Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Hamlogger
- Messages
Search
Re: old CT logs
Hi Barry, Glad I could help you. 73 de Preben OZ5UR Den tors. 6. mar. 2025 kl. 20.57 skrev Barry via <barplo=[email protected]>:
|
Re: Teething pains transferring to Win 11 on a new computer
You said Have multiple copies of backups & complete Logger 32 folder
?
Good thinking Batman!
|
Teething pains transferring to Win 11 on a new computer
New computer, new SSD, with my old HDD installed as G: drive.
Got Logger up and running, everything transferred over, (Have multiple copies of backups & complete Logger 32 folder squirreled away on various devices.)
Got TQsl installed and transferred onto the new SSD.
Problem is now regarding LogSync. I can't swear 100% that it was working, but I'm pretty sure it was, although i didn't upload or download anything, at least it seemed to be OK.
Now, when i start Logger32, it starts, (is still loading), then starts Logsync, then Logsync freezes, then about 2 or 3 seconds later, Logger32 disappears from the screen, leaving me with a frozen Logsync screen.
I assume I should uninstall Logsync, and see what happens then.
Any advice on anything to try before I uninstall Logsync?
?
73? de? N2TBP? Mike
?
? |
Re: old CT logs
Hello Barry, I hope you can use the enclosed files. Well, Google don't allow ZIP/EXE-files as attachment, so I have unzipped the file and renamed the EXE file to: C2A.bak (rename it back to C2A.exe) If needed I have some older versions of the C2A. Good luck. vy 73 de Preben OZ5UR Den ons. 5. mar. 2025 kl. 23.53 skrev Barry via <barplo=[email protected]>:
|
Best Logging App
Does anybody know of a good cross platform (Windows and Android) app that allows for logging contacts?
1. Must work "offline", so not web based 2. Must allow syncing between platforms (when in mobile coverage)
3. Must have a search function 4. Must allow export in CSV or text formats.
|
Re: Azimuth's problems...
Here is working fine. w4ck.? ----> 297 za/w4ck ------> 115 73s Andrea iz2lsc Il giorno mer 5 mar 2025 alle ore 14:32 Bob via <k4cy=[email protected]> ha scritto:
|
Re: Azimuth's problems...
... or maybe you have ZA/W4CK (or W4CK) logged with an incorrect gridsquare? What have you actually done to try to analyze the cause of your problem yourself? SeventyThree(s).
|
Re: Azimuth's problems...
Oh no, you've broken it again! Did you try reloading the Club Log exceptions and the Club Log LoTW/OQRS users databases again? SeventyThree(s).
|
Azimuth's problems...
Hi, ? I don't know since when, but when I enter a callsign, the Azimuth indicated by logger is the right one, but if I precede the callsign with a prefix, followed by slash and the station callsign, instead of telling me the direction of the prefix that precedes, it always tells me the station direction. ? Example:? ? ? ? ? W4CK: 293¡ã/113¡ã ? When I enter ZA/W4C, it gives me the correct direction for ZA, 114¡ã/294¡ã, but when I enter the final K in the callsign, it changes back to 293¡ã (USA).? ? 73 de Steph, F5NZY. |
Re: Checkspot....
Lorenzo What do you expect CheckSpot ? It only displays your interested DX spot. Yes, clicking does nothing. This is by design. 73 de aki JA1NLX
|
Re: QSL Utility
Rick the reason I said it didn't upload is because one, I received an error message telling me to check the error log which I cannot find, two, normally after it says successful I see the QSO's in the lower right corner being processed which I didn't this time, and third I have been unable to reach LOTW on my network for the past two days and am trying to troubleshoot that. The last time something like this happened I exported a partial log and manually signed it with TQSL then uploaded it and it didn't report any duplicate QSO's that I can recall so that tells me they were never uploaded, unless as you stated it might take a day or two for the original upload to appear.
?
Jim K2QB |
Re: QSL Utility
¿ªÔÆÌåÓý
Dear all ... the uploaded file if it is uploaded on LoTW will no longer be on your computer you just have to give the time for the server to manage and at the same time there is actually the crossing of data that's all ... if you have any doubts just manually
flag any suspicious qsos when at the next sending these will be added again if missing otherwise if they are already present you will be notified by the system.
73's Steve
Da: [email protected] <[email protected]> per conto di Rick Ellison via groups.io <rellison@...>
Inviato: marted¨¬ 4 marzo 2025 02:41 A: [email protected] <[email protected]> Oggetto: Re: [hamlogger] QSL Utility ?
"The utility removes all the Flag to Upload to LOTW before it actually uploads the file. "
This is not the case. This question is being asked by Logger32 and has not passed any Data off to the utility at this point.
"Today I attempted to upload almost 800 QSO'S to LOTW and the utility indicated the ADIF file was signed and uploaded and asked if I wanted to remove the QSL upload flag to which I said yes. When I attempted to download from LOTW I was told there was an
error and to try again later. Well, the server was not available so now I have almost 800 QSO's that should still be flagged as Send LOTW QSL."
How do you know your qso's are not uploaded to LOTW? If you received a return from TQSL that says the upload was complete. 9 out of 10 times your qso's are located on LOTW and you just need to wait for them to show up. Over the past week I have been checking
LOTW a couple times a day for a qso to show up for another project I am working on and after 2 days it finally showed up for the other station I worked but I have yet seen no confirmation from the other station yet to show in my qso's.
"Isn't there a way that the Send LOTW QSL flag wouldn't get removed until there is an actual confirmation of a successful upload, not just the signing of the ADIF file by TQSL?"
On the utility on the LOTW tab there is a checkbox that tells the utility to update the qso flags in Logger32 as each qso is uploaded. This takes QUITE a bit of time (With 800 qso's I estimate about 20 minutes.) and a lot of people do not want to wait
that long. So the checkbox was put in place.
73 Rick N2AMG
On 3/3/2025 1:24 PM, Jim K2QB via groups.io wrote:
|