开云体育

wrote: to the shack. ### I suggested at least 2 ga wire to my buddy. Turns out it shoulda been a heluva lot bigger.... once we determined the peak current on the 240 vac line.... every 8.3 msecs.....

be ### agreed ! This new group is gonna blow away the old 'amps' group.... hands down... stay tuned. Later... and greetings... from Jim VE7RF >

<dhallam@...> wrote: means the basis. having a zero signal of the ### The PR version will handle sky high plate voltages... like 10-30 KV. ### In GG... with around 7 v of zener bias.... and 4800V... I

It is information like this that maintains my interest in amateur radio. de Paul, W8AEF

Frank, I thought I took all your 4-1000's ;>) Welcome to the new group. Mod-U-Lator, Mike(y) W3SLK

Earlier today someone mentioned the top band reflector. I love 160 and can't wait until the bands get quiet enough for it to be productive. However I have a lot to learn about building some kinda

Dave Smith VK3HZ did some ivvesigation of these, with interesting findings at: www.users.bigpond.net.au/dwsmith/hv_inverter.pdf Roger

man you got that right John.....all that useless mail. The one on wiring back to the breaker panel that went on for ever sent me a runnin. my $50,000 alpha won't work jcoupejr <JCoupejr@...>

Maybe we could change the pole to what size breaker can you trip.......I plea the fifth ham_amplifiers@... wrote: Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the ham_amplifiers

Other yahoo amplifier groups http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Tube_Amps/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rfamplifiers/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/11meteramps/

Very interesting Rich. What would be the regulation of this switched mode power supply? Cheers, Dick powered units switcher HV. power

Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the ham_amplifiers group: what is the output power capability of your HF power amplifier. (obviously we never exeed our legal limit) o < 2 kW o 3

And what's the alternative? I should "out" him? That's not my prerogative, either. I have been a member of amps since its inception, and while I disagree with prior restraint of speech, I think its

My guess is that Pete won't get banned from here, if that was what he was implying. If he chooses not to post here, it will be of his own free will. at least, this is my understanding of policy on

I am very happy we have found a new unmoderated home. Recent posts on the old group have been boaring to say the least. Welcome to all and lets continue to have free and meaningful discussions on this

Here's a simple request from one op who is interested in amps. Personal grudge matches are bad news and will put off people who don't have any ax to grind. If we really want to support ham amplifier

I just hope we don't spend 3 weeks deciding which size wire to run to the shack. That one sent me running away. bill_w4zv <w0zv@...> wrote: I agree Pete, although I also maintain strict topic

There is no Admin of AMPS. From its beginning in late 1996, AMPS has always had a moderator --- who was identified. I got booted off AMPS three times by three different moderators for questioning the

I agree Pete, although I also maintain strict topic focus on the Topband reflector. AG6K wrote: This list is off to a great start with a lie. I know who the moderator is also and confirm it's not W8JI

Pete, I guess you do what you think you must do, BUT, I have a lot of trouble with the idea that someone operates an “open” forum and feels the need to hide. That concept really bothers me. I post