开云体育

Greetings Thomas, Your best solution for a low-cost scanner is the RTL-SDR dongle, and some scanning software. The best one (currently) is the RTL-SDR.COM V3, ($23) which has a very good TCXO,

Fully agree I'm have been supporting public domain SW for more than 15 years (and still am) The step from having some SW that is usable versus SW that is robust for any usage is rather big and

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 03:52 AM, Dennis W1UE wrote: I'm a newbie user- just received one last week. I've downloaded an instruction package on how to use the VNA. I've used a Mini VNA for several

I agree with Joe's decision to not release his software to anyone. He has already made several great videos on the nanoVNA which I found useful. Some people feel "entitled" to his work and this was

#82 : On The Two-Port Sine Qua Non Practical Application - Source and Load - REF: #81" : update : on the physical expression of two-port s-parameters 10 December 2019 -

Hi Dennis, there's nothing immediately limiting you to using only once package. I can only speak for NanoVNA-Saver, and it certainly uses industry standard Touchstone files where possible, and it does

I'm a newbie user- just received one last week. I've downloaded an instruction package on how to use the VNA. I've used a Mini VNA for several years, and have had problems because of its limited 50dB

Thanks, this helps. As I understand now: they determine the embedded port parameters by using the equivalent of a one-port calibration with 3 known terminations, then express the embedded port

In addition, ISTR that the Gnu Octave development team considers any lack of functionality as compared to MatLab to be a bug. Sent from a small flat thingy

Eric; It might be helpful to review msg #6670. GIN&PEZ presents the derivation of the G-mini equation which is the one-port measurement model, which they summarize in msg #6798. That one port model,

Please have a look here: https://github.com/ttrftech/NanoVNA Quote: "Hardware design material is disclosed to prevent bad quality clone. Please let me know if you would have your own unit." -- NanoVNA

thats fair enough but why cant it be offered on an as is basis warts and all with no support,at least give others a chance to work with it!

I don't think your thoughts about a person's ego is of any relevance whatsoever to this mailing list. I understand that Joe does not have the time nor interest in supporting his software - and knowing

the guy who did that on youtube has a long thread on eevblogg,for some reason he wont release the s/w has been asked about releasing it a few times but always replys with what looks like b.s lame

That seems unlikely. On the contrary; the development to move it from 300MHz to 900MHz would likely not have happened, and the product would be a largely unknown hobby project - akin to what it was a

edy555 decided to open source SW AND HW to avoid bad clones. -- NanoVNA Wiki: /g/nanovna-users/wiki/home NanoVNA Files: /g/nanovna-users/files Erik, PD0EK

In view of the way this thing has took off,i imagine the developer is miffed about making it open source,would of thought there would have been a fair sum of money earnt if not.

While not fully compatible with LabView you can use GNU Octave (free) to very quickly create all kind of nice instrument control and computational applications. Octave has (almost?) all of the

While looking up the various versions of LabVIEW, I came across this webpage: https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/doku.php?id=get_labview&_ga=2.37744224.1746488316.1576035006-1670827954.1576035006 Where

With regard to historical references, while edy555 has not followed up on his original kit with a fully manufactured product he has remained at the forefront of the NanoVNA firmware evolution and also