开云体育

Hi Mark, I setup the MAINTC disks for the purpose of building the C runtime, and BREXX. You should use the GCC user disks which the compiler accesses during the compilation. When the CMS option is

Mark, The CMS headers are the ones on GCCCMS 202 disk. These are what are used when you compile something with GCC and specify the CMS library option. (well assuming you are not logged on to maint and

Bob, I am more interested in the CMS emulation/headers than OS, at this instant. It seems that MAINTC 394 (see the reply to Dave) and GCCCMS 202 contain same/similar files. I will make time to compare

There seems to be a lot of confusion about how various header files are included in compiles. I am certainly not an expert in GCC on VM, C library options, or CMS itself. But, the discussion begs the

Dave, Thanks for the additional explanation. I did find *.h files which seem to emulate/imitate/replace those from /usr/include/*.h files on MAINTC 394. My two cents on minidisk vs MACLIB would be

Hi Mark, I only use GCC to build BREXX, so I am not sure of some of the details. Dave and I will try to provide more details in the help files. I do know that the GCC EXEC on the Y-disk accesses the

Mark, Well the mess is there BECAUSE there are two sets of “.h” files and CMS does not have a directory structure. So the production GCC EXEC accesses the GCCCMS disks that contain the “.h”

Marco Antoniotti wrote: I'm looking into it. -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) Software Development Laboratories http://www.softdevlabs.com mail: fish@...

Hi any chances of removing the win32.mak dependency? It would simplify the process. All the best Marco

I was looking for the equivalent of /usr/include/*.h and /usr/include/sys/*.h? files, so I can build the Zlib program library, the basis for zip and unzip. I wasn't logging on to GCCCMS, but using

Hi Mark, The GCCCMS userID contains the compiler install materials, and there is nothing there that an ordinary compiler user needs. Any changes made on that ID could impact the ability to regenerate

Looks like attachments are off as well Dave

Peter wrote: [...] (grumble) That's what I get for trying to send HTML email I guess (grumble) Let me try attaching it instead. -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) Software Development Laboratories

Fish, I don’t know what kind of picture you sent, but it did not come through in email , nor on the groups.io website either (at least not for me). Peter Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 12:48 AM To:

laddiehanus wrote: Did it look like this? 2.jpg -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) Software Development Laboratories <http://www.softdevlabs.com> http://www.softdevlabs.com fish@...

Mark, Probably because GCC EXEC on GCCCMS is the one Paul supplies with the base GCC. He knows nothing of GCCLIB so it would probably get in the way of his build process. Possibly there should be a

This might be for Bob Bolch ... I'm trying to understand too many things, but in any case I end up with the following question. Why does the GCC EXEC S not exist on the GCCCMS minidisks? When I have

Bill Lewis wrote: [...] [...] Wow! You appear to be more on top of modern Visual Studio issues than I am, Bill! I still use the older and simpler VS2008 and have only dabbled with VS2017 and VS2019

Laddie, You can import the following configuration using Visual Studio Installer, to get the required workloads and individual components required for VS2022. Once Visual Studio Installer is running,

Read the instructions on Fish’es page?linked below.? Laddie Hanus