Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
CPU Question
Daniel Imfeld
I read about a major company, I think it was HP, that has created a Beowulf
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
cluster (a group of cheap PCs linked together to create a supercomputer) that qualifies as one of the more powerful supercomputers in existence. One advantage of this method, they said, is that when you add and remove computers from the cluster, the total processing power changes linearly, so it's easy to calculate how many computers you'll need for a specific task. Also, it makes it easier to split the processing time between two projects if the need arises. I think they used something more powerful than 486's and Pentiums, but I can't remember exactly what they used, as I read about it a few months ago. I know that they used only cheap off-the-shelf PCs though. If I remember correctly, they run it on Linux, or some variation of it, with a master computer (or computers) that controls all the others, similar to Stanford's Folding@home project, but probably more optimized for LAN usage and proprietary things. So I suppose if you do it correctly, you can get great results, although I imagine that it would take quite a bit of work to set everything up. Daniel Imfeld ----- Original Message -----
Saad, Old PC's can beI've heard about that but I wonder whether it is a practical idea. The controlling software that would assign parts of the computing task to various computers would have to be vary sophisticated. Then there would be the distances between computers. It would probably be better to just use the system cards otherwise all those old power supplies would consume lots of energy and there'd be the problem of varying power supply connectors and voltage requirements, maybe some kind of bus communication would be necessary to avoid port bottlenecks. It would certainly be a good project for some IT students but I think the work involved in making it happen in a real world situation would more than cancel most benefits. But then I could be wrong, wouldn't be the first or last time. Jim |
Here is a link to the SciAm article -
- mark --- In Electronics_101@y..., "Daniel Imfeld" <dimfeld@h...> wrote: I read about a major company, I think it was HP, that has created aBeowulf cluster (a group of cheap PCs linked together to create asupercomputer) that qualifies as one of the more powerful supercomputers inexistence. One advantage of this method, they said, is that when you add and removelinearly, so it's easy to calculate how many computers you'll need for aspecific task. Also, it makes it easier to split the processing time between twoprojects if the need arises. I think they used something more powerful than486's and Pentiums, but I can't remember exactly what they used, as Iread about it a few months ago. I know that they used only cheap off-the-shelf PCs though. If I remember correctly, they run it on Linux, or somevariation of it, with a master computer (or computers) that controls all theothers, similar to Stanford's Folding@home project, but probably moreoptimized for LAN usage and proprietary things.although I imagine that it would take quite a bit of work to set everything up.The controlling software that would assign parts of the computing taskto variousbe better to just use thelots of energy and there'd berequirements, maybe some kindIt would certainly be amaking it happen in a |
Jim Purcell
Daniel,
I read about a major company, I think it was HP, that has created a BeowulfIf that is the case I doubt that they are using very old computers. And it would seem wiser to dump everything but the system board. A few larger power supplies are better than many small ones. Jim |
aconto
I read an article where compac and hp are merging...crazy
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Imfeld [mailto:dimfeld@...] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:15 PM To: Electronics_101@... Subject: [Electronics_101] Re: CPU Question I read about a major company, I think it was HP, that has created a Beowulf cluster (a group of cheap PCs linked together to create a supercomputer) that qualifies as one of the more powerful supercomputers in existence. One advantage of this method, they said, is that when you add and remove computers from the cluster, the total processing power changes linearly, so it's easy to calculate how many computers you'll need for a specific task. Also, it makes it easier to split the processing time between two projects if the need arises. I think they used something more powerful than 486's and Pentiums, but I can't remember exactly what they used, as I read about it a few months ago. I know that they used only cheap off-the-shelf PCs though. If I remember correctly, they run it on Linux, or some variation of it, with a master computer (or computers) that controls all the others, similar to Stanford's Folding@home project, but probably more optimized for LAN usage and proprietary things. So I suppose if you do it correctly, you can get great results, although I imagine that it would take quite a bit of work to set everything up. Daniel Imfeld ----- Original Message ----- Saad, Old PC's can beI've heard about that but I wonder whether it is a practical idea. The controlling software that would assign parts of the computing task to various computers would have to be vary sophisticated. Then there would be the distances between computers. It would probably be better to just use the system cards otherwise all those old power supplies would consume lots of energy and there'd be the problem of varying power supply connectors and voltage requirements, maybe some kind of bus communication would be necessary to avoid port bottlenecks. It would certainly be a good project for some IT students but I think the work involved in making it happen in a real world situation would more than cancel most benefits. But then I could be wrong, wouldn't be the first or last time. Jim To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Electronics_101-unsubscribe@... Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to |
Jim Purcell
aconite,
I read an article where compac and hp are merging...crazyYes, both were startup companies, HP in the thirties and I think Compaq in the seventies. Both had a good rep at one time. Right now those HP boxes are the ugliest things I have ever seen. A few years ago I didn't care, I looked at the features. But now I hate modular boxes. I want a nice square one that will be easy to upgrade, especially the CDs. etc. Jim |
aconto
I agree.... I am not a fan of proprietary hardware or software for that
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
matter -----Original Message-----
From: Jim Purcell [mailto:jpurcell@...] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:16 PM To: Electronics_101@... Subject: Re: [Electronics_101] Re: CPU Question aconite, I read an article where compac and hp are merging...crazyYes, both were startup companies, HP in the thirties and I think Compaq in the seventies. Both had a good rep at one time. Right now those HP boxes are the ugliest things I have ever seen. A few years ago I didn't care, I looked at the features. But now I hate modular boxes. I want a nice square one that will be easy to upgrade, especially the CDs. etc. Jim To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Electronics_101-unsubscribe@... Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss