开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Tank eff......WAS 3 - phase HV supply


pentalab
 

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., "PA3DUV" <pa3duv@...> wrote:

Hey guys,

don't make a fuss about the last killowatt :-))))))))))))))))

Cheers, Dick
PA3DUV


----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Voelpel
To: ham_amplifiers@...
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 10:29 PM
Subject: RE: [ham_amplifiers] Re: 3 - phase HV supply


Sorry,


Indeed, for 25KW out one needs 45KVA, but only in class B.
67% efficiency is a bit high in class AB, it will be around 63%
minus loss in the pi-network.
Some of the output in a GG amp is coming from the driver, so
efficiency is NOT= output*100%/input power...

### How come all the tetrode fellows always say that ?? We
carefully measured the eff on this latest 6000A7 linear... and
got 67%. Now granted... the wattmeter slug could be a little
high... the plate current + HV meter's could be a little low...
skewing the results.

### Figure maybe 1% loss in the tank circuit... from the coil.
And more like almost 2% on 10m.[ 1-2% of the power output]
The kicker is.... on 10m...all that tank coil heat is being dumped
into just 2 x turns..... vs less heat being dumped into the
ENTIRE coil (or a portion of it)... on the lower bands.

### In various tests I have done... one would think that on say a
20-10m coil.... that when on say 15m.... that the adjacent
unused portion of the coil would heatsink the used portion......
it sorta does... poorly. It ends up the used portion will get
hot... the unused portion [next turn over] runs barely warm... go
figure.

### BTW.... most Vac caps have an unloaded Q of around 5000....
compared to a typ tank coil of 100-300. IMO... most of the tank
losses are going to be in the tank coil... interconnecting
straps.... bandswitch contacts, etc.

### You need very very few watts to heat up a tank coil....esp
hollow tubing. With solid material... like say 8 ga wire
[used on the L4B 2 x 3-500Z] used on 80/40m.. or say solid 6
ga wire used on some 20m coils.... it just takes longer to heat
up..... the flipside is... with any solid material.... it takes a
helluva lot longer to cool down.... cuz of the the stored up heat
inside a bigger thermal mass.

### On a related subject.... if I remember correctly, in
Eimac's .. "care and feeding" for thermal properties... copper
was ... '1.0' and aluminium was '.57' IE: aluminium
doesn't conduct heat worth banana's... compared to copper !
Steel, and stainless steel is a LOT worse......... just
something to keep in mind.

## A few months back.... I bought a Fluke "Mini 62" IR point and
shoot thermonter.... comes with a built in laser pointer.... and can
be switched from C to F as well. Works slick.... and will
give instant readings onto one LCD display ... and a 2nd
display will always hold the peak highest temp. [both backlit to
boot] By holding the trigger down solid... and moving the
laser pointer about slowly... or quickly.... you can find hot
spots all over the place ! You can see quickly where you are
leaking heat from the outside of a home.... measure exhaust
manifold temps, xfmr's... tank coils... find where ur attic is
not insulated properly [heat radiating down from a ceiling... in
just one spot], and doz's of other uses..... like measuring
exhaust air temp from a linear... Air conditioning problems in the
home or car. This Fluke 62 goes from below freezing
[instant temp readings of ur fridge/deep freezer] to something
like 900 deg F. It will easily differentiate between one part of
a tank coil.... and another portion... just a few mm away. A
great bargain for around $100.00 Shop around.



### IMO.... since a huge portion of the drive power on a GG linear
[ in this case, 640w of the 800 w of drive used] appears in the
output.... I'd consider that ... "free extra eff".

### In any event... anode dissipation is REDUCED... if apparent
eff is UP.

## DC plate input - power out = anode diss. What am I
supposed to do.... subtract the drive power... from the power
output 1st.... THEN calculate plate diss ??? Nobody is about
to do that.... so why bother subtracting the drive power from the
output, to cal eff ?

### I tried several experiments by varying the loaded tank Q on
various bands... and also varying the loaded tank Q on the tuned
input network. Now Rauch will tell you tank Q makes no diff..
and is not important.... and a loaded Q of "22" is just fine.....
fact is loaded Q on a tank circuit DOES make a big
difference. A loaded Q of around 3.3 for a tuned input is fine
[this would equate to Q =2 doing it Rich's way]. A loaded Q
of 10-12 [new method] [ 8-10 old method] is ample for the high
power PI output. You start running a Q of 12-22 [new
method].... you can easily see, and measure effects asap. The
circulating currents skyrocket... tank coils + bandswitch / roller
inductor conacts heat up.... eff DROPS, amp tuning becomes narrow
banded... requiring more frequent tune ups, when u qsy etc.

### On a tuned input.... I tried a Q of 5.... eff drops..esp on
the higher bands. We used bird line sections on both the
input/output of the tuned input circuit [consisted of 2 x
broadcast variables + a tapped 4 uh coilt] output through the 2nd
line section... then into a 50 ohm load was 150-160w . By
INcreasing the small coil's uh tap... just a tiny bit.....
lowering the Q.... and power out of the tuned input... shot up to
195 w.

### with too high a Q on a tuned input... we could actually get
the 5/32 " solid copper 4uh coil good and warm on the high
bands 20-17-15m.

### IF the tuned input is NOT done correctly..... it will kill
ur eff.. real fast. Locating the C2 tuned input variable cap
closer to the tube socket/ and/or installing a small 100 pf NPO
doorknob next to the socket..[ in effect moving a portion of C2
closer to the socket] will improve the eff on the higher bands.

### I'd say we may well be arguing semantics here.... but I'd
say it's just one more advantage of GG amps.... better apparent
eff... and slightly lower plate diss.

