开云体育

icom-7610 Split QSY Macro

Vince Shirley All Messages By This Member #85206 Apologies for repeating myself but this one from a? few days ago appears to have go lost amongst a slew of responses to more important issues. When using the macro? ?$QSY #Split+01q#$ I get a response from Logger32 "The BandPlan has no entries that match a frequency of? 18099.0 MHz" -? which is true if it really did mean 18099.0 MHz but I suspect it should be 18099.0 kHz i.e MHz instead of kHz? Odd? Vince
ja1nlx All Messages By This Member #85207 Vince Try this? ?$qsy #Split+01q#$ ? ?Not $QSY... 73 de aki JA1NLX toggle quoted message Show quoted text ------ Original message ------ From: "Vince Shirley" <vince.g0orc@...> To: [email protected] Date: 2021/07/27 17:52:41 Subject [hamlogger] icom-7610 Split QSY Macro Apologies for repeating myself but this one from a? few days ago appears to have go lost amongst a slew of responses to more important issues. When using the macro? ?$QSY #Split+01q#$ I get a response from Logger32 "The BandPlan has no entries that match a frequency of? 18099.0 MHz" -? which is true if it really did mean 18099.0 MHz but I suspect it should be 18099.0 kHz i.e MHz instead of kHz? Odd? Vince
Vince Shirley All Messages By This Member #85208 Aki, Thank you - I was replicating what was in the manual. Perhaps Gary could amend Section 36.3.4 to reflect the use of the lower case. The manual shows upper case. Thank you again Vince G0ORC toggle quoted message Show quoted text On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 10:18, ja1nlx <ayoshida0205@...> wrote: Vince Try this? ?$qsy #Split+01q#$ ? ?Not $QSY... 73 de aki JA1NLX ------ Original message ------ From: "Vince Shirley" <vince.g0orc@...> To: [email protected] Date: 2021/07/27 17:52:41 Subject [hamlogger] icom-7610 Split QSY Macro Apologies for repeating myself but this one from a? few days ago appears to have go lost amongst a slew of responses to more important issues. When using the macro? ?$QSY #Split+01q#$ I get a response from Logger32 "The BandPlan has no entries that match a frequency of? 18099.0 MHz" -? which is true if it really did mean 18099.0 MHz but I suspect it should be 18099.0 kHz i.e MHz instead of kHz? Odd? Vince
ja1nlx All Messages By This Member #85209 ? 73 de aki JA1NLX toggle quoted message Show quoted text ------ Original message ------ From: "Vince Shirley" <vince.g0orc@...> To: [email protected]; Gary@... Date: 2021/07/27 19:41:42 Subject Re: [hamlogger] icom-7610 Split QSY Macro Aki, Thank you - I was replicating what was in the manual. Perhaps Gary could amend Section 36.3.4 to reflect the use of the lower case. The manual shows upper case. Thank you again Vince G0ORC On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 10:18, ja1nlx <ayoshida0205@...> wrote: Vince Try this? ?$qsy #Split+01q#$ ? ?Not $QSY... 73 de aki JA1NLX ------ Original message ------ From: "Vince Shirley" <vince.g0orc@...> To: [email protected] Date: 2021/07/27 17:52:41 Subject [hamlogger] icom-7610 Split QSY Macro Apologies for repeating myself but this one from a? few days ago appears to have go lost amongst a slew of responses to more important issues. When using the macro? ?$QSY #Split+01q#$ I get a response from Logger32 "The BandPlan has no entries that match a frequency of? 18099.0 MHz" -? which is true if it really did mean 18099.0 MHz but I suspect it should be 18099.0 kHz i.e MHz instead of kHz? Odd? Vince
Bob All Messages By This Member #85210 Oops, my fault. There are six places in the code that look for '$qsy ...' in a macro. one of them was case sensitive. It is fixed for th next auto-update. SeventyThree(s). toggle quoted message Show quoted text On 07/27/2021 6:41 AM Vince Shirley <vince.g0orc@...> wrote: ? ? Aki, ? Thank you - I was replicating what was in the manual. Perhaps Gary could amend Section 36.3.4 to reflect the use of the lower case. ? The manual shows upper case. ? Thank you again ? Vince G0ORC On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 10:18, ja1nlx < ayoshida0205@...> wrote: Vince ? Try this? ?$qsy #Split+01q#$ ? ?Not $QSY... ? ? 73 de aki JA1NLX ? ------ Original message ------ From: "Vince Shirley" < vince.g0orc@...> To: [email protected] Date: 2021/07/27 17:52:41 Subject [hamlogger] icom-7610 Split QSY Macro ? Apologies for repeating myself but this one from a? few days ago appears to have go lost amongst a slew of responses to more important issues. ? When using the macro? ?$QSY #Split+01q#$ ? I get a response from Logger32 "The BandPlan has no entries that match a frequency of? 18099.0 MHz" -? which is true if it really did mean 18099.0 MHz but I suspect it should be 18099.0 kHz ? i.e MHz instead of kHz? ? Odd? ? Vince ? ?
