开云体育

VM/379 has no MP support. OK, why would AP support be nice? Details, please. Bob Bolch wrote:

Thank you Joe. I hope I'm the last to find 3.07 before 4.4.1 Bert.

Hello Chris, Thank you. My point is simple: For new people who are looking for Hercules (such as myself) it looks like Google is going to the www.hercules-390.org website before the 4.4.1 on Github.

Bertram, http://www.hercules-390.org ( http://www.hercules-390.org/ ) is an old website for Hercules, and doesn't have any support beyond 3.07. For Hercules 4 (hyperion) onwards, the current website

https://github.com/SDL-Hercules-390/hyperion/releases/tag/Release_4.4.1 There is no MSI. Just unpack the zip file from here:

Hi Dave, Updating the AP code and adding MP might be nice. I'm assuming (oh, yeah, I know what that can mean) Hercules supports multiple processors (e.g. sockets and cores). If so, it would be nice

Hi, I've been running Hercules 3.07 for two reasons: 1) It is what was discussed in the YouTube video I watched about SixPack and Hercules. (Also why I started with SixPack.) 2) The link

Bertram, The base VM/370 has AP support but I am not sure if you can generate an easily generate an AP nucleus in CE because we didn’t update the AP modules. Dave Sent: 30 October 2022 21:39 To:

VM/370 has AP support... Page 85: http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/370/VM_370/Release_6/GC20-1801-10_VM370_Sysgen_Rel_6_Jan80.pdf Joe wrote:

Hi, I'm wondering if VM/CE has AP and/or MP support? In 1981 and 1982, I was using VM/SP with an AP system and MVS on a MP system. Just wondering if anyone added this support to VM/CE? Am I right that

"In my opinion IEAVEVAL should be changed to prefer using TPROT as its first choice, and then only when that fails to accomplish its goal, to only THEN fall back to using its existing CS technique."

Joe Monk wrote: [...] Oh? Which sounds like the *correct* way to do things! My point is (and HAS been all along (even if I failed to make that clear)) wasn't to completely eliminate/replace the

My POFILE XEDIT has for ages some filetype synonyms, like A for ASSEMBLE, E for EXEC etc. But, that initial setup was not perfect: if you happen to have a file named "TEST A A" you are unable to XEDIT

Ah - OK - it's the callable service IARBRVKR (which you could've mentioned). This claims to be a TPROT *replacement*, though it surely uses TPROT under the covers. Thing is, nobody is going to

[ In passing, a line like the above STATUS = is often enough not updated to show later changes. But I take the point.]

https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=ixg-iarbrvkr-replacement-tprot-instruction Joe

That seems kind of muddled. IEAVEVAL *is* a service that does the check, using TPROT or CS as appropriate. Do you mean there is an *instruction* now that does the same check? If so, I'm not aware of

Hi Harold, Thank you for the very detailed explanation. I think is probably best to move this to the cRexx list seeing that there is work to do working to the solution. I’ll invite you off-list and

Harold, "Hercules is NOT a hardware emulator. ... So, the argument that because hardware worked a certain way dictates how Hercules should operate does not conform to Hercules design objective." I

The situation with 16M of memory and GCC compilations is a known consideration. I am not current with this topic although I was very much aware of what transpired due to the 16M constraint when it was