Re: QSO not accoounted for
What stats are you referring to? SeventyThree(s).
On 11/11/2024 2:46 AM EST Paul F6EXV via groups.io <f6exv@...> wrote:
?
?
So how do I get the stats for satellite QSOs ?
?
Logger32 does not include satellite QSOs in the DXCC-MIXED award. SeventyThree(s)
In 11/10/2024 3:26 PM EST Paul F6EXV via groups.io <f6exv@...> wrote:
?
?
Hi all
I am reverting on an issue which I cannot solve.
My kog has a QSO with France on 13cm (QO-100 contact) which is correctly entered in the log as indicated by Bob a couple of weeks ago.
The band is configured, and has a Y for stats.
France does not show as neither worked nor confirmed on the DXCC mixed award table.
There are many more such examples of QSOs not acoounted for.
?
What am I missing ?
?
See file attached.
?
73
Paul F6EXV
?
?
|
Re: QSO not accoounted for
Paul
Not sure if this is the solution to your issues (I don't operate QO-100) but;?
?
You do not appear to have a "SAT Band" row in your "Worked/Confirmed Table" as shown in paragraph 4 on page 390 of the Help Guide.
In the section: "How do I log QO-100 satellite QSOs correctly?" from Page 389 onwards.
Also, in your Awards Setup Table have you checked the boxes to track "DXCC_SAT" ?
--
73, John - G7SSE
|
Re: QSO not accoounted for
So how do I get the stats for satellite QSOs ?
Logger32 does not include satellite QSOs in the DXCC-MIXED award. SeventyThree(s)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
In 11/10/2024 3:26 PM EST Paul F6EXV via groups.io <f6exv@...> wrote:
?
?
Hi all
I am reverting on an issue which I cannot solve.
My kog has a QSO with France on 13cm (QO-100 contact) which is correctly entered in the log as indicated by Bob a couple of weeks ago.
The band is configured, and has a Y for stats.
France does not show as neither worked nor confirmed on the DXCC mixed award table.
There are many more such examples of QSOs not acoounted for.
?
What am I missing ?
?
See file attached.
?
73
Paul F6EXV
?
?
|
Re: LogSync No longer changing LOTW_SENT flag?
Lenz..
On the LOTW window do you have the checkbox checked to update
Logger32 LOTW flags checked??
If I remember correctly in one of your messages I told you to
turn Debug on and do a LOTW upload and after completing the upload
to trun debug off and send me the DebugLog.txt file? located in
the install directory of Logsync as an attachment. I have yet to
receive any attachments from you..
73 Rick N2AMG
On 11/10/2024 6:42 PM, Lorenz Grassl,
DL8RDL via groups.io wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hi to all,
Someone reported this before. He solved the problem by
updating TQSL.
Is TQSL the latest one ?
Yes that was me. It was not the TQSL-version which caused the
problem. It seems that the updating-process unchecks the
LOTW-upload-function. So make sure that it will be checked again
after updating.
73 de Lenz,
DL8RDL
On 2024-11-08
½ðê×ÈÕ 15:54:13, Rick Williams - VE7TK via groups.io <ve7tk@...>
wrote:
Something has changed ... I'm not sure if it's
pilot error on my part? (Often that is the problem!)
?
In the past LogSync gave me similar to that in the
message box shown in the manual after an up load to
LoTW.
?
?
Recently however the function, at my QTH, is
behaving differently. The LOTW_SEND flags are changed
HOWEVER the QSOs are not flagged as having been sent
to LoTW?
?
Here's the info box I get after an LoTW upload. If
I answer YES the LOTW_SEND flag is changed BUT the
LOTW_SENT flag is not set?
?
?
I am using LogSync 2.0.19.8, which seems to be the
latest. Is there a setting I have missed?
?
Thanks!
?
---------------
73, Rick
VE7TK
Website:?
|
Re: FT8 QSOs not logged automatically
I have no idea. There is no code in Logger32 that keeps count of the number of contacts that are automatically logged.
?
I use the cherry picker, but have only made a hand full of contacts. It has worked as expected.?
?
You have tried WSJT-X and JTDX with the same result. Maybe time to try another cherry-picker.
?
SeventyThree(s.
On 11/10/2024 8:16 PM EST Arturo LU6ETB via groups.io <lu6etb@...> wrote:
?
?
Hi Bob,
?
Today, I tried with JTDX v2.2.159
Same issue.
I did 22 qsos and they were logged automatically.
At qso nr 23, I was prompted to log the qso manually.
?
What I see is that if I do not press the ok, it is not logged neither in Logger nor in wsjtx_log.adi nor wsjtx.log
?
Exiting the JTDX and starting it again, does not solve the issue.
To have it working back it is needed to exit Logger32 and restart it.
?
I oppened the UDP message debug window.
The only difference ?I was able to notice between both cases is that the red "QSO log request" message is not showed.
?
Now, I did 32 qsos with no failure.
?
73
?
?
|
Re: FT8 QSOs not logged automatically
Did you start JTDX from UDP BandMap Start menu ?
