¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: Three questions about VM/CE (Left, middle, and right field question)
Isn't it (in a certain way) what the NICOF program of Hans Latz was doing? I remember there was a disconnected virtual machine TCPIPXY running on VM/370 and a Java machine on the host connecting to
By Ren¨¦ Ferland · #4413 ·
Re: Three questions about VM/CE (Left, middle, and right field question)
"I'd be happy to join a future team looking at adding the OSI 7 layer (better known as TCP/I:) to VM/CE." TCP/IP only uses layers 3 and 4. Joe wrote:
By Joe Monk · #4412 ·
Re: Three questions about VM/CE (Left, middle, and right field question)
Bertram, Whilst licencing is difficult, most any IBM OS works on Hercules. TCP/IP does not use the ISO 7-layer model. If you think it does please explain where the ¡°presentation¡± layer is
By Dave Wade · #4411 ·
Re: Three questions about VM/CE (Left, middle, and right field question)
Harold, Support for TCP/IP would include the physical layer of the OSI model. Thus Hercules would need to support the myriad number of devices one can hook to the IBM iron. Now I see a large part of
By Bertram Moshier · #4410 ·
Re: Three questions about VM/CE (Left, middle, and right field question)
Martin, Thank you for the information / link. Bert wrote:
By Bertram Moshier · #4409 ·
Re: Three questions about VM/CE (Left, middle, and right field question)
Hello, I'm assuming the work necessary to get VM/CE to recognize the OSI 7 layer model is the same as on any hardware supporting the Internet, right? I mean Hercules needs to look like real iron. Thus
By Bertram Moshier · #4408 ·
Hello
Hello, This is a test.
By Bertram Moshier · #4407 ·
FIX: Issue #72 -- EE changes the file mode number : binaries available #VMCE #github
Binaries available for fix of https://github.com/s390guy/vm370/issues/72 : /g/h390-vm/files/MECAFF%20tools:%20fixes%20and%20features/EE125A72.VMARC
By Martin Scheffler · #4406 ·
File /MECAFF tools: fixes and features/EE125A72.VMARC uploaded #file-notice
The following files and folders have been uploaded to the Files area of the [email protected] group. * /MECAFF tools: fixes and features/EE125A72.VMARC (
By Group Notification <noreply@...> · #4405 ·
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
Well, that's the end of that, isn't it? :-) ... Mark S. Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to code C.
By Mark A. Stevens · #4404 ·
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
I also have some qualms about some of the macros on MVS.? I may have misread the documentation, but it is unclear - to me - how reading the VTOC works. All the best MA
By Marco Antoniotti · #4403 ·
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
It doesn't work in VM370. Jason won't release the source so I can't fix. The library is full of OS macros which breaks many things we do on VM Dave
By Dave Wade · #4402 ·
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
https://github.com/mvslovers/jcc#license-user-agreement
By Martin Scheffler · #4401 ·
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
Makes me wonder if the VM group should consider using JCC rather than GCC. Do you have? Pros/Cons for these two compilers someplace? ... Mark S. Just what we need. one more thing to do.
By Mark A. Stevens · #4400 ·
Re: Three questions about VM/CE (Left, middle, and right field question)
By Dave Wade · #4399 ·
Re: Three questions about VM/CE (Left, middle, and right field question)
Pretty sure all of the versions I met used IUCV, not VMCF. De
By Dennis Boone · #4398 ·
Re: Three questions about VM/CE (Left, middle, and right field question)
Bertram, I think it would be challenging to get any ¡°C¡± code similar the ¡°Pi¡± DMR code to run on zVM where you have a modern ¡°C¡± compiler. The ¡°C¡± compiler in VM/370 is rather old, and
By Dave Wade · #4397 ·
Re: Another Time Zone Question (Sorta)
This is how we did it when we were running VM/370. We had ASSEMBLE, OLD, NEW versions of DMKRIO and DMKSNT. For DMKSYS, we had ASSEMBLE, EST, EDT. We just copied the right (OLD/NEW) file into ASSEMBLE
By Thomas Kern · #4396 ·
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
That's the way Regina works. ** When the anchor-points are determined, the variables are filled * in with the parts of the string that comes between each anchor. * Here is an example: * *??? parse
By Martin Scheffler · #4395 ·
Re: Possible bug in BREXX parse instruction
Hi Mike, I am not a bit mad, and I am sorry I gave that impression. I agree that the literals should be identified first, because they must be used to separate the string being parsed into smaller
By Bob Bolch · #4394 ·