开云体育

Fish wrote: [...] [...] Are you perhaps trying to run some type of CICS application or something? I personally have no experience whatsoever with running CICS, but the Key 8 issue tickled something in

René Ferland wrote: I disagree. (Well, maybe not HIM, but *something* *somewhere* in one of his guests is definitely doing something wrong!) OSTAILOR is *not* going to help in this situation. The

Jim Snellen wrote: Which should not make any difference. [...] [...] They *appear* to be legitimate errors, as in whatever you're running in/on your guest is not doing something correctly (i.e.

You are not doing anything wrong Jim. IIRC, these messages come from the tailoring of the OS by Hercules, as specified by the OSTAILOR statement in the configuration file. Check the documentation of

I am running VM/370 with DOS/VS as a guest machine and MVS 3.8J TK4- as a guest machine.? I use HercGUI and Hercules version 4.4.1.10647-SDL-gd0ccfbc9.? I've recently noticed that a recurring

In a previous life I connected a Sun Solaris system to an IBM mainframe, using FTAM (OSI equivalent of FTP) over ISO CONS / X.25 PSDN. That was to retrieve SWIFT MT940 files from bank in Germany. At

I fully understood your personal goals. However, the other side of the question, "anyone" in the title, did not include this alternative view that I felt deserved mentioning. That's all. Harold

While being made in jest, this view fails to recognize the contribution to networking OSI has made and continues to make. "OSI" is really three things: - the Model, - the Standards, and - the

Hello Harold, As the originator of this thread, my goal was two fold. First, to provide a file level backup (and possibly restore) solution. Second, it was to get back into VM again. I stopped using

I have watched this thread and continue to come away with "what is the objective of this discussion?" Is it about backing up your VM DASD or is it about resurrecting some past capability? I realize it

The first prototype of the ALL command (builtin, not a REXX macro) is here. SET SELECT and SET DISPLAY are operational and almost complete. SET SCOPE is implemented but now there is *much* legwork to

I like the idea that we are not limited to what was the physical size of the tapes. In an emulated world like Hercules, I would like to set the size of my backup file at just under what I can write to

On the main Hercules page, if you scroll down about 1/2 way, you should see a section titled "PDF manuals": * https://sdl-hercules-390.github.io/html/#docs PLEASE NOTE the disclaimer! "The below PDF

Bertram Moshier wrote: [...] With Hercules, this is user configurable and controlled by the optional "MAXSIZE=" and "EOTMARGIN=" tape drive device parameters: *

A version 4 Hercules manual can be found at: https://hercdoc.glanzmann.org/V400/HerculesOperationsandUtilities.pdf I'm sure there are other places. ... Mark S.

Tape files are not limited to feet of tape, but to the size of the filesystem/available space. You can, if you have it, attach real devices, like SCSI tape drives to Hercules, and use those. I don't

Data compressions is already in place at the Hercules level, when you create a tape. See: https://hercdoc.glanzmann.org/V400/HerculesOperationsandUtilities.pdf Hercules Emulator V4.00 – Operations

I have been thinking about this and why VM lacked some of the basic subsystems needed for production work. Me and my company worked for many separate organisations over 30 years. We saw the same

VM customers started sharing modifications and utilities decades before there was any Internet. VM's ease of use, and the availability of VM source code with a set of build tools, meant that VM user

My system did full backups of each minidisk on Sunday and then deltas for Monday through Saturday. We already had a mechanism to ask the Operators to mount a tape. I don't remember if there was any