Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
oscilloscope
Keith
--- In Electronics_101@..., "genteelu4ia" <vortex_9x@h...>
wrote: Nother question;It looks like a Velleman HPS10 or a clone (). Limited bandwidth and sampling rate and only one channel. I have the HPS40 - higher bandwidth but still one channel. I bought it to go places I couldn't take my normal 'scope - no mains electricity, water sloshing around so I wouldn't risk my expensive 'scope. It does a job, it is digital storage, it can even be linked to a PC (not the HPS10). I wouldn't like it to be my only 'scope, but then I can afford to spend a lot more because it is my living. It seems well built. I looked around for similar ones and you can pay a lot more, and they are probably a lot better - you get what you pay for. But if money is limited you get your money's worth. I wish I had one 30 years ago when I was diagnosing fdaults with a multimeter becuase 'scopes were too expensive. Search around and you will find it a little cheaper eg: Keith. |
Thanks, Keith
Just what I wanted to know. One other thing, I'm a novice-- are they difficult for dummies to use.<grin> U4ia --- In Electronics_101@..., "Keith" <keith@k...> wrote: --- In Electronics_101@..., "genteelu4ia"<vortex_9x@h...> wrote:hadNother question; stillexperience with similar items like this? Or, is a rip-off?It looks like a Velleman HPS10 or a clone one channel. I bought it to go places I couldn't take my normalbe my only 'scope, but then I can afford to spend a lot more becauseit is my living. It seems well built. I looked around for similarones and you can pay a lot more, and they are probably a lot better -you get what you pay for. But if money is limited you get your money's |
Keith
--- In Electronics_101@..., "genteelu4ia" <vortex_9x@h...>
wrote: Thanks, KeithI would say it is more difficult to use than a normal 'scope. This is because they have crammed in so much functionality with so few buttons (and NO knobs) that it take a bit of learning to know what to push when. Keith. |
Stefan Trethan
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 12:52:39 -0000, genteelu4ia <vortex_9x@...> wrote:
Nother question;I don't know all electronics. I think for $159 it can't be much good if it is new. It depends very much on what you want to do, things i would strongly recommend are at least 2 channels and some sort of storage, digital or analog. The bandwidth (samples) is another issue, it depends very much on what you want to do. You say it is a handheld unit, so it is digital, and i would assume the samples would be very low (number of measured points per second). If you can support technical data i can tell you what i think of it, and of course you need to know what you want to do. I can strongly recommend the old tektronix scopes, like the tek 7000series. they are old, but cheap. the trick is you have a modular system with plugins. You have plugins like vertical amplifiers, timebases, etc... Then you have a main unit with the screen, the main unit also can allow for storage (analog). I have a 7633 which has 100Mhz analog bandwidth and fast analog storage. As plugins i have one 2 channel amplifier, one differential, and a dual time base. I can say this is a very good unit to use, especially considering the age of it it is amazing what tektronix did build in those days. I payd 200eur at ebay for the set, in perfect working order. One disadvantage is the standard plugins do not have readout functions, like amplitude and frequency etc. so you have to count divisions ot use other meters. but i can live with that. Digital scopes have no doubt some advantages, but the ones with serious bandwidth i couldn't find for a price i could afford. So i live with a analog storage scope and i am very happy with it. I know this does not very much answer your question, but as said i don't have data of the scope you ask for. I wanted to give you a general idea what is important. (and of course show off my tek 7633 ;-) ST |
Yeah, Thanks Stefan;
The extra knowledge is very helpful in a decision like this to me and for many, I'm sure. U4ia --- In Electronics_101@..., Stefan Trethan <stefan_trethan@g...> wrote: On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 12:52:39 -0000, genteelu4ia <vortex_9x@h...>what you want to do.assume the samplesit, and of course you need to know what you want to do.7000series. they are old, but cheap. the trick is you have a modular systemwith plugins.allow for storagestorage. As plugins i have one 2 channel amplifier, one differential, and adual time base.the age of it it is amazingthe set, in perfect working order.functions, like amplitude andbut i can live with that.serious bandwidth i couldn'tscope and i am very happy with it.don't have data of the scopecourse show off my tek 7633 ;-) |
