¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: NJE
Hi Daniel, I'd recommend that you use SDL Hercules 4.5 or 4.6; the TCPNJE driver is already in those releases and is stable.? I've been using NJE with SDL Hercules for since 2018.? The problem with
By Bob Polmanter · #5315 ·
Re: NJE
Thanks.? I'll reach out to Mr. Coghlan.
By Daniel L. Srebnick · #5314 ·
Re: NJE
The NJE device code in Hyperion/Hercules 4.x is his code that he developed for 3.x. His NJE line driver for VM/370 will work with the NJE device in Hercules 4.x, but if you run into trouble and need
By Matthew Wilson · #5313 ·
Re: NJE
I am running Hercules 4.0, which seems to have the TCP NJE code built in.? It looks like the Peter Coghlan code was developed for Hercules 3.x.? Am I correct? If I am correct, is there a different
By Daniel L. Srebnick · #5312 ·
Re: MVS Batch Ouput from VM/CMS
Context is everything, as the question is about MVS as a VM guest, asked in VM group. All working nicely here and thanks to the group for the assist.
By Daniel L. Srebnick · #5311 ·
Re: MVS Batch Ouput from VM/CMS
You have a point and I agree. My suggestion was for the specific case of Daniel, and I used the verb "might consider" as, indeed, such a modification has an impact when TK5 is run standalone and would
By Ren¨¦ Ferland · #5310 ·
Re: MVS Batch Ouput from VM/CMS
That is probably not a good idea for the TK5 distribution at large as it is meant to be run standalone, outside of VM, where this would not be true. Adding VM is basically ignored when not running
By Frank D. Engel, Jr. · #5309 ·
Re: MVS Batch Ouput from VM/CMS
You might also consider replacing SEP by NOSEP as VM/370 already provides a separator page when printing. :-) Cheers, Rene FERLAND, Montreal
By Ren¨¦ Ferland · #5308 ·
Re: MVS Batch Ouput from VM/CMS
Hi Daniel, Yes, the 'VM' keyword on the PRINTERx definition in JES2PARM is what enables that printer to be eligible to spool output back to the VM spool.? You can use the keyword on any and all
By Bob Polmanter · #5307 ·
Re: MVS Batch Ouput from VM/CMS
Working!? I already had what I needed, other than getting the jobcard correct. Thanks Bob!
By Daniel L. Srebnick · #5306 ·
Re: MVS Batch Ouput from VM/CMS
Hi Bob: All the pieces appear to be installed already with TK5 Update 2. In JES2PARM, I see: PRINTER1?????? CLASS=A,SEP,AUTO,DSPLTCEL,NOPAUSE,UNIT=00E,DRAIN,?????? + UCS=QN,FCB=6,VM Is the
By Daniel L. Srebnick · #5305 ·
Re: MVS Batch Ouput from VM/CMS
Hi Daniel, If you are using TK5 Update 2, you can spool MVS output back to your CMS userid automatically.? Basically, you need to put your CMS userid in your JOB statement (in the programmer name
By Bob Polmanter · #5304 ·
Re: MVS Batch Ouput from VM/CMS
Thank you Jim. That did occur to me.? I'm hoping for a more "elegant" solution.? I know back in the day in a multiuser situation there was a way via JCL to get the output back to my VM.? I just
By Daniel L. Srebnick · #5303 ·
Re: MVS Batch Ouput from VM/CMS
You can spool 00E to your VM userid by logging on your MVS guest and issuing a #CP SPOOL 00E to yourid CONT NOHOLD
By Jim Salvino · #5302 ·
MVS Batch Ouput from VM/CMS
I'm again playing with MVS (TK5 Update 2) under VM/370 CE 1.2. I've succesfully submitted and executed a batch job from VM to MVS by punching it.? What I cannot figure out is how to tell the JCL to
By Daniel L. Srebnick · #5301 ·
Re: REXX Program to read CP Directory
DIRENT is what you're looking for (it's is not a REXX exec) -- Kris Buelens
By kris.buelens@... · #5300 ·
REXX Program to read CP Directory
I thought I remembered a discussion about there being a REXX program (CBT? VMSHARE?) that would read the minidisk the CP Directory was located and create a USER DIRECT file. I can't seem to find the
By Mark A. Stevens · #5299 ·
Re: NJE
The developer of the NJE device support and RSCS modifications, Peter Coghlan, is usually willing to share his in-progress work privately with people who contact him and let him know they're
By Matthew Wilson · #5298 ·
Re: NJE
Thank you Bob.
By Daniel L. Srebnick · #5297 ·
Re: NJE
Hi Dan, VMCE 1.1.2 RSCS does not support the NJE interface because the developer considers the code incomplete, and does not want to allow it to be included. Bob Bolch [email protected]> wrote:
By Bob Bolch · #5296 ·