¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Problems with the LOG file
Gentles, You get an empty log file with Hercules. I have raised and issue with a solution. https://github.com/s390guy/vm370/issues/62 Dave G4UGM
By Dave Wade · #3863 ·
Re: Change to http://vm370.org/VM/V1R1.1
Ant, The old version works with both 3.13 and 4.xx. The change to the new version was made because the FISH GUI objects to the old version. I believe the real fix is to tell people we don¡¯t support
By Dave Wade · #3862 ·
Change to http://vm370.org/VM/V1R1.1
I have devised several ways of automagically stepping over the issue that I bumped into running CE with 3.13. but using the KISS principle, perhaps a clearer statement on point 3 on this web page
By Anthony Smith · #3861 ·
Any old time VP/CSS folks out there
Understand this is off topic (admin pls bump if not OK). While playing with R1.V1.1 and simultaneously reading my VP/CSS command guide, I wondered if anyone else in the group used VP/CSS (derived from
By Anthony Smith · #3860 ·
Re: Building on macOS
Im going to move this over to the hercules-390 main group. Joe
By Joe Monk · #3859 ·
Re: Rexx PARSE on VM/SP 5 behaves different from BRexx on VM/370 CE V1M1R1.1. #VMCE
I missed that conversation. Sorry. Thanks for the update! ... Mark S.
By Mark A. Stevens · #3858 ·
Building on macOS
more 32-bit anything. Everything MAC is now 64-bit only. for a little while. BTDT, back when Apple went from PPC to Intel. Building a fat binary isn't hard, but it does take some preparation to make
By Jay Maynard · #3857 ·
Re: No VM IPL with V1.R1.1 #VMCE
Oh and one other thing... New Macs are ARM based. No more Intel. Also, no more 32-bit anything. Everything MAC is now 64-bit only. So to build for macOS, you have to build for both ARM and Intel, a
By Joe Monk · #3856 ·
Re: No VM IPL with V1.R1.1 #VMCE
"I haven't tried building on macOS in years. I need to look at that again. But I will *NOT* use Homebrew or the like; they cause far too many unnecessary dependencies to be pulled in." Yeah I know, I
By Joe Monk · #3855 ·
Re: No VM IPL with V1.R1.1 #VMCE
Fish, I have a SDL Hyperion 4.4 .deb for Debian and its descendants almost ready to add to our release assets. Tested so far only by two people other than myself. Bill
By Bill Lewis · #3854 ·
Re: No VM IPL with V1.R1.1 #VMCE
I've discovered almost at the same time hercules, hyperion and the IBM IBM VMESA 2.40 distribution, I'm facing a strange thing between Hyperion (4 something) and Hercules (3 something else). Disn't
By Jean-Pierre Cabani¨¦ · #3853 ·
Re: No VM IPL with V1.R1.1 #VMCE
Anthony, Yes, but it should be on [email protected]. Chris -- <cjar1950@...>
By cjar1950@... · #3852 ·
Re: No VM IPL with V1.R1.1 #VMCE
I am a user of homebrew as it is easy. It perhaps would be better to leave this thread and start another (if there is still energy) on the subject of package distribution/building. For me I have now
By Anthony Smith · #3851 ·
Re: No VM IPL with V1.R1.1 #VMCE
For what it's worth, when I was doing releases, I built RPMs as well as macOS installer disk images. Perhaps what can be done is to add recipes for Windows installer, .DMG, RPM, and DEB packages to
By Jay Maynard · #3850 ·
Re: No VM IPL with V1.R1.1 #VMCE
Hello, I am the correspondent that started this topic. From a pragmatic viewpoint the specific issue has been corrected by my editing of a configuration file.
By Anthony Smith · #3849 ·
Re: No VM IPL with V1.R1.1 #VMCE
Gregg Levine wrote: The good ones do. ;-) AFAIK the OP's issue has already been resolved. Yes? /g/h390-vm/message/3826 And as far as the new subject of conversation this thread has
By Fish Fish · #3848 ·
Re: No VM IPL with V1.R1.1 #VMCE
Hello! I thought those folk from the piscean communities do not have noses? Now a word from one of the managers, now that we have an official last word on these things, let's move the thread back to
By Gregg Levine · #3847 ·
Re: No VM IPL with V1.R1.1 #VMCE
Joe Monk wrote: What constitutes "an OFFICIAL release"? How is that defined? Or perhaps a better question might be, WHO gets to decide? <snip> Old news. The current SDL Hercules hasn't been "mine" for
By Fish Fish · #3846 ·
Re: No VM IPL with V1.R1.1 #VMCE
Mark A. Stevens wrote: [...] <snip> From the sounds of it then, it is not necessarily the developers of the product itself that is necessarily responsible for creating distribution packages, but
By Fish Fish · #3845 ·
Re: Rexx PARSE on VM/SP 5 behaves different from BRexx on VM/370 CE V1M1R1.1. #VMCE
This is the issue we talked about a few weeks ago on this list. The BREXX interpreter has a design flaw in the PARSE statement processor. I opened an issue on the developer's website. BREXX PARSE does
By Bob Bolch · #3844 ·