Set/Show width on DX Clusters is an interesting subject. I have checked several, and they all show a default width of 75. The minimum setting allowed is 45. Just for fun, I set the width to 46. Only the first character is displayed. Set the width to 47 and the first two characters of the comment showed.?So the default width setting of 75 is actually 30 characters of comments are allowed. The excess is truncated.
?
I'm more than happy with the default.
SeventyThree(s).
On 05/05/2025 2:40 PM EDT Andrea via groups.io <fuffa2k5@...> wrote:
?
?
Would it be possible to increment this limit, if it doesn't bother you too much??
Maybe it had a sense at the epoc of the packet cluster but nowadays the limit of 30 characters is a bit anachronistic.
You can see below some spots received by logger32 with more than 30 chars.
?
?
Thanks
Andrea iz2lsc
?
Logger32 limits DX Spot comments to 30 characters. SeventyThree(s).
?
?
The need is to send spot with more than 30 char?comment?using a single?DX command.?
No, the cluster will not remove all excess text, as far as you set the width (i.e. set/width 120)
?
73
?
Andrea
?
?
This will send the DX Spot as a single long line. The cluster will remove all excess text. SeventyThree(s).
?
?
Hi,
when I send a spot with a long comment then it is splitted into multiple dxspots.
Dxcluster doesn't like this as the multiple dxspots are considered duplicated.
Would it be possible to send only one dxspot with the whole comment?
?
Details below
?
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1517Z dxspider >
DX 24910.0 I4TEST this is a long test message,
DX 24910.0 I4TEST perhaps too much
DX 24910.0 I4TEST long!!!!!!!!!!
DX de IZ2LSC: ? ?24910.0 ?I4TEST ? ? ? this is a long test message, ? 1519Z
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1519Z dxspider >
Sorry, this is a duplicate
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1519Z dxspider >
Sorry, this is a duplicate
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1519Z dxspider >
?
?
?
?
|
Would it be possible to increment this limit, if it doesn't bother you too much?? Maybe it had a sense at the epoc of the packet cluster but nowadays the limit of 30 characters is a bit anachronistic. You can see below some spots received by logger32 with more than 30 chars.
Thanks Andrea iz2lsc
Logger32 limits DX Spot comments to 30 characters. SeventyThree(s).
?
?
The need is to send spot with more than 30 char?comment?using a single?DX command.?
No, the cluster will not remove all excess text, as far as you set the width (i.e. set/width 120)
?
73
?
Andrea
?
?
This will send the DX Spot as a single long line. The cluster will remove all excess text. SeventyThree(s).
?
?
Hi,
when I send a spot with a long comment then it is splitted into multiple dxspots.
Dxcluster doesn't like this as the multiple dxspots are considered duplicated.
Would it be possible to send only one dxspot with the whole comment?
?
Details below
?
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1517Z dxspider >
DX 24910.0 I4TEST this is a long test message,
DX 24910.0 I4TEST perhaps too much
DX 24910.0 I4TEST long!!!!!!!!!!
DX de IZ2LSC: ? ?24910.0 ?I4TEST ? ? ? this is a long test message, ? 1519Z
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1519Z dxspider >
Sorry, this is a duplicate
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1519Z dxspider >
Sorry, this is a duplicate
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1519Z dxspider >
?
?
|
Logger32 limits DX Spot comments to 30 characters. SeventyThree(s).
On 05/05/2025 1:10 PM EDT Andrea via groups.io <fuffa2k5@...> wrote:
?
?
The need is to send spot with more than 30 char?comment?using a single?DX command.?
No, the cluster will not remove all excess text, as far as you set the width (i.e. set/width 120)
?
73
?
Andrea
?
?
This will send the DX Spot as a single long line. The cluster will remove all excess text. SeventyThree(s).
?
?
Hi,
when I send a spot with a long comment then it is splitted into multiple dxspots.
Dxcluster doesn't like this as the multiple dxspots are considered duplicated.
Would it be possible to send only one dxspot with the whole comment?
?
Details below
?
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1517Z dxspider >
DX 24910.0 I4TEST this is a long test message,
DX 24910.0 I4TEST perhaps too much
DX 24910.0 I4TEST long!!!!!!!!!!
DX de IZ2LSC: ? ?24910.0 ?I4TEST ? ? ? this is a long test message, ? 1519Z
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1519Z dxspider >
Sorry, this is a duplicate
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1519Z dxspider >
Sorry, this is a duplicate
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1519Z dxspider >
?