Later... Jim VE7RF

73
Peter


PA3DUV
 

开云体育

> ## A few months back.... I? bought a Fluke? "Mini 62"?? IR point and
> shoot thermonter.... comes with a built in laser pointer.... and can
> be? switched? from C? to F as well.??? Works slick.... and will?
> give? instant readings onto? one LCD? display
?
2 weeks ago I checked out? my twin GU84B tetrode amp with that.
?
Running 6 kW on 7 MHz into the R&S dummyload I found the following hot spots:
?
The connection between tubular wound 20 meter coil and the lead to the toroidal 40/80/160 meter coil
?
The coil section on the INSIDE of the toroid
?
The connection from the coil to the bandswitch
?
The hottest point was the coil section INSIDE the toroid, 200C + was measured
?
The DC blocking caps (2 in parallel) remained remarkable cool, no significabt temperature rise.
?
The anode coolers went up to 95C
?
The 10-20-30 meter tank coil section went up to 130C
?
I'll post some pictures of the actual measurement when I'm back home.
?
Cheers from YMM, Alberta,
Dick, PA3DUV
?
?
?

----- Original Message -----
From: pentalab
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 10:45 PM
Subject: [ham_amplifiers] Re: Tank eff......WAS 3 - phase HV supply

--- In ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com, "PA3DUV" wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> don't make a fuss about the last killowatt :-))))))))))))))))
>
> Cheers, Dick
> PA3DUV
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Peter Voelpel
> To: ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 10:29 PM
> Subject: RE: [ham_amplifiers] Re: 3 - phase HV supply
>
>
> Sorry,
>
>
> Indeed, for 25KW out one needs 45KVA, but only in class B.
> 67% efficiency is a bit high in class AB, it will be around 63%
minus loss in the pi-network.
> Some of the output in a GG amp is coming from the driver, so
efficiency is NOT= output*100%/input power...

### How come all the tetrode fellows always say that ?? We
carefully measured the eff on this latest 6000A7 linear... and
got 67%. Now granted... the wattmeter slug could be a little
high... the plate current + HV meter's could be a little low...
skewing the results.

### Figure maybe 1% loss in the tank circuit... from the coil.
And more like almost 2% on 10m.[ 1-2% of the power output]
The kicker is.... on 10m...all that tank coil heat is being dumped
into just 2 x turns..... vs less heat being dumped into the
ENTIRE coil (or a portion of it)... on the lower bands.

### In various tests I have done... one would think that on say a
20-10m coil.... that when on say 15m.... that the adjacent
unused portion of the coil would heatsink the used portion......
it sorta does... poorly. It ends up the used portion will get
hot... the unused portion [next turn over] runs barely warm... go
figure.

### BTW.... most Vac caps have an unloaded Q of around 5000....
compared to a typ tank coil of 100-300. IMO... most of the tank
losses are going to be in the tank coil... interconnecting
straps.... bandswitch contacts, etc.

### You need very very few watts to heat up a tank coil....esp
hollow tubing. With solid material... like say 8 ga wire
[used on the L4B 2 x 3-500Z] used on 80/40m.. or say solid 6
ga wire used on some 20m coils.... it just takes longer to heat
up..... the flipside is... with any solid material.... it takes a
helluva lot longer to cool down.... cuz of the the stored up heat
inside a bigger thermal mass.

### On a related subject.... if I remember correctly, in
Eimac's .. "care and feeding" for thermal properties... copper
was ... '1.0' and aluminium was '.57' IE: aluminium
doesn't conduct heat worth banana's... compared to copper !
Steel, and stainless steel is a LOT worse......... just
something to keep in mind.

## A few months back.... I bought a Fluke "Mini 62" IR point and
shoot thermonter.... comes with a built in laser pointer.... and can
be switched from C to F as well. Works slick.... and will
give instant readings onto one LCD display ... and a 2nd
display will always hold the peak highest temp. [both backlit to
boot] By holding the trigger down solid... and moving the
laser pointer about slowly... or quickly.... you can find hot
spots all over the place ! You can see quickly where you are
leaking heat from the outside of a home.... measure exhaust
manifold temps, xfmr's... tank coils... find where ur attic is
not insulated properly [heat radiating down from a ceiling... in
just one spot], and doz's of other uses..... like measuring
exhaust air temp from a linear... Air conditioning problems in the
home or car. This Fluke 62 goes from below freezing
[instant temp readings of ur fridge/deep freezer] to something
like 900 deg F. It will easily differentiate between one part of
a tank coil.... and another portion... just a few mm away. A
great bargain for around $100.00 Shop around.

### IMO.... since a huge portion of the drive power on a GG linear
[ in this case, 640w of the 800 w of drive used] appears in the
output.... I'd consider that ... "free extra eff".

### In any event... anode dissipation is REDUCED... if apparent
eff is UP.

## DC plate input - power out = anode diss. What am I
supposed to do.... subtract the drive power... from the power
output 1st.... THEN calculate plate diss ??? Nobody is about
to do that.... so why bother subtracting the drive power from the
output, to cal eff ?

### I tried several experiments by varying the loaded tank Q on
various bands... and also varying the loaded tank Q on the tuned
input network. Now Rauch will tell you tank Q makes no diff..
and is not important.... and a loaded Q of "22" is just fine.....
fact is loaded Q on a tank circuit DOES make a big
difference. A loaded Q of around 3.3 for a tuned input is fine
[this would equate to Q =2 doing it Rich's way]. A loaded Q
of 10-12 [new method] [ 8-10 old method] is ample for the high
power PI output. You start running a Q of 12-22 [new
method].... you can easily see, and measure effects asap. The
circulating currents skyrocket... tank coils + bandswitch / roller
inductor conacts heat up.... eff DROPS, amp tuning becomes narrow
banded... requiring more frequent tune ups, when u qsy etc.

### On a tuned input.... I tried a Q of 5.... eff drops..esp on
the higher bands. We used bird line sections on both the
input/output of the tuned input circuit [consisted of 2 x
broadcast variables + a tapped 4 uh coilt] output through the 2nd
line section... then into a 50 ohm load was 150-160w . By
INcreasing the small coil's uh tap... just a tiny bit.....
lowering the Q.... and power out of the tuned input... shot up to
195 w.

