Re: 8410/9500 Wattmeter Failure
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:37?AM Steve < k0xp@...> wrote:
Oops, fat fingers... no, it was on 7025, 40m.
Steve, K0XP
On 2/15/2024 6:14 AM, Bob wrote:
Thirty meters? 1150w?
Bob W4JFA?
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024, 8:18 PM
Steve < k0xp@...>
wrote:
If they are the ones in the wattmeter bridge circuit,
they're 1N5711, a fairly common Schottky diode that I've
used before (and may even have some in my stash). They
used to be available everywhere, I dunno about now, I'll
hafta look.
I just chased 8R7X on 30m and am pushing it to 1150W
output; and lo and behold, the very first reflected LED is
popping up dimly but reliably at that output power and
frequency; no others, just that one. I've decided I really
don't like this scheme of using LEDs as a meter; they just
don't seem to give very reliable information all the time
even if they're much cheaper to implement.
Mine seemed to fail either when I turned it off this
morning, or when I turned it back on after a couple hours
(or possibly in-between??). I didn't disturb any coaxes in
between those times, just snuck off and took a nap for a
couple hours after chasing early morning Asian DX. And
this happens when I come back... We had clear skies and
very little but high cloud up there at all. Humidity
perhaps around 30% or so, temp around 40 degs F when I
turned it back on. Odd. I really hate to drag it out to
remove the cover and poke around when I don't yet know
what, specifically, to look at, because this thing is so
heavy and big that I'll have to lug it across the room to
get access to all 19 of the screws, then lug it back to
plug in and try it again. Maybe I'll do that just to try
reseating all the Berg connectors, in the hope...? And I
need to check what the 22-ohm cathode resistors are on
mine, anyway... I don't think mine has had Glenn's
(George??) upgrade to three resistors per tube installed.
AFTER the DX contest, of course? 8-D
Steve, K0XP
On 2/14/2024 4:07 PM, Al wrote:
?Hi Steve,
My 8410 took static hit just before Covid started. I talked to Alpha just before they went silent and the sampling diodes are known to blow under your and my conditions. I am currently traveling so I can¡¯t give you the diode numbers but you will find them on the schematic. Like yours mine has full output power but no power out display. With the diodes blown the computer interface has nothing to read. I could not find diodes during Covid hopefully you will have better luck. Let me know how you make out.
73 Allen N3JOC
On Feb 14, 2024, at 10:44 AM, Steve <k0xp@...> wrote:
?I have an 8410; however, according to the schematic(s), it appears as if
it probly uses the same wattmeter as the 9500.
The other day, I encountered intermittent flashover in my external
antenna tuner while running around 1100 watts on 160; it would cause all
the reflected power LEDs on my 8410 to light up. I managed to finish
working someone, let the amp cool down for five mins, then shut it down.
All front panel indicators appeared to work properly at that time
(although I've never, ever, seen a grid current LED light up, nor the
FAULT LED even though I once did have a real fault where I thought that
LED SHOULD light... but it didn't). The output power and reflected power
indicators have always been very accurate and worked fine.
Later that day, I fired it up again... and was chagrined to find NO
output power indicated on the front panel LEDs... neither forward nor
reverse. But the amp was still amplifying normally; output power on an
external wattmeter indicated full power out. I fired up the AE9K Alpha
Monitor program and it, too, shows no output power. But the amp does
still have full output power; so something common to both forward and
reverse power that drives the front panel display failed in my amp. When
the tuner flashed over, my external LP-100A power meter usually
indicated something really high like over 2500 watts momentarily.. once,
I think I saw 2932 watts indicated ===8-O Since then, I've fixed the
tuner problem... but have no output power indication on either the
amplifier front panel, nor with the AE9K Alpha Monitor program, even
though the amp is actually still correctly putting out full power.
I'm now printing out all 19 pages of the schematics, but an eyeball
perusal in Acrobat hasn't yet identified exactly which connector carries
the output of the tube deck to the TR system and what it plugs into on
another schematic page. Meanwhile, I thought I'd ask here, in case
someone else has already "invented the wheel" and fixed this kind of
problem. Any help?
TNX,
Steve K0XP
--
See my QRZ.com page at
--
See my QRZ.com page at
|
Re: Loaded Plate chokes...again
The Rohde&Schwarz chokes are with solid rod.
?
73
Peter
?
?

?
?
?
-----Original-Nachricht-----
Betreff: Re: [ham-amplifiers] Loaded Plate chokes...again
Datum: 2024-02-15T18:39:13+0100
Von: "Jim VE7RF" <jim.thom@...>
?
## Reid might not have had success with ferrite, but other's like floyd have.? ?I think the secret is the use of hollow beads...vs a solid rod.?
?
|
Re: Loaded Plate chokes...again
Probably so less likely to draw an arc to the chassis , no sharp point
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 2024-02-15 10:39, Jim VE7RF wrote: On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 04:59 PM, W7WRX wrote:
Looks really nice. What's the purpose of the ring around the base of the choke? I have not seen that before. ## My guess is to shift one of the series resonance freqs. I have seen a similar trick used before, where a snug fitting copper band (3/8" to 1/2" tall) was slid up / down the entire length of the winding, to shift the series resonance freqs. His ring might be to disperse coronas / extremely high RF voltages. ## I'm well aware of enamel / formvar /nyclad etc, etc. There is magnet wire....and there is magnet wire. Typ, you can buy magnet wire in 4 x different thickness of insulation. You can get several different temp ratings...and also several different voltage ratings, so beware. I have 8 ga magnet wire, that uses polyimide insulation, rated for 15 kv and 200 deg C....( but that 15 kv rating is only on the larger gauges, like 8-10-12-14-16 ga). You can also get polyester polyimide insulation, rated at 225 deg C. That was the big problem with folks trying to duplicate existing designs, like the ameritron choke. With 4 x different thickness's available, that will change the interwinding C....and shift the series resonance freqs. The dielectric constant will also change series resonance freqs. ## The belden 22 ga, silver plated / stranded teflon wire I used has .016" thick insulation. It sez on the spool, it can be immersed into gasoline ! ARRL book sez teflon is good for at least 2 kv per .001" (.001" = 1 mil). Web sez, typ it's 1.5 kv per mil. .016 = 16 mils. At 2 kv per mil, it should be good for 32 kv...( AND 64 KV BETWEEN TURNS). Even at 1.5 kv per mil, it's good for 24 kv..... and double any of that, when going from turn to turn. Ec ## I will test that concept with my new 0-15 kvdc hi-pot tester. I will test between strands in the inside, vs a grnd plane it lays on. Even AT 1 KV PER MIL IT'S STILL 16 KV ( AND 32 KV BETWEEN TURNS). ## Reid might not have had success with ferrite, but other's like floyd have. I think the secret is the use of hollow beads...vs a solid rod. Links: ------ [1] /g/ham-amplifiers/message/40214 [2] /mt/104281887/8135091 [3] /g/ham-amplifiers/post [4] /g/ham-amplifiers/editsub/8135091 [5] /g/ham-amplifiers/leave/12941173/8135091/773995006/xyzzy
|
Re: Loaded Plate chokes...again
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 04:59 PM, W7WRX wrote:
Looks really nice.? ?What's the purpose of the ring around the base of the choke?? I have not seen that before.