?
|
The need is to send spot with more than 30 char?comment?using a single?DX command.? No, the cluster will not remove all excess text, as far as you set the width (i.e. set/width 120)
73
Andrea
?
This will send the DX Spot as a single long line. The cluster will remove all excess text. SeventyThree(s).
?
?
Hi,
when I send a spot with a long comment then it is splitted into multiple dxspots.
Dxcluster doesn't like this as the multiple dxspots are considered duplicated.
Would it be possible to send only one dxspot with the whole comment?
?
Details below
?
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1517Z dxspider >
DX 24910.0 I4TEST this is a long test message,
DX 24910.0 I4TEST perhaps too much
DX 24910.0 I4TEST long!!!!!!!!!!
DX de IZ2LSC: ? ?24910.0 ?I4TEST ? ? ? this is a long test message, ? 1519Z
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1519Z dxspider >
Sorry, this is a duplicate
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1519Z dxspider >
Sorry, this is a duplicate
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1519Z dxspider >
|
?
This will send the DX Spot as a single long line. The cluster will remove all excess text. SeventyThree(s).
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 05/05/2025 11:33 AM EDT Andrea via groups.io <fuffa2k5@...> wrote:
?
?
Hi,
when I send a spot with a long comment then it is splitted into multiple dxspots.
Dxcluster doesn't like this as the multiple dxspots are considered duplicated.
Would it be possible to send only one dxspot with the whole comment?
?
Details below
?
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1517Z dxspider >
DX 24910.0 I4TEST this is a long test message,
DX 24910.0 I4TEST perhaps too much
DX 24910.0 I4TEST long!!!!!!!!!!
DX de IZ2LSC: ? ?24910.0 ?I4TEST ? ? ? this is a long test message, ? 1519Z
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1519Z dxspider >
Sorry, this is a duplicate
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1519Z dxspider >
Sorry, this is a duplicate
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1519Z dxspider >
|
Re: Export to ADIF without QSO numbering
You can export your contest log then import it into ADIF Master. Delete the QSO numbers, save it and then import it into Logger32.
?
Jim K2QB
|
Hi,
when I send a spot with a long comment then it is splitted into multiple dxspots. Dxcluster doesn't like this as the multiple dxspots are considered duplicated. Would it be possible to send only one dxspot with the whole comment?
Details below
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1517Z dxspider >
DX 24910.0 I4TEST this is a long test message,
DX 24910.0 I4TEST perhaps too much
DX 24910.0 I4TEST long!!!!!!!!!!
DX de IZ2LSC: ? ?24910.0 ?I4TEST ? ? ? this is a long test message, ? 1519Z
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1519Z dxspider >
Sorry, this is a duplicate
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1519Z dxspider >
Sorry, this is a duplicate
IZ2LSC-1 de IZ2LSC-55 ?5-May-2025 1519Z dxspider >
|
Re: CheckCall - Data Import
Nope - I was expecting auto populate.
I said it would be something very stupid ?
Mark
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Mark
You need to click the line in popup window to transfer data to Logger32.
You did ?
On 2025-05-05 ÔÂ 19:48:55, Mark via groups.io <mark.g0mgx@...> wrote:
Correction, menu says 8.1 but banner in app says 8.2.
Mark
I have 8.1
MarK
What is the version of CheckCall ?
The latest one is ver8.2.
If you mean CheckCallMini, then the latest one is ver7.2.
On 2025-05-05 ÔÂ 18:51:40, Mark via <mark.g0mgx=[email protected]> wrote:
Hi All
?
I'm struggling with something very simple, which usualy means I've missed something very stupid :-(
?
I have CheckCall by JA1NLX on my Utilities menu and it is configured to auto lookup the call field from the log entry window - mine looks up membership numbers of CWOps and FISTS. This is working as the "lookup for <<CALL>>" window displays the results
correctly.
?
In Logger32 I have the USER field 1 set up as:
?
?
and similarly for FISTS I have User field 2 configuerd:
?
?
In CheckCall I have "enable to transfer data to Logger32" selected and USER_1 field selected for file1 (which is my CWOps data file) and similarly for USER_2 field for FISTS.
?
My problem is that the lookup works, but the data doesnt populate into my users fields in L32.
?
Can anyone help?
?
Mark
G0MGX
?
?
|
Re: CheckCall - Data Import
Mark You need to click the line in popup window to transfer data to Logger32. You did ?