### with too high a Q on a tuned input... we could actually get
the 5/32 " solid copper 4uh coil good and warm on the high
bands 20-17-15m.

### IF the tuned input is NOT done correctly..... it will kill
ur eff.. real fast. Locating the C2 tuned input variable cap
closer to the tube socket/ and/or installing a small 100 pf NPO
doorknob next to the socket..[ in effect moving a portion of C2
closer to the socket] will improve the eff on the higher bands.

### I'd say we may well be arguing semantics here.... but I'd
say it's just one more advantage of GG amps.... better apparent
eff... and slightly lower plate diss.

Later... Jim VE7RF

> 73
> Peter
>


Peter Voelpel
 

________________________________

From: ham_amplifiers@... [mailto:ham_amplifiers@...]
On Behalf Of pentalab

Some of the output in a GG amp is coming from the driver, so
efficiency is NOT= output*100%/input power...

### How come all the tetrode fellows always say that ?? We
carefully measured the eff on this latest 6000A7 linear... and
got 67%. Now granted... the wattmeter slug could be a little
high... the plate current + HV meter's could be a little low...
skewing the results.

lets assume you drive the 3CX6000 with 1KW.
63% of this drive power is on the output.
the driving power is from a different power supply.
when you calculate efficieny you have to deduct 630W from what is shown on
your wattmeter


### Figure maybe 1% loss in the tank circuit... from the coil.
And more like almost 2% on 10m.[ 1-2% of the power output]
The kicker is.... on 10m...all that tank coil heat is being dumped
into just 2 x turns..... vs less heat being dumped into the
ENTIRE coil (or a portion of it)... on the lower bands.

### In various tests I have done... one would think that on say a
20-10m coil.... that when on say 15m.... that the adjacent
unused portion of the coil would heatsink the used portion......
it sorta does... poorly. It ends up the used portion will get
hot... the unused portion [next turn over] runs barely warm... go
figure.

shure, it must be
there is no rf current flowing in the unused part
### You need very very few watts to heat up a tank coil....esp
hollow tubing. With solid material... like say 8 ga wire
[used on the L4B 2 x 3-500Z] used on 80/40m.. or say solid 6
ga wire used on some 20m coils.... it just takes longer to heat
up..... the flipside is... with any solid material.... it takes a
helluva lot longer to cool down.... cuz of the the stored up heat
inside a bigger thermal mass.

one reason I use bigger material for the coils and strips
0,5" tubing for 50A RF current, 0,75" flat strip for the same current.
1" tubing for 100A or 1,5" flat copper strips
if I am space limited I blow air through smaller tubing
### IMO.... since a huge portion of the drive power on a GG linear
[ in this case, 640w of the 800 w of drive used] appears in the
output.... I'd consider that ... "free extra eff".

Not really, you have to pay the bill for it...
### In any event... anode dissipation is REDUCED... if apparent
eff is UP.

No, that part of the efficiency is dissipated in the driver
## DC plate input - power out = anode diss. What am I
supposed to do.... subtract the drive power... from the power
output 1st.... THEN calculate plate diss ??? Nobody is about
to do that.... so why bother subtracting the drive power from the
output, to cal eff ?

not to cheat yourself

### with too high a Q on a tuned input... we could actually get
the 5/32 " solid copper 4uh coil good and warm on the high
bands 20-17-15m.

Very true, in high impedance output networks you are obliged to run high Q
as the minum plate C is too high for >lower Q
I guess the 5/32" coil is at the cathode?
### IF the tuned input is NOT done correctly..... it will kill
ur eff.. real fast. Locating the C2 tuned input variable cap
closer to the tube socket/ and/or installing a small 100 pf NPO
doorknob next to the socket..[ in effect moving a portion of C2
closer to the socket] will improve the eff on the higher bands.

yes, you must avoid long leads there
### I'd say we may well be arguing semantics here.... but I'd
say it's just one more advantage of GG amps.... better apparent
eff... and slightly lower plate diss.

No, not in the same class of operation, like AB1 in GC and AB2 in GG.
Unless you are running class B in the GG amp and AB1 in grounded cathode
when you compare efficiency, it will be >the same.
Efficiency is much higher in class B
73
Peter


Peter Voelpel
 

Hi Dick,

200° on a iron powder toroid is pretty high.
That will raise your circuit L at least by 4%.
I replaced many low band toroidsin Command amps...

I wonder what the temperature of your 10m coil is at that 6KW

73
Peter

________________________________

From: ham_amplifiers@... [mailto:ham_amplifiers@...]
On Behalf Of PA3DUV

The hottest point was the coil section INSIDE the toroid, 200C + was
measured

The 10-20-30 meter tank coil section went up to 130C


GGLL
 

PA3DUV escribi:
> ## A few months back.... I bought a Fluke "Mini 62" IR point and
> shoot thermonter.... comes with a built in laser pointer.... and can
> be switched from C to F as well. Works slick.... and will give instant readings onto one LCD display
2 weeks ago I checked out my twin GU84B tetrode amp with that.
Running 6 kW on 7 MHz into the R&S dummyload I found the following hot spots:
The connection between tubular wound 20 meter coil and the lead to the toroidal 40/80/160 meter coil
How are these connections made?. Mechanically wrapped and then soldered?, with maybe siver solder?.

Best regards
Guillermo - LU8EYW.

