¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: DMKCNS modifications
Hi Bob, If by "discussion forum" you mean the Moshix Discord channel, then the topic was discussed in the #uts-unix room (under Spare Computer Room group):
By Ren¨¦ Ferland · #4964 ·
Re: DMKCNS modifications
Hi Ren¨¦, I joined the discussion forum to look at the discussion on DMKCNS, but I could not find it. Any pointers would be appreciated. I would need to understand the issue more completely, before I
By Bob Bolch · #4963 ·
Re: DMKCNS modifications
Yes, they are present normally in CP, but they need to be removed from DMKCNS TXTHRC if one wants the 2703 connection to UTS to work properly. I am wondering if that "removal" will affect the
By Ren¨¦ Ferland · #4962 ·
Re: DMKCNS modifications
Aww Nuts! I missed and cut & paste ... FSVIEW: DMKCNS AUXR60 H1???????????????? Lines 1-23/23 F80[1-79]? FSVIEW V1.2.5 R15227DK 629 UV06277 PEVM11927 SWITCHED LINE DISABLED ON IR AND
By Mark A. Stevens · #4961 ·
Re: DMKCNS modifications
Rene, I'm confused about the patches above not being applied. The following files are found after a vmsetup cp is run on MAINT. XLIST: DMKCNS *
By Mark A. Stevens · #4960 ·
New release of New Stanford Pascal (2023.01)
This is cross-posted to both H390-VM and Hercules-390 The Stanford Pascal Compiler release 2023.01 is now available for Windows, OS/2, Linux etc. - and for VM/CMS and MVS (or z/OS) on IBM mainframes
By Bernd Oppolzer · #4959 ·
Re: DMKCNS modifications
PUT tapes are accumulative in VM, so if you have a PLC 629 tape for example, the fixes that Rene mentioned will be on that tape as well and on any tape 625 or later.? The fixes will also be listed in
By Bob Polmanter · #4958 ·
Re: DMKCNS modifications
Rene, I can¡¯t say for sure as they are from a PUT tape we don¡¯t have, so don¡¯t have the matching ¡°memo¡± file which lists the fixes and the problem they fix. However it looks likely that they
By Dave Wade · #4957 ·
DMKCNS modifications
Hello everyone, I have a question for those of you who know VM/370 "internals". There has been some activity recently on the Moshix Discord channel regarding UTS (Amdahl Unix), and to make it possible
By Ren¨¦ Ferland · #4956 ·
Re: "Waterloo Tapes" in H390-VM group's Files area
Ren¨¦ Ferland wrote: [...] Both of those sound very nice! -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) Software Development Laboratories http://www.softdevlabs.com mail: fish@...
By Fish Fish · #4955 ·
Re: "Waterloo Tapes" in H390-VM group's Files area
I agree as far as "general interest" stuff is concerned. Looking at the abstract of the tape, I recognize indeed many items present on VM/370 CE. But there might be items of more "personal interest"
By Ren¨¦ Ferland · #4954 ·
Re: "Waterloo Tapes" in H390-VM group's Files area
Mark, I think we have extracted everything usable and beneficial using from that tape. So the command recall code, EDIT modifications, several compilers, EXEC utilities all came from that tape.
By Dave Wade · #4953 ·
Re: "Waterloo Tapes" in H390-VM group's Files area
Probably me, and I probably had it coming. ;-) In any case, a followup question. Bob Abele had a tape, waterloo.aws, which also had a number of files, on it. Does that tape/file have anything we need?
By Mark A. Stevens · #4952 ·
Re: DLMALLOC PANIC LINE 3503
Bertram Moshier wrote: [...] As far as I know, "Sys" functions are exclusive to ooRexx, and ooRexx was written for Windows (and later, for Linux, Solaris and MacOS too), not CMS:
By Fish Fish · #4951 ·
Re: DLMALLOC PANIC LINE 3503
Hi Bert, Do you understand that the REXX function package you want does not and has never existed on any version of VM? The manuals you need to understand what does work are:
By Bob Bolch · #4950 ·
Re: DLMALLOC PANIC LINE 3503
Hello Bob, I MESSED up the descriptions. The subject for this thread goes with my adding trace 'e' The DMSIPT error goes with the package and call REXXUTIL. Bert.
By Bertram Moshier · #4949 ·
Re: DLMALLOC PANIC LINE 3503
It sounds like this mystery code is a REXX function package from a non-VM system. If that is true, then the best we could do here would be to fail more gracefully. The DLMALLOC msg indicates a storage
By Bob Bolch · #4948 ·
Re: DLMALLOC PANIC LINE 3503
Bert, As far as I can tell the sys functions are an add-on package on all CMS. On LCM+l which is a later VM/CMS but not real iron, it fails gracefully, but support for external functions was only just
By Dave Wade · #4947 ·
Re: DLMALLOC PANIC LINE 3503
Hey! Wait a minute! This error occurred once I added trace 'e' To the Rexx program. The DMSITP error is from the RxFunctions, such as SysSleep. So -> trace 'e' gave the DLMALLOC error. Bert
By Bertram Moshier · #4946 ·
Re: DLMALLOC PANIC LINE 3503
Dave, So none of the sys functions exist in CMS REXX? Should REXX blow up this way? How did it blow up on your real iron system? I'm not sure REXX is ready for what I need. Sys functions are basic to
By Bertram Moshier · #4945 ·