On 2024-11-11 ÔÂê×ÈÕ 10:16:28, Arturo LU6ETB via groups.io <lu6etb@...> wrote:
Hi Bob,
?
Today, I tried with JTDX v2.2.159
Same issue.
I did 22 qsos and they were logged automatically.
At qso nr 23, I was prompted to log the qso manually.
?
What I see is that if I do not press the ok, it is not logged neither in Logger nor in wsjtx_log.adi nor wsjtx.log
?
Exiting the JTDX and starting it again, does not solve the issue.
To have it working back it is needed to exit Logger32 and restart it.
?
I oppened the UDP message debug window.
The only difference ?I was able to notice between both cases is that the red "QSO log request" message is not showed.
?
Now, I did 32 qsos with no failure.
?
73
?
?
|
Re: FT8 QSOs not logged automatically
Hi Bob,
?
Today, I tried with JTDX v2.2.159
Same issue.
I did 22 qsos and they were logged automatically.
At qso nr 23, I was prompted to log the qso manually.
?
What I see is that if I do not press the ok, it is not logged neither in Logger nor in wsjtx_log.adi nor wsjtx.log
?
Exiting the JTDX and starting it again, does not solve the issue.
To have it working back it is needed to exit Logger32 and restart it.
?
I oppened the UDP message debug window.
The only difference ?I was able to notice between both cases is that the red "QSO log request" message is not showed.
?
Now, I did 32 qsos with no failure.
?
73
?
?
|
Re: LogSync No longer changing LOTW_SENT flag?
Hi to all,
Someone reported this before. He solved the problem by
updating TQSL.
Is TQSL the latest one ?
Yes that was me. It was not the TQSL-version which caused the
problem. It seems that the updating-process unchecks the
LOTW-upload-function. So make sure that it will be checked again
after updating.
73 de Lenz,
DL8RDL
On 2024-11-08
½ðê×ÈÕ 15:54:13, Rick Williams - VE7TK via groups.io
<ve7tk@...> wrote:
Something has changed ... I'm not sure if it's pilot
error on my part? (Often that is the problem!)
?
In the past LogSync gave me similar to that in the
message box shown in the manual after an up load to
LoTW.
?
?
Recently however the function, at my QTH, is behaving
differently. The LOTW_SEND flags are changed HOWEVER the
QSOs are not flagged as having been sent to LoTW?
?
Here's the info box I get after an LoTW upload. If I
answer YES the LOTW_SEND flag is changed BUT the
LOTW_SENT flag is not set?
?
?
I am using LogSync 2.0.19.8, which seems to be the
latest. Is there a setting I have missed?
?
Thanks!
?
---------------
73, Rick
VE7TK
Website:?
|
Re: Logger32 and ... XIEGU G90
Harrr, my COM Port is defective ........ ;-(
?
Daniel
HB9DDS
|
Re: QSO not accoounted for
Logger32 does not include satellite QSOs in the DXCC-MIXED award. SeventyThree(s)
In 11/10/2024 3:26 PM EST Paul F6EXV via groups.io <f6exv@...> wrote:
?
?
Hi all
I am reverting on an issue which I cannot solve.
My kog has a QSO with France on 13cm (QO-100 contact) which is correctly entered in the log as indicated by Bob a couple of weeks ago.
The band is configured, and has a Y for stats.
France does not show as neither worked nor confirmed on the DXCC mixed award table.
There are many more such examples of QSOs not acoounted for.
?
What am I missing ?
?
See file attached.
?
73
Paul F6EXV
?
?
|
Hi all
I am reverting on an issue which I cannot solve.
My kog has a QSO with France on 13cm (QO-100 contact) which is correctly entered in the log as indicated by Bob a couple of weeks ago.
The band is configured, and has a Y for stats.
France does not show as neither worked nor confirmed on the DXCC mixed award table.
There are many more such examples of QSOs not acoounted for.
What am I missing ?
See file attached.
73
Paul F6EXV
|
Utlity program for Logger32 moved
Hi all
This page has been moved.? ?https://ja1nlx.web.fc2.com/UtilityProgram/index.html There are several updated and new utilities. Check new page.
|
Re: LogSync No longer changing LOTW_SENT flag?
I just checked mine as well, & that was turned off here
also!!
73
Ken ZL4NR
On 10/11/2024 6:33 am, Rick Williams -
VE7TK via groups.io wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks for getting back Aki & Rick. I deleted my earlier
post after I found another discussion on this issue.
?
It looks like the update process at my end unchecked the Update
Logger32 LOTW Flags After Upload.
?
So as expected the issue was one of pilot error on my part!
?
--
---------------
73, Rick
VE7TK
Website:?
|
Re: LogSync No longer changing LOTW_SENT flag?
Thanks for getting back Aki & Rick. I deleted my earlier post after I found another discussion on this issue.
?
It looks like the update process at my end unchecked the Update Logger32 LOTW Flags After Upload.
?
So as expected the issue was one of pilot error on my part!
?
--
---------------
73, Rick
VE7TK
Website:?
|
Re: LogSync No longer changing LOTW_SENT flag?
At first I was looking thru my code to see where the message was
located but those messages are from Logger32 not from Logsync.