On 2025-05-05 ÔÂ 19:48:55, Mark via groups.io <mark.g0mgx@...> wrote:
Correction, menu says 8.1 but banner in app says 8.2.
Mark
I have 8.1
MarK
What is the version of CheckCall ?
The latest one is ver8.2.
If you mean CheckCallMini, then the latest one is ver7.2.
On 2025-05-05 ÔÂ 18:51:40, Mark via <mark.g0mgx=[email protected]> wrote:
Hi All
?
I'm struggling with something very simple, which usualy means I've missed something very stupid :-(
?
I have CheckCall by JA1NLX on my Utilities menu and it is configured to auto lookup the call field from the log entry window - mine looks up membership numbers of CWOps and FISTS. This is working as the "lookup for <<CALL>>" window displays the results
correctly.
?
In Logger32 I have the USER field 1 set up as:
?
?
and similarly for FISTS I have User field 2 configuerd:
?
?
In CheckCall I have "enable to transfer data to Logger32" selected and USER_1 field selected for file1 (which is my CWOps data file) and similarly for USER_2 field for FISTS.
?
My problem is that the lookup works, but the data doesnt populate into my users fields in L32.
?
Can anyone help?
?
Mark
G0MGX
?
?
|
Re: CheckCall - Data Import
Correction, menu says 8.1 but banner in app says 8.2.
Mark
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I have 8.1
MarK
What is the version of CheckCall ?
The latest one is ver8.2.
If you mean CheckCallMini, then the latest one is ver7.2.
On 2025-05-05 ÔÂ 18:51:40, Mark via <mark.g0mgx=[email protected]> wrote:
Hi All
?
I'm struggling with something very simple, which usualy means I've missed something very stupid :-(
?
I have CheckCall by JA1NLX on my Utilities menu and it is configured to auto lookup the call field from the log entry window - mine looks up membership numbers of CWOps and FISTS. This is working as the "lookup for <<CALL>>" window displays the results
correctly.
?
In Logger32 I have the USER field 1 set up as:
?
?
and similarly for FISTS I have User field 2 configuerd:
?
?
In CheckCall I have "enable to transfer data to Logger32" selected and USER_1 field selected for file1 (which is my CWOps data file) and similarly for USER_2 field for FISTS.
?
My problem is that the lookup works, but the data doesnt populate into my users fields in L32.
?
Can anyone help?
?
Mark
G0MGX
?
?
|
Re: CheckCall - Data Import
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
MarK What is the version of CheckCall ? The latest one is ver8.2. If you mean CheckCallMini, then the latest one is ver7.2.
On 2025-05-05 ÔÂ 18:51:40, Mark via <mark.g0mgx=[email protected]> wrote: Hi All
?
I'm struggling with something very simple, which usualy means I've missed something very stupid :-(
?
I have CheckCall by JA1NLX on my Utilities menu and it is configured to auto lookup the call field from the log entry window - mine looks up membership numbers of CWOps and FISTS. This is working as the "lookup for <<CALL>>" window displays the results correctly.
?
In Logger32 I have the USER field 1 set up as:
?
?
and similarly for FISTS I have User field 2 configuerd:
?
?
In CheckCall I have "enable to transfer data to Logger32" selected and USER_1 field selected for file1 (which is my CWOps data file) and similarly for USER_2 field for FISTS.
?
My problem is that the lookup works, but the data doesnt populate into my users fields in L32.
?
Can anyone help?
?
Mark
G0MGX
?
?
|
Re: CheckCall - Data Import
MarK What is the version of CheckCall ? The latest one is ver8.2. If you mean CheckCallMini, then the latest one is ver7.2.
On 2025-05-05 ÔÂ 18:51:40, Mark via groups.io <mark.g0mgx@...> wrote: Hi All
?
I'm struggling with something very simple, which usualy means I've missed something very stupid :-(
?
I have CheckCall by JA1NLX on my Utilities menu and it is configured to auto lookup the call field from the log entry window - mine looks up membership numbers of CWOps and FISTS. This is working as the "lookup for <<CALL>>" window displays the results correctly.
?
In Logger32 I have the USER field 1 set up as:
?
?
and similarly for FISTS I have User field 2 configuerd:
?
?
In CheckCall I have "enable to transfer data to Logger32" selected and USER_1 field selected for file1 (which is my CWOps data file) and similarly for USER_2 field for FISTS.
?
My problem is that the lookup works, but the data doesnt populate into my users fields in L32.
?
Can anyone help?
?
Mark
G0MGX
?
?
|
Hi All
?