?
## My guess is to shift one of the series resonance freqs.? ?I have seen a similar trick used before, where a snug fitting copper band (3/8" to 1/2" tall)? was slid? up / down the entire length of the winding, to shift the series resonance freqs.?
His ring might be to disperse coronas /? extremely high? RF voltages.?
?
## I'm well aware of enamel / formvar /nyclad etc, etc.? There is magnet wire....and there is magnet wire.? Typ,? you can buy magnet wire in 4 x different thickness of insulation.? You can get several different temp ratings...and also several different voltage ratings, so beware.? ?I have 8 ga magnet wire, that uses polyimide insulation, rated for 15 kv and 200 deg C....( but that 15 kv rating is only on the larger gauges, like 8-10-12-14-16 ga).? ?You can also get polyester polyimide insulation, rated at 225 deg C.? That was the big problem with folks trying to duplicate existing designs, like the ameritron choke.? ?With 4 x different thickness's available, that will change the interwinding C....and shift the series resonance freqs. The dielectric constant will also change series resonance freqs.?
?
##? The belden 22 ga, silver plated / stranded teflon wire I used has .016" thick insulation. It sez on the spool, it can be immersed into gasoline !? ? ARRL book sez teflon is good for at least 2 kv per .001" (.001" = 1 mil).? Web sez, typ it's 1.5 kv per mil.? ?.016 = 16 mils.? At 2 kv per mil, it should be good for? 32 kv...( AND 64 KV BETWEEN TURNS).? ?Even at 1.5 kv per mil, it's good for 24 kv..... and double any of that, when going from turn to turn.? ?Ec
##? I will test that concept with my new 0-15 kvdc? hi-pot tester.? I will test between strands in the inside, vs a grnd plane it lays on. Even? AT 1 KV PER MIL IT'S STILL 16 KV ( AND 32 KV BETWEEN TURNS).?
## Reid might not have had success with ferrite, but other's like floyd have.? ?I think the secret is the use of hollow beads...vs a solid rod.?
|
Re: Loaded Plate chokes...again
Looks really nice.? ?What's the purpose of the ring around the base of the choke?? I have not seen that before.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I've been in and out and read this thread with some interest.?
My bets are the ferrite loaded chokes will ultimately fail in service (ie. 4CX15,000, 3CX10,000 and similar)
I guess the mention of ole Rich Measures makes me wanna pipe in on this subject, the nutcase that he was... (another story for another day)
anyhow I made plate chokes several years ago after one of the "commercial" hammyfied ferrite loaded chokes blew up and melted down.
Did some experiments using none other than a grid dip meter and buying Teflon by the yard.?
Does the source of Teflon matter? Yes absolutely Industrial grade. Unspecified Teflon can be (is) lossy.?
Does the type of wire matter, yes. Formvar please.
Does the type of Formvar matter yes if you want repeatability.? it comes in different temperature ratings.
I rebuilt most of (the critical parts) of W6CCP's Henry amplifier.? 3CX3000A7 P.O.C.
Attached is a pic of the second choke I had to add to make it perfect, note the small vac relay.
If I had access to a lathe again I would make a few of these.
but they wouldn't be FS to CB'ers. my notes tell why
Very 73,? ?Reid? W6MTF??
from my notes,? ? Series resonances: major at 26.95 minor at 17.2MHz
One series at 34.5MHz. Parallel resonance at 29.0 +/- the proximity to metal.
Total inductance 125uH using #20 AWG high temp Formvar? ??
|
Re: 8410/9500 Wattmeter Failure
Oops, fat fingers... no, it was on 7025, 40m.
Steve, K0XP
On 2/15/2024 6:14 AM, Bob wrote:
Thirty meters? 1150w?
Bob W4JFA?
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024, 8:18 PM
Steve < k0xp@...>
wrote:
If they are the ones in the wattmeter bridge circuit,
they're 1N5711, a fairly common Schottky diode that I've
used before (and may even have some in my stash). They
used to be available everywhere, I dunno about now, I'll
hafta look.
I just chased 8R7X on 30m and am pushing it to 1150W
output; and lo and behold, the very first reflected LED is
popping up dimly but reliably at that output power and
frequency; no others, just that one. I've decided I really
don't like this scheme of using LEDs as a meter; they just
don't seem to give very reliable information all the time
even if they're much cheaper to implement.
Mine seemed to fail either when I turned it off this
morning, or when I turned it back on after a couple hours
(or possibly in-between??). I didn't disturb any coaxes in
between those times, just snuck off and took a nap for a
couple hours after chasing early morning Asian DX. And
this happens when I come back... We had clear skies and
very little but high cloud up there at all. Humidity
perhaps around 30% or so, temp around 40 degs F when I
turned it back on. Odd. I really hate to drag it out to
remove the cover and poke around when I don't yet know
what, specifically, to look at, because this thing is so
heavy and big that I'll have to lug it across the room to
get access to all 19 of the screws, then lug it back to
plug in and try it again. Maybe I'll do that just to try
reseating all the Berg connectors, in the hope...? And I
need to check what the 22-ohm cathode resistors are on
mine, anyway... I don't think mine has had Glenn's
(George??) upgrade to three resistors per tube installed.
AFTER the DX contest, of course? 8-D
Steve, K0XP
On 2/14/2024 4:07 PM, Al wrote:
?Hi Steve,
My 8410 took static hit just before Covid started. I talked to Alpha just before they went silent and the sampling diodes are known to blow under your and my conditions. I am currently traveling so I can¡¯t give you the diode numbers but you will find them on the schematic. Like yours mine has full output power but no power out display. With the diodes blown the computer interface has nothing to read. I could not find diodes during Covid hopefully you will have better luck. Let me know how you make out.
73 Allen N3JOC
On Feb 14, 2024, at 10:44 AM, Steve <k0xp@...> wrote:
?I have an 8410; however, according to the schematic(s), it appears as if
it probly uses the same wattmeter as the 9500.
The other day, I encountered intermittent flashover in my external
antenna tuner while running around 1100 watts on 160; it would cause all
the reflected power LEDs on my 8410 to light up. I managed to finish
working someone, let the amp cool down for five mins, then shut it down.
All front panel indicators appeared to work properly at that time
(although I've never, ever, seen a grid current LED light up, nor the
FAULT LED even though I once did have a real fault where I thought that
LED SHOULD light... but it didn't). The output power and reflected power
indicators have always been very accurate and worked fine.