P.S.: curious to know how one do at those power levels.
The coil section on the INSIDE of the toroid
The connection from the coil to the bandswitch
The hottest point was the coil section INSIDE the toroid, 200C + was measured
The DC blocking caps (2 in parallel) remained remarkable cool, no significabt temperature rise.
The anode coolers went up to 95C
The 10-20-30 meter tank coil section went up to 130C
I'll post some pictures of the actual measurement when I'm back home.
Cheers from YMM, Alberta,
Dick, PA3DUV
----- Original Message -----
*From:* pentalab <mailto:jim.thomson@...>
*To:* ham_amplifiers@...
<mailto:ham_amplifiers@...>
*Sent:* Thursday, October 05, 2006 10:45 PM
*Subject:* [ham_amplifiers] Re: Tank eff......WAS 3 - phase HV supply
--- In ham_amplifiers@...
<mailto:ham_amplifiers@...>, "PA3DUV" <pa3duv@...> wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> don't make a fuss about the last killowatt :-))))))))))))))))
>
> Cheers, Dick
> PA3DUV
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Peter Voelpel
> To: ham_amplifiers@...
<mailto:ham_amplifiers@...>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 10:29 PM
> Subject: RE: [ham_amplifiers] Re: 3 - phase HV supply
>
>
> Sorry,
>
>
> Indeed, for 25KW out one needs 45KVA, but only in class B.
> 67% efficiency is a bit high in class AB, it will be around 63%
minus loss in the pi-network.
> Some of the output in a GG amp is coming from the driver, so
efficiency is NOT= output*100%/input power...
### How come all the tetrode fellows always say that ?? We
carefully measured the eff on this latest 6000A7 linear... and
got 67%. Now granted... the wattmeter slug could be a little
high... the plate current + HV meter's could be a little low...
skewing the results.
### Figure maybe 1% loss in the tank circuit... from the coil.
And more like almost 2% on 10m.[ 1-2% of the power output]
The kicker is.... on 10m...all that tank coil heat is being dumped
into just 2 x turns..... vs less heat being dumped into the
ENTIRE coil (or a portion of it)... on the lower bands.
### In various tests I have done... one would think that on say a
20-10m coil.... that when on say 15m.... that the adjacent
unused portion of the coil would heatsink the used portion......
it sorta does... poorly. It ends up the used portion will get
hot... the unused portion [next turn over] runs barely warm... go
figure.
### BTW.... most Vac caps have an unloaded Q of around 5000....
compared to a typ tank coil of 100-300. IMO... most of the tank
losses are going to be in the tank coil... interconnecting
straps.... bandswitch contacts, etc.
### You need very very few watts to heat up a tank coil....esp
hollow tubing. With solid material... like say 8 ga wire
[used on the L4B 2 x 3-500Z] used on 80/40m.. or say solid 6
ga wire used on some 20m coils.... it just takes longer to heat
up..... the flipside is... with any solid material.... it takes a
helluva lot longer to cool down.... cuz of the the stored up heat
inside a bigger thermal mass.
### On a related subject.... if I remember correctly, in
Eimac's .. "care and feeding" for thermal properties... copper
was ... '1.0' and aluminium was '.57' IE: aluminium
doesn't conduct heat worth banana's... compared to copper !
Steel, and stainless steel is a LOT worse......... just
something to keep in mind.
## A few months back.... I bought a Fluke "Mini 62" IR point and
shoot thermonter.... comes with a built in laser pointer.... and can
be switched from C to F as well. Works slick.... and will
give instant readings onto one LCD display ... and a 2nd
display will always hold the peak highest temp. [both backlit to
boot] By holding the trigger down solid... and moving the
laser pointer about slowly... or quickly.... you can find hot
spots all over the place ! You can see quickly where you are
leaking heat from the outside of a home.... measure exhaust
manifold temps, xfmr's... tank coils... find where ur attic is
not insulated properly [heat radiating down from a ceiling... in
just one spot], and doz's of other uses..... like measuring
exhaust air temp from a linear... Air conditioning problems in the
home or car. This Fluke 62 goes from below freezing
[instant temp readings of ur fridge/deep freezer] to something
like 900 deg F. It will easily differentiate between one part of
a tank coil.... and another portion... just a few mm away. A
great bargain for around $100.00 Shop around.
### IMO.... since a huge portion of the drive power on a GG linear
[ in this case, 640w of the 800 w of drive used] appears in the
output.... I'd consider that ... "free extra eff".
### In any event... anode dissipation is REDUCED... if apparent
eff is UP.
## DC plate input - power out = anode diss. What am I
supposed to do.... subtract the drive power... from the power
output 1st.... THEN calculate plate diss ??? Nobody is about
to do that.... so why bother subtracting the drive power from the
output, to cal eff ?
### I tried several experiments by varying the loaded tank Q on
various bands... and also varying the loaded tank Q on the tuned
input network. Now Rauch will tell you tank Q makes no diff..
and is not important.... and a loaded Q of "22" is just fine.....
fact is loaded Q on a tank circuit DOES make a big
difference. A loaded Q of around 3.3 for a tuned input is fine
[this would equate to Q =2 doing it Rich's way]. A loaded Q
of 10-12 [new method] [ 8-10 old method] is ample for the high
power PI output. You start running a Q of 12-22 [new
method].... you can easily see, and measure effects asap. The
circulating currents skyrocket... tank coils + bandswitch / roller
inductor conacts heat up.... eff DROPS, amp tuning becomes narrow
banded... requiring more frequent tune ups, when u qsy etc.
### On a tuned input.... I tried a Q of 5.... eff drops..esp on
the higher bands. We used bird line sections on both the
input/output of the tuned input circuit [consisted of 2 x
broadcast variables + a tapped 4 uh coilt] output through the 2nd
line section... then into a 50 ohm load was 150-160w . By
INcreasing the small coil's uh tap... just a tiny bit.....
lowering the Q.... and power out of the tuned input... shot up to
195 w.
### with too high a Q on a tuned input... we could actually get
the 5/32 " solid copper 4uh coil good and warm on the high
bands 20-17-15m.
### IF the tuned input is NOT done correctly..... it will kill
ur eff.. real fast. Locating the C2 tuned input variable cap
closer to the tube socket/ and/or installing a small 100 pf NPO
doorknob next to the socket..[ in effect moving a portion of C2
closer to the socket] will improve the eff on the higher bands.
### I'd say we may well be arguing semantics here.... but I'd
say it's just one more advantage of GG amps.... better apparent
eff... and slightly lower plate diss.
Later... Jim VE7RF

