Re: Zs FCC callsign
wrote: RICH SEZ... Do you have a FCC callsign? group? Thompson, per my birth cert. No ham ticket, no callsign. Not a famous author, nobody knows me anyway. Why does it matter. I've gone by "Z" or
By
pentalab <jim.thomson@...>
·
#885
·
|
Re: What happened to message 863 ??? IMD on new xcvr's
wrote: wrote: you can hit a .."sweet spot" and come up with really good IMD numbers. spacing, you challenge the power supply bypassing, so the worst numbers often occur at that test condition. ### say
By
pentalab <jim.thomson@...>
·
#884
·
|
Re: IMD (was 3XYC156)
Z is slick... The bench test with just the filament heated fills the tube with an electron cloud... The electrons have velocity... Some will impact the grid and be captured... The grid will become
By
ad4hk2004 <ad4hk2004@...>
·
#883
·
|
Re: IMD on xcv'rs
My guess is that his glass had been emptied before he made this measurement. cheers, Jim R L Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734 r@..., , rlm@..., www.somis.org
By
R L Measures
·
#882
·
|
Re: IMD (was 3XYC156)
As I recall, the problem is that "Z" previously stated that, according to the characteristic curves, a 3-500Z(?) flows __mA of grid current when the grid-cathode potential is negative __V. According
By
R L Measures
·
#881
·
|
Re: Zs FCC callsign
It does not appear in your signature. for Zebediah? Because you are a human just like most of the rest of us.
By
R L Measures
·
#880
·
|
Re: IMD (was 3XYC156)
Gidday Z, Keep postin mate,callsigns dont matter, I don't post, just like to read an learn...just finnished me first amp an picking up tips for me next one...so keep em coming. Cookie zl4ad
By
Brian <bejo@...>
·
#879
·
|
Re: IMD on xcv'rs
Yeah thats far far too much, he must have had some dirt on his glasses when he did that measurement. I have a T-4XC on the shelf, one of these days I will measure it. 73 Jim SM2EKM -------------------
By
Jan Erik Holm SM2EKM
·
#878
·
|
Re: IMD on xcv'rs
Those tests where at full power, with quite a bit ALC pulled, also quite a bit of processing. One can say that both radios was "forced" a bit, did also use an audio RF clipper with the KWM2. This is a
By
Jan Erik Holm SM2EKM
·
#877
·
|
Re: 3 x YC-156's vs 8281
This is a very good point by Greg, I agree 100% 73 Jim SM2EKM --------------------- badgerscreek wrote:
By
Jan Erik Holm SM2EKM
·
#876
·
|
Re: new alpha amps newsgroup?
Mark wrote: And apparently you must have a call sign to join too.
By
larryw6lar
·
#875
·
|
Re: Zs FCC callsign
zerobeat40 wrote: Welcome to the group Z.
By
larryw6lar
·
#874
·
|
new alpha amps newsgroup?
I just ran across this on yahoo groups http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Alpha_Amps 73 Mark W0NCL ____________________________________________________________________________________ Get your email and
By
Mark Stevenson
·
#873
·
|
Re: IMD (was 3XYC156)
Sounds like someone needs to review his basic tube theory. Specifically, look up "contact potential bias". Now, for the experiment. Lay tube on bench. Any tube, as long as it works. Apply specified
By
zerobeat40 <zerobeat40@...>
·
#872
·
|
Zs FCC callsign
I don't hide my name. My given name is Z Sampson Thompson, per my birth cert. No ham ticket, no callsign. Not a famous author, nobody knows me anyway. Why does it matter. I've gone by "Z" or "Zed" all
By
zerobeat40 <zerobeat40@...>
·
#871
·
|
Re: IMD (was 3XYC156)
chortle Charles Thomas Rauch, Jr. It can't be Rauch because he knows that the grid has to be positive with respect to the cathode in order for grid-current to flow. R L Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734
By
R L Measures
·
#870
·
|
Re: IMD (was 3XYC156)
Definitely Not. So why do you hide your name? He also looks down on those who do not agree with his technical missteps. > > R L Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734 r@..., , rlm@..., www.somis.org
By
R L Measures
·
#869
·
|
Re: What happened to message 863 ??? IMD on new xcvr's
Yahoogroups allows the originator of a posting to delete it. Or the moderator can. I don't fundamentally like that - once posted, a posting ought stay as a matter of record. That's usually with very
By
zerobeat40 <zerobeat40@...>
·
#868
·
|
Re: IMD (was 3XYC156)
--- In ham_amplifiers@..., R L Measures <r@...> wrote: > > > On Nov 1, 2006, at 12:20 PM, zerobeat40 wrote: > > > --- In ham_amplifiers@..., R L Measures <r@...> wrote: > >> >
By
zerobeat40 <zerobeat40@...>
·
#867
·
|
Re: IMD (was 3XYC156)
### He doesn't need one..... I don't have a FCC callsign either. Check the master list.... a LOT of fellows with no callsigns... who cares. ### some ZL remarked that having to take a CW exam was akin
By
pentalab <jim.thomson@...>
·
#866
·
|