¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: Update: Cherry picking
Jay Use JTDX. It supports everything. 73 de aki JA1NLX
By ja1nlx · #85115 ·
Re: Update: Cherry picking
The cherry-picking work again but only with the stations calling CQ, he didn¡¯t work for the grid square¡­ 73 qro Jay F4CVO Envoy¨¦ de mon iPhone
By F4CVO · #85114 ·
Re: Update: Cherry picking
Can you describe 'doesn't work anymore' please. SeventyThree(s).
By Bob · #85113 ·
Re: Update: Cherry picking
Jay Cherry picking worked with MSHV before Logger32 update. Is this correct ? If so something changed in UDP BandMap settings. Check all options first. 73 de aki JA1NLX
By ja1nlx · #85112 ·
Re: Update: Cherry picking
Hi everyone, Just before the update, I discovered the cherry-picking. It was worked on MSHV software, and without make something, cherry-picking didn¡¯t work anymore. 73 Jay F4CVO
By F4CVO · #85111 ·
Update: Cherry picking
Just discovered that,? in JTDX, the "AutoTx" button needs to be enabled for Logger32 Cherry Picking to work.? Guess I inadvertently toggled it off somehow.? Nothing to do with Logge32 update.?
By Howard McVay KD7MA · #85110 ·
Re: Cherry picking
And¡­.. on the right hand side of the front screen, check the AutoTX button is green. Sent: Monday, July 19, 2021 16:51 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [hamlogger] Cherry picking On JTDX click
By n5kd · #85109 ·
Re: Cherry picking
On JTDX click FILE | SETTINGS. Click the REPORTING tab. Make sure ACCEPT UDP REQUESTS is checked. Click OK. On JTDX Click MISC | ACCEPT UDP REPLY MESSAGES. Make sure ANY MESSAGE is checked.
By Bob · #85108 ·
Re: Cherry picking
I too experience this behavior using JTDX v156.? ?This began shortly after I updated Logger32 to V4.0.469.? Nothing else has changed (to my knowledge) in a while. In the Cherry Picking Event
By Howard McVay KD7MA · #85107 ·
Re: Jim (W5IFP)
Thanks for the update Bob. I hope Jim gets better soon. We all miss him, his calm demeanor and his expertise! Get well soon Jim! 73, Rick VE7TK
By Rick Williams - VE7TK · #85106 ·
Re: Jim (W5IFP)
And hope Jim for all the best!? I just want to tell that there are friends on another side of the earth caring about him. 73 de Joseph, BD4EPV
By BD4EPV · #85105 ·
Re: Jim (W5IFP)
Thanks you for sharing and your eloquence Bob.? My prayers for Jim and his family. Larry K8YYY Shinnston WV EM99uk -- I got expelled from school on Pajama Day. Not my fault - I sleep naked.
By Larry Fravel · #85104 ·
Re: Jim (W5IFP)
I really hope Jim is back again. 73 de aki JA1NLX
By ja1nlx · #85103 ·
Re: Jim (W5IFP)
Very nice said Bob Get well Jim de KB2SSE
By Kenneth Hansen <khansen@...> · #85102 ·
Re: Jim (W5IFP)
Randall, thanks so much for your message. We, the Logger32 community and Beta testers, have been very concerned for Jim's well being for a few weeks. Please tell Jim we are all rooting for him, and he
By Bob · #85101 ·
Re: LOTW showing ¡°cross¡± band contacts
When logging FT4/FT8 contacts that originated from UDP messages, a single frequency is part of the message. It is the radio VFO frequency plus the transmit audio. This is logged as the ADIF FREQ
By Bob · #85100 ·
Re: LOTW showing ¡°cross¡± band contacts
??? IF you start WSJT-X from the Start menu on the UDP BandMap, it takes control of the radio away from Logger32 (Logger32 drops its CAT connection, then WSJT-X opens its CAT connection). This happens
By Gary Hinson <Gary@...> · #85099 ·
Re: LOTW showing ¡°cross¡± band contacts
I also had the issue. But it was operator error. WSJT you never changed the frequency in the program. Mine was a 60m contact and I had 6m on wsjt. That¡¯s why it di the cross band. Sent from Mail for
By Bruce B · #85098 ·
Re: LOTW showing ¡°cross¡± band contacts
Hi Dale. Please check section 38.10 of the User Manual <https://www.logger32.net/files/Logger32_v4_User_Manual.pdf#page=625&zoom=100,76,710> for me. Does that help? I don¡¯t use SO2R so haven¡¯t had
By Gary Hinson <Gary@...> · #85097 ·
LOTW showing ¡°cross¡± band contacts
On a recent manual upload (from Logger 32 to LOTW) many Qs in LOTW showed the band as ¡°cross¡±¡­which they were not. Everything in Logger looks fine and all the Qs were made with WSJT X. ?I¡¯m