> 73
> Peter
>


FRANCIS CARCIA
 

Danger that toroid must be getting to the curie temperature not a good thing when it changes forever..gfz

GGLL wrote:

PA3DUV escribi:
> > ## A few months back.... I bought a Fluke "Mini 62" IR point and
> > shoot thermonter.... comes with a built in laser pointer.... and can
> > be switched from C to F as well. Works slick.... and will
> > give instant readings onto one LCD display
>
> 2 weeks ago I checked out my twin GU84B tetrode amp with that.
>
> Running 6 kW on 7 MHz into the R&S dummyload I found the following hot
> spots:
>
> The connection between tubular wound 20 meter coil and the lead to the
> toroidal 40/80/160 meter coil

How are these connections made?. Mechanically wrapped and then soldered?,
with maybe siver solder?.

Best regards
Guillermo - LU8EYW.

P.S.: curious to know how one do at those power levels.
>
> The coil section on the INSIDE of the toroid
>
> The connection from the coil to the bandswitch
>
> The hottest point was the coil section INSIDE the toroid, 200C + was
> measured
>
> The DC blocking caps (2 in parallel) remained remarkable cool, no
> significabt temperature rise.
>
> The anode coolers went up to 95C
>
> The 10-20-30 meter tank coil section went up to 130C
>
> I'll post some pictures of the actual measurement when I'm back home.
>
> Cheers from YMM, Alberta,
> Dick, PA3DUV
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* pentalab jim.thomson@telus.com>
> *To:* ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com
> ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 05, 2006 10:45 PM
> *Subject:* [ham_amplifiers] Re: Tank eff......WAS 3 - phase HV supply
>
> --- In ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com
> ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com>, "PA3DUV" wrote:
> >
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > don't make a fuss about the last killowatt :-))))))))))))))))
> >
> > Cheers, Dick
> > PA3DUV
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Peter Voelpel
> > To: ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com
> ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 10:29 PM
> > Subject: RE: [ham_amplifiers] Re: 3 - phase HV supply
> >
> >
> > Sorry,
> >
> >
> > Indeed, for 25KW out one needs 45KVA, but only in class B.
> > 67% efficiency is a bit high in class AB, it will be around 63%
> minus loss in the pi-network.
> > Some of the output in a GG amp is coming from the driver, so
> efficiency is NOT= output*100%/input power...
>
> ### How come all the tetrode fellows always say that ?? We
> carefully measured the eff on this latest 6000A7 linear... and
> got 67%. Now granted... the wattmeter slug could be a little
> high... the plate current + HV meter's could be a little low...
> skewing the results.
>
> ### Figure maybe 1% loss in the tank circuit... from the coil.
> And more like almost 2% on 10m.[ 1-2% of the power output]
> The kicker is.... on 10m...all that tank coil heat is being dumped
> into just 2 x turns..... vs less heat being dumped into the
> ENTIRE coil (or a portion of it)... on the lower bands.
>
> ### In various tests I have done... one would think that on say a
> 20-10m coil.... that when on say 15m.... that the adjacent
> unused portion of the coil would heatsink the used portion......
> it sorta does... poorly. It ends up the used portion will get
> hot... the unused portion [next turn over] runs barely warm... go
> figure.
>
> ### BTW.... most Vac caps have an unloaded Q of around 5000....
> compared to a typ tank coil of 100-300. IMO... most of the tank
> losses are going to be in the tank coil... interconnecting
> straps.... bandswitch contacts, etc.
>
> ### You need very very few watts to heat up a tank coil....esp
> hollow tubing. With solid material... like say 8 ga wire
> [used on the L4B 2 x 3-500Z] used on 80/40m.. or say solid 6
> ga wire used on some 20m coils.... it just takes longer to heat
> up..... the flipside is... with any solid material.... it takes a
> helluva lot longer to cool down.... cuz of the the stored up heat
> inside a bigger thermal mass.
>
> ### On a related subject.... if I remember correctly, in
> Eimac's .. "care and feeding" for thermal properties... copper
> was ... '1.0' and aluminium was '.57' IE: aluminium
> doesn't conduct heat worth banana's... compared to copper !
> Steel, and stainless steel is a LOT worse......... just
> something to keep in mind.
>
> ## A few months back.... I bought a Fluke "Mini 62" IR point and
> shoot thermonter.... comes with a built in laser pointer.... and can
> be switched from C to F as well. Works slick.... and will
> give instant readings onto one LCD display ... and a 2nd
> display will always hold the peak highest temp. [both backlit to
> boot] By holding the trigger down solid... and moving the
> laser pointer about slowly... or quickly.... you can find hot
> spots all over the place ! You can see quickly where you are
> leaking heat from the outside of a home.... measure exhaust
> manifold temps, xfmr's... tank coils... find where ur attic is
> not insulated properly [heat radiating down from a ceiling... in
> just one spot], and doz's of other uses..... like measuring
> exhaust air temp from a linear... Air conditioning problems in the
> home or car. This Fluke 62 goes from below freezing
> [instant temp readings of ur fridge/deep freezer] to something
> like 900 deg F. It will easily differentiate between one part of
> a tank coil.... and another portion... just a few mm away. A
> great bargain for around $100.00 Shop around.
>
> ### IMO.... since a huge portion of the drive power on a GG linear
> [ in this case, 640w of the 800 w of drive used] appears in the
> output.... I'd consider that ... "free extra eff".
>
> ### In any event... anode dissipation is REDUCED... if apparent
> eff is UP.
>
> ## DC plate input - power out = anode diss. What am I
> supposed to do.... subtract the drive power... from the power
> output 1st.... THEN calculate plate diss ??? Nobody is about
> to do that.... so why bother subtracting the drive power from the
> output, to cal eff ?
>
> ### I tried several experiments by varying the loaded tank Q on
> various bands... and also varying the loaded tank Q on the tuned
> input network. Now Rauch will tell you tank Q makes no diff..
> and is not important.... and a loaded Q of "22" is just fine.....
> fact is loaded Q on a tank circuit DOES make a big
> difference. A loaded Q of around 3.3 for a tuned input is fine
> [this would equate to Q =2 doing it Rich's way]. A loaded Q
> of 10-12 [new method] [ 8-10 old method] is ample for the high
> power PI output. You start running a Q of 12-22 [new
> method].... you can easily see, and measure effects asap. The
> circulating currents skyrocket... tank coils + bandswitch / roller
> inductor conacts heat up.... eff DROPS, amp tuning becomes narrow
> banded... requiring more frequent tune ups, when u qsy etc.
>
> ### On a tuned input.... I tried a Q of 5.... eff drops..esp on
> the higher bands. We used bird line sections on both the
> input/output of the tuned input circuit [consisted of 2 x
> broadcast variables + a tapped 4 uh coilt] output through the 2nd
> line section... then into a 50 ohm load was 150-160w . By
> INcreasing the small coil's uh tap... just a tiny bit.....
> lowering the Q.... and power out of the tuned input... shot up to
> 195 w.
>
> ### with too high a Q on a tuned input... we could actually get
> the 5/32 " solid copper 4uh coil good and warm on the high
> bands 20-17-15m.
>
> ### IF the tuned input is NOT done correctly..... it will kill
> ur eff.. real fast. Locating the C2 tuned input variable cap
> closer to the tube socket/ and/or installing a small 100 pf NPO
> doorknob next to the socket..[ in effect moving a portion of C2
> closer to the socket] will improve the eff on the higher bands.
>
> ### I'd say we may well be arguing semantics here.... but I'd
> say it's just one more advantage of GG amps.... better apparent
> eff... and slightly lower plate diss.
>
> Later... Jim VE7RF
>
> > 73
> > Peter
> >
>
>