Later that day, I fired it up again... and was chagrined to find NO
output power indicated on the front panel LEDs... neither forward nor
reverse. But the amp was still amplifying normally; output power on an
external wattmeter indicated full power out. I fired up the AE9K Alpha
Monitor program and it, too, shows no output power. But the amp does
still have full output power; so something common to both forward and
reverse power that drives the front panel display failed in my amp. When
the tuner flashed over, my external LP-100A power meter usually
indicated something really high like over 2500 watts momentarily.. once,
I think I saw 2932 watts indicated ===8-O Since then, I've fixed the
tuner problem... but have no output power indication on either the
amplifier front panel, nor with the AE9K Alpha Monitor program, even
though the amp is actually still correctly putting out full power.
I'm now printing out all 19 pages of the schematics, but an eyeball
perusal in Acrobat hasn't yet identified exactly which connector carries
the output of the tube deck to the TR system and what it plugs into on
another schematic page. Meanwhile, I thought I'd ask here, in case
someone else has already "invented the wheel" and fixed this kind of
problem. Any help?
TNX,
Steve K0XP
--
See my QRZ.com page at
--
See my QRZ.com page at
|
Re: 8410/9500 Wattmeter Failure
Thirty meters? 1150w? Bob W4JFA?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024, 8:18 PM Steve < k0xp@...> wrote:
If they are the ones in the wattmeter bridge circuit, they're
1N5711, a fairly common Schottky diode that I've used before (and
may even have some in my stash). They used to be available
everywhere, I dunno about now, I'll hafta look.
I just chased 8R7X on 30m and am pushing it to 1150W output; and
lo and behold, the very first reflected LED is popping up dimly
but reliably at that output power and frequency; no others, just
that one. I've decided I really don't like this scheme of using
LEDs as a meter; they just don't seem to give very reliable
information all the time even if they're much cheaper to
implement.
Mine seemed to fail either when I turned it off this morning, or
when I turned it back on after a couple hours (or possibly
in-between??). I didn't disturb any coaxes in between those times,
just snuck off and took a nap for a couple hours after chasing
early morning Asian DX. And this happens when I come back... We
had clear skies and very little but high cloud up there at all.
Humidity perhaps around 30% or so, temp around 40 degs F when I
turned it back on. Odd. I really hate to drag it out to remove the
cover and poke around when I don't yet know what, specifically, to
look at, because this thing is so heavy and big that I'll have to
lug it across the room to get access to all 19 of the screws, then
lug it back to plug in and try it again. Maybe I'll do that just
to try reseating all the Berg connectors, in the hope...? And I
need to check what the 22-ohm cathode resistors are on mine,
anyway... I don't think mine has had Glenn's (George??) upgrade to
three resistors per tube installed.
AFTER the DX contest, of course? 8-D
Steve, K0XP
On 2/14/2024 4:07 PM, Al wrote:
?Hi Steve,
My 8410 took static hit just before Covid started. I talked to Alpha just before they went silent and the sampling diodes are known to blow under your and my conditions. I am currently traveling so I can¡¯t give you the diode numbers but you will find them on the schematic. Like yours mine has full output power but no power out display. With the diodes blown the computer interface has nothing to read. I could not find diodes during Covid hopefully you will have better luck. Let me know how you make out.
73 Allen N3JOC
On Feb 14, 2024, at 10:44 AM, Steve <k0xp@...> wrote:
?I have an 8410; however, according to the schematic(s), it appears as if
it probly uses the same wattmeter as the 9500.
The other day, I encountered intermittent flashover in my external
antenna tuner while running around 1100 watts on 160; it would cause all
the reflected power LEDs on my 8410 to light up. I managed to finish
working someone, let the amp cool down for five mins, then shut it down.
All front panel indicators appeared to work properly at that time
(although I've never, ever, seen a grid current LED light up, nor the
FAULT LED even though I once did have a real fault where I thought that
LED SHOULD light... but it didn't). The output power and reflected power
indicators have always been very accurate and worked fine.
Later that day, I fired it up again... and was chagrined to find NO
output power indicated on the front panel LEDs... neither forward nor
reverse. But the amp was still amplifying normally; output power on an
external wattmeter indicated full power out. I fired up the AE9K Alpha
Monitor program and it, too, shows no output power. But the amp does
still have full output power; so something common to both forward and
reverse power that drives the front panel display failed in my amp. When
the tuner flashed over, my external LP-100A power meter usually
indicated something really high like over 2500 watts momentarily.. once,
I think I saw 2932 watts indicated ===8-O Since then, I've fixed the
tuner problem... but have no output power indication on either the
amplifier front panel, nor with the AE9K Alpha Monitor program, even
though the amp is actually still correctly putting out full power.
I'm now printing out all 19 pages of the schematics, but an eyeball
perusal in Acrobat hasn't yet identified exactly which connector carries
the output of the tube deck to the TR system and what it plugs into on
another schematic page. Meanwhile, I thought I'd ask here, in case
someone else has already "invented the wheel" and fixed this kind of
problem. Any help?
TNX,
Steve K0XP
--
See my QRZ.com page at
|
Re: 8410/9500 Wattmeter Failure
Glen AE0Q is the expert on those amps. He's on qrz and also e-ham all the time.? He mentioned those didoes several times over the last 2 years...and also recently.?
|
Re: Loaded Plate chokes...again
I've been in and out and read this thread with some interest.? My bets are the ferrite loaded chokes will ultimately fail in service (ie. 4CX15,000, 3CX10,000 and similar) I guess the mention of ole Rich Measures makes me wanna pipe in on this subject, the nutcase that he was... (another story for another day) anyhow I made plate chokes several years ago after one of the "commercial" hammyfied ferrite loaded chokes blew up and melted down. Did some experiments using none other than a grid dip meter and buying Teflon by the yard.? Does the source of Teflon matter? Yes absolutely Industrial grade. Unspecified Teflon can be (is) lossy.? Does the type of wire matter, yes. Formvar please. Does the type of Formvar matter yes if you want repeatability.? it comes in different temperature ratings. I rebuilt most of (the critical parts) of W6CCP's Henry amplifier.? 3CX3000A7 P.O.C. Attached is a pic of the second choke I had to add to make it perfect, note the small vac relay. If I had access to a lathe again I would make a few of these. but they wouldn't be FS to CB'ers. my notes tell why Very 73,? ?Reid? W6MTF?? from my notes,? ? Series resonances: major at 26.95 minor at 17.2MHz One series at 34.5MHz. Parallel resonance at 29.0 +/- the proximity to metal. Total inductance 125uH using #20 AWG high temp Formvar? ??
|
Re: 8410/9500 Wattmeter Failure
If they are the ones in the wattmeter bridge circuit, they're
1N5711, a fairly common Schottky diode that I've used before (and
may even have some in my stash). They used to be available
everywhere, I dunno about now, I'll hafta look.
I just chased 8R7X on 30m and am pushing it to 1150W output; and
lo and behold, the very first reflected LED is popping up dimly
but reliably at that output power and frequency; no others, just
that one. I've decided I really don't like this scheme of using
LEDs as a meter; they just don't seem to give very reliable
information all the time even if they're much cheaper to
implement.
