Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- H390-Vm
- Messages
Search
Re: Contributing to, Building, and Maintaining VM370CE
#VMCE
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýMe too - I think it is very important for the people who love VM and Rexx but are not inclined to do peacemeal updates of these environments - due to lack of expercience or lack of time. We should try to move it forward and having 'nightlies' available to be able to test interactions of new levels of software are very important.With the BREXX fixes and the work done on EE it is already a very representative and usable environment; I hope someone with the right skills and motivation can take over from Bob. Looking at MVS TK5, it is very successful in that an update can be done which leaves intact the modifications one did to it (adding your own favourite historical userid et cetera) or choose a whole new distribution with the latest and greatest. I hope to see that also for VM/CE. A particular requirement would be to be able to painlessy connect to the new BITNET (HNET) - I know Bob left us a script for that, but personally I never got that to run; did some work with RSCS but apparently not enough. Also, I absolutely love to be able to use and experiment with the old language tools - COBOL, FORTRAN, SNOBOL, ALGOL - would love to see the addition of SIMULA370 and some more. Be able to run BREXX is an absolute dream, and whatever we can do to connect that even more with CMS should be wonderful. best regards, ¸é±ð²Ô¨¦.
|
Re: XNET v1.4.1
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýSee below, Harold Grovesteen On 9/12/24 17:45, Bob Polmanter wrote:
That is interesting.? I have never worked with a CTC at this level.? Was unaware that is how the CTC works.? I would of course expect the software to work that way.? As I said, though, I doubt Hercules will ever have the channel appear busy.? Putting CTC's on different channels might keep the software from getting confused in some way. Thanks for the insight!
|
Re: Contributing to, Building, and Maintaining VM370CE
#VMCE
I second to keep it... On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 8:26?PM Mark A. Stevens via <marXtevens=[email protected]> wrote:
--
Ken Dreger ? |
How to setup DASDs sharing correctly between two z/VMs under Hercules.
Hello!
Sorry for my bad English.
I use one Hercules' instance for Share Device Server.
?
One Hercules' instance should use DASDs with read-write access, the second Hercules' instance should use DASDs with read-only access.
In Hercules' config for second Hercules' instance i define these DASDs as "READONLY FAKEWRITE".
In z/VM's SYSTEM CONFIG i deifne theseDASDs as "RDEV ... SHARED YES MDC OFF".
In z/VM's DIRECTORY minidisks on these DASDs are defined as "MDISK .... MWV ..."
?
Now I start Hercules' instances on the same PC under Windows 10, but in the future Hercules' instances should run on different servers under Linux.
?
These DASDs are used by the DBMS ADABAS. When I make changes in one Hercules instance, the changes are not displayed in another Hercules instance.
But if DASDs with changes are copied to another server where ADABAS is running, without closing the ADABAS nucleus, without rebooting Hercules or re-ipl z/VM, detach-attach DASDs, JUST COPY, then the changes will be visible immediately. ADABAS uses minidisks, but uses its own input/output.
?
§³an i set up DASDs sharing so that changes are visible immediately?
How do I set up shared access to DASDs correctly in my case?
?
Thanks in advance. |
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 03:22 AM, Mark A. Stevens wrote:
... has anyone tried to install SEDIT from the CIA?I have transferred the archive and looked at the list of files, but I do not have an empty minidisk at hands. ?
I am still busy with some nasty bugs in EE, which prevent a new bleeding edge release.
?
And you want instructions ... there is the question if to use the new help system or the small EE internal help.
Since EE can now run in high memory via RESLIB, the new help system can be called from within EE if EE is running in high memory.
?
EE now checks if it is running in the user area at 020000 ... and all CMS command restrictions are lifted if EE is running in high memory.
?
Martin |
Re: Contributing to, Building, and Maintaining VM370CE
#VMCE
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 02:02 AM, William Denton wrote:
I really don't know why but I have always thought of PF10 as being the RETRIEVE key... don't know where that came from It would be possible to set up a first run EXEC that would let you choose the PF key of your choice, for RETRIEVE. and probably anything else.
?
Volunteers?
?
... Mark S. |
Re: Contributing to, Building, and Maintaining VM370CE
#VMCE
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 04:32 PM, Mike Rankin wrote:
In favor of - "is there really any serious interest in continuing the "Community Edition" idea?¡± Aye!