pentalab
 

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@...>
wrote:
one reason I use bigger material for the coils and strips
0,5" tubing for 50A RF current, 0,75" flat strip for the same
current. 1" tubing for 100A or 1,5" flat copper strips
if I am space limited I blow air through smaller tubing
#### partially agreed. There is no way .5" tubing is going to
handle 50 A.... maybe 36 A. Depends whether RTTY/SSB... and
also what Freq. Skin depth at 1.8 mhz = .05mm Skin depth at
30 mhz = .01 mm ....... a 5:1 ratio !

### 3 A of plate curent x Q of 10 is gonna result in aprx 30-
36 A of circulating current in the pi-net.

### 1.5+ " wide flat strap is easy to wind for 10m... than
1" tubing coil. 3/4" tubing is about the upper limit for
practical tubing winding....esp with an aprx 3" ID for 10m.


### with too high a Q on a tuned input... we could actually get
the 5/32 " solid copper 4uh coil good and warm on the high
bands 20-17-15m.

Very true, in high impedance output networks you are obliged to
run high Q
as the minum plate C is too high for >lower Q
I guess the 5/32" coil is at the cathode?

#### Either insert .6 uh b4 the main PI-NET [or pi-L] or
just tap into the .6uh point... with the vac tune cap. Then..
u can transform the plate load Z DOWN to something lower... the
PI/PI-L can handle. Yes, the 5/32" solid CU coil IS the 4.0
uh tuned input coil.



### I'd say we may well be arguing semantics here.... but I'd
say it's just one more advantage of GG amps.... better apparent
eff... and slightly lower plate diss.

No, not in the same class of operation, like AB1 in GC and AB2 in
GG.
Unless you are running class B in the GG amp and AB1 in grounded
cathode
when you compare efficiency, it will be >the same.
Efficiency is much higher in class B
### Class B in any GG amp is NOT linear. Class B implies a
180 deg conduction angle.... IE bias set so idle current is
exactly zero ma..... which would result in lousy TX imd.

### A SB-220.. with a 5.0 v zener for bias, has a 210 deg
conduction angle idles at, I think 180 ma.

## Myself and others... bitched to Eimac about the Class B
nonsense in all of Eimac's older literature... it finally got
corrected..... GG linears.... drawing as little as 1 ma... are
actually AB-2.

### I concur with everything else though. I posdted a few more
pix as well.

later... Jim VE7RF
73
Peter


Peter Voelpel
 

________________________________

From: ham_amplifiers@... [mailto:ham_amplifiers@...]
On Behalf Of pentalab

Very true, in high impedance output networks you are obliged to
run high Q
as the minum plate C is too high for >lower Q
I guess the 5/32" coil is at the cathode?
#### Either insert .6 uh b4 the main PI-NET [or pi-L] or
just tap into the .6uh point... with the vac tune cap. Then..
u can transform the plate load Z DOWN to something lower...

it does not help much if you need to transform down from 3kohms
## Myself and others... bitched to Eimac about the Class B
nonsense in all of Eimac's older literature... it finally got
corrected..... GG linears.... drawing as little as 1 ma... are
actually AB-2.

AB2 only works with modern high mu tubes, to get gain from older tubes you
needed class B

### I concur with everything else though. I posdted a few more
pix as well.

very nice!
I also prefer the old style meters
73
Peter


PA3DUV
 

开云体育

Peter,
?
The 200 C was the coil wire, not the toroid itself.
The toroid?barely heated up.
?
Cheers, Dick
PA3DUV
?

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 12:21 AM
Subject: RE: [ham_amplifiers] Re: Tank eff......WAS 3 - phase HV supply


Hi Dick,

200° on a iron powder toroid is pretty high.
That will raise your circuit L at least by 4%.
I replaced many low band toroidsin Command amps...