Vince Shirley All Messages By This Member #85211 Thanks Bob... Vince G0ORC toggle quoted message Show quoted text On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 12:43, Bob <k4cy@...> wrote: Oops, my fault. There are six places in the code that look for '$qsy ...' in a macro. one of them was case sensitive. It is fixed for th next auto-update. SeventyThree(s). On 07/27/2021 6:41 AM Vince Shirley <vince.g0orc@...> wrote: ? ? Aki, ? Thank you - I was replicating what was in the manual. Perhaps Gary could amend Section 36.3.4 to reflect the use of the lower case. ? The manual shows upper case. ? Thank you again ? Vince G0ORC On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 10:18, ja1nlx < ayoshida0205@...> wrote: Vince ? Try this? ?$qsy #Split+01q#$ ? ?Not $QSY... ? ? 73 de aki JA1NLX ? ------ Original message ------ From: "Vince Shirley" < vince.g0orc@...> To: [email protected] Date: 2021/07/27 17:52:41 Subject [hamlogger] icom-7610 Split QSY Macro ? Apologies for repeating myself but this one from a? few days ago appears to have go lost amongst a slew of responses to more important issues. ? When using the macro? ?$QSY #Split+01q#$ ? I get a response from Logger32 "The BandPlan has no entries that match a frequency of? 18099.0 MHz" -? which is true if it really did mean 18099.0 MHz but I suspect it should be 18099.0 kHz ? i.e MHz instead of kHz? ? Odd? ? Vince ? ?
Gary Hinson #85217 开云体育 With amazing foresight and without changing the wording, section 36.3.4 of the manual will become correct as the universe snaps neatly back into alignment with Logger32 version 4.0.290. ??? ? Well spotted, Vince.? Well I never, Bob.? ? Hopefully there are no other weird case-dependent macro oddities and the like but anything is possible – including oversites, errrors and typoos lurking in the manual and, yes, pesky bugs lurking under the covers of Logger32.? ? Please continue reporting them.? We’ll get there in the end.? Expect jam tomorrow. ? 73 Gary? ZL2iFB ? PS? Nobody has yet reported the Easter eggs hidden somewhere in the manual … ? toggle quoted message Show quoted text From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Bob Sent: 27 July 2021 23:43 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [hamlogger] icom-7610 Split QSY Macro ? Oops, my fault. There are six places in the code that look for '$qsy ...' in a macro. one of them was case sensitive. It is fixed for th next auto-update. SeventyThree(s). On 07/27/2021 6:41 AM Vince Shirley <vince.g0orc@...> wrote: ? ? Aki, ? Thank you - I was replicating what was in the manual. Perhaps Gary could amend Section 36.3.4 to reflect the use of the lower case. ? The manual shows upper case. ? Thank you again ? Vince G0ORC ? On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 10:18, ja1nlx < ayoshida0205@...> wrote: Vince ? Try this? ?$qsy #Split+01q#$ ? ?Not $QSY... ? ? 73 de aki JA1NLX ? ------ Original message ------ From: "Vince Shirley" < vince.g0orc@...> To: [email protected] Date: 2021/07/27 17:52:41 Subject [hamlogger] icom-7610 Split QSY Macro ? Apologies for repeating myself but this one from a? few days ago appears to have go lost amongst a slew of responses to more important issues. ? When using the macro? ?$QSY #Split+01q#$ ? I get a response from Logger32 "The BandPlan has no entries that match a frequency of? 18099.0 MHz" -? which is true if it really did mean 18099.0 MHz but I suspect it should be 18099.0 kHz ? i.e MHz instead of kHz? ? Odd? ? Vince ? ?

Previous Topic Next Topic