开云体育

wrote: Yes, but... Indeed. Only once in my life did I run on a real machine with 16 MB.. That was a 168MP at an IBM s

Ross Patterson wrote: Ah. I wasn't familiar with that title. I've heard of CE (Customer Engineer) and SE (Systems Engineer), but not SRE. Thanks. Cool! Thanks for the education. Appreciated. So I

In assuming Drew, like me later in my career, was called a "Site Reliability Engineer". As to VMer, well, I spent 20 years or so working on VM/CMS systems, and once led the VM activities at SHARE.

I'm curious: what's an "SRE" or "VMER"? :) -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) Guru Emeritus

wrote: That was true up to a point. FORTRAN IV, as you note, had F, G, and H versions, which differed both in function and in required memory (and in overlay structure - remember overlays?). But after

Remember, the suffixes for various products is not based on function level but how much (real) memory it needed; this was an era when the IBM S/360 65 maxed out at 1 MB core of fast core.? Even the

I would like to second Eddy Balem's plug of Harold Grovesteen's most excellent SATK/ASMA product: * https://github.com/s390guy/SATK As Harold already knows, I'm his biggest fan. It's a *very* nice,

Can't forget what I didn't know. Thank you very much. I will add it to the ever growing list of things-to-do. ... Mark S.

I've been 'collecting' various 'versions' to see what is different, as the very first version I got, from a CBT tape some years ago, differs from what is out there now. ... Mark S.

Thank you very much for the history lesson. I read somewhere that G was written because of limitations in F, but I don't remember what those all were. Installing G on VM/370 is necessarily needed, but

I believe it would from the code I have been living with. There are modules that support the following instruction sets This is why I have been trying to get this installed, as I believe it could be

I would add, regarding ASMA, that the .OBJ object code generated is (in my experience) 100% compatible with IBM object decks, except that it does not include RLD information. This means it should be

I hadn't realized that IBM rewrote F into XF while H was already available. Interesting. Would it be feasible to expand G into full H compatibility? AIUI, H started out as IBM's version of G...

And do not forget the assembler that comes with SATK, also called ASMA it appears. https://github.com/s390guy/SATK The SATK ASMA manual is at the doc/asma/ASMA.pdf in the github repository. The syntax

Mark, To echo what Tony says, F and XF are different beasts. Basically, F was I think the pre MVS OS assembler, XF was distributed with MVS, VM and DOS. I have never seen “F” on VM. I am sure I

[email protected]> wrote: Assembler F and XF are indeed completely different programs. For whatever reasons, IBM appears to have written XF to the same specs as F, but from scratch. There are a

I am still trying, as I can find time, to get Assembler G installed on VM/370. I've run into an EXEC that mentions Assembler F as separate from Assembler XF. Is that true/possible? I only find

Dave's right - if you want to preserve your SPOOL files (which can sometimes be recovered by a checkpoint start), and avoid the start prompt, don't just close Hercules. Instead, issue a /SHUTDOWN

wrote: OK, so here's some more explanation of the magic :-) /18:32:35 AUTO LOGON *** OPERATOR USERS = 001 BY SYSTEM > > Once the SPOOL has been recovered or cleared, the system operator userid

Steve, Normally it would come up on its own. The reason you are seeing this is because it hasn’t been shutdown properly, because you have had issues bringing it up in the past. Dave Sent: Monday,