I'm struggling with something very simple, which usualy means I've missed something very stupid :-(
?
I have CheckCall by JA1NLX on my Utilities menu and it is configured to auto lookup the call field from the log entry window - mine looks up membership numbers of CWOps and FISTS. This is working as the "lookup for <<CALL>>" window displays the results correctly.
?
In Logger32 I have the USER field 1 set up as:
?
?
and similarly for FISTS I have User field 2 configuerd:
?
?
In CheckCall I have "enable to transfer data to Logger32" selected and USER_1 field selected for file1 (which is my CWOps data file) and similarly for USER_2 field for FISTS.
?
My problem is that the lookup works, but the data doesnt populate into my users fields in L32.
?
Can anyone help?
?
Mark
G0MGX
?
?
|
Re: Export to ADIF without QSO numbering
Try this. 1. Backup your Logbook in ADIF. 2. Import your contest log. 3. Reformat QSO number. (Tool/Database meintenance/Reformat QSO number)
On 2025-05-05 ÔÂ 17:14:13, Peter Koch via groups.io <pk@...> wrote: Hi Group,
?
Simple question -- hopefully...
?
Is it possible to export a complete logbook to ADIF, but without the QSO numbers.
?
Reason for asking is that I'm using L32 for RTTY contesting -- and yes, it works actually quite well -- and afterwards I'd like to import the contest log into my ordinary logbook.
?
However, if the contest log contains QSO numbers, it causes two QSOs with the same number when being merged into the main log which, of course, contains the overall consecutive QSO numbering.
?
Or maybe there is a better / smarter workaround to this issue...??
?
73 de OZ1LFI
|
Export to ADIF without QSO numbering
Hi Group,
?
Simple question -- hopefully...
?
Is it possible to export a complete logbook to ADIF, but without the QSO numbers.
?
Reason for asking is that I'm using L32 for RTTY contesting -- and yes, it works actually quite well -- and afterwards I'd like to import the contest log into my ordinary logbook.
?
However, if the contest log contains QSO numbers, it causes two QSOs with the same number when being merged into the main log which, of course, contains the overall consecutive QSO numbering.
?
Or maybe there is a better / smarter workaround to this issue...??
?
73 de OZ1LFI
|
Re: Problems with lagging / MMTTY engine
Hi Bob et al.,
?
Thanks for the many constructive suggestions -- unfortunately neither worked, and this problem was therefore gradually driving me crazy. So, this weekend I decided to uninstall L32 and then start all over. My installation was an upgrade from ver. 3 or from the very early ver. 4, can't remember exactly.
?
Although it is always a pain to start from scratch, it helped -- things are now working flawlessly.
?
Thanks for a nice logging software.
?
73 de OZ1LFI
|
That pearl of wisdom has been in the manual for at least a year, in section 49.3 for the TS-570 and TS-870 ...
73 Gary? ?beater/tester &?
Honor Roll &? checker
Thanks for posting. I'm sure this pearl of wisdom will make it into the documentation.?Don't you just?hate it when your radio is smarter than you are? SeventyThree(s).
On 05/04/2025 8:37 PM EDT Bill Neumann < billn@...> wrote:
?
?
Dilemma solved. After much research, I found that the TS870 needs to use a straight through serial cable.
Once I obtained one and plugged it in, CAT control took right off! Just a note for anyone else looking.
?
73?
Bill
KB0RMS
|
Thanks for posting. I'm sure this pearl of wisdom will make it into the documentation.?Don't you just?hate it when your radio is smarter than you are? SeventyThree(s).
On 05/04/2025 8:37 PM EDT Bill Neumann <billn@...> wrote:
?
?
Dilemma solved. After much research, I found that the TS870 needs to use a straight through serial cable.
Once I obtained one and plugged it in, CAT control took right off! Just a note for anyone else looking.
?
73?
Bill
KB0RMS
|
Dilemma solved. After much research, I found that the TS870 needs to use a straight through serial cable.
Once I obtained one and plugged it in, CAT control took right off! Just a note for anyone else looking.
?
73?
Bill
KB0RMS
|
Re: Automatic Capitalizing State Field + one More
Thanks to all- I really do RTFM but this tidbit eluded several searches.? Gary, you are a candidate for Ham Radio Saint Hood for writing and maintaining that incredible manual.? I wish that most commercial software was one tenth as good as your Logger32 manual.
TU to Aki and for Bob for being both? helpful and kind.
73, Dave WB2PJH
|
Jim K2QB
Mark
ZL2iFB