On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 08:10 PM, Kurt Poulsen wrote:
The same test done for the 20cm long test cable supplied with the NanoVNA. Its
traces look very much like a cable not being 50 ohm
Hello Kurt,
Thank you very much for your interesting comparison of the two coax cables.
Unfortunately I could not understand by which parameter you conclude
that the 20 cm NanoVNA supplied cable (RG174?) does *not* have 50 Ohm.
Do you please have a more detailed explanation for that assumption?
In your posting 7937 (2019-12-06 23:04) you appended the file: "Measurements of test cables.pdf" you wrote also about a 33 cm NanoVNA supplied cable (RG174?). Is that the same coax cable like to 20 cm NanoVNA supplied cable (RG174?) you mentioned in post 7877 ?
By the way, the nanoVNA-saver screen shots in x=1024 pixel size are very difficult to read by me (NanoVNA supplied cable 50K to 500MHz.png). I am using a font size of 11 pt and a x width of about 1600 pixel.
If you replace in the PDF file names the SPACE characters by an underscore it will give less problems in a web link.
73, Rudi DL5FA