I wonder what the temperature of your 10m coil is at that 6KW

73
Peter

________________________________

From: ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com [mailto:ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of PA3DUV

The hottest point was the coil section INSIDE the toroid, 200C + was
measured

The 10-20-30 meter tank coil section went up to 130C



pentalab
 

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., PA3DUV <pa3duv@...> wrote:

Peter,

The 200 C was the coil wire, not the toroid itself.
The toroid barely heated up.
#### 200 deg C = 400 deg F !! Which imo is way too hot.

### Looks like the taps are done with teflon coated wire ??
Teflon, although rated at 250 deg C.... is usually maxed out.. and
never run above 200 deg C. The teflon coated wires used for
tank coil taps will simply hold the heat in.... it won't be able
to escape. .... except for the hot connections at each end of the
wire... where it terminates.

### On my 3CX-3000A7 HB lineear... I used wire for temp taps
on the 3/8" tubing coil.... just for doing the MFJ test set
up.. with the usual resistor between anode and chassis.
Worked fine.... but when I replaced the temp small ga wire with
3/4" wide strap.... the mfj was off.... turns out the temp wire
taps had MORE inductance than the 3/4" wide strap. I had to
increase the tune C to compensate. Later on, I moved the tap
again.... so I would end up with the desired uh..... with strap
being used.

### Now I never use wire for temp coil taps.

### I don't see any air being blown about the tank compartment..
for cooling tank coils, bandswitch, [looks sorta like a model 86]
etc.

### On Emtron's website... as of 2 mins ago... the DX-4 is NOT
listed anywhere !! Nor is it listed under "orders" or anywhere
else. However... do a google on dx-4... and loads of stuff
appears. I know it's an export only. Is it still being
made ????

## In any event.... the Fluke Mini 62 pistol grip IR
thermometer is an invaluable tool ! I USED to do it the old
way..... run a dead cxr.... get stuff hot.... with one finger
hovering 1" away from a tank coil..... shut off the cxr...
then start "touching" stuff..... and burning my finger. With
HV every where... I highly DON'T reccomend this method....
hence the Fluke 62 .... faster, SAFER.. precise readings in
either C or F.

### Works on LC networks with NPO caps, coils etc. One would
think every commercial amp manufacturer would have a few on
hand.

Later... Jim VE7RF




Cheers, Dick
PA3DUV

----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Voelpel
To: ham_amplifiers@...
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 12:21 AM
Subject: RE: [ham_amplifiers] Re: Tank eff......WAS 3 - phase HV
supply



Hi Dick,

200° on a iron powder toroid is pretty high.
That will raise your circuit L at least by 4%.
I replaced many low band toroidsin Command amps...

I wonder what the temperature of your 10m coil is at that 6KW

73
Peter

________________________________

From: ham_amplifiers@...
[mailto:ham_amplifiers@...]
On Behalf Of PA3DUV

The hottest point was the coil section INSIDE the toroid, 200C +
was
measured

The 10-20-30 meter tank coil section went up to 130C


pentalab
 

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@...>
wrote:



#### Either insert .6 uh b4 the main PI-NET [or pi-L] or
just tap into the .6uh point... with the vac tune cap. Then..
u can transform the plate load Z DOWN to something lower...

it does not help much if you need to transform down from 3kohms
### Nonsense.... sure it does. You can easily drop a 3 K ohm plate
load Z ...down to 354 ohms on 29.7 mhz. .... just by adding .5
uh b4 the pi net. Then C1 = 23.9 pf L = .34 uh C2 = 280 pf

## Make it .6 uh.... and C1= 80pf plate load Z = 173 ohms.

### Use GM3SEK's excellent PI PI-L spreadsheet [free on his
site] and toss some numbers in.... then try juggling the
value of the suppresssor inductance AND /OR this extra uh
anywhere between tube anode and main pi net. Any extra uh b4
the pi net makes a HUGE difference to the transformed plate load
Z.. on the upper bands.... with a decreasing effect as u go lower
in freq.

### Then try it on the mfj test jig.... it actually works dead
on. Just make sure you measure the uh 1st. I use a B+K 875-
B.... available from Mouser, etc..... measures down to .1
uh.... and down to .1pf My #1 tool in the shop

## as a side bonus... since the transformed plate load Z
drops.... harmonic suppression goes up !

### still, If u want 10/12 m..... you ALSO need either a low C
vac cap.... OR a low C air variable. Alpha, etc... uses a 2 x
section air variable cap.... and bandswitches em.... the 2nd
section of course is a tiny thing... with 2 x stator + 3 x rotor
plates = real low min C.

### Now I don't get wound up about harmonic suppression too
much. Any mono band ant is going to be sky high swr on it's
2nd harmonic. The ant may well resosnate on it's 3rd
harmonic.... BUT a simple PI will have -50 db of 2nd harmonic
suppression. .... depending on loaded tank Q.... and also what the
ratio of the transformed tube Z is. Lower transformation's
always give higher harmonic suppression.

## glad u enjoyed the pix. I'm trying to dig one up that shows
the bias board assy.

Later.... Jim VE7RF


Dick
 

See the pics in the photo section.
The taps are done with bare wire, but the coil is done with double
wire in a teflon sleeve.
In SSB service this works good, but in my opinion the toroid wound
coil section gets a bit too hot in higher duty modes.

### On Emtron's website... as of 2 mins ago... the DX-4 is NOT
listed anywhere !! Nor is it listed under "orders" or anywhere
else. However... do a google on dx-4... and loads of stuff
appears. I know it's an export only. Is it still being
made ????
The DX4 is currently made in larger numbers than all other Emtron HF
amps according to Rudi Breznik.
Because of the relatively low B+ voltage the tank caps are air caps
for both tune and load which reduces the costs for the tank circuit.

