My understanding is that the RF components are the same in the "Vanilla"
and the -F version, and that they should both go to 1500 MHz with similarly
mixed results.
The -F, as I understand it, has a different microcontroller, a larger
screen (4.3"), a larger battery (5000mAh), and a built-in 16MB flash memory.
It seems to cost around 3-4 times as much.
--
Rune / 5Q5R
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 18:40, hwalker <herbwalker2476@...> wrote:
David,
The meaning is the upper limit is 100 MHz higher than the 900 MHz of the
NanoVNA-F.
Herb