Mine seemed to fail either when I turned it off this morning, or
when I turned it back on after a couple hours (or possibly
in-between??). I didn't disturb any coaxes in between those times,
just snuck off and took a nap for a couple hours after chasing
early morning Asian DX. And this happens when I come back... We
had clear skies and very little but high cloud up there at all.
Humidity perhaps around 30% or so, temp around 40 degs F when I
turned it back on. Odd. I really hate to drag it out to remove the
cover and poke around when I don't yet know what, specifically, to
look at, because this thing is so heavy and big that I'll have to
lug it across the room to get access to all 19 of the screws, then
lug it back to plug in and try it again. Maybe I'll do that just
to try reseating all the Berg connectors, in the hope...? And I
need to check what the 22-ohm cathode resistors are on mine,
anyway... I don't think mine has had Glenn's (George??) upgrade to
three resistors per tube installed.
AFTER the DX contest, of course? 8-D
Steve, K0XP
On 2/14/2024 4:07 PM, Al wrote:
?Hi Steve,
My 8410 took static hit just before Covid started. I talked to Alpha just before they went silent and the sampling diodes are known to blow under your and my conditions. I am currently traveling so I can¡¯t give you the diode numbers but you will find them on the schematic. Like yours mine has full output power but no power out display. With the diodes blown the computer interface has nothing to read. I could not find diodes during Covid hopefully you will have better luck. Let me know how you make out.
73 Allen N3JOC
On Feb 14, 2024, at 10:44 AM, Steve <k0xp@...> wrote:
?I have an 8410; however, according to the schematic(s), it appears as if
it probly uses the same wattmeter as the 9500.
The other day, I encountered intermittent flashover in my external
antenna tuner while running around 1100 watts on 160; it would cause all
the reflected power LEDs on my 8410 to light up. I managed to finish
working someone, let the amp cool down for five mins, then shut it down.
All front panel indicators appeared to work properly at that time
(although I've never, ever, seen a grid current LED light up, nor the
FAULT LED even though I once did have a real fault where I thought that
LED SHOULD light... but it didn't). The output power and reflected power
indicators have always been very accurate and worked fine.
Later that day, I fired it up again... and was chagrined to find NO
output power indicated on the front panel LEDs... neither forward nor
reverse. But the amp was still amplifying normally; output power on an
external wattmeter indicated full power out. I fired up the AE9K Alpha
Monitor program and it, too, shows no output power. But the amp does
still have full output power; so something common to both forward and
reverse power that drives the front panel display failed in my amp. When
the tuner flashed over, my external LP-100A power meter usually
indicated something really high like over 2500 watts momentarily.. once,
I think I saw 2932 watts indicated ===8-O Since then, I've fixed the
tuner problem... but have no output power indication on either the
amplifier front panel, nor with the AE9K Alpha Monitor program, even
though the amp is actually still correctly putting out full power.
I'm now printing out all 19 pages of the schematics, but an eyeball
perusal in Acrobat hasn't yet identified exactly which connector carries
the output of the tube deck to the TR system and what it plugs into on
another schematic page. Meanwhile, I thought I'd ask here, in case
someone else has already "invented the wheel" and fixed this kind of
problem. Any help?
TNX,
Steve K0XP
--
See my QRZ.com page at
|
Re: 8410/9500 Wattmeter Failure
?Hi Steve, My 8410 took static hit just before Covid started. I talked to Alpha just before they went silent and the sampling diodes are known to blow under your and my conditions. I am currently traveling so I can¡¯t give you the diode numbers but you will find them on the schematic. Like yours mine has full output power but no power out display. With the diodes blown the computer interface has nothing to read. I could not find diodes during Covid hopefully you will have better luck. Let me know how you make out. 73 Allen N3JOC
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Feb 14, 2024, at 10:44 AM, Steve <k0xp@...> wrote: ?I have an 8410; however, according to the schematic(s), it appears as if it probly uses the same wattmeter as the 9500.
The other day, I encountered intermittent flashover in my external antenna tuner while running around 1100 watts on 160; it would cause all the reflected power LEDs on my 8410 to light up. I managed to finish working someone, let the amp cool down for five mins, then shut it down. All front panel indicators appeared to work properly at that time (although I've never, ever, seen a grid current LED light up, nor the FAULT LED even though I once did have a real fault where I thought that LED SHOULD light... but it didn't). The output power and reflected power indicators have always been very accurate and worked fine.
Later that day, I fired it up again... and was chagrined to find NO output power indicated on the front panel LEDs... neither forward nor reverse. But the amp was still amplifying normally; output power on an external wattmeter indicated full power out. I fired up the AE9K Alpha Monitor program and it, too, shows no output power. But the amp does still have full output power; so something common to both forward and reverse power that drives the front panel display failed in my amp. When the tuner flashed over, my external LP-100A power meter usually indicated something really high like over 2500 watts momentarily.. once, I think I saw 2932 watts indicated ===8-O Since then, I've fixed the tuner problem... but have no output power indication on either the amplifier front panel, nor with the AE9K Alpha Monitor program, even though the amp is actually still correctly putting out full power.
I'm now printing out all 19 pages of the schematics, but an eyeball perusal in Acrobat hasn't yet identified exactly which connector carries the output of the tube deck to the TR system and what it plugs into on another schematic page. Meanwhile, I thought I'd ask here, in case someone else has already "invented the wheel" and fixed this kind of problem. Any help?
TNX,
Steve K0XP
|
Retrofit for remote operation of tube amplifiers
Does anyone make a retrofit module for tube amplifiers that can monitor key parameters remotely, ideally via Ethernet. I could build something but if something is available ready-made, I would rather save the time. For now, I could use
an IP camera for the metering, but they are noisy and not ideal for an EMEr such as I.
?
A long shot I know.
?
73
?
Conrad PA5Y
|
Re: Loaded Plate chokes...again
Thanks Clark, This looks like a quality design. I'll hold fire and watch this thread? before I purchase any chokes. Mike
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 1:13?PM W7WRX < clark@...> wrote:
Mike. This is the choke we are discussing.? Jim is working on a better, high per version.
Hi Clark,
Please share a photo of the choke with the ferrite for reference.
I'm currently seeking both filament and plate chokes for this GI7B HF amp circuit.
Thanks,
Mike Peace
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:35?AM W7WRX < clark@...> wrote:
I can assure you the Floyd chokes do not blow up.? You know that also. It must be like you said, a different material.?
?I have used those chokes in several amps.? A Dual 3-1000Z amp with 6kv on plates, It runs 15 to 160.? never an issue. Amp does 5kw out plus.? It's been in there for maybe 6 years now.??
