¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: Thoughts on changing a remote RX and TX.
my comments were about power plug costing more (~80+ usd/node) than X10. TCP/IP isn't lightweight and so could not be done with a cheap uC. Also powerplug uses a pile of signal processing to get more
By Phil · #9618 ·
Re: Variable Resistor Using FETs
Some comments: (1) A Sallen-Key filter is not generally the best filter topology. Leakage feed through limits its ultimate stop band rejection to perhaps 60 dB, maximum. For a given application, an
By Bruce Carter <brucec@...> · #9616 ·
Re: Thoughts on changing a remote RX and TX.
hi try looking at the rfpics. only problem with them is the receiver side is surfacemount, other wize it is a very good thing to use. it works in the range of 400mhz I am using them for a robot
By edd <edel@...> · #9617 ·
Re: Flash programming specs
the part number sounds like an EEPROM. Those aren't the same as flash, are they? -- They're not? I thought they were. -- No, the only similar chips are 28Cxxx, like 28C17, 28C64 and 28C256; these are
By mario lopez · #9615 ·
Re: Flash programming specs
I've just build an EEPROM programer from www.batronix.com and I'm messing aruond with EEPROM, EEPROM, FLASH devices, etc. All that I can say about 28F001 devices is that's a 128 kbytes FLASH EEPROM .
By mario lopez · #9614 ·
Re: Flash programming specs
Are they? I dunno at this point... For some reason I'm rather fuzzy about where things went when this stuff came out. I guess it's connected somewhat to me being cut off for a while from a lot of the
By Roy J. Tellason <rtellason@...> · #9612 ·
Re: Flash programming specs
Thanks for the link, I've added that to the "pile of stuff" here... I am a bit fuzzy on some of these parts, I guess.
By Roy J. Tellason <rtellason@...> · #9613 ·
Re: Flash programming specs
They're not? I thought they were. Mike
By MikeK · #9611 ·
Re: Att: Sudeep; Wireless transmission
Hi Sudeep, Yes U can use AM/FM transmitter-Receiver of same frequency. If U are interested U can email me on my email ID seperately. Ill provide consultancy. I am dip engr. Tell me abt Ur project
By Ritesh Waghray <ritesh_raj_waghray@...> · #9610 ·
Re: Flash programming specs
wrote: to can't Finally! I found some documentation here: http://bellota.ele.uva.es/~jesus/datasheets/intel/28f001.pdf
By Don Kinzer <dkinzer@...> · #9609 ·
Re: Flash programming specs
<rtellason@b...> wrote: The part says Flash right on it. I assumed that that meant it is a flash device. By changing the timing (adding delays), I can get different results. They're not right yet,
By Don Kinzer <dkinzer@...> · #9608 ·
Re: Flash programming specs
I'm not as up on that stuff as I'd like to be, but the part number sounds like an EEPROM. Those aren't the same as flash, are they?
By Roy J. Tellason <rtellason@...> · #9606 ·
Re: Triac instead of relay ?
<...> That's the expression I was reaching for and couldn't quite recall, dv/dt! This meshes with my understanding as well.
By Roy J. Tellason <rtellason@...> · #9605 ·
Flash programming specs
I have an Intel Flash device that is marked N28F001 that I'd like to be able to program with my home-built Flash burner. However, I can't seem to find any specifications for it that would tell what
By Don Kinzer <dkinzer@...> · #9604 ·
Re: Triac instead of relay ?
<rtellason@b...> wrote: only the hope. sensitivity in refer to
By manifold · #9602 ·
Re: Triac instead of relay ?
I would think so, yeah.
By Roy J. Tellason <rtellason@...> · #9601 ·
Re: assembly board houses
<mariss92705@y...> wrote: it's layer is Yes, but you have the pick-and-place machine to do the assembly. I can get the boards made, but am looking for someone to assemble the boards with chips and
By Dave Mucha · #9600 ·
Re: Triac instead of relay ?
<stefan_trethan@g...> wrote: Doh, oh well. Back to relays for this application. I'll check epanorama though, good to know these things! Thanks again.
By ghidera2000 · #9599 ·
Re: Thoughts on changing a remote RX and TX.
Why not just use wireless networking modules? Two Radio Control TX/RX's have got to be a lot more money than just two wireless network cards. Plus using RC sets or garage door openers this way is just
By Steven AE7HD · #9598 ·
Re: Yahoo seriously messed up
First, we did not lose the search function. I keep seeing this repeated. You do have to keep hitting "next". Second, I like having most of the lists I'm on, in one place. I'm on other lists on other
By Steven AE7HD · #9597 ·