This group is for all folks running the original IBM VM/370 Release 6 operating system (or later (e.g. VMTCE (Community Edition)) on Hercules. Like the other early IBM operating systems this version has always been in the public domain and so can be freely distributed. The base version as supplied by IBM is lacking in many facilities. IBM solved this by providing additional extension products which were licensed and so are not available. There are however many user enhancements available which can be installed. In addition, in order to get users up and running quickly updated "releases" of VM/370 included the most popular updates are available for download, so novices can start to learn VM without having to delve into the system internals. It is intended that this wiki will provide information on the base release and these updates.
The available versions are here :-
?
?
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
Welcome back from your surgery. Once again, I'm leaving out thoughts and not writing them down. Sorry. I am referencing Mike's 2nd edition, also the ANSI X3J18-199X document. I will also eat my words
By
Mark A. Stevens
·
#4372
·
|
Re: Another Time Zone Question (Sorta)
There are other control files, aux files, and then code which are included when AP is selected for a build. I've forgotten the details, but I used it on our 4381[-P2]?, as it had an attached
By
Mark A. Stevens
·
#4371
·
|
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
Will check this. Martin Scheffler <San-Lorenzo@...> schrieb am So. 16. Okt. 2022 um 21:28:
By
Mike Gro?mann
·
#4370
·
|
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
We might look for? TEMPLATE? C? F?? on MAINTC: *q disk* ** * Label? CUU M? Stat? Cyl Type Blksize?? Files? Blks Used-(%) Blks Left? Blk Total MNT191 191 A?? R/W?? 50 3350?
By
Martin Scheffler
·
#4369
·
|
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
I¡®m on my way to find a fix. Debug environment is back in running state. Martin Scheffler <San-Lorenzo@...> schrieb am So. 16. Okt. 2022 um 19:28: Von Gmail Mobile gesendet
By
Mike Gro?mann
·
#4368
·
|
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
I had to build bREXX for bug chasing already .. I will look into this. I checked KEDIT/KEXX, Regina and ooRexx under Microsoft Windows and all these results are the same as with *REXX370 4.02*.
By
Martin Scheffler
·
#4367
·
|
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
Bob, did you came closer to a c file, where the problem may occur? I just reviewed my old mail, but can¡¯t really remember. Something with not finding the closing ?)¡°. Where do you think is the
By
Mike Gro?mann
·
#4366
·
|
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
Hello Mark, yes, MVS has the same bug. But unfortunately I'm not able to find a fix. :( Mike
By
Mike Gro?mann
·
#4365
·
|
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
Yes. The problem is that BREXX doesn't handle literals in the parse template!! I just don't know enough C to find and fix it. Bob Bolch wrote:
By
Bob Bolch
·
#4364
·
|
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
Comparing with results from real iron (z/VM 6.4): *Ready; T=0.01/0.01 10:46:48 DAVEMTST z/VM Version 6 Release 4.0, service level 1701 (64-bit) Generated at 04/24/17 16:30:42 EST IPL at 10/08/22
By
Martin Scheffler
·
#4363
·
|
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
The best description of how the parsing of literal strings in the template is supposed to work, see: 'The Rexx Language' by Mike ( I have the second edition.) See Section 10 on Parsing in the
By
Bob Bolch
·
#4362
·
|
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
Hi Mark, 'That said, the definition for parsing using the PARSE ARG, or ARG commands does not appear to identify the right parenthesis as a special character, as it identifies the left parenthesis.'
By
Bob Bolch
·
#4361
·
|
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
With the replacement of the GCCLIB segment, I tried this again, and the results are the same. I've been looking at the REXX syntax definitions, and Mike's
By
Mark A. Stevens
·
#4360
·
|
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
Any luck in finding time? ... Mark S.
By
Mark A. Stevens
·
#4359
·
|
Re: Another Time Zone Question (Sorta)
Dave, I don't have my system available in front of me at the moment but to the best of my recollection those change files were controlling the OPTIONS COPY member, for the support of varying the
By
Bob Polmanter
·
#4358
·
|
Re: Another Time Zone Question (Sorta)
Later CMS versions have some command where you can edit a file with all updates applied, and where you can create new update files. So I made something similar (much simpler, I expect). I called it
By
Rhialto
·
#4357
·
|
Re: Another Time Zone Question (Sorta)
Bertram, We handle most things folks throw at us. I¡¯ve updated that page to point out later versions are elsewhere. Dave Sent: 16 October 2022 06:50 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [h390-vm]
By
Dave Wade
·
#4356
·
|
Re: Another Time Zone Question (Sorta)
Bob, That¡¯s certainly the way I used to do it. I suspect in some situations in the ¡°modern world¡± one might be asked to use UPDATE files simply for change control. However I notice that there
By
Dave Wade
·
#4355
·
|
Re: Another Time Zone Question (Sorta)
I have just done a fresh install to have an "untouched" VM/370 Community Edition V1R1.2 ( http://vm370.org/VM/V1R1.2 ) running under a second Hercules. Of course the port number has to be different
By
Martin Scheffler
·
#4354
·
|
Re: Another Time Zone Question (Sorta)
Is it possible to run different Herc systems with their own different VM systems. of course on the same PC or different PC connected by means? Thank you.
By
Bertram Moshier
·
#4353
·
|