¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: IMD (was 3XYC156)
Probably pico-A with 5v of reverse bias.
By R L Measures · #895 ·
Re: IMD (was 3XYC156)
Not with several volts negative on the grid with respect to the cathode.
By R L Measures · #894 ·
Re: new alpha amps newsgroup?
That's too bad.. it's elitist... I can remove any email (spammer) by just administering the list. His excuse of stopping spammers is bogus... There was a ALPHA list somewhere else too...maybe it went
By KR4DA <kr4da@...> · #892 ·
Re: What happened to message 863 ??? IMD on new xcvr's
Message 863 is not there as you stated... I have no clue where it went.. And there is NO censoreing on this list. Just play nice. pentalab wrote: -- Bob Vmoa chat list ->
By KR4DA <kr4da@...> · #893 ·
Re: IMD (was 3XYC156)
Microamps is still not zero...Rich is claiming zero. I think I measured fractional milliamps - e.g. hundreds of microamps. May have to re-run the exp. The 3-500Z is not a tube I have a lot of
By zerobeat40 <zerobeat40@...> · #891 ·
Re: IMD (was 3XYC156)
I would expect, at that plate voltage and 3-5 volts bias you'd have significant ZSAC... but I'd think that grid current, if any, with no drive would be measured in microamps. True? 73, Tony W4ZT
By Tony King - W4ZT <w4zt-060920@...> · #890 ·
Re: IMD (was 3XYC156)
My word, did I write that? At my age, I am often guilty of mis-types of all sorts. 20 mA is far more than I would expect, and I seem to recall that I did the experiment shortly after writing about it
By zerobeat40 <zerobeat40@...> · #889 ·
Re: Zs FCC callsign
By R L Measures · #888 ·
Re: Zs FCC callsign
No He's ZED from Men in Black BOB DD ### sounds to me like "Z".... just got vindicated.... and I doubt "Z" would semi-float the grids on a 3-500Z linear either. Heck... for all we know... the "Z" in
By Robert B. Bonner <rbonner@...> · #887 ·
Re: IMD (was 3XYC156)
True enough, Denny Z. I did the same experiment when I was in college. Zeb's problem is that he is the person who said: #643 Re: SB-220 Questions "With 3.5kV applied, a good tube in one socket, and
By R L Measures · #886 ·
Re: Zs FCC callsign
wrote: RICH SEZ... Do you have a FCC callsign? group? Thompson, per my birth cert. No ham ticket, no callsign. Not a famous author, nobody knows me anyway. Why does it matter. I've gone by "Z" or
By pentalab <jim.thomson@...> · #885 ·
Re: What happened to message 863 ??? IMD on new xcvr's
wrote: wrote: you can hit a .."sweet spot" and come up with really good IMD numbers. spacing, you challenge the power supply bypassing, so the worst numbers often occur at that test condition. ### say
By pentalab <jim.thomson@...> · #884 ·
Re: IMD (was 3XYC156)
Z is slick... The bench test with just the filament heated fills the tube with an electron cloud... The electrons have velocity... Some will impact the grid and be captured... The grid will become
By ad4hk2004 <ad4hk2004@...> · #883 ·
Re: IMD on xcv'rs
My guess is that his glass had been emptied before he made this measurement. cheers, Jim R L Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734 r@..., , rlm@..., www.somis.org
By R L Measures · #882 ·
Re: IMD (was 3XYC156)
As I recall, the problem is that "Z" previously stated that, according to the characteristic curves, a 3-500Z(?) flows __mA of grid current when the grid-cathode potential is negative __V. According
By R L Measures · #881 ·
Re: Zs FCC callsign
It does not appear in your signature. for Zebediah? Because you are a human just like most of the rest of us.
By R L Measures · #880 ·
Re: IMD (was 3XYC156)
Gidday Z, Keep postin mate,callsigns dont matter, I don't post, just like to read an learn...just finnished me first amp an picking up tips for me next one...so keep em coming. Cookie zl4ad
By Brian <bejo@...> · #879 ·
Re: IMD on xcv'rs
Yeah thats far far too much, he must have had some dirt on his glasses when he did that measurement. I have a T-4XC on the shelf, one of these days I will measure it. 73 Jim SM2EKM -------------------
By Jan Erik Holm SM2EKM · #878 ·
Re: IMD on xcv'rs
Those tests where at full power, with quite a bit ALC pulled, also quite a bit of processing. One can say that both radios was "forced" a bit, did also use an audio RF clipper with the KWM2. This is a
By Jan Erik Holm SM2EKM · #877 ·
Re: 3 x YC-156's vs 8281
This is a very good point by Greg, I agree 100% 73 Jim SM2EKM --------------------- badgerscreek wrote:
By Jan Erik Holm SM2EKM · #876 ·