This amp would KILL other chokes.? I started out with a linear wound choke, That one had a burn spot and arc.? I then tried an ameritron choke and that failed. I put a Glitch resistor and a second ameritron choke. I thought maybe it had a flash over and that
took the choke out.? That did not help. The second choke failed almost immediately on 80 meter SSB.? The odd thing about it is that the ameritron would UNWIND right in front of your eyes.? You could hear a metal spooling sound and all the wires were in a ball
down low on the form.? ?I was confused at the time as to what was going on with it.? I got the first choke from Floyd and it never did this again.
I have one in the 4x10 and it runs 15 to 80 meters. 20kw out and never a problem.? ?
I did have one problem with this choke.. I installed one in a Johnson desk KW.? This is a pair of 4-400s plate modulated by 810s.? I lost 15 meters completely and had trouble getting it to load on 10.? I pulled the deck back out, Put the Johnson choke back
in and the problem was fixed.? ?I think the Desk KW actually has two chokes and that was likely my issue. I only changed the one near the finals.
I have a few of those in the parts bin. Is there a way I can test or inspect to see which material they are?
C
<Jim. Thanks for the Post.? That is a real eye opener.? Sadly, I placed a Choke very close to the back wall of my amps.? It seems to run ok but that is great information.??
?
<I remember us talking about these new chokes. I am glad you got one built!? ?Can you post a picture of it?
?
<C
?
I spoke with Floyd a few yrs back, and I think he said he used type 43. IF his beads are 2" tall, they have to be type 43.? Floyd has his 5000 sq ft new machine shop. He takes 1" solid teflon rod and machines out the inside to take the slightly bigger .767"
OD beads.... with their .400" ID. Floyd doesn't machine it to the very bottom, just to the bottom of the winding.? ?He then drills and taps the base for a 1/4-20? nylon bolt....to mount to chassis.?
?
I have no easy access to any machine shop so bought a doz 1' lengths of hollow teflon tubing from McMaster-Carr.? It's listed as 1" OD? x .125" wall thickness.? ?Then they state...'slightly thicker so u can do ur own final precision machining'.? ?Well all mine
are thicker.... at .145" wall. With an ID of now just .710" (instead of? .750")? my originally planned .767" x 2" long x .400" ID? (type 43)? beads would not fit.? I got a caseload from a local buddy, we use em to slide over 393 coax, (.393" OD)... they will
NOT slide over 213-U? ( .405")
?
Ok, so ordered the smaller .687" OD beads.? ?Got into it with W8JI.? ?He claims that where U1 and U2? cross on the graph, the Q? of the ferrite = 0.? ? And when Q=0 = kaboom.? ?Well U1 + U2 cross at exactly 7 mhz using type 43.? Your floyd choke doesn't blow
up on a 4x10..and it uses type 43.? ? So I mentioned to W8JI that type 61 has U1 + U2 crossing at exactly 45 mhz.? He? sez... still not good enough and that they will? all dissipate 5 kw, and explode immediately.? ?After analyzing this for hrs, I believe that
type 61 is the preferred material.? Even though U1 = 125 (vs 800 for type 43).... the 2 x chokes I have made so far have bucketloads of uh.? ?Type 61 has a lot higher curie temp, like > 300 deg C. (type 43 is just 150 deg C).? Resistivity is a magnitude higher
on type 61 vs type 43. ( 100 megohms per cm? ?for type 61? ?vs 10 megohms per cm for type 43.?
?
Then I also factored in the wire used for the winding.? Teflon has a dielectric constant of just 2.1? ?Magnet wire has a dielectric constant of 4.0 to 4.2? (air is 1.0)? .? This 22 ga teflon wire I got on ebay (belden)? is .060" OD, but the inner 22 ga wire
is just .028".? ?Inner core consists of 7 x strands of silver plated wire, which of course is twisted.? With turns butt? tight on the form,? it's almost like space winding turns.? Dunno how much the .016" wall thickness of the teflon insulation affects the
overall dielectric constant.? On paper, it should have 1/2 the interwinding capacitance? vs magnet? wire... and 1/2 again, since it's effectively space wound.?
?
With all the beads removed, it drops from 315 uh....down to just 33 uh.?
?
?
|
Re: Loaded Plate chokes...again
Mike. This is the choke we are discussing.? Jim is working on a better, high per version.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hi Clark,
Please share a photo of the choke with the ferrite for reference.
I'm currently seeking both filament and plate chokes for this GI7B HF amp circuit.
Thanks,
Mike Peace
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:35?AM W7WRX < clark@...> wrote:
I can assure you the Floyd chokes do not blow up.? You know that also. It must be like you said, a different material.?
?I have used those chokes in several amps.? A Dual 3-1000Z amp with 6kv on plates, It runs 15 to 160.? never an issue. Amp does 5kw out plus.? It's been in there for maybe 6 years now.??
This amp would KILL other chokes.? I started out with a linear wound choke, That one had a burn spot and arc.? I then tried an ameritron choke and that failed. I put a Glitch resistor and a second ameritron choke. I thought maybe it had a flash over and that
took the choke out.? That did not help. The second choke failed almost immediately on 80 meter SSB.? The odd thing about it is that the ameritron would UNWIND right in front of your eyes.? You could hear a metal spooling sound and all the wires were in a ball
down low on the form.? ?I was confused at the time as to what was going on with it.? I got the first choke from Floyd and it never did this again.
I have one in the 4x10 and it runs 15 to 80 meters. 20kw out and never a problem.? ?
I did have one problem with this choke.. I installed one in a Johnson desk KW.? This is a pair of 4-400s plate modulated by 810s.? I lost 15 meters completely and had trouble getting it to load on 10.? I pulled the deck back out, Put the Johnson choke back
in and the problem was fixed.? ?I think the Desk KW actually has two chokes and that was likely my issue. I only changed the one near the finals.
I have a few of those in the parts bin. Is there a way I can test or inspect to see which material they are?
C
<Jim. Thanks for the Post.? That is a real eye opener.? Sadly, I placed a Choke very close to the back wall of my amps.? It seems to run ok but that is great information.??
?
<I remember us talking about these new chokes. I am glad you got one built!? ?Can you post a picture of it?
?
<C
?
I spoke with Floyd a few yrs back, and I think he said he used type 43. IF his beads are 2" tall, they have to be type 43.? Floyd has his 5000 sq ft new machine shop. He takes 1" solid teflon rod and machines out the inside to take the slightly bigger .767"
OD beads.... with their .400" ID. Floyd doesn't machine it to the very bottom, just to the bottom of the winding.? ?He then drills and taps the base for a 1/4-20? nylon bolt....to mount to chassis.?
?
I have no easy access to any machine shop so bought a doz 1' lengths of hollow teflon tubing from McMaster-Carr.? It's listed as 1" OD? x .125" wall thickness.? ?Then they state...'slightly thicker so u can do ur own final precision machining'.? ?Well all mine
are thicker.... at .145" wall. With an ID of now just .710" (instead of? .750")? my originally planned .767" x 2" long x .400" ID? (type 43)? beads would not fit.? I got a caseload from a local buddy, we use em to slide over 393 coax, (.393" OD)... they will
NOT slide over 213-U? ( .405")
?
