开云体育

William, I think more than that, looking at the Functional Characteristics manuals for these from BitSavers https://bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/370/funcChar/ and I was interested to read some had a light

Perfect!! Thanks!! -- William

Personally, I would like to see efforts on EE going into creating a rich enough REXX integration that would allow the "side modes" to be implemented in REXX.like IBM did. cheers, William

From a programming standpoint, the 3066 had different geometry (80x33), different set of buffer orders, and completely different CCWs, interrupts, and sense data. I think IBM only put software support

The /168 console (like the 158 & later) didn't have very many blinky lights. As I recall, just the five above the Interrupt, Start, Stop, Load buttons. So, the "not" microfiche viewer was the

How important are the "side modes" of EE like FSLIST and FSVIEW ? I did not care of these up to now. I have reworked EE focussed on XEDIT as it was in VM/SP 1 (that means no FILELIST, RDRLIST ...).

Dave Wade wrote: [...] You don't?! Wow. Just... wow. Which, when eliminated, would free up those registers for other uses. Which, when replaced with relative instructions that don't need base

[email protected]> wrote: It was interesting from both the hardware and software points of view. I understand that the hardware was based on a stripped down 2250 with no actual graphics

Dave Wade wrote: Yes, you're right: it would. Oh well. Just a thought. -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) Software Development Laboratories http://www.softdevlabs.com mail: fish@...

Not wanting to highjack the "[h390-vm] Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal" thread. What was unique about the 3066? I understand it was the integrated console for the /165 and /168, but what unique

Fish, I would prefer not to do this as I believe it would stop VM/CE running on my P/390. Dave

If you tackle the SMSG, then we wouldn't need commands in the CONFIG, as

Hello, How about following IBM and splitting the module into two? Just a thought. [email protected]> wrote:

I've been following this thread with interest, so allow me to offer what may be, while somewhat radical, a nevertheless viable solution: Require your Hercules control file to have a "FACILITY ENABLE

Mark, Having a heartbeat really wouldn't help matters much for detecting that a system on the other side has gone away.? The main problem is really the nature of CTCE devices on Hercules.? When one

Tony, If you look at the link I sent to the VMSHARE archives :- http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/browse.cgi?fn=DMKGRF <http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/browse.cgi?fn=DMKGRF&ft=PROB&args=dmkgrf+split#hit>

On Sun, 22 Sept 2024 at 17:19, Tony Harminc <tharminc@...> wrote: [...] > Some shops made a hardware mod to support the ENTER (or maybe it was CR) key as, well, an ENTER key. The 3066 as it came

[email protected]> wrote: Some shops made a hardware mod to support the ENTER (or maybe it was CR) key as, well, an ENTER key. The 3066 as it came required the operator to hit the separate and very