Those messages are generated just before Logger32 sends Logsync a
message to upload the file it created..
73 Rick
On 11/8/2024 2:06 AM, ja1nlx wrote:
Rick
Someone reported this before. He solved the problem by
updating TQSL.
Is TQSL the latest one ?
On 2024-11-08
½ðê×ÈÕ 15:54:13, Rick Williams - VE7TK via groups.io
<ve7tk@...> wrote:
Something has changed ... I'm not sure if it's pilot
error on my part? (Often that is the problem!)
?
In the past LogSync gave me similar to that in the
message box shown in the manual after an up load to
LoTW.
?
?
Recently however the function, at my QTH, is behaving
differently. The LOTW_SEND flags are changed HOWEVER the
QSOs are not flagged as having been sent to LoTW?
?
Here's the info box I get after an LoTW upload. If I
answer YES the LOTW_SEND flag is changed BUT the
LOTW_SENT flag is not set?
?
?
I am using LogSync 2.0.19.8, which seems to be the
latest. Is there a setting I have missed?
?
Thanks!
?
---------------
73, Rick
VE7TK
Website:?
|
Re: LogSync No longer changing LOTW_SENT flag?
Rick Someone reported this before. He solved the problem by updating TQSL.
On 2024-11-08 ½ðê×ÈÕ 15:54:13, Rick Williams - VE7TK via groups.io <ve7tk@...> wrote: Something has changed ... I'm not sure if it's pilot error on my part? (Often that is the problem!)
?
In the past LogSync gave me similar to that in the message box shown in the manual after an up load to LoTW.
?
?
Recently however the function, at my QTH, is behaving differently. The LOTW_SEND flags are changed HOWEVER the QSOs are not flagged as having been sent to LoTW?
?
Here's the info box I get after an LoTW upload. If I answer YES the LOTW_SEND flag is changed BUT the LOTW_SENT flag is not set?
?
?
I am using LogSync 2.0.19.8, which seems to be the latest. Is there a setting I have missed?
?
Thanks!
?
---------------
73, Rick
VE7TK
Website:?
|
Correction:
?
The speed up plus is translated to chr$(187) ?
andthe speed down minus is translated to chr$(171) ?
?
SeventyThree(s).
On 11/07/2024 2:57 PM EST Bob via groups.io <k4cy@...> wrote:
?
?
I made a macro BLAH BLAH $SPEED +++++$? BLAH BLAH
?
When I click on the macro button the transmit pane of the CW Machine is populated? BLAH BLAH ????? IBLAH BLAH. The + is translated to ? chr$(187). And it I had $SPEED - - - - -$? the - is translated to ? Chr$(171)
?
When the CW Machine sees a ? or a ??it does not transmit the character, it bumps the speed up or down.
?
I assume your PC does not use the same character set and the chr$(187) is a / or something. SeventyThree(s).
?
On 11/07/2024 12:10 PM EST Regin, OY1R <dreamglider@...> wrote:
?
?
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 11:46 AM, Regin, OY1R wrote:
i use the Winkeyer and the hardware microHAM Digi Keyer II. I just updated logger32, still not working, now the $speed+$ macro command sends "/"
it sends the + in the $speed+$ an a "/" ( -..-. )
If the macro is $call$ $speed++++++$ $sentrstn$ it sends "OY1R ////// 5NN"
?
?
?
Regin, OY1R
|
I made a macro BLAH BLAH $SPEED +++++$? BLAH BLAH
?
When I click on the macro button the transmit pane of the CW Machine is populated? BLAH BLAH ????? IBLAH BLAH. The + is translated to ? chr$(187). And it I had $SPEED - - - - -$? the - is translated to ? Chr$(171)
?
When the CW Machine sees a ? or a ??it does not transmit the character, it bumps the speed up or down.
?
I assume your PC does not use the same character set and the chr$(187) is a / or something. SeventyThree(s).
?
On 11/07/2024 12:10 PM EST Regin, OY1R <dreamglider@...> wrote:
?
?
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 11:46 AM, Regin, OY1R wrote:
i use the Winkeyer and the hardware microHAM Digi Keyer II. I just updated logger32, still not working, now the $speed+$ macro command sends "/"
it sends the + in the $speed+$ an a "/" ( -..-. )
If the macro is $call$ $speed++++++$ $sentrstn$ it sends "OY1R ////// 5NN"
?
?
?
Regin, OY1R
|
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 11:46 AM, Regin, OY1R wrote:
i use the Winkeyer and the hardware microHAM Digi Keyer II. I just updated logger32, still not working, now the $speed+$ macro command sends "/"
it sends the + in the $speed+$ an a "/" ( -..-. )
If the macro is $call$ $speed++++++$ $sentrstn$ it sends "OY1R ////// 5NN"
?
?
?
Regin, OY1R
|
Re: Logger32 and ... XIEGU G90
Daniel,
?
Have you read and followed the instructions in the G90 manual? url:
?
?
?
?
--
Gerald, VE1DT
|
John Munton - G7SSE
HB9DDS
Rick Williams - VE7TK
Gerald Boutin