Ok, so ordered the smaller .687" OD beads.? ?Got into it with W8JI.? ?He claims that where U1 and U2? cross on the graph, the Q? of the ferrite = 0.? ? And when Q=0 = kaboom.? ?Well U1 + U2 cross at exactly 7 mhz using type 43.? Your floyd choke doesn't blow
up on a 4x10..and it uses type 43.? ? So I mentioned to W8JI that type 61 has U1 + U2 crossing at exactly 45 mhz.? He? sez... still not good enough and that they will? all dissipate 5 kw, and explode immediately.? ?After analyzing this for hrs, I believe that
type 61 is the preferred material.? Even though U1 = 125 (vs 800 for type 43).... the 2 x chokes I have made so far have bucketloads of uh.? ?Type 61 has a lot higher curie temp, like > 300 deg C. (type 43 is just 150 deg C).? Resistivity is a magnitude higher
on type 61 vs type 43. ( 100 megohms per cm? ?for type 61? ?vs 10 megohms per cm for type 43.?
?
Then I also factored in the wire used for the winding.? Teflon has a dielectric constant of just 2.1? ?Magnet wire has a dielectric constant of 4.0 to 4.2? (air is 1.0)? .? This 22 ga teflon wire I got on ebay (belden)? is .060" OD, but the inner 22 ga wire
is just .028".? ?Inner core consists of 7 x strands of silver plated wire, which of course is twisted.? With turns butt? tight on the form,? it's almost like space winding turns.? Dunno how much the .016" wall thickness of the teflon insulation affects the
overall dielectric constant.? On paper, it should have 1/2 the interwinding capacitance? vs magnet? wire... and 1/2 again, since it's effectively space wound.?
?
With all the beads removed, it drops from 315 uh....down to just 33 uh.?
?
?
|
Re: Loaded Plate chokes...again
Hi Clark, Please share a photo of the choke with the ferrite for reference. I'm currently seeking both filament and plate chokes for this GI7B HF amp circuit.
Thanks, Mike Peace
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:35?AM W7WRX < clark@...> wrote:
I can assure you the Floyd chokes do not blow up.? You know that also. It must be like you said, a different material.?
?I have used those chokes in several amps.? A Dual 3-1000Z amp with 6kv on plates, It runs 15 to 160.? never an issue. Amp does 5kw out plus.? It's been in there for maybe 6 years now.??
This amp would KILL other chokes.? I started out with a linear wound choke, That one had a burn spot and arc.? I then tried an ameritron choke and that failed. I put a Glitch resistor and a second ameritron choke. I thought maybe it had a flash over and that
took the choke out.? That did not help. The second choke failed almost immediately on 80 meter SSB.? The odd thing about it is that the ameritron would UNWIND right in front of your eyes.? You could hear a metal spooling sound and all the wires were in a ball
down low on the form.? ?I was confused at the time as to what was going on with it.? I got the first choke from Floyd and it never did this again.
I have one in the 4x10 and it runs 15 to 80 meters. 20kw out and never a problem.? ?
I did have one problem with this choke.. I installed one in a Johnson desk KW.? This is a pair of 4-400s plate modulated by 810s.? I lost 15 meters completely and had trouble getting it to load on 10.? I pulled the deck back out, Put the Johnson choke back
in and the problem was fixed.? ?I think the Desk KW actually has two chokes and that was likely my issue. I only changed the one near the finals.
I have a few of those in the parts bin. Is there a way I can test or inspect to see which material they are?
C
<Jim. Thanks for the Post.? That is a real eye opener.? Sadly, I placed a Choke very close to the back wall of my amps.? It seems to run ok but that is great information.??
?
<I remember us talking about these new chokes. I am glad you got one built!? ?Can you post a picture of it?
?
<C
?
I spoke with Floyd a few yrs back, and I think he said he used type 43. IF his beads are 2" tall, they have to be type 43.? Floyd has his 5000 sq ft new machine shop. He takes 1" solid teflon rod and machines out the inside to take the slightly bigger .767"
OD beads.... with their .400" ID. Floyd doesn't machine it to the very bottom, just to the bottom of the winding.? ?He then drills and taps the base for a 1/4-20? nylon bolt....to mount to chassis.?
?
I have no easy access to any machine shop so bought a doz 1' lengths of hollow teflon tubing from McMaster-Carr.? It's listed as 1" OD? x .125" wall thickness.? ?Then they state...'slightly thicker so u can do ur own final precision machining'.? ?Well all mine
are thicker.... at .145" wall. With an ID of now just .710" (instead of? .750")? my originally planned .767" x 2" long x .400" ID? (type 43)? beads would not fit.? I got a caseload from a local buddy, we use em to slide over 393 coax, (.393" OD)... they will
NOT slide over 213-U? ( .405")
?
Ok, so ordered the smaller .687" OD beads.? ?Got into it with W8JI.? ?He claims that where U1 and U2? cross on the graph, the Q? of the ferrite = 0.? ? And when Q=0 = kaboom.? ?Well U1 + U2 cross at exactly 7 mhz using type 43.? Your floyd choke doesn't blow
up on a 4x10..and it uses type 43.? ? So I mentioned to W8JI that type 61 has U1 + U2 crossing at exactly 45 mhz.? He? sez... still not good enough and that they will? all dissipate 5 kw, and explode immediately.? ?After analyzing this for hrs, I believe that
type 61 is the preferred material.? Even though U1 = 125 (vs 800 for type 43).... the 2 x chokes I have made so far have bucketloads of uh.? ?Type 61 has a lot higher curie temp, like > 300 deg C. (type 43 is just 150 deg C).? Resistivity is a magnitude higher
on type 61 vs type 43. ( 100 megohms per cm? ?for type 61? ?vs 10 megohms per cm for type 43.?
?
Then I also factored in the wire used for the winding.? Teflon has a dielectric constant of just 2.1? ?Magnet wire has a dielectric constant of 4.0 to 4.2? (air is 1.0)? .? This 22 ga teflon wire I got on ebay (belden)? is .060" OD, but the inner 22 ga wire
is just .028".? ?Inner core consists of 7 x strands of silver plated wire, which of course is twisted.? With turns butt? tight on the form,? it's almost like space winding turns.? Dunno how much the .016" wall thickness of the teflon insulation affects the
overall dielectric constant.? On paper, it should have 1/2 the interwinding capacitance? vs magnet? wire... and 1/2 again, since it's effectively space wound.?
?
With all the beads removed, it drops from 315 uh....down to just 33 uh.?
?