you've gotten some good advice so far. I'll toss my $.02 in as
well. Looking for used scopes is a great way to get a quality scope for not much money. I bought one off of ebay for $120 - its a Tek 2225 (2 channels, external trigger, single sweep, 50 Mhz analog scope). I looked at new scopes and used ones from dealers. I also spent time looking at US Gov auctions (great deals but spotty availablity). I selected the 2225 from the portable scope series because I liked the form factor (doesn't demand permanent counter space). Either HP or Tek scopes are very good. Military scopes are usually built to last forever but there is less info. I would have liked more channels and 100 Mhz bandwidth but I'm quite happy with what I've got. The external trigger really comes in handy. The next step up would be a digital scope but I'm not willing to fork over that much. So, spend some time looking at whats out there, learn about scope functions, see if you can find some one that will show you theirs and let you play with it. Phil --- In Electronics_101@..., "genteelu4ia" <vortex_9x@h...> wrote: Nother question; |
Stefan Trethan
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:43:30 -0000, genteelu4ia <vortex_9x@...> wrote:
Yeah, Thanks Stefan;after reading the other posts the scope you mentioned got technical data. -10Msamples is not really high, but would do for low frequency things. --For me 1 channel would be the major negative point. -90% of the time you need only 1 but the other 10% you really want the second. ++A big plus is that it is so portable. -The display might be harder to read than a crt. -There seems to be no x/y mode. +There are many readout functions. I would certainly not trade it for my scope, but as a second unit it might be nice. Bad thing is in europe a similar unit wold cost eur200, likely more. It depends on what you want to do if this is suitable. ST |
Keith
--- In Electronics_101@..., Stefan Trethan
<stefan_trethan@g...> wrote: On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:43:30 -0000, genteelu4ia <vortex_9x@h...>data. -10Msamples is not really high, but would do for low frequency things.might be nice.I agree with both the preceding posts. I would not want it to be my only 'scope, but it depends on what you want it for (I have a 4 channel 500MHz 1Gs/s colour one with 2MB of acquisition memory as well:). Also if you can buy something like a second hand Tektronix 2225 for similar money you have a lot more 'scope for your money, but that should always be true of anything second hand. I haven't looked for a while, but Hameg always used to make decent priced oscilloscopes, but times have changed and there are probably a lot of Far Eastern imports to choose from as well. Keith. |
Stefan Trethan
TheThant's true, it can almost substitute 1 more channel. (never used mine though, 'cause there is no channel shortage...) Phil, you might consider isolation amps that can chop, if your signal frequency is low enough.... they can get your scope up to 4 ch easily. The next step up would be a"fork over"... yea guess that is a good word for it. I am very satisfied with the analog storage, i still don't understand how it works though. somehow the image gets stored inside the crt, even if you power off the scope it is still stored if you switch on within a few hours. (i personally think some dark magic is involved but don't tell ;-) ) Another point where you really want a digital scope is if you need hardcopys of your screens, for documentation etc. then you can easily do it with a digital scope while you need a camera with a analog scope. I would not recommend a completely analog scope, without storage, even for the beginner. It is just so convenient, even if you only want to eliminate the 50Hz flicker. There are also "small" tek scopes which have analog storage. If you want to get into old scopes, you can have a glance at the 7000 series here: <> sure, they need a permanent desk space but the modules are really neat and you still get LOADS of stuff at ebay for them. Good luck.. ST |
--- In Electronics_101@..., "Phil" <phil1960us@y...> wrote:
you've gotten some good advice so far. I'll toss my $.02 in as Picked up a Tek 465B 100Mhz (the 20 year old scope, not the 30 year old scope) for $100 on eBay a while back. Came with a bunch of probes, accessory pouch, spare graticule, original manual. I scrounged eBay for about two weeks before I saw this deal and snapped it up. Important thing to remember is that there always will be a better deal. I was watching a similar scope earlier, and some newbie got in there and began bidding hours before the auction ended. Whenever someone threw in a bid, he'd go in there and keep punching in bids until he was on top. I bowed out around $150, but kept watching. That newb ran the auction all the way up past $250. No one else was bidding for about five minutes, I bet he figured "Yeah! How do you like that! I beat all you guys!" I kept watching, because I knew what would happen...and it did. A sniper came in about seven seconds before the auction ended, and sniped the auction by a dollar. That was hilarious. The point is that getting competitive on eBay will not do anything for you...there will always be a better deal coming along. If the price gets too high, just quit bidding and don't buy the thing because you're trying to prove something to all the other bidders. |
Roy J. Tellason
On Monday 26 April 2004 01:18 pm, cybermace5 wrote:
Picked up a Tek 465B 100Mhz (the 20 year old scope, not the 30 yearWow, you got yourself a deal there all right! Came with a bunch of probes, accessory pouch, spare graticule, originalWhen that thing was new, some of the probes alone cost that much. I got to play with one of those for a while some years back, and it was a pretty nice scope. If I hadn't ended up with a 2246, I'd want one of those... I've had a number of different scopes over the years, ranging from really crude ac-couple tube type units on up. Those were cheap, typically $20 at a pawnshop, and while they weren't suited to measurement and higher frequencies they did prove useful and worth what I had invested in them. I guess what scope you _need_ really depends a lot on what you want to do with it. |
I bought a couple of years ago a Tek scope
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
at EBay. The thing works great and does even over 500 MHz while rated (-3dB) at 150 MHz bandwidth! Amplitude is not calibrated anymore outside bandwidth but that is in most cases not a real issue. You should remember that, when buying an old scope, it can be very hard and/or expensive to find spare parts if it breaks down. That's why usually it is better to buy a quite modern one. These also have cursors to measure various things like voltage and phase differences and periods. I would spend a little bit more money on a good scope than try to get a cheap old one (at least if you plan to really use the thing often). Stuff from EBay usually needs a new calibration done, but in most cases it is not that necessary, for a hobyist. Albert
|
Roy J. Tellason
On Monday 26 April 2004 03:09 pm, a.mil@... wrote:
I bought a couple of years ago a Tek scope at EBay. The thing works greatThis is a sign of really good design. The cheaper stuff drops off after rated bandwidth *very* abruptly, and is probably not all that useful for nonsinusoidal waveforms even up _near_ rated bandwidth. It's a matter of different approaches to the design. Amplitude is not calibrated anymore outside bandwidth but that is in mostTrue. You should remember that, when buying an old scope, it can be very hard andTrue, but if you get a really cheap one then it's not that much of an investment, and if you get a really good one (Tek or HP) they just don't tend to break down all that much. Those things were build *well*, and continue to operate for amazingly long times. That's why usually it is better to buy a quite modern one. These also haveWhile that stuff ia handy, there are a lot of situations where it's useful just to be able to *see* a waveform, and measurement is a secondary issue. That's how come I was able to do useful work with the really old junk that I started with. (Eico model 425, Paco model SS-50, Precision model S-100, and an old DuMont "military" scope. :-) I would spend a little bit more money on a good scope than try to get aIt isn't so much a question of how often you use it as what you're going to use it for. With me, the cheap ones were fine for hobby stuff. When I started to find a scope particularly useful in terms of actually making my living working on stuff, that's when I went for the Tek. |
--- In Electronics_101@..., "Keith" <keith@k...> wrote:
--- In Electronics_101@..., "genteelu4ia" <vortex_9x@h...>Very nice! RS232 on the HPS40. I want one! The HPS40 is 12MHz BW. Apogee Kits is out of stock on both! Q Kits has the HPS 40 in stock, but it's $320 USD. They say they'll match price, though. Alien Steve |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss