I might leave some feedback on github (did it also in the past). But first
I need to understand what might be the issue. As Chris says, it is all a
little too confusing...
I am still busy untanging it (as I need to get a good workflow for future
NanoVNA measurements...)
Op wo 6 okt. 2021 om 18:34 schreef Roger Need via groups.io <sailtamarack=
[email protected]>:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 09:01 AM, Jim Lux wrote:
Saver, in general, doesn't have a lot of error recovery built in - it's
a nice program, but there's plenty of places where if something is
wrong, it just dies, and leaves it up to you to go look at the source
code to figure out how to fix it.
The original author of NanoVNA Saver, Rune, developed a very nice program
and graciously shared it with the user community. He was very responsive
to comments in this group and corrected bugs quickly and added many user
requested features.
Sadly he became quite ill and was no longer able to work on this project.
He graciously allowed his project to be taken over by Holger M¨¹ller
(zarath) and he has released several new versions but is not active in this
group. Bugs and new features requests can me made on the NanoVNA Saver
github page.
Roger