?
|
Re: Loaded Plate chokes...again
Yes I am aware how Plate modulation works and the voltage there.? However, I also have a HB transmitter,? It uses a pair of 4-400s from 10 to 160.? 3600 volts.? The Modulator has its own power supply and runs a pair of 304TLs at 3.5kv? ?This rig runs 1100 carrier
on lower bands and 1000 carrier on 10m.? I typically run it at 550.? It runs 140 to 150 pos peaks with an Orban 9200.? I made over 300 ,10 meter AM contacts with it in the last few months.? This rig runs the Ameritron RF parts choke. I expected it to fail
but its been years on all those bands and it looks perfect.? ?How it has lasted, I do not know.? ?You would think this would be harder on the choke then an amp.? ?I tried the ameritron choke in a Desk KW and it unwound on 40 meters with in 30 minutes.??
I think you are thinking of W0VMC?? He is in Wisconsin.? I am an avid AMer.? I run AM more than SSB.? I have never noticed any drift on the floyd choke.? I dont run 160 much though.
C
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 05:45 PM, Amp Guy Llc wrote:
I would like to point something out before I take my wife out for a Valentine¡¯s Day lunch and then get to work
Jim¡¯s choke will be tested at a high duty cycle 100 percent. Theirs a big difference between a ssb type duty cycle , vrs am long rag chew or a data mode type.
Really Apples to oranges.
There are A LOT of guys running am and other high duty cycle modes. High power pa¡¯s
Once the chain and sprockets finally arrive I¡¯ll be back on the 160-15 meter pa and then can map out the capacitor capacitance to turns ratio and finish tapping the output pi network coil. Look forward to getting back on it and showing it in operation.
I¡¯ll have to deal with the line drop issue prior to the test. So don¡¯t have a repeat of the 10kw 6 meter test.
73
## agreed.? Every newbie and his dog runs FT-8....esp on 160m.? ( all bands really, but most folks don't have good ants on the lower bands, and they also have high noise levels on the low? bands).? They go to bed at night, and meanwhile their xcvr / pc /
amp is running full bore? FT-8 all night long.? Then they get up the next morning to see.....'how many? new countries' ...they...'worked'.? If I say the choke works good on SSB, somebody is gonna bitch how they overheated it on FT-8, hence testing it with
a cxr, at least for 15 sec on, 15 sec off.... for 1/2 hr.? ?RTTY is even worse.?
## The issue with plate modulated AM is..... the B+ doubles with 100% positive modulation....and a helluva lot more with 125% to 150% positive modulation.? I can see all hell breaking loose with his? ( black dude, forget his callsign) pair of 4-1000's modulated
by a pair of 4-1000's.? 5 kv now becomes 10-12 kv on peaks.?
## I think ( I might be wrong here), the black dude in Co had issues with the floyd choke...and I think on 160m plate modulated AM.? I think it drifted enough in uh value, that it affected the C1 tuning, putting the amp out of resonance a bit.?
## any plate choke is directly in parallel electrically, with the C1 tune cap. ( cold end of the plate choke is bypassed to the chassis with real low XC bypass caps. IF the caps overheated, and drifted? higher / lower in value, it could affect tuning.
The C1 tune cap's? C has to be increased a bit over calculated values when on 160+80m? since the C1 cap has to also cancel out the XL of the plate choke.?
##? IE: the big choke from the 8K ultra measures exactly 180 uh.? With it in the circuit, the C1 tune cap has to be increased by 40 pf.? (and 10 pf on 75m).? With a bigger 360 uh choke, C1 has to be increased by? 20 pf? ( and 5 pf on 75m).? With a bigger
choke to begin with, any change in value of the choke will have a lesser effect on the tuning.?
?
##? I only saw a measured 2 uh drop, from 305 uh, down to 302 uh, after 2 hrs at 3.222 amps CCS dc current flowing.? ?Sounds good so far, but that test has no RF current flowing (which will be 1.25 amps @ 1.8 mhz).?
## This entire mess will get tested out soon enough.? ?I have a busy week, and the tweaked up version of Scotts new choke still has to be shipped out. (+ a pair of .01uf @ 30 kv disc? bypass caps).
|
Re: Loaded Plate chokes...again
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 05:45 PM, Amp Guy Llc wrote:
I would like to point something out before I take my wife out for a Valentine¡¯s Day lunch and then get to work
Jim¡¯s choke will be tested at a high duty cycle 100 percent. Theirs a big difference between a ssb type duty cycle , vrs am long rag chew or a data mode type.
Really Apples to oranges.
There are A LOT of guys running am and other high duty cycle modes. High power pa¡¯s
Once the chain and sprockets finally arrive I¡¯ll be back on the 160-15 meter pa and then can map out the capacitor capacitance to turns ratio and finish tapping the output pi network coil. Look forward to getting back on it and showing it in operation.
I¡¯ll have to deal with the line drop issue prior to the test. So don¡¯t have a repeat of the 10kw 6 meter test.
73
## agreed.? Every newbie and his dog runs FT-8....esp on 160m.? ( all bands really, but most folks don't have good ants on the lower bands, and they also have high noise levels on the low? bands).? They go to bed at night, and meanwhile their xcvr / pc / amp is running full bore? FT-8 all night long.? Then they get up the next morning to see.....'how many? new countries' ...they...'worked'.? If I say the choke works good on SSB, somebody is gonna bitch how they overheated it on FT-8, hence testing it with a cxr, at least for 15 sec on, 15 sec off.... for 1/2 hr.? ?RTTY is even worse.?
## The issue with plate modulated AM is..... the B+ doubles with 100% positive modulation....and a helluva lot more with 125% to 150% positive modulation.? I can see all hell breaking loose with his? ( black dude, forget his callsign) pair of 4-1000's modulated by a pair of 4-1000's.? 5 kv now becomes 10-12 kv on peaks.?
## I think ( I might be wrong here), the black dude in Co had issues with the floyd choke...and I think on 160m plate modulated AM.? I think it drifted enough in uh value, that it affected the C1 tuning, putting the amp out of resonance a bit.?
## any plate choke is directly in parallel electrically, with the C1 tune cap. ( cold end of the plate choke is bypassed to the chassis with real low XC bypass caps. IF the caps overheated, and drifted? higher / lower in value, it could affect tuning. The C1 tune cap's? C has to be increased a bit over calculated values when on 160+80m? since the C1 cap has to also cancel out the XL of the plate choke.?
##? IE: the big choke from the 8K ultra measures exactly 180 uh.? With it in the circuit, the C1 tune cap has to be increased by 40 pf.? (and 10 pf on 75m).? With a bigger 360 uh choke, C1 has to be increased by? 20 pf? ( and 5 pf on 75m).? With a bigger choke to begin with, any change in value of the choke will have a lesser effect on the tuning.?
?
##? I only saw a measured 2 uh drop, from 305 uh, down to 302 uh, after 2 hrs at 3.222 amps CCS dc current flowing.? ?Sounds good so far, but that test has no RF current flowing (which will be 1.25 amps @ 1.8 mhz).?
## This entire mess will get tested out soon enough.? ?I have a busy week, and the tweaked up version of Scotts new choke still has to be shipped out. (+ a pair of .01uf @ 30 kv disc? bypass caps).
|
Re: Loaded Plate chokes...again
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 05:35 PM, W7WRX wrote:
I have a few of those in the parts bin. Is there a way I can test or inspect to see which material they are?
