Herb,
The slightly larger display that Herman installed is identical to the 2.8" it just has bigger pixels.
The resolution and driver IC are the same as in the 2.8" LCD. Hence the direct swap.?
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 5:55 PM, hwalker<herbwalker2476@...> wrote: Herman,
The 2.8 in display uses a 320 * 240 * 2 bytes to transfer data and I assume the 3.2 in display requires more.? Therefore I am? I right in also assuming that program features that depend on display size, such as screen capture, do not work correctly with the 3.2 in display?
Not a big issue since you can always use your smartphone camera to capture a screen image, but it is a caveat when stating that the 3.2 works with the same software,
- Herb
