use something around 2 to 3 MHz. This avoids the effects of introducing unknown parasitics into the measurement. All the following is without renormalizing which can introduce unknown additional errors to the measurements. From what I've read and utilized, the three methods are: METHOD 1: 1) Connect one side of the CMC choke to the s11 port or source port. 2) With the "other" side of the CMC open terminated, measure and note the capacitance. 3) With the "other" side of the CMC short circuit terminated, measure and note the inductance. 4) Calculate the Zo using the following formula: Zo = SQRT [L / C] Be sure to use basic units, Farads and Henries. 1 pF = 1E-12 F 1 ?H = 1E-6 H METHOD 2: 1) Connect one side of the CMC to the s11 port or source port. 2) Terminate the "other" port with a known (measured) potentiometer of nominally 100 to 150-ohms over the frequency range of interest. Use minimal leads from the pot. to the CMC. 3) While observing the Smith Chart on the VNA, adjust the potentiometer such that both the capacitance (-j) and the inductance (+j) are simultaneously minimized along the real, horizontal, axis on the Smith Chart. The real axis is the only place on the Smith Chart that is purely resistive. 4) Now remove the potentiometer and read its DC resistance on a DMM. That is Zo. METHOD 3 (my favorite): 1) Connect one side of the CMC to the s11 port or source port. 2) Terminate the "other" port of the CMC with a known potentiometer measured to be non-reactive over the frequency range of interest. A value of 100 to 150-ohms is useful since most of the CMC chokes have a Zo between 70 to 125 ohms. Keep leads to an absolute minimum. 3) While observing the Smith Chart on the VNA, adjust the potentiometer such that both the capacitance (-j) and the inductance (+j) are minimized simultaneously along the central (real) axis of the Smith Chart. 4) Observe the numerals at the top of the VNA. You can read all the "interesting" parameters of your CMC from that data, including the Zo of the choke. No calculations or renormalizing is required for this third and last method, minimizing potential sources of error. Dave - W?LEV -- Dave - W?LEV |
Re: S21 balun losses with Z0 renormalisation from 50 Ohm to 78 Ohm
jahman
How about a pipe? The sender doesn't even have to be aware of the pipe's
existence. WIKIPEDIA - Named Pipe (Software) 73 de Andrew/N5ASE On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 4:37?PM Team-SIM SIM-Mode via groups.io <sim31_team= [email protected]> wrote: Thanks Brian |
Re: S21 balun losses with Z0 renormalisation from 50 Ohm to 78 Ohm
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 12:37 PM, Team-SIM SIM-Mode wrote:
I'm not going to write another NanoVNA-Saver or NanoVNA-App. Someone can incorporate the features they like into those programs if they wish. Brian |
Re: Smith Charts
Alan, if I were to display several Q contours simultaneously, what values would be most useful? This would require no user input.
Q of 1, 2, 3... These Q contours roughly align with SWR circles of 2.5:1, 4:1, 6:1 Larger values tend to be academic as they would most likely be classified as narrow band. Although that opinion is subjective. <:) Thanks, |
Re: S21 balun losses with Z0 renormalisation from 50 Ohm to 78 Ohm
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 11:25 AM, Team-SIM SIM-Mode wrote:
No. It runs from .s1p or .s2p files only. See splot.txt for details. Brian |
Re: S21 balun losses with Z0 renormalisation from 50 Ohm to 78 Ohm
Hi Brian
Thank you , and great work , i am still not familiar to , it seems great and can be developped more , if any youtube video can help us step by step how to use it , it will be very helpfull . I need a real time plotting to adjust in real time the reisistor trimmer terminaison to focus the impedances on one graphical dot as small as possible on smith shart to measure characteristic impedances of coax's or baluns , wondering if your software can download S11 and S12 data's on real time from nanoVNA as Nano-App does ? Congratulation for your good Work. 73's Nizar . |
Re: Smith Charts
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 12:38 PM, Brian Beezley wrote:
Routine I did inputs a single Q contour value. The Q=1 is a default value. No input required. This value of unity at one time was used and provided with vna instruments as an overlay or etched into the screen. |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss