Re: BREXX/CMS vs BREXX
Adrian? (I presume!) said: ZLIB is pretty simple too: MIT: https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT ZLIB: https://opensource.org/licenses/Zlib Of course there's also the WTFPL license too, which is
By
Fish Fish
·
#889
·
|
Re: BREXX/CMS vs BREXX
I'll go for MIT based on simplicity
By
adriansutherland67
·
#888
·
|
Re: BREXX/CMS vs BREXX
yes, I stay away from those as much as possible. ooRexx is CPL NetRexx is ICU Regina is LGPLv2 I would choose one that is OSI accredited but does not scare away the customers. Ren¨¦.
By
[email protected]
·
#887
·
|
Re: BREXX/CMS vs BREXX
Have you a view on licence?
By
adriansutherland67
·
#886
·
|
Re: BREXX/CMS vs BREXX
Ha! I thought the c could imply compiled ....
By
adriansutherland67
·
#885
·
|
Re: BREXX/CMS vs BREXX
Should have googled first. zrexx is a node.js library to call z/OS rexx using IRXEXEC on z/OS. It is fairly new.
By
[email protected]
·
#884
·
|
Re: BREXX/CMS vs BREXX
CREXX is a lot like CRX, which exists. I don¡¯t mind, but I think you should know. AREXX obviously is taken. ZREXX does not sound bad. Ren¨¦.
By
[email protected]
·
#883
·
|
Re: BREXX/CMS vs BREXX
After sleeping on it, considering time etc. I think I will 1. Maintain gcclib on a break fix basis. But I will refactor the IO, reslib, and cmscommand() as job #1 2. Maintain brexx on a break fix
By
adriansutherland67
·
#882
·
|
Re: odd brexx bug
https://github.com/adesutherland/CMS-370-BREXX/commit/8c20bc969d24d879f45b7f004d069aa6b53f15d6
By
adriansutherland67
·
#881
·
|
Re: odd brexx bug
Initial Hotfix has been checked in. I am not certain if this should be pushed into live. The way BREXX handles calls to external REXX programs is: - When launching a program the program name is marked
By
adriansutherland67
·
#880
·
|
Re: odd brexx bug
Hello! That was aimed at Dave McGuire who while he doesn't have a practical interest in this, he does sometimes have access to running examples. They are rioting because he was away from the museum he
By
Gregg Levine
·
#879
·
|
Re: odd brexx bug
Well - another layer added before we clean it all down. Just testing the fix. Will post the change set for information / upstream fixing and push to a release this weekend. A
By
adriansutherland67
·
#878
·
|
Re: BREXX/CMS vs BREXX
We could do this. And the advantage would be that it would run through the LLVM optimisers. The problem is someone would need to create the backend - as you say hacking (sorry to use that word) the
By
adriansutherland67
·
#877
·
|
Re: BREXX/CMS vs BREXX
Agreed! WRT Regina - I hope we can take some aspects/code across (like the maths library - although there are open source C libraries as well like https://gmplib.org/) ( https://gmplib.org/ ) There
By
adriansutherland67
·
#876
·
|
Re: BREXX/CMS vs BREXX
Note, the 24-bit program will run on a Z machine. While LLVM for Z Arch generates 64-bit aware instructions, all of those instructions have 24-bit instructions of similar functionality. ?The issues
By
Harold Grovesteen
·
#875
·
|
Re: BREXX/CMS vs BREXX
Hi Adrian, modernisation: 1/ it is there to use but at some point it needs to be more standards compliant. Like Date() but also numeric digits, I mean numeric digits 1000 say 100/81 ? test
By
[email protected]
·
#874
·
|
Re: odd brexx bug
Aren't Yetis also doing social isolation? Or perhaps they have been for the last 100 years?!
By
adriansutherland67
·
#873
·
|
Re: BREXX/CMS vs BREXX
In BREXX we have a runtime library (i.e. REXX Variables and the Builtin Functions), a simple old school one pass compiler, and a kind of byte code interpreter. The bytecode is a kind of high
By
adriansutherland67
·
#872
·
|
Re: BREXX/CMS vs BREXX
X86_64, aarch64, s390x, etc - the latter to have some address space already in z/OS. Ren¨¦.
By
[email protected]
·
#871
·
|
Re: odd brexx bug
Hello! Why what happened? And I did not arrange it. But I did cause a riot at a closed museum of Yetis and the odd Bigfoot. ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8@... "This signature fought the Time
By
Gregg Levine
·
#870
·
|