¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I forgot the VOLSER of drives (3380) I created


 

Hello?Ren¨¦ of Montr¨¦al and et al,

I?got 380-383 (BGM380-BGM383) to attach at IPL time.

When I tried the next group of four (384-387 / BGM384-BGM387), none of this group showed up, but the drives (6D0-6D3 / VM14-0 through VM14-3) did become attached to the system.

===== ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?KICKS0,VSAMIN, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?X
=====? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? BGM380,BGM381,BGM382,BGM383, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?X
===== ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?BGM384,BGM385,BGM386,BGM387, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?X
===== ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?VM14-0,VM14-1,VM14-2,VM14-3 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? X

15:59:40 DASD 380 CP SYSTEM BGM380? ?000
15:59:40 DASD 381 CP SYSTEM BGM381? ?000
15:59:40 DASD 382 CP SYSTEM BGM382? ?000
15:59:40 DASD 383 CP SYSTEM BGM383? ?000
15:59:40 DASD 6A0 CP SYSTEM GCCBRX ? 001
15:59:40 DASD 6A1 CP OWNED ?VM50-1? ?018
.

.

.
15:59:40 DASD 6D0 CP SYSTEM VM14-0? ?001
15:59:40 DASD 6D1 CP SYSTEM VM14-1? ?001
15:59:40 DASD 6D2 CP SYSTEM VM14-2? ?001
15:59:40 DASD 6D3 CP SYSTEM VM14-3? ?001


Next, I changed to adding the fifth 3380 (384 / BGM384) to the attached system list via DMKSYS, and it failed!

===== ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?KICKS0,VSAMIN, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?X
===== ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?BGM380,BGM381,BGM382,BGM383, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?X
===== ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?BGM384, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? X
===== ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?VM14-0,VM14-1,VM14-2,VM14-3

The DASD list stayed the same from the above.

I even verified that 384 / BGM384 was in the DMKSYS TEXT file.

It looks like the maximum number of 3380 drives you can attach at IPL time is four, but why only four? I say four 3380 only because there are thirteen 3350 drives (6A0-6A8, 6AC-6AD, 6B0-6B1) attached at IPL time.

So, what might be happening? Is this a bug, or am I doing something wrong (other than wanting more than four 3380 drives attached via DMKSYS at IPL time)?

Bertram Moshier of Chicago
WB8ERT
















 

On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 02:27 PM, Bertram Moshier wrote:
So, what might be happening? Is this a bug, or am I doing something wrong (other than wanting more than four 3380 drives attached via DMKSYS at IPL time)?
Hello Bertram,

Well, I tried with 16 disks, BGM380 to BGM38F, and guess what, it works... all 16 disks are attached to the system! So, at this point, I am inclined to say you are doing something wrong. What exactly? I can't tell. :-(

Cheers,

Ren¨¦ FERLAND, Montr¨¦al?


 

Hello? Ren¨¦,

Yeah, I need to agree with you both that it is something?here and I have zero idea where to go from here.

Are we running the same version of VM/CE even with fixes?

I want to thank you for testing this with me. What are your thoughts on figuring out my issue? How can I diagnose this problem?

Bert





On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 5:49?PM Ren¨¦ Ferland via <ferland.rene=[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 02:27 PM, Bertram Moshier wrote:
So, what might be happening? Is this a bug, or am I doing something wrong (other than wanting more than four 3380 drives attached via DMKSYS at IPL time)?
Hello Bertram,

Well, I tried with 16 disks, BGM380 to BGM38F, and guess what, it works... all 16 disks are attached to the system! So, at this point, I am inclined to say you are doing something wrong. What exactly? I can't tell. :-(

Cheers,

Ren¨¦ FERLAND, Montr¨¦al?


 

>> Are we running the same version of VM/CE even with fixes?

As I wrote before, I tested on a freshly downloaded VM/370 CE R1.2.


>> I want to thank you for testing this with me.

My pleasure. :-)


>> What are your thoughts on figuring out my issue? How can I diagnose this problem?

Well, like me, try it on a freshly downloaded version of VM/370 CE R1.2. If it works there, then the problem lies with your current system somehow. That would be some progress.

Cheers,

Ren¨¦ FERLAND, Montr¨¦al


 

Hello Ren¨¦ of ?Montr¨¦al,

I was able to get the fresh copy working.? All sixteen 3380 drives mount to the system without a hitch.? I wonder how I messed it up, but I did.

Now, maybe, I'll start working on the VM Backup program, which I keep finding reasons to avoid.

Bert of Chicago

??


On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 7:35?PM Ren¨¦ Ferland via <ferland.rene=[email protected]> wrote:
>> Are we running the same version of VM/CE even with fixes?

As I wrote before, I tested on a freshly downloaded VM/370 CE R1.2.


>> I want to thank you for testing this with me.

My pleasure. :-)


>> What are your thoughts on figuring out my issue? How can I diagnose this problem?

Well, like me, try it on a freshly downloaded version of VM/370 CE R1.2. If it works there, then the problem lies with your current system somehow. That would be some progress.

Cheers,

Ren¨¦ FERLAND, Montr¨¦al