This group is for all folks running the original IBM VM/370 Release 6 operating system (or later (e.g. VMTCE (Community Edition)) on Hercules. Like the other early IBM operating systems this version has always been in the public domain and so can be freely distributed. The base version as supplied by IBM is lacking in many facilities. IBM solved this by providing additional extension products which were licensed and so are not available. There are however many user enhancements available which can be installed. In addition, in order to get users up and running quickly updated "releases" of VM/370 included the most popular updates are available for download, so novices can start to learn VM without having to delve into the system internals. It is intended that this wiki will provide information on the base release and these updates.
The available versions are here :-
?
?
|
Re: CTCE on the same host with unique ports
Drew, yes, you're right, it appears that keyword "3088" in the current spinhawk CTCE is optional. Thanks for making me aware of this. Cheers, Peter
By
Peter Jansen
·
#409
·
|
|
Re: CTCE on the same host with unique ports
BTW, please print the full status of the CTCE; this is /not/ useful when debugging half open links: 0:0E44 3088 .:....=127.0.0.1:2216 open 0:0E45 3088 .:....=127.0.0.1:2218 open -- Drew Derbyshire "It
By
Drew Derbyshire
·
#408
·
|
|
Re: CTCE on the same host with unique ports
It's not needed in my copy, which was pulled from Github January 6. veronica.conf:08C0???? CTCE??? 2216 localhost 2316 veronica.conf:08C1???? CTCE??? 2218 localhost 2318
By
Drew Derbyshire
·
#407
·
|
|
Re: CTCE on the same host with unique ports
Drew, My earlier reply has not yet been approved by the moderators, which is good because it was wrong. No, the configuration statement for all 3088 type devices on spinhawk still requires the keyword
By
Peter Jansen
·
#406
·
|
|
Re: CTCE on the same host with unique ports
Yes Drew, this is a correct configuration, not only on spinhawk, but also on SDL-hyperion ( https://github.com/SDL-Hercules-390/hyperion ) where my newest CTCE v2 is already committed (and which still
By
Peter Jansen
·
#405
·
|
|
CTCE on the same host with unique ports
On spinhawk, is this the correct configuration to connect two systems on the same host? The example uses unique IP addresses and same port numbers. veronica/veronica.conf: 08C0???? CTCE??? 2216
By
Drew Derbyshire
·
#404
·
|
|
Re: building BREXX
great work, I¡¯ll be sure to check it over the weekend!
By
[email protected]
·
#403
·
|
|
Re: building BREXX
Automatic build done ... added to latest docker image. I'll try and actually do some debugging now!
By
adriansutherland67
·
#402
·
|
|
Re: building BREXX
yes, that is fine with me, I¡¯ll start on the testsuite and the errors that remain when the gcc runtime gets better
By
[email protected]
·
#401
·
|
|
Re: building BREXX
I think you can assign people to issues. I would like to concentrate on reentrancy, residency, and gcclib issues if that works for you?
By
adriansutherland67
·
#400
·
|
|
Re: building BREXX
No ... I disconnect and logon the user to the console as needed. However if you are using a real mainframe that won't work :-(
By
adriansutherland67
·
#399
·
|
|
Re: building BREXX
yes, forgot about the .h files, noticed that just now when trying to compile on z/VM. lower case, fine. I prefer that too. yes, that would also be good for the wiki.
By
[email protected]
·
#398
·
|
|
Re: building BREXX
Added some missing files (just headers I think - also separated the .horig files following your approach) and made all the files lower case (sorry!!). Added some very rough instructions.txt for
By
adriansutherland67
·
#397
·
|
|
Re: GCCLIB Advice
GLOBAL TXTLIB GCCLIB?is definitely needed in SYSPROF (for both GCCLIB and BREXX) however I don't understand the logic of what is included in the TEXT file being loaded high, and what can be left out
By
adriansutherland67
·
#396
·
|
|
Re: BREXX Login
Thanks Rene Rebuilt the BREXX module - I found I needed to issue a GLOBAL TXTLIB GCCLIB first for it to be happy (it had a few standard library missing symbols otherwise). btw - PDPCLIB is not what we
By
adriansutherland67
·
#395
·
|
|
Re: Docker image (1.4.1/latest) with GCCLIB 0.7.1
Just as well! :-)
By
adriansutherland67
·
#394
·
|
|
Re: Docker image (1.4.1/latest) with GCCLIB 0.7.1
Adrian, You tell me there is no BREXX module so its no linked at all. BREXX is re-linked with the dynamic library from the Profile EXEC I loaded the statically linked versions of EE and FSLIST etc
By
Dave Wade
·
#393
·
|
|
Docker image (1.4.1/latest) with GCCLIB 0.7.1
This GCLIB version of 0.7.1 is almost identical to the last version available (i.e. I have not materially edited it ... yet!) docker pull adriansutherland/vm370:latest Interestingly both EE, FSLIST
By
adriansutherland67
·
#392
·
|
|
Re: GCCLIB Advice
For info. TXTLIB did not work when run from sysprof exec when "installed globally" (it wa ok for a local install on cmsuser). Perhaps a disk is missing at that ipl stage? Anyway I have left it as a
By
adriansutherland67
·
#391
·
|
|
Re: BREXX Login
To correct that: gimme brexx 191 j mr J is the mode it needs to be attached to. Ren¨¦.
By
[email protected]
·
#390
·
|