Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Limits tracks to 45°
开云体育Hello,??? I have unchecked "Limits Tracks to 45°" but using "Route Tracks" I am not able to create a track in an other direction that 0, 45 or 90°. ??? I am using Pcbnew version 5.1.8 under Win10. ??? Any help is welcome. ??? Regards, ??? Jean-Paul, F5BU **** Jean-Paul Gendner Site : |
Check your clearances very carefully. If two clearance zones "just"
touch then a track will not route. Tracks at 0,45 and 90 tend to (but not always) have better chances of not infringing on clearances Andy On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:17:56 +0100 "jpgendner" <jean-paul.gendner@...> wrote: Hello, |
开云体育Thank you so much for your answer Andy,??? I do not think that this may be the problem. ??? Here a picture from what happens : ??? I would like to connect the two "2" pads by an unbroken straight line ? ??? Regards, ??? Jean-Paul **** Jean-Paul Gendner Site : Le 2021-12-15 à 18:36, Andy a écrit?:
Check your clearances very carefully. If two clearance zones "just" touch then a track will not route. Tracks at 0,45 and 90 tend to (but not always) have better chances of not infringing on clearances Andy On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:17:56 +0100 "jpgendner" <jean-paul.gendner@...> wrote:Hello, ??? I have unchecked "Limits Tracks to 45°" but using "Route Tracks" I am not able to create a track in an other direction that 0, 45 or 90°. ??? I am using Pcbnew version 5.1.8 under Win10. ??? Any help is welcome. ??? Regards, ??? Jean-Paul, F5BU **** Jean-Paul Gendner Site : f5bu.fr |
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:49:28 +0100
"jpgendner" <jean-paul.gendner@...> wrote: ??? I would like to connect the two "2" pads by an unbroken straightWhy? I would do it exactly as the picture shows. There would be an extremely short straight bit within the as yet unconnected pad, and I would prefer the track coming off the corner of the pad to prevent an angle of less than 90 degrees between the track and pad to stop etch solution inclusion in the angle. Any high reliability application will require that this situation be avoided. |
A pic says a thousand words. :-)
That's the interactive router getting in the way. There used to be a way to switch to free routing, but that looks like it's gone. The legacy toolset works, but remember to turn off limit to 45 / 90 etc in preference. Another way to get around this in the modern toolset , and it's an awkward kludge... On one of the pads create a sort stub of track, then end the track function. Place the curson on the end of the stub and from the right click menu select drag (free angle) Andy On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:49:28 +0100 "jpgendner" <jean-paul.gendner@...> wrote: Thank you so much for your answer Andy, |
开云体育??? My picture is probabely not a good example. It is for a small HF circuit and some times I prefer to get straith line between pads.??? As there is a check box to be able to do so, I think it should work, so probably I do some thing wrong. ??? Thank you, ??? Jean-Paul **** Jean-Paul Gendner 03 88 27 03 44 Site : Le 2021-12-15 à 19:20, Alan Pearce via
groups.io a écrit?:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:49:28 +0100 "jpgendner" <jean-paul.gendner@...> wrote:??? I would like to connect the two "2" pads by an unbroken straight line ? Regards,Why? I would do it exactly as the picture shows. There would be an extremely short straight bit within the as yet unconnected pad, and I would prefer the track coming off the corner of the pad to prevent an angle of less than 90 degrees between the track and pad to stop etch solution inclusion in the angle. Any high reliability application will require that this situation be avoided. |
开云体育Thank you very much Andy,??? I have tried the free angle menu and this Works. ??? Best regards,
??? Jean-Paul, F5BU **** Jean-Paul Gendner 03 88 27 03 44 Site : Le 2021-12-15 à 19:31, Andy a écrit?:
A pic says a thousand words. :-) That's the interactive router getting in the way. There used to be a way to switch to free routing, but that looks like it's gone. The legacy toolset works, but remember to turn off limit to 45 / 90 etc in preference. Another way to get around this in the modern toolset , and it's an awkward kludge... On one of the pads create a sort stub of track, then end the track function. Place the curson on the end of the stub and from the right click menu select drag (free angle) Andy On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:49:28 +0100 "jpgendner" <jean-paul.gendner@...> wrote:Thank you so much for your answer Andy, ??? I do not think that this may be the problem. ??? Here a picture from what happens : ??? I would like to connect the two "2" pads by an unbroken straight line ? ??? Regards, ??? Jean-Paul **** Jean-Paul Gendner Site : f5bu.fr Le 2021-12-15 à 18:36, Andy a écrit?:Check your clearances very carefully. If two clearance zones "just" touch then a track will not route. Tracks at 0,45 and 90 tend to (but not always) have better chances of not infringing on clearances Andy On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:17:56 +0100 "jpgendner"<jean-paul.gendner@...> wrote:Hello, ??? I have unchecked "Limits Tracks to 45°" but using "Route Tracks" I am not able to create a track in an other direction that 0, 45 or 90°. ??? I am using Pcbnew version 5.1.8 under Win10. ??? Any help is welcome. ??? Regards, ??? Jean-Paul, F5BU **** Jean-Paul Gendner Site : f5bu.fr |
开云体育JP:That looks correct to me since the pads are not aligned. John On 12/15/2021 9:49 AM, jpgendner wrote:
Thank you so much for your answer Andy, |
开云体育Here, the expected result obtained with Andy's solution.??? ??? Regards, ??? Jean-Paul **** Jean-Paul Gendner Site : Le 2021-12-15 à 20:01, John Baker a
écrit?:
JP: |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss