开云体育

Joe, A bit of researching turned this up from 19 years ago. https://hercules-390.yahoogroups.narkive.com/a1u6DtwP/processor-exception if you scroll down you will see:- I am now getting HCCP014I

Joe, Sorry I am asleep. Looking at DMKPRV which has simulation for CS and CSD I see:- * THE CS AND CDS * INSTRUCTION SIMULATION TAKES PLACE ONLY ON THOSE * CPU'S NOT EQUIPED WITH THE HARDWARE

Joe, Sorry I am asleep. Looking at DMKPRV which has simulation for CS and CSD I see:- * THE CS AND CDS * INSTRUCTION SIMULATION TAKES PLACE ONLY ON THOSE * CPU'S NOT EQUIPED WITH THE HARDWARE

Also dave, If you look at the instruction, it is RS R1,R3,B2,D2 So, BA6610000 which is a compare and swap R6 and R1, moving R6 to R1 if they are equal... Here are the registers: 22:21:46.722 000060B8

Fish, I note your earlier remark "One should **NEVER** use OSTAILOR QUIET ". Like many Hercules users, I have downloaded and used many Turnkey clients like Volker's MVS TK3, Juergen's MVS TK4- and

Dave, Compare_and_swap is a non-privileged instruction. But he's getting a protection exception. Now how is that possible? If we look at his PSW ... 078D2000000383EC DAT is controlled by bit 5 in a EC

Joe, But isn’t this VM/370 and classic MVS 3.8J? Dave Sent: 26 October 2022 11:39 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [h390-vm] Do I have a looping issue? ISTM that this is normal for VM ... "Some

Not relevant Dave Sent: 26 October 2022 11:39 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [h390-vm] Do I have a looping issue? ISTM that this is normal for VM ... "Some instructions are valid either in the

ISTM that this is normal for VM ... "Some instructions are valid either in the 370-XA mode or in the System/370 mode, but not in both modes. If instruction interception is either mandatory or

Fish wrote: (ACK!) I meant "Of course NOT!" Sorry. Typo. Yes, you are correct that OSTAILOR QUIET would indeed *suppress* the message. The error message would indeed disappear if OSTAILOR QUIET was

René Ferland wrote: Of course. BUT... One should **NEVER** use OSTAILOR QUIET for that very reason! Doing so masks (hides) bona fide (legitimate) programming errors! You can manually disable the

Well, I am the one in error this time :-(? But to my defense, I am not a Hercules person! :-) What would happen if OSTAILOR QUIET is coded? Would the error appear anyway? Just curious... Cheers, Rene

Fish wrote: [...] [...] Are you perhaps trying to run some type of CICS application or something? I personally have no experience whatsoever with running CICS, but the Key 8 issue tickled something in

René Ferland wrote: I disagree. (Well, maybe not HIM, but *something* *somewhere* in one of his guests is definitely doing something wrong!) OSTAILOR is *not* going to help in this situation. The

Jim Snellen wrote: Which should not make any difference. [...] [...] They *appear* to be legitimate errors, as in whatever you're running in/on your guest is not doing something correctly (i.e.

You are not doing anything wrong Jim. IIRC, these messages come from the tailoring of the OS by Hercules, as specified by the OSTAILOR statement in the configuration file. Check the documentation of

I am running VM/370 with DOS/VS as a guest machine and MVS 3.8J TK4- as a guest machine.? I use HercGUI and Hercules version 4.4.1.10647-SDL-gd0ccfbc9.? I've recently noticed that a recurring

In a previous life I connected a Sun Solaris system to an IBM mainframe, using FTAM (OSI equivalent of FTP) over ISO CONS / X.25 PSDN. That was to retrieve SWIFT MT940 files from bank in Germany. At