¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Locked Reverification after Blacklist
Folks, I can see we have thee types of users in this group. One type have received a re-verification message from groups.io and replied, to these I say Thank You. One type, the ones I am targeting
By Dave Wade · #5415 ·
Re: SRE
only if the device needing service is not the paging device.
By Doug Wegscheid · #5414 ·
Re: SRE
If I signal an interrupt, can they be paged in? ;-) ... Mark S.
By Mark A. Stevens · #5413 ·
Re: SRE
Of course, most SREs are in a pager duty rotation. I wrote a "How to Set up your Pager" webpage for the Google Docs SRE team, including how have each page be sent via text, email, *and* robocall. (I
By Drew Derbyshire · #5412 ·
Re: SRE
No, we revert to our native form: *BOFH * -ahd-
By Drew Derbyshire · #5411 ·
Re: SRE
And fathers? Desired? :D
By Bob Flanders · #5410 ·
Re: SRE
wrote: There are lists out there along the lines of "If priests are defrocked and lawyers are disbarred, then..." electricians are delighted, cowboys are deranged, models are deposed, and so on. So I
By Tony Harminc · #5409 ·
Re: SRE
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Site_reliability_engineering ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Site_reliability_engineering; ) ; while at Google I was in Ben Treynor's organization for five years. All
By Drew Derbyshire · #5408 ·
Re: VM/370 CE Assembler F, Assembler XF
wrote: Yes, but... Indeed. Only once in my life did I run on a real machine with 16 MB.. That was a 168MP at an IBM s
By Tony Harminc · #5407 ·
Re: VM/370 CE Assembler F, Assembler XF
Ross Patterson wrote: Ah. I wasn't familiar with that title. I've heard of CE (Customer Engineer) and SE (Systems Engineer), but not SRE. Thanks. Cool! Thanks for the education. Appreciated. So I
By Fish Fish · #5406 ·
Re: VM/370 CE Assembler F, Assembler XF
In assuming Drew, like me later in my career, was called a "Site Reliability Engineer". As to VMer, well, I spent 20 years or so working on VM/CMS systems, and once led the VM activities at SHARE.
By Ross Patterson · #5405 ·
Re: VM/370 CE Assembler F, Assembler XF
I'm curious: what's an "SRE" or "VMER"? :) -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) Guru Emeritus
By Fish Fish · #5404 ·
Re: VM/370 CE Assembler F, Assembler XF
wrote: That was true up to a point. FORTRAN IV, as you note, had F, G, and H versions, which differed both in function and in required memory (and in overlay structure - remember overlays?). But after
By Ross Patterson · #5403 ·
Re: VM/370 CE Assembler F, Assembler XF
Remember, the suffixes for various products is not based on function level but how much (real) memory it needed; this was an era when the IBM S/360 65 maxed out at 1 MB core of fast core.? Even the
By Drew Derbyshire · #5402 ·
Re: VM/370 CE Assembler F, Assembler XF
I would like to second Eddy Balem's plug of Harold Grovesteen's most excellent SATK/ASMA product: * https://github.com/s390guy/SATK As Harold already knows, I'm his biggest fan. It's a *very* nice,
By Fish Fish · #5401 ·
Re: VM/370 CE Assembler F, Assembler XF
Can't forget what I didn't know. Thank you very much. I will add it to the ever growing list of things-to-do. ... Mark S.
By Mark A. Stevens · #5400 ·
Re: VM/370 CE Assembler F, Assembler XF
I've been 'collecting' various 'versions' to see what is different, as the very first version I got, from a CBT tape some years ago, differs from what is out there now. ... Mark S.
By Mark A. Stevens · #5399 ·
Re: VM/370 CE Assembler F, Assembler XF
Thank you very much for the history lesson. I read somewhere that G was written because of limitations in F, but I don't remember what those all were. Installing G on VM/370 is necessarily needed, but
By Mark A. Stevens · #5398 ·
Re: VM/370 CE Assembler F, Assembler XF
I believe it would from the code I have been living with. There are modules that support the following instruction sets This is why I have been trying to get this installed, as I believe it could be
By Mark A. Stevens · #5397 ·
Re: VM/370 CE Assembler F, Assembler XF
I would add, regarding ASMA, that the .OBJ object code generated is (in my experience) 100% compatible with IBM object decks, except that it does not include RLD information. This means it should be
By eddy_balem@... · #5396 ·