More info including pics of the 3 phase power supply on the Emtron
owners yahoo group,



There are rumours about the design of a GU84B three holer but I have
no confirmation for this.

Cheers, Dick
PA3DUV


--- In ham_amplifiers@..., "pentalab" <jim.thomson@...>
wrote:

--- In ham_amplifiers@..., PA3DUV <pa3duv@> wrote:

Peter,

The 200 C was the coil wire, not the toroid itself.
The toroid barely heated up.
#### 200 deg C = 400 deg F !! Which imo is way too hot.

### Looks like the taps are done with teflon coated wire ??
Teflon, although rated at 250 deg C.... is usually maxed out..
and
never run above 200 deg C. The teflon coated wires used for
tank coil taps will simply hold the heat in.... it won't be able
to escape. .... except for the hot connections at each end of
the
wire... where it terminates.

### On my 3CX-3000A7 HB lineear... I used wire for temp
taps
on the 3/8" tubing coil.... just for doing the MFJ test set
up.. with the usual resistor between anode and chassis.
Worked fine.... but when I replaced the temp small ga wire
with
3/4" wide strap.... the mfj was off.... turns out the temp
wire
taps had MORE inductance than the 3/4" wide strap. I had to
increase the tune C to compensate. Later on, I moved the
tap
again.... so I would end up with the desired uh..... with strap
being used.

### Now I never use wire for temp coil taps.

### I don't see any air being blown about the tank compartment..
for cooling tank coils, bandswitch, [looks sorta like a model 86]
etc.

### On Emtron's website... as of 2 mins ago... the DX-4 is NOT
listed anywhere !! Nor is it listed under "orders" or anywhere
else. However... do a google on dx-4... and loads of stuff
appears. I know it's an export only. Is it still being
made ????

## In any event.... the Fluke Mini 62 pistol grip IR
thermometer is an invaluable tool ! I USED to do it the old
way..... run a dead cxr.... get stuff hot.... with one finger
hovering 1" away from a tank coil..... shut off the cxr...
then start "touching" stuff..... and burning my finger.
With
HV every where... I highly DON'T reccomend this method....
hence the Fluke 62 .... faster, SAFER.. precise readings in
either C or F.

### Works on LC networks with NPO caps, coils etc. One would
think every commercial amp manufacturer would have a few on
hand.

Later... Jim VE7RF




Cheers, Dick
PA3DUV

----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Voelpel
To: ham_amplifiers@...
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 12:21 AM
Subject: RE: [ham_amplifiers] Re: Tank eff......WAS 3 - phase
HV
supply



Hi Dick,

200° on a iron powder toroid is pretty high.
That will raise your circuit L at least by 4%.
I replaced many low band toroidsin Command amps...

I wonder what the temperature of your 10m coil is at that 6KW

73
Peter

________________________________

From: ham_amplifiers@...
[mailto:ham_amplifiers@...]
On Behalf Of PA3DUV

The hottest point was the coil section INSIDE the toroid, 200C
+
was
measured

The 10-20-30 meter tank coil section went up to 130C


Peter Voelpel
 

Hi Dick,

How hot is the step-down toroid on the output getting?
The problem with air caps will be the rotor contacts which have to carry
about 25A and probably more on 10m in the DX4.
It looks they are using quite normal contacts on the caps.
Even the very high power caps of Oren Elliot are only good for 30A.
I use vacuum variables for this reason and their size also in my low
impedance amps like 3xRS1072C

73
Peter

________________________________

From: ham_amplifiers@... [mailto:ham_amplifiers@...]
On Behalf Of Dick

See the pics in the photo section.
The taps are done with bare wire, but the coil is done with double
wire in a teflon sleeve.
In SSB service this works good, but in my opinion the toroid wound
coil section gets a bit too hot in higher duty modes.

### On Emtron's website... as of 2 mins ago... the DX-4 is NOT
listed anywhere !! Nor is it listed under "orders" or anywhere
else. However... do a google on dx-4... and loads of stuff
appears. I know it's an export only. Is it still being
made ????
The DX4 is currently made in larger numbers than all other Emtron HF
amps according to Rudi Breznik.
Because of the relatively low B+ voltage the tank caps are air caps
for both tune and load which reduces the costs for the tank circuit.


PA3DUV
 

开云体育

Hi Peter,
?
That is a bit difficult to measure it with the IR meter since the coil on the toroid gets rather hot.
The only way I was able to get an indication of the toroid temperature?was to run a 6 kW carrier after which I switched the drive off and poked with my finger between the coil turns in an attempt to feel the toroid surface temperature.
?
The toroid was way below 60 C as I could touch it without hurting my fingers.
?
Cheers, Dick
PA3DUV?
?

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 9:47 PM
Subject: RE: [ham_amplifiers] Re: Tank eff......WAS 3 - phase HV supply

Hi Dick,

How hot is the step-down toroid on the output getting?
The problem with air caps will be the rotor contacts which have to carry
about 25A and probably more on 10m in the DX4.
It looks they are using quite normal contacts on the caps.
Even the very high power caps of Oren Elliot are only good for 30A.
I use vacuum variables for this reason and their size also in my low
impedance amps like 3xRS1072C

73
Peter

________________________________

From: ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com [mailto:ham_amplifiers@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Dick

See the pics in the photo section.
The taps are done with bare wire, but the coil is done with double
wire in a teflon sleeve.
In SSB service this works good, but in my opinion the toroid wound
coil section gets a bit too hot in higher duty modes.

> ### On Emtron's website... as of 2 mins ago... the DX-4 is NOT
> listed anywhere !! Nor is it listed under "orders" or anywhere
> else. However... do a google on dx-4... and loads of stuff
> appears. I know it's an export only. Is it still being
> made ????

The DX4 is currently made in larger numbers than all other Emtron HF
amps according to Rudi Breznik.
Because of the relatively low B+ voltage the tank caps are air caps
for both tune and load which reduces the costs for the tank circuit.