?
?... Mark S.
? |
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 12:57 PM, Dave Wade wrote:
There are lists of all the mods on the MAINT disk¡.. I found the files that list the changes to VM/370, so now I have a better understanding of what is present/absent.
?
Not to put as damper on Martin's efforts, as I use EE and FSVIEW daily, has anyone tried to install SEDIT from the CIA?
?
?... Mark S. |
Re: XNET v1.4.1
Mark,
?
It is not just XNET, it is the nature of the beast.? When a CTC device has an i/o in progress, the entire channel is busy; if there are other devices on the channel, whether they are other CTCs or any other device, they will be unable to do i/o or receive interruptions during the CTC i/o.
?
So if you are using 500 for XNET, then I would recommend you put RSCS's CTC on 600 or some other channel.? But if you are aware of the possible reduction in throughput on a CTC channel, then yes you could also put RSCS's CTC on channel 5.
?
The other thing is that our systems are small and generally just single user, so the number of i/os issued by XNET across the channel isn't going to be much of an impact.? XNET doesnt do any "heartbeat" i/o, so if you are not doing anything at your 3270 terminal dialed to XNET, then there is no idle-time CTC i/o.
?
Regards,
Bob
? |
Re: XNET v1.4.1
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThe channel does not actually exist in Hercules.? It started out as an ESA/390 emulator so initially the channel subsystem was implemented for subchannel I/O.? Later, support for S/370 was added and the channel I/O commands were added as a wrapper to the already existing channel subsystem.? The channel subsystem does not report the channel busy. There was an effort to emulate channels, but that did not make it into Hercules. So from Hercules stand point, it does not matter. From the perspective of the guest operating system running in
Hercules, VM, it might care. Harold Grovesteen On 9/12/24 15:10, Mark A. Stevens via
groups.io wrote:
|
Re: dial cpwatch and what it says
I remember that blob! (I think I dated her for a while..)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-Dave On 9/12/24 17:43, Gregg Levine wrote:
Hello! --
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA |
Re: dial cpwatch and what it says
Hello!
No those were the two, one of yours, and one a wild cat that followed those Yeti, who were watching you. The others are watching the Yeti. Now please stop staring at that blob in the parking lot across the street, it returned. ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8@... "This signature was present when the impossible happened 23 years ago, twice." On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 5:39?PM Dave McGuire via groups.io <mcguire@...> wrote:
|
Re: dial cpwatch and what it says
Yeah it was a long time ago.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
And there are a lot more cats here than two! -Dave On 9/12/24 17:38, Gregg Levine wrote:
Hello! --
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA |
Re: dial cpwatch and what it says
Hello!
Which was stated by the man running his museum with help from far away, and had the message proofread by two cats, one of them came with that group in blue hats. Seriously though, I am quite pleased that the original thread has been restarted. ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8@... "This signature was present when the impossible happened 23 years ago, twice." On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 5:33?PM Dave McGuire via groups.io <mcguire@...> wrote:
|
Re: XNET v1.4.1
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 07:50 AM, Bob Polmanter wrote:
For example, you have port 30880 on the CTCE at 500 and at 600.? They need to be different ports, on both sides of the CTCE definition.? So, I'd suggest using 30880 for address 500 and something like 30890 for address 600.? This isnt XNET's rules; rather, this is required by CTCE to function properly. Bob,
?
A follow up question concerning use of channels/CTCE for XNET vs. other applications, say RSCS.
?
I remember your documentation saying, I should only use XNET on a channel once, so 500, but not 501, ... Is it "safe" to use 501 for RSCS, or other products, or does XNET keep the whole channel too busy, when it is in use?
?
Thanks!
?
?... Mark S. |
Re: dial cpwatch and what it says
On 9/12/24 15:51, Mark A. Stevens via groups.io wrote:
I can see CPWATCH on the WATERLOO tape, with a name there: G.D.Any idea of whether or not it'll run under VM/ESA? -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA |
Re: dial cpwatch and what it says
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 07:32 PM, Ren¨¦ Ferland wrote:
I wish I had known of/installed CPWATCH on my VM/SP system back in the day. Wow! ?
Read ALL the manuals FIRST. Read ALL the MEMO/DOCUMENT files FIRST. Read ALL the code FIRST.
?
?... Mark S. |