## The floyd choke ??
That's why I well label all ferrite.? U don't wanna ever mix em up.? U can get identical dimension beads? in type 77? / 31? /? 43? /? 61.? They are all the same color.? U would have to wind a few turns on each...then measure on a lcr meter.? The difference between type 43 and 61 and 31 should be obvious.
Just measuring the uh on an unknown core is not much help, unless u compare it to an identical known series of cores.?
|
Re: Loaded Plate chokes...again
I would like to point something out before I take my wife out for a Valentine¡¯s Day lunch and then get to work
Jim¡¯s choke will be tested at a high duty cycle 100 percent. Theirs a big difference between a ssb type duty cycle , vrs am long rag chew or a data mode type.
Really Apples to oranges.
There are A LOT of guys running am and other high duty cycle modes. High power pa¡¯s
Once the chain and sprockets finally arrive I¡¯ll be back on the 160-15 meter pa and then can map out the capacitor capacitance to turns ratio and finish tapping the output pi network coil. Look forward to getting back on it and showing it in operation.
I¡¯ll have to deal with the line drop issue prior to the test. So don¡¯t have a repeat of the 10kw 6 meter test.
73
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 2024-02-14 09:37, Jim VE7RF wrote: On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 07:14 PM, W7WRX wrote:
I am interested in learning more RIkki. This is how one of my respected amplifier builders always handles the plate choke. He uses two, Never switched. Each tuned. Sounds like a good solution. Especially if you have space limitations. Where are the resonances of your example? What values are each of the chokes? How did you build them? ## This I briefly dabbled with years ago. Even with 2 x chokes, say at right angles, and a 1-2" distance between the horz, smaller choke, parallel to the chassis..... and the bigger, vertically mounted choke, you can still have issues. Like the peak V at the junction point can be wicked on some freqs. Rich measures found that out with his 160m mod to his SB-220. Rich wired a hb 135 uh choke in series with the oem 50 uh heath choke, non switched...(and at right angles). The peak V at the junction point was high enough to arc the oem heath aluminum stand off on the 50 uh choke. His fix was to replace it with a ceramic stand off. He ends up with 135+50 = 185 uh...which is barely adequate on 160m... ( .75 amps of RF current flowing through the choke at 1.8 mhz...which is probably ok for the 28 ga magnet wire he used). ## His hb 135 uh choke resonates at 23 mhz and also 35 mhz. The oem heath 50 uh choke resonates at 40 mhz. (testing each choke individually, with a GDO, and each choke with a temp short across it's terminals). A better method would be to put the vna ( S11 output) across the 2 x chokes in series. Then the vna would spit out ALL the series resonances at once. ## I didn't have a VNA way back then. A GDO across both chokes, with a temp short across each choke may have worked. (or a single temp short across both chokes). ## I will revisit this scheme next...IF my ferrite loaded scheme goes all to hell. In my case, I want more uh, and also more dc current handling. To pull this off, the big choke would have to be increased to aprx 250 uh. Small choke to aprx 70 uh. A few issues with this. The 250 uh choke would be big, when wound with 22 ga magnet wire. Like 1" diam teflon solid rod, and a 7.936" long winding. 282 turns required. Then both series resonant freqs on the big 250 uh choke would have to be....'parked' so they don't end up near any ham bands. That may well be doable.... but maybe not. Perhaps only 1 freq could be...'parked'. We shall see. It would take a lotta time to tweak it, removing turns a bit at a time. ## The big choke would have to be mounted vertical, with the smaller 70 uh choke at right angles, at the top of the big choke. An L bracket would work for this application. ## stuff that works on table top amps, with 2.5 to 3 kv and perhaps an amp of plate current is one thing. 2.5 to 3.0 amps, or more, and with 7-8 kv, is a whole different ballgame. Links: ------ [1] /g/ham-amplifiers/message/40198 [2] /mt/104281887/8135091 [3] /g/ham-amplifiers/post [4] /g/ham-amplifiers/editsub/8135091 [5] /g/ham-amplifiers/leave/12941173/8135091/773995006/xyzzy
|
Re: Loaded Plate chokes...again
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 07:14 PM, W7WRX wrote:
I am interested in learning more RIkki.? This is how one of my respected amplifier builders always handles the plate choke. He uses two, Never switched.? Each tuned.? Sounds like a good solution. Especially if you have space limitations.? Where are the resonances of your example?? What values are each of the chokes?? How did you build them?
##? This I briefly? dabbled with years ago.? ?Even with 2 x chokes, say at right angles, and a 1-2"? distance between the horz, smaller? choke, parallel? to the chassis..... and the?bigger, vertically mounted choke, you can still have issues.?
Like the peak V at the junction point can be wicked on some freqs. Rich measures found that out with his 160m mod to his SB-220.? Rich wired a? hb 135 uh choke in series with the oem 50 uh heath choke, non switched...(and at right angles).? ?The peak V? at the junction point was high enough to? arc the oem heath aluminum? stand off on the 50 uh choke.? His fix was to replace it with a ceramic stand off.? He ends up with 135+50 = 185 uh...which is barely adequate on 160m... ( .75 amps of RF current? flowing through the choke at 1.8 mhz...which is probably ok for the 28 ga magnet wire he used).? ?
?
##? His? hb 135 uh choke resonates at? 23 mhz? and also? 35 mhz.? ?The oem heath 50 uh choke resonates at? 40 mhz.? ?(testing each choke individually, with a GDO, and each choke with a temp short across it's terminals).? ?A better method would be to put the vna ( S11 output)? across the 2 x chokes in series.? Then the vna would spit out ALL the series resonances at once.?
?
##? I didn't have a VNA way back then.? ?A GDO across both chokes, with a? temp short across each choke may have worked. (or a single temp short across? both chokes).?
?
##? I will revisit this scheme next...IF my ferrite loaded scheme goes all to hell.? In my case, I want more uh, and also more dc current handling. To pull this off, the big choke? would have to be increased to aprx? 250 uh.? Small choke to aprx 70 uh.? ?A few issues with this.? The 250 uh choke would be big,? when wound with 22 ga magnet wire.? Like 1" diam teflon solid rod, and? a 7.936" long winding. 282 turns required.? Then both series resonant freqs on the big 250 uh choke would have to be....'parked' so they don't end up near any ham bands. That may well be doable.... but maybe not. Perhaps only 1 freq could be...'parked'.? We shall see.? It would take a lotta time to tweak it, removing turns a bit at a time.?
## The big choke would have to be mounted vertical, with the smaller 70 uh choke at right angles, at the top of the big choke. An L bracket would work for this application.?
##? stuff that works on table top amps, with 2.5 to 3 kv and perhaps an amp of plate current is one thing. 2.5 to 3.0 amps,? or more, and with 7-8 kv, is a whole different ballgame.?
|